Kjær, Susanne K.

Abstract Breast, ovarian, and prostate cancers are hormone-related and may have a shared genetic basis, but this has not been investigated systematically by genome-wide association (GWA) studies. Meta-analyses combining the largest GWA meta-analysis data sets for these cancers totaling 112,349 cases and 116,421 controls of European ancestry, all together and in pairs, identified at P < 10−8 seven new cross-cancer loci: three associated with susceptibility to all three cancers (rs17041869/2q13/BCL2L11; rs7937840/11q12/INCENP; rs1469713/19p13/GATAD2A), two breast and ovarian cancer risk loci (rs200182588/9q31/SMC2; rs8037137/15q26/RCCD1), and two breast and prostate cancer risk loci (rs5013329/1p34/NSUN4; rs9375701/6q23/L3MBTL3). Index variants in five additional regions previously associated with only one cancer also showed clear association with a second cancer type. Cell-type–specific expression quantitative trait locus and enhancer–gene interaction annotations suggested target genes with potential cross-cancer roles at the new loci. Pathway analysis revealed significant enrichment of death receptor signaling genes near loci with P < 10−5 in the three-cancer meta-analysis. Significance: We demonstrate that combining large-scale GWA meta-analysis findings across cancer types can identify completely new risk loci common to breast, ovarian, and prostate cancers. We show that the identification of such cross-cancer risk loci has the potential to shed new light on the shared biology underlying these hormone-related cancers. Cancer Discov; 6(9); 1052–67. ©2016 AACR. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 932

Abstract Background: Despite a large body of literature evaluating the association between recreational physical activity and epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) risk, the extant evidence is inconclusive, and little is known about the independent association between recreational physical inactivity and EOC risk. We conducted a pooled analysis of nine studies from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium to investigate the association between chronic recreational physical inactivity and EOC risk. Methods: In accordance with the 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans, women reporting no regular, weekly recreational physical activity were classified as inactive. Multivariable logistic regression was utilized to estimate the ORs and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between inactivity and EOC risk overall and by subgroups based upon histotype, menopausal status, race, and body mass index. Results: The current analysis included data from 8,309 EOC patients and 12,612 controls. We observed a significant positive association between inactivity and EOC risk (OR = 1.34; 95% CI, 1.14–1.57), and similar associations were observed for each histotype. Conclusions: In this large pooled analysis examining the association between recreational physical inactivity and EOC risk, we observed consistent evidence of an association between chronic inactivity and all EOC histotypes. Impact: These data add to the growing body of evidence suggesting that inactivity is an independent risk factor for cancer. If the apparent association between inactivity and EOC risk is substantiated, additional work via targeted interventions should be pursued to characterize the dose of activity required to mitigate the risk of this highly fatal disease. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 25(7); 1114–24. ©2016 AACR.

Abstract Background: Many epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) risk factors relate to hormone exposure and elevated estrogen levels are associated with obesity in postmenopausal women. Therefore, we hypothesized that gene–environment interactions related to hormone-related risk factors could differ between obese and non-obese women. Methods: We considered interactions between 11,441 SNPs within 80 candidate genes related to hormone biosynthesis and metabolism and insulin-like growth factors with six hormone-related factors (oral contraceptive use, parity, endometriosis, tubal ligation, hormone replacement therapy, and estrogen use) and assessed whether these interactions differed between obese and non-obese women. Interactions were assessed using logistic regression models and data from 14 case–control studies (6,247 cases; 10,379 controls). Histotype-specific analyses were also completed. Results: SNPs in the following candidate genes showed notable interaction: IGF1R (rs41497346, estrogen plus progesterone hormone therapy, histology = all, P = 4.9 × 10−6) and ESR1 (rs12661437, endometriosis, histology = all, P = 1.5 × 10−5). The most notable obesity–gene–hormone risk factor interaction was within INSR (rs113759408, parity, histology = endometrioid, P = 8.8 × 10−6). Conclusions: We have demonstrated the feasibility of assessing multifactor interactions in large genetic epidemiology studies. Follow-up studies are necessary to assess the robustness of our findings for ESR1, CYP11A1, IGF1R, CYP11B1, INSR, and IGFBP2. Future work is needed to develop powerful statistical methods able to detect these complex interactions. Impact: Assessment of multifactor interaction is feasible, and, here, suggests that the relationship between genetic variants within candidate genes and hormone-related risk factors may vary EOC susceptibility. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 25(5); 780–90. ©2016 AACR.

