Sulman, Erik P.

Abstract DNA damage response (DDR) mechanisms are critical to maintenance of overall genomic stability, and their dysfunction can contribute to oncogenesis. Significant advances in our understanding of DDR pathways have raised the possibility of developing therapies that exploit these processes. In this expert-driven consensus review, we examine mechanisms of response to DNA damage, progress in development of DDR inhibitors in IDH-wild-type glioblastoma and IDH-mutant gliomas, and other important considerations such as biomarker development, preclinical models, combination therapies, mechanisms of resistance and clinical trial design considerations.

Abstract Meningiomas are the most common intracranial neoplasms in adults. While most meningiomas are cured by resection, further treatment by radiotherapy may be needed, particularly in WHO grades 2 and 3 tumors which have an increased risk of recurrence, even after conventional therapies. Still, there is an urgent need for novel therapeutic strategies after the exhaustion of local treatment approaches. Radionuclide therapies combine the specificity of tumor-specific antibodies or ligands with the cytotoxic activity of radioactive emitters. Alongside this, integrated molecular imaging allows for a noninvasive assessment of predictive biomarkers as treatment targets. Whereas the concept of “theranostics” has initially evolved in extracranial tumors such as thyroid diseases, neuroendocrine tumors, and prostate cancer, data from retrospective case series and early phase trials underscore the potential of this strategy in meningioma. This review aims to explore the available evidence of radionuclide treatments and ongoing clinical trial initiatives in meningioma. Moreover, we discuss optimal clinical trial design and future perspectives in the field, including compound- and host-specific determinants of the efficacy of “theranostic” treatment approaches.

Abstract BACKGROUND Differentiating radiation necrosis from tumour progression after radiation therapy (RT) for brain metastases (BM) remains clinically challenging, and accurate imaging is crucial to prevent unnecessary surgery or unwarranted changes in therapy. 18F-Fluciclovine is a PET radiopharmaceutical with low background uptake in the brain and increased uptake in BM. The PURSUE study (NCT04410367) aimed to establish image interpretation criteria (IIC) for detecting suspected recurrent BM after RT using 18F-fluciclovine PET, based on several measures of lesion uptake. MATERIAL AND METHODS Across 7 US sites, 23 patients with solid tumour BM and a previously irradiated ‘reference’ lesion equivocal for recurrence on MRI who were scheduled for craniotomy underwent 18F-fluciclovine PET (185 MBq) <42 days post-MRI and 1-21 days pre-craniotomy. Three independent, blinded readers qualitatively rated lesion 18F-fluciclovine uptake as ‘mild’ (up to blood pool), ‘moderate’ (above blood pool to parotid gland), or ‘marked’ (above parotid gland). The primary endpoint was the diagnostic performance of different thresholds of lesion uptake on qualitative (visual) reads vs central histopathology. Secondary endpoints included diagnostic performance, based on different thresholds, of quantitative (e.g., lesion standardized uptake value [SUV]), and dynamic measures. A committee, including two independent imaging physicians, reviewed all data to establish the IIC, which were subsequently used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of 18F-fluciclovine. RESULTS All 23 reference lesions underwent histopathological analysis, with 10 (43%) being pathologically confirmed BM recurrence. The highest performing qualitative measure of 18F-fluciclovine lesion uptake was ‘marked’, rendering 92-100% and variable (40-80%) across readers. SUVmax was a reader-independent, high-performing quantitative metric (AUC 0.87, SUVmax threshold 4.8, 80% sensitivity, 85% specificity). Dynamic measures did not add diagnostic value. Thus, the committee established IIC as: "Lesions with 18F-fluciclovine uptake of a SUVmax equal to or greater than 4.8, or visually greater than the parotid gland, should be considered suspicious for recurrence. Otherwise, recurrence should be considered unlikely." Application of these IIC resulted in 80% sensitivity, 77-85% specificity, 73-80% positive predictive value, and 83-85% negative predictive value across readers. CONCLUSION PURSUE is the first prospective, multicentre study to define IIC for 18F-fluciclovine PET for accurate identification of suspected recurrent BM after RT, verified by histopathology. In this initial cohort, the IIC convey excellent diagnostic performance for 18F-fluciclovine and will help evaluate 18F-fluciclovine PET in future studies. This study was sponsored by Blue Earth Diagnostics Ltd.

