Ramus, Susan J.

Abstract Mucinous ovarian carcinoma (MOC) is a rare histotype of ovarian cancer. Women with advanced disease (FIGO stage III/IV) have very poor outcomes, with 5-year survival of <20%. Little is known about the anti-tumor immune response in MOC, limiting potential immunotherapeutic options for patients. Immune data from 3 platforms were analysed. A NanoString mRNA expression panel with 39 immune-related genes (n=60 MOC, n=4198 other ovarian histotypes), a NanoString mRNA plexset with PD-1, PD-L1 (n=241 MOC, n=115 upper and lower gastrointestinal (GI) cancers), and 2 multicolor immunofluorescence (mcIF) panels (n=121 MOC) for CD68, PD-L1, PD-1, CD8 and FOXP3. Data overlapped all platforms for 22 MOC. Immune marker expression by ovarian cancer histotype was measured. Uni- and multivariable Cox Proportional Hazards assessed overall survival (OS) within MOC. Hierarchical clustering looked for subgroups of patients based on co-expression of immune genes. Compared to more common high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC) and GI cancers, MOC were less immunologically active. High IGHM expression was associated with poorer OS (HR 1.31 (95% CI 1.02–1.69), p=0.033). High tumor densities of FOXP3 and PD-1 positive cells conferred poorer OS in a model with age, stage and site; however, these and PD-L1 and CD68 were associated with grade. The 39 gene NanoString and mcIF datasets revealed 4 clusters, roughly translating to immune cold, moderate and hot (groups 3,4). mcIF analysis revealed a subset with PD-L1 expression in the absence of T-regulatory cell infiltrates. This study provides novel insights into the MOC immune landscape. Despite relatively low immune activity overall, immunotherapy could be explored for a subset of patients with MOC. Supported by NSW Ministry of Health and UNSW Sydney, through the NSW Health PhD Scholarship Program 2017-2022; Translational Cancer Research Network top-up scholarship 2021

AbstractBackgroundCyclin E1 (CCNE1) is a potential predictive marker and therapeutic target in tubo‐ovarian high‐grade serous carcinoma (HGSC). Smaller studies have revealed unfavorable associations for CCNE1 amplification and CCNE1 overexpression with survival, but to date no large‐scale, histotype‐specific validation has been performed. The hypothesis was that high‐level amplification of CCNE1 and CCNE1 overexpression, as well as a combination of the two, are linked to shorter overall survival in HGSC.MethodsWithin the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium, amplification status and protein level in 3029 HGSC cases and mRNA expression in 2419 samples were investigated.ResultsHigh‐level amplification (>8 copies by chromogenic in situ hybridization) was found in 8.6% of HGSC and overexpression (>60% with at least 5% demonstrating strong intensity by immunohistochemistry) was found in 22.4%. CCNE1 high‐level amplification and overexpression both were linked to shorter overall survival in multivariate survival analysis adjusted for age and stage, with hazard stratification by study (hazard ratio [HR], 1.26; 95% CI, 1.08‐1.47, p = .034, and HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.05‐1.32, p = .015, respectively). This was also true for cases with combined high‐level amplification/overexpression (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.09‐1.47, p = .033). CCNE1 mRNA expression was not associated with overall survival (HR, 1.00 per 1‐SD increase; 95% CI, 0.94‐1.06; p = .58). CCNE1 high‐level amplification is mutually exclusive with the presence of germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants and shows an inverse association to RB1 loss.ConclusionThis study provides large‐scale validation that CCNE1 high‐level amplification is associated with shorter survival, supporting its utility as a prognostic biomarker in HGSC.

AbstractBackgroundKnown risk alleles for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) account for approximately 40% of the heritability for EOC. Copy number variants (CNVs) have not been investigated as EOC risk alleles in a large population cohort.MethodsSingle nucleotide polymorphism array data from 13 071 EOC cases and 17 306 controls of White European ancestry were used to identify CNVs associated with EOC risk using a rare admixture maximum likelihood test for gene burden and a by-probe ratio test. We performed enrichment analysis of CNVs at known EOC risk loci and functional biofeatures in ovarian cancer–related cell types.ResultsWe identified statistically significant risk associations with CNVs at known EOC risk genes; BRCA1 (PEOC = 1.60E-21; OREOC = 8.24), RAD51C (Phigh-grade serous ovarian cancer [HGSOC] = 5.5E-4; odds ratio [OR]HGSOC = 5.74 del), and BRCA2 (PHGSOC = 7.0E-4; ORHGSOC = 3.31 deletion). Four suggestive associations (P < .001) were identified for rare CNVs. Risk-associated CNVs were enriched (P < .05) at known EOC risk loci identified by genome-wide association study. Noncoding CNVs were enriched in active promoters and insulators in EOC-related cell types.ConclusionsCNVs in BRCA1 have been previously reported in smaller studies, but their observed frequency in this large population-based cohort, along with the CNVs observed at BRCA2 and RAD51C gene loci in EOC cases, suggests that these CNVs are potentially pathogenic and may contribute to the spectrum of disease-causing mutations in these genes. CNVs are likely to occur in a wider set of susceptibility regions, with potential implications for clinical genetic testing and disease prevention.

