Day, Gregory S.

Abstract Background and purpose Cognitive complaints are common in patients recovering from Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), yet their etiology is often unclear. We assess factors that contribute to cognitive impairment in ambulatory versus hospitalized patients during the sub-acute stage of recovery. Methods Participants were prospectively recruited from a hospital-wide registry. All patients tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection using a real-time reverse transcriptase polymerasechain-reaction assay. Patients ≤ 18 years-of-age and those with a pre-existing major neurocognitive disorder were excluded. Participants completed an extensive neuropsychological questionnaire and a computerized cognitive screen via remote telemedicine platform. Rates of subjective and objective neuropsychological impairment were compared between the ambulatory and hospitalized groups. Factors associated with impairment were explored separately within each group. Results A total of 102 patients (76 ambulatory, 26 hospitalized) completed the symptom inventory and neurocognitive tests 24 ± 22 days following laboratory confirmation of SARSCoV-2 infection. Hospitalized and ambulatory patients self-reported high rates of cognitive impairment (27-40%), without differences between the groups. However, hospitalized patients showed higher rates of objective impairment in visual memory (30% vs. 4%; p=0.001) and psychomotor speed (41% vs. 15%; p=0.008). Objective cognitive test performance was associated with anxiety, depression, fatigue, and pain in the ambulatory but not the hospitalized group. Conclusions Focal cognitive deficits are more common in hospitalized than ambulatory patients. Cognitive performance is associated with neuropsychiatric symptoms in ambulatory but not hospitalized patients. Objective neurocognitive measures can provide essential information to inform neurologic triage and should be included as endpoints in clinical trials.

Purpose of review Does neuroinflammation promote neurodegeneration? Does neurodegeneration promote neuroinflammation? Or, is the answer to both questions, yes? These questions have proven challenging to answer in patients with typical age-related neurodegenerative diseases in whom the onset of neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration are largely unknown. Patients recovering from diseases associated with abrupt-onset neuroinflammation, including rare forms of antibody-mediated encephalitis (AME) and common complications of novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), provide a unique opportunity to untangle the relationship between neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration. This review explores the lessons learned from patients with AME and COVID-19. Recent findings Persistent cognitive impairment is increasingly recognized in patients recovering from AME or COVID-19, yet the drivers of impairment remain largely unknown. Clinical observations, neuroimaging and biofluid biomarkers, and pathological studies imply a link between the severity of acute neuroinflammation, subsequent neurodegeneration, and disease-associated morbidity. Summary Data from patients with AME and COVID-19 inform key hypotheses that may be evaluated through future studies incorporating longitudinal biomarkers of neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration in larger numbers of recovering patients. The results of these studies may inform the contributors to cognitive impairment in patients with AME and COVID-19, with potential diagnostic and therapeutic applications in patients with age-related neurodegenerative diseases.

AbstractBackgroundTau hyperphosphorylation at Threonine 217 (pT217) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) has recently been linked to early amyloidosis and could serve as a highly sensitive biomarker for Alzheimer disease (AD). However, it remains unclear whether pT217 could be modified in other tauopathies. Using immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry, we compared CSF T217 phosphorylation occupancy (pT217/T217) and amyloid beta (Aβ) 42/40 ratio in cognitively normal controls, and individuals with AD, Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP), Corticobasal Syndrome (CBS), and sporadic and familial Frontotemporal Dementia (FTD).MethodCSF Aβ, tau and phosphorylated tau (p‐tau) were measured using immunoprecipitation and quantitative mass spectrometry methods. Amyloid and tau Positron Emission Topography (PET) imaging were measured in a subset of participants and analyzed for correlation. Quadrant analyses were performed to assess amyloid and p‐tau positivity.ResultWe confirmed the strong association between CSF Aβ 42/40 and pT217 measures in most samples. Individuals with AD had high CSF pT217/T217 and low Aβ 42/40. In contrast, controls and the majority of patients with other tauopathies had low CSF pT217/T217 and normal Aβ 42/40. We identified a subgroup of individuals with increased CSF pT217/T217 and normal Aβ 42/40 ratio relative to controls. Most of these individuals were identified as MAPT R406W mutation carriers, a tau mutation leading to 3R+4R tauopathy similar to AD but without amyloid pathology. Diagnostic accuracies of CSF Aβ 42/40 alone, CSF pT217/T217 alone, and combination of both biomarkers were examined. We show that combination of both biomarkers can separate MAPT R406W carriers from control (AUC=0.960) and other tauopathies that are primarily 4R tauopathies (AUC=0.934).ConclusionWe demonstrate the importance of measuring both CSF Aβ 42/40 and pT217/T217 to improve AD diagnosis and differentiate MAPT R406W mutation carriers. This supports that changes in CSF pT217/T217 ratio is not a specific biomarker for AD but reflects common downstream tau pathology in these two 3R+4R tauopathies.