Abstract BACKGROUND After radiation therapy (RT) for brain metastases (BM), differentiating radiation necrosis from tumor recurrence remains challenging. PURSUE (NCT04410367) evaluated various measures of lesion 18F-fluciclovine uptake to establish image interpretation criteria (IIC) for 18F-fluciclovine-PET to accurately diagnose recurrent BM. METHODS Patients with solid tumor BM and a previously irradiated ‘reference’ lesion equivocal for recurrence on MRI who were scheduled for craniotomy underwent 18F-fluciclovine-PET (185 MBq) <42 days post-MRI and 1-21 days pre-craniotomy. Lesion 18F-fluciclovine uptake was qualitatively rated as ‘mild’ (up to blood pool), ‘moderate’ (above blood pool to parotid gland), or ‘marked’ (above parotid gland) by three independent blinded readers. The primary endpoint was diagnostic performance of different uptake thresholds on qualitative reads vs central histopathology. Secondary endpoints included diagnostic performance, based on different thresholds, of quantitative (e.g., lesion standardized uptake value [SUV]) and dynamic measures. IIC were determined by committee and subsequently used to assess the diagnostic performance of 18F-fluciclovine. RESULTS All 23 reference lesions from 23 enrolled patients underwent histopathological analysis; 10 (43%) were pathologically-confirmed BM recurrence. The highest performing qualitative measure was ‘marked’, rendering 92-100% sensitivity and 40-80% specificity across readers. SUVmax was a reader-independent, high-performing quantitative metric (AUC 0.87, SUVmax threshold 4.8, 80% sensitivity, 85% specificity). Dynamic measures did not add diagnostic value. Thus, IIC was established as: “Lesions with 18F-fluciclovine uptake of SUVmax equal to or greater than 4.8, or visually greater than the parotid gland, should be considered suspicious for recurrence. Otherwise, recurrence should be considered unlikely.” Application of the IIC resulted in 80% sensitivity, 77-85% specificity, 73-80% PPV, and 83-85% NPV across the readers. CONCLUSIONS PURSUE is the first prospective, multicenter trial to establish IIC for 18F-fluciclovine-PET for suspected recurrent BM after RT, verified by histopathology. Finalized IIC demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance for 18F-fluciclovine and will help evaluate 18F-fluciclovine-PET in future studies.

2001 Background: Differentiating radiation necrosis from tumor progression remains one of the most commonly encountered and clinically challenging scenarios after radiation therapy (RT) for brain metastases (BM). PURSUE (NCT04410367) evaluated the diagnostic performance of 18F-fluciclovine, an amino acid PET radiopharmaceutical, based on various lesion metrics, to establish image interpretation criteria (IIC) for suspected recurrent BM after RT. Methods: Patients with solid tumor BM were enrolled across 7 US sites if they had a previously irradiated ‘reference’ lesion equivocal on MRI for recurrence and were planned for craniotomy. 18F-Fluciclovine PET (185 MBq) took place <42 days post-MRI and 1-21 days pre-craniotomy. The primary endpoint was the diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity, positive-, and negative-predictive value [PPV/NPV]) of different thresholds of lesion 18F-fluciclovine uptake on qualitative, visual reads vs central histopathological analysis. Lesion 18F-fluciclovine uptake was assessed qualitatively by 3 independent blinded readers who visually rated the uptake as ‘mild’ (up to blood pool), ‘moderate’ (above blood pool to parotid), or ‘marked’ (above parotid). Secondary endpoints included the diagnostic performance based on different thresholds of quantitative (e.g., lesion SUV) and dynamic measures of uptake. A committee, including 2 expert imaging physicians independent to PURSUE, reviewed all data in round-table meetings to establish the IIC, which were subsequently used to assess diagnostic performance. Results: All 23 reference lesions in 23 subjects underwent histopathological analysis, with 10 (43%) confirmed as recurrent tumor. The highest performing qualitative measure was ‘marked’, rendering a sensitivity of 92-100%, with variable specificity of 40-80% across readers. SUVmax was a reader-independent, high-performing quantitative metric on ROC analysis (AUC 0.87, SUVmax threshold 4.8 conferring a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 85%). Dynamic measures did not provide added diagnostic value. After analyzing these metrics, the committee established IIC as: Lesions with 18F-fluciclovine uptake of a SUVmax equal to or greater than 4.8, or visually greater than the parotid gland, should be considered suspicious for recurrence. Otherwise, recurrence should be considered unlikely. Application of the IIC resulted in a sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 77-85%, PPV of 73-80%, and NPV of 83-85% across the readers. Conclusions: This is the first prospective multicenter trial to evaluate PET characteristics of suspected recurrent BM after RT, verified by histopathology. Qualitative and quantitative IIC show 18F-fluciclovine to be a high-performing diagnostic tool. These IIC will help evaluate the diagnostic performance of 18F-fluciclovine PET in future trials. Clinical trial information: NCT04410367 .