Abstract Background: While numerous susceptibility loci for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) have been identified, few associations have been reported with overall survival. In the absence of common prognostic genetic markers, we hypothesize that rare coding variants may be associated with overall EOC survival and assessed their contribution in two exome-based genotyping projects of the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC). Methods: The primary patient set (Set 1) included 14 independent EOC studies (4,293 patients) and 227,892 variants, and a secondary patient set (Set 2) included six additional EOC studies (1,744 patients) and 114,620 variants. Because power to detect rare variants individually is reduced, gene-level tests were conducted. Sets were analyzed separately at individual variants and by gene, and then combined with meta-analyses (73,203 variants and 13,163 genes overlapped). Results: No individual variant reached genome-wide statistical significance. A SNP previously implicated to be associated with EOC risk and, to a lesser extent, survival, rs8170, showed the strongest evidence of association with survival and similar effect size estimates across sets (Pmeta = 1.1E−6, HRSet1 = 1.17, HRSet2 = 1.14). Rare variants in ATG2B, an autophagy gene important for apoptosis, were significantly associated with survival after multiple testing correction (Pmeta = 1.1E−6; Pcorrected = 0.01). Conclusions: Common variant rs8170 and rare variants in ATG2B may be associated with EOC overall survival, although further study is needed. Impact: This study represents the first exome-wide association study of EOC survival to include rare variant analyses, and suggests that complementary single variant and gene-level analyses in large studies are needed to identify rare variants that warrant follow-up study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 25(3); 446–54. ©2016 AACR.

ABSTRACTEpithelial‐mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a process whereby epithelial cells assume mesenchymal characteristics to facilitate cancer metastasis. However, EMT also contributes to the initiation and development of primary tumors. Prior studies that explored the hypothesis that EMT gene variants contribute to epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) risk have been based on small sample sizes and none have sought replication in an independent population. We screened 15,816 single‐nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 296 genes in a discovery phase using data from a genome‐wide association study of EOC among women of European ancestry (1,947 cases and 2,009 controls) and identified 793 variants in 278 EMT‐related genes that were nominally (P < 0.05) associated with invasive EOC. These SNPs were then genotyped in a larger study of 14,525 invasive‐cancer patients and 23,447 controls. A P‐value <0.05 and a false discovery rate (FDR) <0.2 were considered statistically significant. In the larger dataset, GPC6/GPC5 rs17702471 was associated with the endometrioid subtype among Caucasians (odds ratio (OR) = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.07–1.25, P = 0.0003, FDR = 0.19), whereas F8 rs7053448 (OR = 1.69, 95% CI = 1.27–2.24, P = 0.0003, FDR = 0.12), F8 rs7058826 (OR = 1.69, 95% CI = 1.27–2.24, P = 0.0003, FDR = 0.12), and CAPN13 rs1983383 (OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.69–0.90, P = 0.0005, FDR = 0.12) were associated with combined invasive EOC among Asians. In silico functional analyses revealed that GPC6/GPC5 rs17702471 coincided with DNA regulatory elements. These results suggest that EMT gene variants do not appear to play a significant role in the susceptibility to EOC.

