Charkoudian, Nisha

Human skin blood flow responses to body heating and cooling are essential to the normal processes of physiological thermoregulation. Large increases in skin blood flow provide the necessary augmentation of convective heat loss during environmental heat exposure and/or exercise, just as reflex cutaneous vasoconstriction is key to preventing excessive heat dissipation during cold exposure. In humans, reflex sympathetic innervation of the cutaneous circulation has two branches: a sympathetic noradrenergic vasoconstrictor system, and a non-noradrenergic active vasodilator system. Noradrenergic vasoconstrictor nerves are tonically active in normothermic environments and increase their activity during cold exposure, releasing both norepinephrine and cotransmitters (including neuropeptide Y) to decrease skin blood flow. The active vasodilator system in human skin does not exhibit resting tone and is only activated during increases in body temperature, such as those brought about by heat exposure or exercise. Active cutaneous vasodilation occurs via cholinergic nerve cotransmission and has been shown to include potential roles for nitric oxide, vasoactive intestinal peptide, prostaglandins, and substance P (and/or neurokinin-1 receptors). It has proven both interesting and challenging that no one substance has been identified as the sole mediator of active cutaneous vasodilation. The processes of reflex cutaneous vasodilation and vasoconstriction are both modified by acute factors, such as exercise and hydration, and more long-term factors, such as aging, reproductive hormones, and disease. This review will highlight some of the recent findings in these areas, as well as interesting areas of ongoing and future work.

As our understanding of the importance of individualized medicine continues to grow, the clinical relevance of interindividual variability in hemodynamic variables is receiving increasing attention. However, it is not known whether the rat, which is often used for studies of cardiovascular regulation, exhibits similar interindividual variability. In the present study, we evaluated whether the magnitude of interindividual variability in cardiac output (CO) and total peripheral resistance (TPR) was similar in humans and in rats. We assessed interindividual variability of mean arterial pressure (MAP), CO, and TPR during control conditions in normotensive humans ( n = 40) and during normotension and deoxycorticosterone acetate-salt hypertension in Sprague-Dawley rats ( n = 16). Humans and rats showed marked interindividual variability in CO and TPR but low variability in MAP. During deoxycorticosterone acetate-salt hypertension, CO was maintained, but TPR was elevated compared with the baseline period. We conclude that the magnitudes of interindividual variability of MAP, CO, and TPR are quantitatively similar in humans and rats, providing support for the relevance of this variability in both species and suggesting that studies in rats could be designed to address questions specific to individualized medicine in hypertension.

Within an individual, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) is negatively related to sympathetic burst incidence, such that lower pressure is associated with high burst incidence. Our goal was to explore the use of a calculation of a DBP “error signal” in the control of muscle sympathetic nerve activity in men and women. Baseline muscle sympathetic nerve activity was measured in healthy young men (n=22) and women (n=28). Women had significantly lower muscle sympathetic nerve activity than men (29±3 versus 43±2 bursts per 100 heartbeats; P <0.05). For each individual, the DBP at which there is a 50% likelihood of a muscle sympathetic nerve activity burst, the “T50” value, was calculated. Mean DBP was subtracted from the T50 blood pressure as an approximate error signal for burst activation. Error signal was negative in both sexes, indicating that DBP in both sexes was higher than the DBP value associated with a 50% burst likelihood. However, average error signal was significantly larger in women (−4±2 mm Hg) than in men (−1±0 mm Hg; P <0.05 versus women). We conclude that women operate at a mean DBP greater than their T50 compared with men, and this may be a contributing factor to low basal muscle sympathetic nerve activity in women. The relationship between error signal and burst incidence may provide important insight into the control of muscle sympathetic nerve activity across sexes and in various populations.

The sensitivity of baroreflex control of sympathetic nerve activity (SNA) represents the responsiveness of SNA to changes in blood pressure. In a slightly different analysis, the baroreflex threshold measures the probability of whether a sympathetic burst will occur at a given diastolic blood pressure. We hypothesized that baroreflex threshold analysis could be used to estimate the sensitivity of the sympathetic baroreflex measured by the pharmacological modified Oxford test. We compared four measures of sympathetic baroreflex sensitivity in 25 young healthy participants: the “gold standard” modified Oxford analysis (nitroprusside and phenylephrine), nonbinned spontaneous baroreflex analysis, binned spontaneous baroreflex analysis, and threshold analysis. The latter three were performed during a quiet baseline period before pharmacological intervention. The modified Oxford baroreflex sensitivity was significantly related to the threshold slope ( r = 0.71, P < 0.05) but not to the binned (1 mmHg bins) and the nonbinned spontaneous baroreflex sensitivity ( r = 0.22 and 0.36, respectively, P > 0.05), which included burst area. The threshold analysis was also performed during the modified Oxford manipulation. Interestingly, we found that the threshold analysis results were not altered by the vasoactive drugs infused for the modified Oxford. We conclude that the noninvasive threshold analysis technique can be used as an indicator of muscle SNA baroreflex sensitivity as assessed by the modified Oxford technique. Furthermore, the modified Oxford method does not appear to alter the properties of the baroreflex.

