Desai, Aakash

PURPOSE International medical graduates (IMGs) are an essential component of the oncology workforce in the United States, comprising a third of all practicing oncologists and almost half of hematology/oncology fellows. In this article, we discuss the contributions of IMGs in the US oncology workforce, review unique challenges faced by IMGs, and propose potential solutions to overcome these challenges. METHODS ASCO's IMG Community of Practice was established with the mission to connect, mentor, guide, raise awareness, and overcome the challenges unique to IMGs interested in pursuing medical oncology in the United States. The content of this article is based on discussions at the IMG Community of Practice meetings at ASCO's 2023 and 2024 Annual Meetings. RESULTS IMGs bring an inherent diversity of thought and experience to the oncology workforce. They provide high-quality, culture- and language-concordant care to a diverse population of patients with cancer. However, IMGs in oncology face significant hardships throughout their careers, including visa-related restrictions, psychosocial and cultural struggles, as well as differential treatment while applying for residency and fellowship training, and early career positions. Greater awareness of these challenges among the members of the hematology/oncology community, along with institutional and individual efforts to support IMGs, is warranted. CONCLUSION We encourage oncology professionals and institutions to join our efforts in recognizing the unique paths of IMGs and providing support and advocacy to maximize the potential of IMGs in the US oncology workforce.

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) provide recommendations for the treatment of patients with NSCLC, including diagnosis, primary disease management, surveillance for relapse, and subsequent treatment. The panel has updated the list of recommended targeted therapies based on recent FDA approvals and clinical data. This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for NSCLC focuses on treatment recommendations for advanced or metastatic NSCLC with actionable molecular biomarkers.

Purpose: To investigate the molecular characteristics of and potential for precision medicine in KRAS wildtype pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Patients and Methods: We investigated 27 patients with KRASWT PDAC at our institution. Clinical data were obtained via chart review. Tumor specimens for each subject were interrogated for somatic single nucleotide variants, insertion and deletions, and copy number variants by DNA sequencing. Gene fusions were detected from RNA-seq. A patient-derived organoid (PDO) was developed from a patient with a MET translocation and expanded ex vivo to predict therapeutic sensitivity prior to enrollment in a phase 2 clinical trial. Results: Transcriptomic analysis showed our cohort may be stratified by the relative gene expression of the KRAS signaling cascade. The PDO derived from our patient harboring a TFG-MET rearrangement was found to have in vitro sensitivity to the multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor crizotinib. The patient was enrolled in the phase 2 SPARTA clinical trial and received monotherapy with vebrelitinib, a c-MET inhibitor, and achieved a partial and durable response. Conclusions: KRASWT PDAC is molecularly distinct from KRASMUT and enriched with potentially actionable genetic variants. In our study, transcriptomic profiling revealed that the KRAS signaling cascade may play a key role in KRASWT PDAC. Our report of a KRASWT PDAC patient with TFG-MET rearrangement who responded to a cMET inhibitor further supports the pursuit of precision oncology in this sub-population. Identification of targetable mutations, perhaps through approaches like RNA-seq, can help enable precision-driven approaches to select optimal treatment based on tumor characteristics.

Objectives The aim of this study was to study the prevalence of exocrine pancreas insufficiency (EPI) at a population level and the subsequent risk of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Materials and Methods Using TriNetX (a database of over 79 million US residents), we included patients ≥18 years with EPI (identified via ICD-10 codes) and continuous follow-up from 2016–2022. Patients with prior pancreas resection and PDAC before an EPI diagnosis were excluded. The primary outcome was EPI prevalence. Secondary outcomes included imaging utilization, PDAC risk, and pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) utilization. We performed 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) of patients with EPI versus patients without an EPI diagnosis. Results The population prevalence of EPI was 0.8% (n = 24,080) with a mean age of 55.6 years. After PSM, PDAC risk among patients with EPI was twice as high compared with patients without EPI (aHR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.66–2.36). This risk persisted even after excluding patients with a history of acute or chronic pancreatitis (adjusted odds ratio, 4.25; 95% CI, 2.99–6.04). Only 58% (n = 13, 390) of patients with EPI received PERT. No difference was observed in PDAC risk between patients with EPI on PERT and those not on PERT (aHR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.95–1.26; P = 0.17). Conclusions Despite a low prevalence, patients with EPI may have a higher risk of PDAC, and majority with EPI were not on PERT. PERT did not impact incident PDAC risk after an EPI diagnosis.