AbstractBackgroundThe overarching goal of the Longitudinal Early‐onset Alzheimer Disease study (LEADS) is to optimally characterize early‐onset AD (EOAD) and establish an EOAD clinical trials network. Here we report the baseline demographic and imaging biomarker comparisons of the LEADS cohort to late‐onset AD (LOAD) subjects from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI3).Method123 amyloid‐positive EOAD, 47 amyloid‐negative EOnonAD, 60 cognitively normal young controls were compared to 130 amyloid‐positive LOAD, 110 amyloid‐negative LOnonAD and 286 amyloid‐negative cognitively normal older controls. To account for the effect of cognitive aging between EO and LO populations, each cognitive measure was Z‐transformed. Cortical and hippocampal atrophy were quantified using W‐scores adjusted for age, sex and total intracranial volume. Z‐scores and W‐scores were compared using t‐test or Wilcoxson rank test as appropriate. All p‐values were corrected for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate correction.ResultEOAD showed greater pathology burden and greater cortical atrophy (AD signature) relative to LOAD. EOAD also showed greater cognitive impairment across all cognitive tests. EOAD showed greater functional impairment, more depression but less neuropsychiatric behaviors overall compared to LOAD (Table 1 and Figure 1, all ps<0.05). Repeating the analyses stratified by cognitive stage (MCI/dementia) or CDR global rating (0.5/1) did not result in any major differences.EOnonAD differed from LOnonAD by also showing greater impairment on all cognitive and functional measures There were no significant differences in amyloid and tau burden, or atrophy W‐scores between these groups. EOnonAD were more depressed and showed more functional impairment compared to LOnonAD (Table 2 and Figure 2, all ps<0.05). Repeating the analyses split by cognitive stage (MCI/dementia) or CDR global rating (0.5/1) did not result in any major differences.ConclusionConsistent with our preexisting hypotheses, EOAD and EOnonAD perform much worse relative to their LO counterparts. EOAD also show greater pathological burden as expected. The reported analyses were done in chronological rather than disease time (time since disease onset). Benchmarking individuals along the disease spectrum might prove to be a better strategy especially when conducting analyses on rate of disease progression.