Abstract Background: Ovarian cancer is the deadliest gynecologic cancer. Standard treatments for advanced stage high-grade serous ovarian cancer, the most common type, include (1) primary cytoreductive surgery (PCS) followed by adjuvant chemotherapy or (2) neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with interval debulking surgery. Patients in whom PCS is unlikely to yield optimal cytoreduction to no visible residual disease (R0) or who have medical contraindications to PCS are recommended to undergo NACT. Previous studies on associations between environmental factors and risk of any macroscopic residual disease have yielded inconsistent results. We aimed to (1) comprehensively examine the associations between demographic, lifestyle and reproductive factors and risk of residual disease after PCS; and (2) develop and internally validate a risk prediction model based on these factors. Methods: We used pooled data on 3,492 women who had PCS following a diagnosis with advanced stage high-grade serous ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancers from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium. Fifteen exposures of interest included age at diagnosis, menopausal status, race/ethnicity, education level, first-degree family history of ovarian cancer, endometriosis, smoking, body mass index, parity, incomplete pregnancy, tubal ligation, use of combined oral contraceptives, depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate, estrogen (ET), and combined estrogen-progestin therapy. We fit logistic regression models to examine each exposure-residual disease association in 80% of the data (n=2,794; random selection of participants). We developed a risk prediction model including the factors with p-values ≤0.2. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to assess the model’s discrimination in the remaining 20% of the data (n=698). Results: Of the 3,492 participants, 2,003 (57%) had residual disease following PCS. Older age at diagnosis was associated with an increased risk of residual disease (OR=1.07 per five years, 95% CI 1.03-1.11). In contrast, a family history of ovarian cancer (OR=0.63, 95% CI 0.42-0.95) or ET use for 5+ years (OR=0.61, 95% CI 0.39-0.96) were associated with achieving R0. These above factors were included in the risk prediction model as were race/ethnicity, personal history of endometriosis, and smoking, whose p-values ≤0.2. The model showed modest performance in the validation set (AUC=0.64). Conclusions: Younger age at diagnosis, family history of ovarian cancer, and long-term ET use were associated with achieving R0 following PCS. Future studies incorporating genetic and clinical factors to improve the risk prediction for residual disease following PCS are warranted. Citation Format: Minh Tung Phung, Andrew Berchuck, Ellen L. Goode, Marc T. Goodman, Gillian E. Hanley, Jean Richardson, Bronwyn Grout, Anne Chase, Cindy McKinnon Deurloo, Beth Y. Karlan, Toon Van Gorp, Keitaro Matsuo, Karen McLean, Malcolm C. Pike, Joellen M. Schildkraut, Kathryn L. Terry, Anna DeFazio, Penelope M. Webb, Paul D. P. Pharoah, Susan J. Ramus, Celeste Leigh Pearce. Environmental factors associated with residual disease after ovarian cancer primary cytoreduction surgery [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 2248.

Abstract ARID1A (BAF250a) is a component of the SWI/SNF chromatin modifying complex, plays an important tumour suppressor role, and is considered prognostic in several malignancies. However, in ovarian carcinomas there are contradictory reports on its relationship to outcome, immune response, and correlation with clinicopathological features. We assembled a series of 1623 endometriosis‐associated ovarian carcinomas, including 1078 endometrioid (ENOC) and 545 clear cell (CCOC) ovarian carcinomas, through combining resources of the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis (OTTA) Consortium, the Canadian Ovarian Unified Experimental Resource (COEUR), local, and collaborative networks. Validated immunohistochemical surrogate assays for ARID1A mutations were applied to all samples. We investigated associations between ARID1A loss/mutation, clinical features, outcome, CD8 + tumour‐infiltrating lymphocytes (CD8 + TILs), and DNA mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd). ARID1A loss was observed in 42% of CCOCs and 25% of ENOCs. We found no associations between ARID1A loss and outcomes, stage, age, or CD8 + TIL status in CCOC. Similarly, we found no association with outcome or stage in endometrioid cases. In ENOC, ARID1A loss was more prevalent in younger patients ( p = 0.012) and was associated with MMRd ( p < 0.001) and the presence of CD8 + TILs ( p = 0.008). Consistent with MMRd being causative of ARID1A mutations, in a subset of ENOCs we also observed an association with ARID1A loss‐of‐function mutation as a result of small indels ( p = 0.035, versus single nucleotide variants). In ENOC, the association with ARID1A loss, CD8 + TILs, and age appears confounded by MMRd status. Although this observation does not explicitly rule out a role for ARID1A influence on CD8 + TIL infiltration in ENOC, given current knowledge regarding MMRd, it seems more likely that effects are dominated by the hypermutation phenotype. This large dataset with consistently applied biomarker assessment now provides a benchmark for the prevalence of ARID1A loss‐of‐function mutations in endometriosis‐associated ovarian cancers and brings clarity to the prognostic significance. © 2021 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Abstract Background: There is suggestive evidence that inflammation is related to ovarian cancer survival. However, more research is needed to identify inflammation-related factors that are associated with ovarian cancer survival and to determine their combined effects. Methods: This analysis used pooled data on 8,147 women with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium. The prediagnosis inflammation-related exposures of interest included alcohol use; aspirin use; other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use; body mass index; environmental tobacco smoke exposure; history of pelvic inflammatory disease, polycystic ovarian syndrome, and endometriosis; menopausal hormone therapy use; physical inactivity; smoking status; and talc use. Using Cox proportional hazards models, the relationship between each exposure and survival was assessed in 50% of the data. A weighted inflammation-related risk score (IRRS) was developed, and its association with survival was assessed using Cox proportional hazards models in the remaining 50% of the data. Results: There was a statistically significant trend of increasing risk of death per quartile of the IRRS [HR = 1.09; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.03–1.14]. Women in the upper quartile of the IRRS had a 31% higher death rate compared with the lowest quartile (95% CI, 1.11–1.54). Conclusions: A higher prediagnosis IRRS was associated with an increased mortality risk after an ovarian cancer diagnosis. Further investigation is warranted to evaluate whether postdiagnosis exposures are also associated with survival. Impact: Given that pre- and postdiagnosis exposures are often correlated and many are modifiable, our study results can ultimately motivate the development of behavioral recommendations to enhance survival among patients with ovarian cancer.

