Vedder, Alexis

Abstract Purpose: Preclinical studies in myeloid neoplasms have demonstrated efficacy of bromodomain and extra-terminal protein inhibitors (BETi). However, BETi demonstrates poor single-agent activity in clinical trials. Several studies suggest that combination with other anticancer inhibitors may enhance the efficacy of BETi. Experimental Design: To nominate BETi combination therapies for myeloid neoplasms, we used a chemical screen with therapies currently in clinical cancer development and validated this screen using a panel of myeloid cell line, heterotopic cell line models, and patient-derived xenograft models of disease. We used standard protein and RNA assays to determine the mechanism responsible for synergy in our disease models. Results: We identified PIM inhibitors (PIMi) as therapeutically synergistic with BETi in myeloid leukemia models. Mechanistically, we show that PIM kinase is increased after BETi treatment, and that PIM kinase upregulation is sufficient to induce persistence to BETi and sensitize cells to PIMi. Furthermore, we demonstrate that miR-33a downregulation is the underlying mechanism driving PIM1 upregulation. We also show that GM-CSF hypersensitivity, a hallmark of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), represents a molecular signature for sensitivity to combination therapy. Conclusions: Inhibition of PIM kinases is a potential novel strategy for overcoming BETi persistence in myeloid neoplasms. Our data support further clinical investigation of this combination.

Abstract Mutations in chromatin regulator ASXL1 are frequently identified in myeloid malignancies, in particular ∼40% of patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). ASXL1 mutations are associated with poor prognosis in CMML and significantly co-occur with NRAS mutations. Here, we show that concurrent ASXL1 and NRAS mutations defined a population of CMML patients who had shorter leukemia-free survival than those with ASXL1 mutation only. Corroborating this human data, Asxl1−/− accelerated CMML progression and promoted CMML transformation to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in NrasG12D/+ mice. NrasG12D/+;Asxl1−/− (NA) leukemia cells displayed hyperactivation of MEK/ERK signaling, increased global levels of H3K27ac, upregulation of Flt3. Moreover, we find that NA-AML cells overexpressed all the major inhibitory immune checkpoint ligands: programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)/PD-L2, CD155, and CD80/CD86. Among them, overexpression of PD-L1 and CD86 correlated with upregulation of AP-1 transcription factors (TFs) in NA-AML cells. An AP-1 inhibitor or short hairpin RNAs against AP-1 TF Jun decreased PD-L1 and CD86 expression in NA-AML cells. Once NA-AML cells were transplanted into syngeneic recipients, NA-derived T cells were not detectable. Host-derived wild-type T cells overexpressed programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and T-cell immunoreceptor with immunoglobulin and ITIM domains (TIGIT) receptors, leading to a predominant exhausted T-cell phenotype. Combined inhibition of MEK and BET resulted in downregulation of Flt3 and AP-1 expression, partial restoration of the immune microenvironment, enhancement of CD8 T-cell cytotoxicity, and prolonged survival in NA-AML mice. Our study suggests that combined targeted therapy and immunotherapy may be beneficial for treating secondary AML with concurrent ASXL1 and NRAS mutations.