AbstractBackgroundDiagnostic criteria emphasize the use of real‐time quaking‐induced conversion (RT‐QuIC) assays in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) to identify patients with rapidly progressive dementia (RPD) due to for Creutzfeldt‐Jakob disease (CJD; CDC Diagnostic Criteria; Oct‐2018). Yet, this test is often performed in specialized centers, leading to delays in return of results. There is a need to leverage clinical features and the results of readily available tests to distinguish patients with CJD from those with other causes (‘CJD mimics’), including patients with potentially treatment‐responsive RPD.MethodPatients with definite (pathology‐confirmed) or probable CJD (clinical features with positive RT‐QuIC) were identified through retrospective review of Mayo Clinic Enterprise (n=91) and Washington University in St. Louis records (n=14; Jan‐2014 to Dec‐2020). Demographic, clinical details and results of common investigations (e.g., neuroimaging, CSF analyses and electroencephalogram) were compared between CJD cases and ‘mimics’ who met clinical criteria for probable CJD but did not have CJD.ResultCJD mimics were diagnosed with autoimmune encephalitis (n=8), neurosarcoidosis (n=1), FTLD/MND (n=1) and unknown dementia (n=1), comprising 11/155 (7%) patients enrolled with RPD at study sites. Median [range] ages‐at‐presentation (65.6 [21.9‐81.5] vs 62.4 [32.8‐76.4] years; p=0.09), % females (51% vs 46%; p>0.99) and symptoms/signs were similar between groups, with the exception of motor complaints (e.g., spasms, focal weakness), which were more common in mimics (11/11 vs 55/105; p<0.01). Electroencephalogram findings did not differ between groups. MRI findings compatible with CJD (i.e., restricted diffusion within deep nuclei/cortical ribbon) predominated in cases (80/105 vs 4/11; p<0.01), while elevations in CSF leukocytes (>5 cells/hpf: 6/11 vs 5/103; p<0.01) and protein >45 mg/dL (10/11 vs 43/103; p<0.01) were more common in mimics. Total‐tau levels >1150 pg/mL (76/84 vs 2/10; p<0.01) and ‘positive’ 14‐3‐3 (67/98 vs 3/10; p=0.03) were frequent in cases. Autoantibodies associated with autoimmune encephalitis were detected in 5/10 mimics but 0/87 cases (p<0.01). Immunosuppressant therapies were provided to 10 mimics and 24 cases, with response limited to mimics.ConclusionsAutoimmune encephalitis, neurosarcoidosis and select neurodegenerative diseases may mimic CJD at presentation. Findings from brain MRI and commonly available CSF tests may facilitate early recognition of mimics, providing an opportunity for early treatment.

AbstractBackgroundPatients with prion disease commonly present with visual, sensorimotor or gait complaints that may prompt surgical interventions for related disorders (e.g., cataracts, carpal tunnel syndrome and joint disease). To prevent iatrogenic transmission of prion disease, surgical instruments used on patients with possible prion disease must be decontaminated or decommissioned. This is only done when the diagnosis of possible prion disease is recognized by the healthcare team. We considered the frequency with which patients with definite or probable prion disease underwent surgeries within one year of the symptomatic onset of prion disease diagnosed.MethodThe Mayo Clinic’s Advanced Cohort Explorer was used to identify patients with prion disease diagnostic codes assessed since 1/1/2014 (n=296). Patients with prion disease enrolled in prospective studies of rapidly progressive dementia beginning 2/14/2015 at Washington University School of Medicine (St. Louis, MO) were also included (n=14). Charts were independently reviewed by two team members, and demographic and clinical details extracted.Result108 patients with probable or definite prion disease were identified, including 62 (57%) with autopsy‐ or genetically‐proven prion disease (57 sporadic, 4 familial, 1 fatal familial insomnia). The majority of patients experienced a rapidly progressive course (mean symptom‐duration 10.0±9.7 months). Twenty‐nine patients (26.9%) underwent 36 surgeries or invasive procedures using durable instruments, including 3 high‐risk procedures directly involving the central nervous system, and 13 intermediate‐ (e.g., joint replacement) and 20 low‐risk procedures (e.g., endoscopy). Surgeries were performed a median of 10.2 months before death (range: 0.8‐62.3), with 16 (44%) performed after symptom onset. Surgical operators were unaware of the diagnosis of possible prion disease in all but one case (diagnostic brain biopsy).ConclusionSurgeries were common in patients with prion disease in this series and were commonly performed by operators who were unaware of the diagnosis. Coordinated approaches to screening and reporting may be needed to reduce the risk of iatrogenic spread of prion disease.