Citations 14

Efficacy of CD19 Directed Therapies in Large B-Cell Lymphoma (LBCL) Relapsing after Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-Cell Therapy

Blood | November 28, 2022 | Volume: 140 | Issue: Supplement 1 | Pages: 10396-10398

10.1182/blood-2022-169689

Performance of Glomerular Filtration Rate Estimating Equations in Cancer Patients Evaluated for Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy

Blood | November 28, 2022 | Volume: 140 | Issue: Supplement 1 | Pages: 10942-10944

10.1182/blood-2022-164785

Characterization of Cytokine Release Syndrome in the KarMMa Study of Idecabtagene Vicleucel (ide-cel, bb2121) for Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood | November 4, 2020 | Volume: 136 | Issue: Supplement 1 | Pages: 26-27

10.1182/blood-2020-134383

Introduction: Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) is an expected and potentially life-threatening toxicity associated with CAR T cell therapy. Idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel, bb2121), a BCMA-directed CAR T cell therapy, demonstrated promising efficacy in triple-class exposed and highly refractory patients with multiple myeloma in the pivotal phase 2 KarMMa study, with an overall response rate (ORR), complete response (CR) rate, median duration of response, and median progression-free survival of 73%, 33%, 10.7 months, and 8.8 months, respectively, across the target dose levels of 150−450 × 106 CAR+ T cells, and 82%, 39%, 11.3 months, and 12.1 months at the highest target dose of 450 × 106 CAR+ T cells (Munshi et al. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38[suppl, abstr]:8503). Identifying the patterns of CRS evolution, associations with baseline patient and disease characteristics, and the impact of interventions are key to understanding this adverse event in the context of ide-cel. In addition, a better understanding of lower-grade CRS, including maximum grade 1 events, is important as these are easier to manage and represent a lower burden on the healthcare system. We report results of an examination of CRS events in the KarMMa study. Methods: Patients in the KarMMa trial (NCT03361748) were required to have ≥3 prior regimens (including an immunomodulatory agent, a proteasome inhibitor, and an anti-CD38 antibody) and were refractory to their last regimen per International Myeloma Working Group criteria. Patients received ide-cel target doses of 150, 300, or 450 × 106 CAR+ T cells 2 days after lymphodepletion with cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2 plus fludarabine 30 mg/m2 daily for 3 days. The primary endpoint was ORR. The key secondary endpoint was CR rate; other secondary endpoints included safety. CRS was graded according to criteria in Lee et al. (Blood. 2014;124:188). Patient characteristics and CRS management were examined by CRS grade to identify variables associated with higher-grade CRS. Management of CRS included tocilizumab 8 mg/kg with the addition of corticosteroids and other agents as needed. Results: Of 128 patients treated with ide-cel, 107 (84%) experienced CRS; 61 patients (48%) had maximum grade 1 and 46 (36%) had maximum grade ≥2 CRS (grade 2, n=39; grade 3, n=5; grade 4, n=1; and grade 5, n=1). Baseline characteristics were generally balanced among patients with maximum grade 1 and grade ≥2 (Table). Thirty patients (65%) with maximum grade ≥2 CRS progressed from initial grade 1 events, whereas 16 (35%) had initial grade ≥2. Median time to onset of CRS was the same (1 day) regardless of initial or maximum grade (Table). Median duration was 5.0 days in patients with maximum grade 1, 5.5 days in patients with maximum grade 2, and 11.0 days in patients with maximum grade ≥3 CRS. Median duration was shorter in patients with maximum grade 1 CRS than in those with initial grade 1 events that progressed to grade ≥2 (5.0 days vs 7.0 days). Most patients (83%) with maximum grade ≥2 CRS received at least 1 dose of tocilizumab and approximately one-third (35%) received corticosteroids, compared with 48% and 5%, respectively, of patients with maximum grade 1 CRS. A higher percentage of patients with initial grade ≥2 vs initial grade 1 CRS received multiple doses of tocilizumab (50% vs 37%) or at least 1 dose of corticosteroids (50% vs 27%). Conclusions: Almost half of the patients treated with ide-cel experienced maximum grade 1 CRS. Baseline disease and patient characteristics were similar among patients experiencing grade 1 and higher-grade CRS events. CRS was effectively managed with tocilizumab and corticosteroids, and more frequent use of these interventions in patients with grade ≥2 CRS was not associated with prolonged CRS events. The time to onset of CRS was predictable and equivalent in patients with maximum grade 1 and higher-grade CRS events. Duration of CRS was similar in patients with maximum grade 1 and 2 but was longer in patients with maximum grade ≥3 CRS. These data demonstrate the feasible management of CRS and thus confirm the tolerability of ide-cel in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Table 1 Disclosures Kansagra: Karyopharm: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; Alnylam: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; GSK: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria. Lin:Novartis: Consultancy; Sorrento: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gamida Cells: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Vineti: Consultancy; Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy, Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy; Legend BioTech: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding. Berdeja:BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cellularity: Research Funding; Lilly: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Poseida: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bioclinica: Consultancy; Bluebird: Research Funding; Prothena: Consultancy; Legend: Consultancy; Kesios: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Constellation: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding; Servier: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; CRISPR Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Glenmark: Research Funding; EMD Sorono: Research Funding; Vivolux: Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Research Funding; CURIS: Research Funding; Acetylon: Research Funding. Shah:GSK, Amgen, Indapta Therapeutics, Sanofi, BMS, CareDx, Kite, Karyopharm: Consultancy; BMS, Janssen, Bluebird Bio, Sutro Biopharma, Teneobio, Poseida, Nektar: Research Funding. Oriol:Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy. Yakoub-Agha:Celgene: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Gilead/Kite: Honoraria, Other: travel support; Janssen: Honoraria. Einsele:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Rambaldi:BMS/Celgene: Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company); University of Milan: Current Employment; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Support of parent study and funding of editorial support. Received travel support., Research Funding; Omeros: Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company); Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company); Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company). Advisory board and speaker fees from Pfizer.; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company). Research grant from Amgen Inc.; Sanofi: Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company); Astellas: Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company); Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel support from Gilead.. Truppel-Hartmann:bluebird bio, Inc: Current Employment, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company); F. Hoffmann La Roche: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Ended employment in the past 24 months. Rowe:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Current Employment. Wang:Bristol Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Agarwal:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Campbell:BMS: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Lonial:Takeda: Consultancy, Other: Personal fees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Personal fees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Personal fees; Millennium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Personal fees, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Personal fees, Research Funding; Onyx: Honoraria; Genentech: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Personal fees; JUNO Therapeutics: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Personal fees; Abbvie: Consultancy.
A Population of Suppressive Monocytes Inhibiting T Cell Proliferation and Dendritic Cell Differentiation in Relapsed Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma

Blood | October 13, 2019 | Volume: 112 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 808-808

10.1182/blood.v112.11.808.808

Abstract Despite advances in treatments for patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL), the relapse rates remain high and 40% of diffuse large B-cell NHL (DLBCL) patients die of disease. New therapies to augment the host anti-tumor immune response are needed. Reports of graft-versus-lymphoma responses in patients who have received allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant indicate a role for cellular immunotherapy. However, these patients have variable levels of immunodeficiency which may impact the efficacy of cellular therapy. To study this we first evaluated the cellular immune status of patients with relapsed NHL. Proliferation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNC) stimulated with anti-CD3/CD28 beads was reduced by more than 3.5 folds for patients with DLBCL (n = 3) compared to that of age-matched healthy donors (n = 5; p = 0.02). Removal of monocytes from PBMNC by use of anti-CD14 immunomagnetic beads restored proliferation to that of healthy donors. Further, monocytes from these patients were deficient in stimulating allogeneic T cell proliferation by 3 folds compared to monocytes from healthy donors (n = 3 NHL; n = 8 normal; p < 0.01). Peripheral blood from 12 NHL patients (9 DLBCL; 1 grade 3 follicular lymphoma; 2 composite) and 12 age-matched healthy donors were characterized by flow cytometry to determine the phenotype of these suppressive monocytes. There was no difference in the % monocytes in the blood between NHL patients and healthy donors; however, NHL patients had elevated % monocytes with a suppressive phenotype (CD14+HLA-DRneg) compared to normals (NHL 38.9 ± 4.93%; normal 8.3 ± 2.15; p < 0.0001). This phenotype is distinct from other myeloid suppressors (Lin-CD33+HLA-DR-) or non-classical monocytes (CD16+), neither of which was different in numbers between NHL and normal donors. This suggests that the CD14+HLA-DRneg monocytes are responsible for the observed T cell suppression. To further characterize the function of these cells, we cultured purified CD14+ monocytes from NHL and compared their differentiation capacity with those from normal donors. The percentage of CD14+HLA-DRneg monocytes in initial ex vivo culture was inversely correlated with the percentage of pure, mature dendritic cells (mDC) generated with TNF-a and PGE2 as maturation factors (CD80+CD83+; n = 9; p = 0.015). As CpG oligonucleotides are also capable of immune stimulation and have some anti-tumor activity in clinical trials, we investigated the effect of CpG on mDC differentiation in NHL. In healthy donors, maturation of monocytes with CpG yielded highly pure mDC (90.7 ± 2.15%, n = 3). However, preliminary results of mDC yield from monocytes of NHL patients matured with CpG was only 22.6 ± 11.2% (n = 2). This data suggests alternative signaling pathways of these suppressive monocytes. Preliminary analysis of a proteome array for 46 kinase phosphorylation sites from 37 proteins in 2 NHL and 3 healthy donors suggest changes in phosphorylation of 17 protein kinases for CD14+HLA-DRneg compared to CD14+HLA-DR+ cells. Functional correlation of these protein kinase phosphorylation changes is needed to definitively target the pathway characteristic of CD14+HLA-DRneg monocytes. Finally, we have identified a serum-free culture method that can consistently generate highly pure mDC from monocytes of NHL patients (93.0 ± 3.6%, n = 9) and is readily adaptable to good manufacturing practice for clinical use in immunotherapy. Taken together we have described for the first time a population of CD14+HLA-DRneg monocytes that is a significant source of immunosuppression in NHL patients and are beginning to target methods of overcoming this suppression.