MYC gene amplification and somatic mutations are frequent in both adult and pediatric AML although how MYC drives and contributes to the development and maintenance of AML has not been resolved. Transcription factor EB (TFEB) is a master regulator of genes that control autophagy and lysosome biogenesis, a central catabolic recycling pathway that regulates cell survival. Given the oncogenic effects of MYC in AML and that the induction of autophagy compromises AML cell growth and survival, we tested if the oncogenic effect of MYC depends on its suppression of TFEB transcription programs in AML. In support of this hypothesis, inducible MYC expression in K562 and THP-1 leukemia cells was sufficient to suppress expression of TFEB and its target genes. Further and conversely, MYC knockdown in NB4 AML cells provoked increased expression of TFEB mRNA and protein, as well as increased expression of TFEB target genes. Notably, dose response studies demonstrated that expression of TFEBS211A, constitutively nuclear form of TFEB that is refractory to control by mTORC1 signaling, dramatically impairs proliferation of HL60, OCI-AML2 and OCI-AML3 AML cells. In addition, induction of TFEBS211A provoked rampant apoptosis. Of important, overexpression of TFEBS211A in HL-60 and OCI-AML3 cells was also sufficient to promote monocytic and granulocytic differentiation, as judged by morphological changes and the acquisition of mature monocytic and granulocytic markers including CD11b, Gr1, and CD15. To identify TFEB targets that might contribute to myeloid/granulocytic differentiation, we performed RNA-seq analysis of HL60 leukemia cells engineered to inducibly express the TFEBS211A transgene. Using a cut-off of fold change>4 with q<0.01, a total of 1152 genes were differentially regulated following the induction of TFEBS211A in HL60 cells. As expected, this included the robust induction of nearly all TFEB target genes associated with the autophagy-lysosome pathway, but also of STAT1, KLF4, KLF6, CEBPB, CSF1 and GATA2 genes that are necessary and/or sufficient to provoke terminal monocytic and granulocytic differentiation of AML cells. Surprisingly, among genes induced by TFEB in HL60 cells is IDH1, which catalyzes the production of α-ketoglutarate (α-KG), a required substrate of the TET family of dioxygenases that convert 5-methylcytosine (5mC) to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC). In particular, TFEBS211A expression provoked increases in levels of α-KG and significant increases in global levels of 5hmC in genomic DNA of HL60 leukemia cells both ex vivo and in vivo. Furthermore, TFEB-mediated induction of IDH1/2 mRNA and protein, and of IDH1 promoter activity, was antagonized by inducible expression of MYC. To assess the global effects of TFEB on 5mC/5hmC landscapes, we performed paired reduced representation bisulfite (BS)- and oxidation bisulfite (oxBS)-sequencing. As predicted, TFEBS211A induced both loss and gains of 5mC, but there were more losses (n = 722) than gains (n = 459) across all 22 chromosomes. Quite remarkably, and consistent with TFEB-provoked increases of 5hmC signals, TFEBS211A exclusively induced 5hmC gains (in a total of 863 genes), and 37% and 36% of these 5hmC gains occurred in promoter regions and CpG islands, and across all 22 chromosomes. Comparison of BS- and oxBS-seq versus RNA-seq analyses of HL60 cells expressing TFEB revealed significant changes in mRNA levels and concomitant differential changes in 5mC and 5hmC marks in KLF4, KLF6, STAT3, TP73, andFOXO1 that have pivotal roles in controlling myeloid cell differentiation and death. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that MYC suppresses TFEB expression and function in AML cells, and that TFEB functions as a tumor suppressor that provokes AML cell differentiation and death. Strikingly, these responses rely on epigenetic control, where TFEB directly induces the transcription of IDH1 and IDH2 to provoke global hydroxylation of 5-methylcytosine and the expression of genes that drive terminal differentiation and apoptosis. Thus, a MYC-TFEB-IDH1/2-TET2 circuit controls AML cell fate. Disclosures Murphy: Merck: Research Funding; Puma Biotech: Research Funding. Ballabio:CASMA Therapeutics: Other: Co-Founder. Kaufmann:Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.

Abstract MYC oncoproteins regulate transcription of genes directing cell proliferation, metabolism, and tumorigenesis. A variety of alterations drive MYC expression in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and enforced MYC expression in hematopoietic progenitors is sufficient to induce AML. Here we report that AML and myeloid progenitor cell growth and survival rely on MYC-directed suppression of Transcription Factor EB (TFEB), a master regulator of the autophagy–lysosome pathway. Notably, although originally identified as an oncogene, TFEB functions as a tumor suppressor in AML, where it provokes AML cell differentiation and death. These responses reflect TFEB control of myeloid epigenetic programs by inducing expression of isocitrate dehydrogenase-1 (IDH1) and IDH2, resulting in global hydroxylation of 5-methycytosine. Finally, activating the TFEB–IDH1/IDH2–TET2 axis is revealed as a targetable vulnerability in AML. Thus, epigenetic control by an MYC–TFEB circuit dictates myeloid cell fate and is essential for maintenance of AML. Significance: Alterations in epigenetic control are a hallmark of AML. This study establishes that a MYC–TFEB circuit controls AML differentiation and epigenetic programs by inducing IDH1/IDH2 and hydroxylation of 5-methylcytosine, that TFEB functions as a tumor suppressor in AML, and that this circuit is a targetable vulnerability in AML. See related commentary by Wu and Eisenman, p. 116.