Cutaneous sensory nerve-mediated vasodilation is an important component of normal microvascular responsiveness to thermal and nonthermal stimuli. Since both neural and microvascular function can be impaired in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), we tested the hypothesis that local sensory nerve-mediated vasodilation during nonpainful local warming of the skin is less in T2DM compared with healthy controls (C) matched for age and body size. The rapid vasodilation during the first ∼5 min of this local warming (“initial peak”) was previously shown to rely primarily on local sensory nerves. We measured skin blood flow in T2DM and C subjects ( n = 7 in each group) at baseline and during 35 min of local warming of the skin to 42°C at two sites on the ventral forearm. One site was pretreated with 4% lidocaine (LIDO) to block local sensory innervation. During local warming, cutaneous vascular conductance (CVC) during the initial peak was not different between groups, either at the untreated site [T2DM 75 ± 2 vs. C 81 ± 6% of maximum CVC (%maxCVC); P > 0.05] or at the LIDO site (T2DM 63 ± 7 vs. C 64 ± 6%maxCVC; P > 0.05). The difference between untreated and LIDO sites (sensory nerve contribution) was also similar between groups (T2DM 13 ± 5 vs. C 18 ± 5%maxCVC; P > 0.05) and was smaller with LIDO than was previously shown with other local anesthetics. Our results suggest that relatively healthy individuals with T2DM do not exhibit impairments in local sensory nerve vasodilation during thermal stimulation compared with controls of similar age and body size.

As humans age, the tonic level of activity in sympathetic vasoconstrictor nerves increases and may contribute to age-related increases in blood pressure. In previous studies in normotensive young men with varying levels of resting sympathetic nerve activity, we observed a balance among factors contributing to blood pressure regulation, such that higher sympathetic activity was associated with lower cardiac output and lesser vascular responsiveness to α-adrenergic agonists, which limited the impact of high sympathetic activity on blood pressure. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that older normotensive men would exhibit a similar balance among these variables (sympathetic nerve activity, cardiac output, and α-adrenergic responsiveness) but that this balance would be shifted toward higher sympathetic nerve activity values. We measured muscle sympathetic nerve activity, cardiac output, arterial pressure, and forearm vasoconstrictor responses in 17 older men and compared these with previous data collected in 14 younger men. Muscle sympathetic activity (burst incidence) was positively related to diastolic blood pressure in the older men ( r =0.49; P =0.05); this relationship was not observed in young men. In addition, there was no relationship between cardiac output and muscle sympathetic activity ( r =0.29; P >0.05) or between muscle sympathetic activity and vasoconstrictor responses in the older men (eg, norepinephrine: r =−0.21; P >0.05). Although our older subjects were normotensive, the relationship between muscle sympathetic nerve activity and diastolic blood pressure and the lack of “balance” among the other variables suggest that these changes with aging may contribute to the risk of sympathetically mediated hypertension in older humans.

Among young normotensive men, a reciprocal balance between cardiac output and sympathetic nerve activity is important in the regulation of arterial pressure. In young women, the balance among cardiac output, peripheral resistance, and sympathetic nerve activity is unknown. Consequently, the aim of this study was to examine the relationship of cardiac output and total peripheral resistance to muscle sympathetic nerve activity in young women. Multiunit peroneal recordings of muscle sympathetic nerve activity were obtained in 17 women (mean±SEM: age 24±3 years) and 21 men (mean±SEM: age 25±5 years). Mean resting muscle sympathetic nerve activity was lower in women compared with men (19±3 versus 25±1 bursts minute −1 ; P <0.05), as was mean arterial pressure (89±1 versus 94±2 mm Hg; P <0.05). Mean arterial pressure was not related to muscle sympathetic nerve activity in men ( P =0.80) or women ( P =0.62). There was a positive relationship between total peripheral resistance and muscle sympathetic nerve activity ( r =0.62; P <0.05) and an inverse relationship between cardiac output and muscle sympathetic nerve activity ( r =−0.69; P <0.05) in men. Unexpectedly, muscle sympathetic nerve activity had no relationship to either total peripheral resistance ( r =−0.27; P >0.05) or cardiac output ( r =0.23; P >0.05) in women. Our results demonstrate that men and women rely on different integrated physiological mechanisms to maintain a normal arterial pressure despite widely varying sympathetic nerve activity among individuals. These findings may have important implications for understanding how hypertension and other disorders of blood pressure regulation occur in men and women.

Patients with hypertension have a blunted sensitivity of baroreflex control of heart period. In these patients, baroreflex sensitivity is positively related to heart rate variability and inversely related to blood pressure variability. We hypothesized that this relationship would also be evident in healthy normotensive subjects and that individuals with higher baroreflex sensitivity would have lower ambulatory 24-hour blood pressure. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure and heart rate were recorded in 50 healthy, normotensive, nonobese individuals (31 women and 19 men). The baroreflex was assessed using sequential bolus administration of sodium nitroprusside and phenylephrine, and baroreflex sensitivity was calculated as the slope of the relation between systolic blood pressure and R-R interval during the resulting blood pressure transients. Baroreflex sensitivity was inversely correlated to 24-hour average mean arterial pressure ( R =0.49; P <0.001) and positively related to daytime heart rate variability ( R =0.33; P =0.02). In contrast, no relationship was found between baroreflex sensitivity and 24-hour heart rate or blood pressure variabilities. We conclude that the relationship between baroreflex sensitivity and daytime heart rate variability was similar to that reported previously in hypertensive subjects. Furthermore, the inverse relation between baroreflex sensitivity and mean arterial pressure supports the idea that the baroreflex may exert longer-term effects on blood pressure than thought previously.