Mesothelioma is a rare cancer that originates from the mesothelial surfaces of the pleura and other sites, and is estimated to occur in approximately 3,500 people in the United States annually. Pleural mesothelioma is the most common type and represents approximately 85% of these cases. The NCCN Guidelines for Mesothelioma: Pleural provide recommendations for the diagnosis, evaluation, treatment, and follow-up for patients with pleural mesothelioma. These NCCN Guidelines Insights highlight significant updates to the NCCN Guidelines for Mesothelioma: Pleural, including revised guidance on disease classification and systemic therapy options.

AbstractBackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has led to significant improvement in outcomes for patients with nononcogene‐driven advanced non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The rate of crossover and receipt of postprotocol ICI in frontline trials for advanced NSCLC has not been systematically evaluated.MethodsClinicalTrials.gov was used to identify phase 3 studies evaluating the use of immunotherapy or combination chemoimmunotherapy against chemotherapy alone in the frontline management of advanced NSCLC. Data on outcomes, rate of crossover and/or subsequent post‐protocol receipt of immunotherapy, and the start dates of these clinical trials were then extracted.ResultsTwenty‐three frontline trials in nononcogene‐driven advanced NSCLC were identified. Six trials with ICI monotherapy/dual ICI therapy and 17 trials evaluating chemotherapy/ICI in first‐line advanced NSCLC were included in the analysis. The crossover rate ranged 0% to 54% in ICI monotherapy/dual ICI trials and 0% to 52% in chemotherapy/ICI trials. Nineteen of 23 trials provided information on subsequent postprotocol therapies. Among the trials not allowing crossover, postprotocol ICI was administered to 17% to 45.8% of patients. Information regarding the eventual receipt of ICI therapy was available for 22 of 23 trials. Of 6631 patients, 2507 (37.8%) randomized to the control arm eventually received ICI therapy.ConclusionThe rate of crossover and postprotocol ICI use was low in frontline trials for first‐line NSCLC incorporating ICI. Given the proven improved overall survival of ICI in a broad population, there is a need to ensure availability of this life‐prolonging therapy in future trials, either by crossover treatment or postprotocol administration.

68 Background: While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment, their high cost and limited global supply pose major challenges. Optimizing ICI dosing to achieve a minimum effective dose that has shown to maintain clinical benefit may be a potential solution with significant savings to the health system. We investigated potential savings in Medicare that could be attained from alternative ICI dosing. Methods: We conducted a literature review including original Phase 1/2 trials describing the minimal effective dose of three commonly used ICIs: Pembrolizumab (P), Nivolumab (N) and Atezolizumab (A). Alternate dosing strategies based on existing data for Pembrolizumab (2 mg/kg), Nivolumab (1 mg/kg) and Atezolizumab (4 mg/kg) were proposed. Publicly available CMS data on Medicare Part B expenditure for these therapies was utilized to obtain average cost per dosage unit, mg/dosage unit, and number of Medicare beneficiaries between 2018-2021. Average cost per dose and total cost per ICI was calculated based on current FDA approved dosing and alternate dosing strategies. Results: The average wholesale cost per fixed dose for P (200 mg), N (480 mg), and A were $9,242.00, $12,460.80, and $8,616.00, respectively. Implementing the proposed alternate dosing strategies led to a substantial reduction in drug costs: P ($7,393.60), N ($2,076.80), and A ($2,297.60). The ensuing cost savings were calculated based on the annual number of Medicare beneficiaries. From 2018-2021, the average total savings were estimated to be $95,545,182 for Pembrolizumab, $294,734,264 for Nivolumab, and $62,937,582 for Atezolizumab (Table). The cumulative average total cost savings from 2018-2021 exceeded $453 million. Conclusions: We demonstrate potential savings in Medicare with implementation of an alternative ICI dosing strategy. Our study underscores an urgent need to better understand clinical efficacy and cost savings from a patient perspective, and feasibility from a regulatory standpoint. This perspective may hold considerable global implications, providing a roadmap for cost-effective care in the domain of immunotherapy. [Table: see text]