CMML is a lethal myeloid neoplasm with no therapies that improve its dismal prognosis. Inhibition of BET family members has been proposed as a therapeutic strategy based on preclinical data identifying BRD4 as a therapeutic target in acute myeloid leukemia. However, despite potent on-target transcriptional remodeling, early phase clinical trials have demonstrated only modest activity secondary to a variety of resistance mechanisms. In ovarian cancer BET inhibitor (BETi) treated cells, compensatory upregulation and addiction to pro-survival kinase networks have been observed. Given that over 50% of CMML cases have mutations upregulating kinase signaling, we hypothesized that BETi resistance is mediated by these networks in CMML and can be targeted therapeutically. We tested this hypothesis by performing a limited screen of kinase inhibitors alone and in combination with the IC20 of the BETi INCB54329 in 8 human leukemia cell lines. This screen revealed that the IC50 of the PIM inhibitor (PIMi) INCB53914 decreased after co-treatment with BETi in a majority of the leukemia cell lines tested. Synergy was validated chemically in U937, TF1 and SKM1 leukemia cells using other selective inhibitors of BET and PIM. We next assessed the activity of the BET-PIM combination in 14-day colony formation assays with 10 unique CMML bone marrow mononuclear cell (BM-MNCs) patient samples(Fig. 1A). These studies revealed that combination therapy significantly suppressed clonogenicity versus BMNCs treated with vehicle or single drug alone. Finally, this synergy was validated in vivo in 36 patient derived xenografts (PDX) from 3 CMML patients, as manifest by reduced leukemic burden/engraftment in CMML PDX treated with combination therapy(Fig. 1B). To explore the mechanism by which BETi and PIMi therapeutically synergize we treated U937 and SKM1 leukemia cells with INCB54329 and measured mRNA and protein levels for all PIM isoforms. Surprisingly, we identified that PIM1 was increased following treatment with INCB54329, other BETi, or a JQ1-derived PROTAC (Fig. 1C). PIM1 upregulation was also manifest in INCB54329 persistor U937 leukemia cells generated by daily BETi treatment for 6 weeks. Testing across a broader panel of leukemia cell lines revealed an inverse correlation between PIM1 induction and decrease in the IC50 of PIMi following BETi treatment, suggesting PIM1 upregulation confers sensitivity to combination therapy. Consistent with this, isogenic SKM1 leukemia cells engineered to overexpress PIM1 were resistant to INCB54329 and were more sensitive to INCB53914 versus controls cells. Recent studies have demonstrated that inhibitory miRNAs, especially those located near super-enhancers, are suppressed by BET inhibition. Given that several miRNAs are known to control PIM1 expression, we hypothesized that paradoxical PIM1 upregulation following BETi treatment was due to down-regulation of select miRNAs. To test this, we treated our leukemia cell models with broad inhibitors of miRNA activity (i.e., AGO and Dicer inhibitors) and observed a dose dependent increase in PIM1 levels similar to that seen with BET inhibition(Fig. 1Di). Further, integrating public H3K27 CHIP-seq and miRNA super enhancer datasets and using computational prediction algorithms, we identified 6 candidate miRNAs that could regulate PIM1 and were predicted to be controlled by BET inhibitors. Of these, only miR-33a levels were reduced in a dose dependent manner in SKM1 cells by BETi treatment(Fig. 1Dii). This was confirmed by genetically silencing all BET proteins, which suppressed miR-33a levels in SKM1 leukemia cells. Finally, miR-33a mimics (but not control miRNAs) abolished BETi-induced upregulation of PIM1(Fig. 1Diii). Collectively, these studies established BET and PIM inhibition as a novel and potent combination therapy for CMML that is mediated by miR-33a-dependent upregulation of PIM1(Fig. 1E). Disclosures Liu: Incyte Corporation: Employment. Patnaik:Stem Line Pharmaceuticals.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lancet:Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Other: fees for non-CME/CE services ; Agios, Biopath, Biosight, Boehringer Inglheim, Celator, Celgene, Janssen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Karyopharm, Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding. Komrokji:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; JAZZ: Speakers Bureau; JAZZ: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; DSI: Consultancy; pfizer: Consultancy; celgene: Consultancy. Epling-Burnette:Incyte Corporation: Research Funding. List:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Haura:Incyte Corporation: Research Funding. Reuther:Incyte Corporation: Research Funding. Koblish:Incyte Corporation: Employment.