2001 Background: PolyADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) is an important modulator of DNA repair following temozolomide (TMZ) therapy. Pre-clinical testing demonstrated significant survival benefit for the combination of TMZ and PARP inhibitor veliparib in a subset of GBM pt-derived xenografts with MGMT promoter hypermethylation. Methods: After central pathology review and MGMT testing, patients (pts) with newly diagnosed, MGMT promoter hypermethylated GBM who had completed concurrent radiation and TMZ were randomized to adjuvant therapy with TMZ (Days 1-5 q28 days) combined with either placebo or veliparib (Days 1-7 q28 days). Veliparib/placebo+TMZ treatment was continued for up to 6 cycles. Pts accrued on the phase II and III portions of the trial were included in the primary endpoint analysis of overall survival (OS), with 90% power to detect a hazard ratio of 0.71 using a one-sided log-rank test with type I error rate of 0.05. The planned phase III sample size was 400 pts with data maturity after 302 deaths. Results: The phase II and III portions of the trial were open to accrual from 12/15/2014 to 2/6/2017 and 11/8/2017 to 10/15/2018, respectively; 447 pts were accrued to the trial and used in this intention to treat analysis. The two treatment groups were well balanced for prognostic factors, 421 pts initiated treatment, median follow-up was 57.8 months (mos), 380 pts had disease progression and 335 pts have died. There was no difference in OS (p = 0.15; HR 0.89 (0.71-1.11), median OS 28.1 vs. 24.8 mo. for TMZ+veliparib vs. TMZ+placebo, respectively) and no difference in secondary endpoint progression free survival (PFS, p = 0.31; HR 1.05 (0.86-1.30), median 13.2 vs. 12.1 mo, respectively). There was a notable trend for extended OS with TMZ+veliparib treatment at intermediate time-points between 24 and 42 mos (3-year OS 36.6% vs. 28.9% with TMZ+placebo, p = 0.09). In an unplanned exploratory analysis, treatment with TMZ at the time of first recurrence was associated with extended post-recurrence OS (p = 0.03) for pts treated on the experimental arm; median post-recurrence OS with TMZ salvage was 17.0 mo in the TMZ+veliparib arm and 12.6 mo in the TMZ+placebo arm, as compared to 9.6 mo in either arm if TMZ salvage was not used. These data are consistent with a possible effect of veliparib limiting the emergence of TMZ resistance in a subset of GBM pts. Conclusions: Veliparib combined with adjuvant TMZ therapy was not associated with significant extension in OS or PFS in newly diagnosed, MGMT hypermethylated GBM pts. However, a subset of pts treated with TMZ+veliparib may have an extended survival following re-treatment with TMZ at first recurrence. Clinical trial information: NCT02152982.