Abstract The known genetic variance for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) accounts for less than half the familial risks of the disease. BRCA1 and BRCA2 are the major high-penetrance EOC susceptibility genes. More recently genes that interact with BRCA1 and BRCA2 in the same biological pathways, but conferring more moderate penetrance (e.g. RAD51C, RAD51D) have also been identified. Mutations in these genes result in defects in homologous recombination and double strand break repair (HR/DSB). We hypothesized that other genes operating in these and other DNA repair pathways may also confer EOC susceptibility. Whole exome sequencing data, available from more than 400 high-grade serous ovarian cancers, were used to identify 24 candidate genes harboring germline truncating mutations in at least 2 cases, followed by replication analysis using targeted resequencing in ~3,000 cases and 3,000 controls. Subjects were also sequenced for the known susceptibility genes listed above. The data confirmed the previously reported contributions of BRCA1, BRCA2, RAD51C and RAD51D to EOC. In addition, we identified BRIP1, and FANCM as candidate EOC susceptibility genes. Surprisingly, for several genes we found truncating mutations were equally prevalent in cases as they were in controls. These mutations may still represent rare low-penetrance susceptibility alleles for EOC, which we are too limited in sample size and power to confirm; or more likely, it indicates that cells can tolerate heterozygous loss-of-function mutations in apparently critical DNA repair genes without any impact on neoplastic development. These findings may have implications for risk prediction and prevention strategies for EOC and possibly for the identification of novel therapeutic targets. Citation Format: Susan J. Ramus, Honglin Song, Ed Dicks, Maria Intermaggio, Jane Hayward, Jonathan P. Tyrer, Jacek Gronwald, Susanne Krüger Kjær, Alice Wittemore, Beth Karlan, Kunle Odunsi, Usha Menon, David D. Bowtell, Ellen L. Goode, Paul D.P. Pharoah, Simon A. Gayther. Whole exome and targeted resequencing, of population based ovarian cancer cases and controls, identifies susceptibility genes for ovarian cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 10th Biennial Ovarian Cancer Research Symposium; Sep 8-9, 2014; Seattle, WA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2015;21(16 Suppl):Abstract nr POSTER-CTRL-1213.

Abstract Background: CA125 is elevated in 80% of ovarian cancer cases and has proven utility in assessing response to therapy and prognosis. Unfortunately, CA125 is elevated in a variety of benign conditions and only in 50% of early stage ovarian cancers, resulting in a sensitivity and specificity unacceptable for population-based screening. Therefore, understanding factors that influence CA125 at presentation could provide important insights for interpreting CA125 values. Methods: Using pre-treatment CA125 and detailed epidemiologic data from 12 studies participating in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC), we evaluated factors previously reported to influence CA125 levels, including age, race, oral contraceptive use, parity, tubal ligation, endometriosis, body mass index (BMI), personal history of breast cancer, or a family history of breast or ovarian cancer. We used linear regression to estimate the association between each variable and CA125 probit scores, which we used to standardize values between studies. Secondary analyses included adjustment for histologic subtype. We also estimated the associations within each study using log-transformed CA125 as the outcome and estimated summary measures using random effects meta-analyses. Results: Of the 4417 cases included in the analysis, 2918 (66%) were serous, 227 (5%) were mucinous, 484 (11%) were endometrioid, and 258 (6%) were clear cell carcinomas. Median CA125 values varied between studies with a high of 831 U/mL and a low of 271 U/mL. We observed no association between race, oral contraceptive use, tubal ligation, endometriosis, prior breast cancer, and family history of breast cancer and pre-treatment CA125. However, we observed increased pre-treatment CA125 levels with older age (&gt;70 vs. &lt; 50, p=0.03), parity (p=0.01), number of children (p=0.02), obesity (BMI&gt;30 vs. 21-25, p=0.03), and family history of ovarian cancer (p=0.05). Results were similar but attenuated when we calculated summary estimates of the association using meta-analysis of study specific estimates of the association with log-transformed CA125 rather than probit scores. Age and BMI remained predictive of pre-treatment CA125 values after adjustment for histologic subtype. Our data are limited by between site variability in CA125 assays; therefore, validation of these findings is needed with adjustment for type of assay used or in a study population in which all cases had pre-treatment CA125 values measured with the same assay. Conclusions: Despite these limitations, results from this analysis of over 4000 ovarian cancer cases suggest that age and body size may influence pre-treatment CA125 values. Citation Format: KL Terry, A Babic, BY Karlan, MT Goodman, D Lambrechts, F Heitz, K Matsuo, I McNeish, T Pejovic, S Kruger Kjaer, PM Webb, E Hogdall, EL Goode, DW Cramer, for the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium. Epidemiologic predictors of pre-treatment CA125 in women with ovarian cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 10th Biennial Ovarian Cancer Research Symposium; Sep 8-9, 2014; Seattle, WA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2015;21(16 Suppl):Abstract nr AS13.