PURPOSE American Society of Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) has developed a guideline on appropriate radiation therapy for brain metastases. ASCO has a policy and set of procedures for endorsing clinical practice guidelines that have been developed by other professional organizations. METHODS “Radiation Therapy for Brain Metastases: An ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline” 2 was reviewed for developmental rigor by methodologists. An ASCO Endorsement Panel subsequently reviewed the content and the recommendations. RESULTS The ASCO Endorsement Panel determined that the recommendations from the ASTRO guideline, published May 6, 2022, are clear, thorough, and based upon the most relevant scientific evidence. ASCO endorses “Radiation Therapy for Brain Metastases: An ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline.” 2 RECOMMENDATIONS Within the guideline, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is recommended for patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 and up to four intact brain metastases, and conditionally recommended for patients with up to 10 intact brain metastases. The guideline provides detailed dosing and fractionation recommendations on the basis of the size of the metastases. For patients with resected brain metastases, radiation therapy (SRS or whole-brain radiation therapy [WBRT]) is recommended to improve intracranial disease control; if there are limited additional brain metastases, SRS is recommended over WBRT. For patients with favorable prognosis and brain metastases ineligible for surgery and/or SRS, WBRT is recommended with hippocampal avoidance where possible and the addition of memantine is recommended. For patients with brain metastases, limiting the single-fraction V 12Gy to brain tissue to ≤ 10 cm 3 is conditionally recommended. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/neurooncology-guidelines .

Abstract Purpose To provide guidance to clinicians regarding therapy for patients with brain metastases from solid tumors. Methods ASCO convened an Expert Panel and conducted a systematic review of the literature. Results Thirty-two randomized trials published in 2008 or later met eligibility criteria and form the primary evidentiary base. Recommendations Surgery is a reasonable option for patients with brain metastases. Patients with large tumors with mass effect are more likely to benefit than those with multiple brain metastases and/or uncontrolled systemic disease. Patients with symptomatic brain metastases should receive local therapy regardless of the systemic therapy used. For patients with asymptomatic brain metastases, local therapy should not be deferred unless deferral is specifically recommended in this guideline. The decision to defer local therapy should be based on a multidisciplinary discussion of the potential benefits and harms that the patient may experience. Several regimens were recommended for non–small-cell lung cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma. For patients with asymptomatic brain metastases and no systemic therapy options, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone should be offered to patients with one to four unresected brain metastases, excluding small-cell lung carcinoma. SRS alone to the surgical cavity should be offered to patients with one to two resected brain metastases. SRS, whole brain radiation therapy, or their combination are reasonable options for other patients. Memantine and hippocampal avoidance should be offered to patients who receive whole brain radiation therapy and have no hippocampal lesions and 4 months or more expected survival. Patients with asymptomatic brain metastases with either Karnofsky Performance Status ≤ 50 or Karnofsky Performance Status &lt; 70 with no systemic therapy options do not derive benefit from radiation therapy. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/neurooncology-guidelines.

PURPOSE To provide guidance to clinicians regarding therapy for patients with brain metastases from solid tumors. METHODS ASCO convened an Expert Panel and conducted a systematic review of the literature. RESULTS Thirty-two randomized trials published in 2008 or later met eligibility criteria and form the primary evidentiary base. RECOMMENDATIONS Surgery is a reasonable option for patients with brain metastases. Patients with large tumors with mass effect are more likely to benefit than those with multiple brain metastases and/or uncontrolled systemic disease. Patients with symptomatic brain metastases should receive local therapy regardless of the systemic therapy used. For patients with asymptomatic brain metastases, local therapy should not be deferred unless deferral is specifically recommended in this guideline. The decision to defer local therapy should be based on a multidisciplinary discussion of the potential benefits and harms that the patient may experience. Several regimens were recommended for non–small-cell lung cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma. For patients with asymptomatic brain metastases and no systemic therapy options, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone should be offered to patients with one to four unresected brain metastases, excluding small-cell lung carcinoma. SRS alone to the surgical cavity should be offered to patients with one to two resected brain metastases. SRS, whole brain radiation therapy, or their combination are reasonable options for other patients. Memantine and hippocampal avoidance should be offered to patients who receive whole brain radiation therapy and have no hippocampal lesions and 4 months or more expected survival. Patients with asymptomatic brain metastases with either Karnofsky Performance Status ≤ 50 or Karnofsky Performance Status < 70 with no systemic therapy options do not derive benefit from radiation therapy. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/neurooncology-guidelines .