Abstract Background: Accumulating evidence suggests a relationship between endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer. Independent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer have identified 16 and 27 risk regions, respectively, four of which overlap between the two cancers. We aimed to identify joint endometrial and ovarian cancer risk loci by performing a meta-analysis of GWAS summary statistics from these two cancers. Methods: Using LDScore regression, we explored the genetic correlation between endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer. To identify loci associated with the risk of both cancers, we implemented a pipeline of statistical genetic analyses (i.e., inverse-variance meta-analysis, colocalization, and M-values) and performed analyses stratified by subtype. Candidate target genes were then prioritized using functional genomic data. Results: Genetic correlation analysis revealed significant genetic correlation between the two cancers (rG = 0.43, P = 2.66 × 10−5). We found seven loci associated with risk for both cancers (PBonferroni &lt; 2.4 × 10−9). In addition, four novel subgenome-wide regions at 7p22.2, 7q22.1, 9p12, and 11q13.3 were identified (P &lt; 5 × 10−7). Promoter-associated HiChIP chromatin loops from immortalized endometrium and ovarian cell lines and expression quantitative trait loci data highlighted candidate target genes for further investigation. Conclusions: Using cross-cancer GWAS meta-analysis, we have identified several joint endometrial and ovarian cancer risk loci and candidate target genes for future functional analysis. Impact: Our research highlights the shared genetic relationship between endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer. Further studies in larger sample sets are required to confirm our findings.

Abstract A majority of patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC) develop progressive disease following primary treatment, with a five-year survival rate of approximately 40%, and less than 10% survive more than 10 years. Profound genomic instability, treatment with DNA-damaging drugs, and a large tumor burden promote the development of acquired resistance in a large proportion of patients, including multiple convergent resistant events within individuals. Despite the propensity of HGSC to develop drug resistance, a small proportion of patients with advanced disease at diagnosis become long-term survivors. These exceptional patients include those who had suboptimal surgical clearance, and therefore were not cured surgically, and others who have had no evidence of disease recurrence following initial surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. Our study, which is part of the international collaborative Multidisciplinary Ovarian Cancer Outcomes Group (MOCOG), seeks to identify molecular, immunologic, and epidemiologic factors that influence long-term survival in HGSC. This presentation describes our genomic and immunologic analysis of exceptional survival of this deadly disease. Patient characteristics and clinical histories were evaluated to identify patients diagnosed with advanced stage (Stage IIIC/IV) and histopathologically confirmed HGSC with greater than 10-year overall survival. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was performed on primary tumors (median 78x coverage) and germline samples (median 39x coverage) of 55 long-term survivors. Primary tumor samples were also characterized by RNA sequencing, DNA methylation profiling, and immunohistochemistry. Thirty-eight (69%) of long-term surviving patients had residual disease following surgery, suggestive of highly chemosensitive disease. Most patients (41, 75%) were alive at last follow-up and 26 (47%) were progression free. Somatic mutation burden was higher in primary tumors of long-term survivors relative to controls. Genome-wide mutational signatures were predominantly Signature 3 (associated with homologous recombination deficiency), Signature 1 (age related), and Signatures 5, 8, and 16 (unknown etiology). Inactivation of the tumor suppressor RB1 by structural rearrangements or homozygous deletion was frequent in long-term survivors, with 33% of tumors showing associated loss of RB1 protein expression by immunohistochemistry compared to 13% of unselected HGSC controls (n=207; P = 0.001). In an independent HGSC cohort (n=847), RB1 protein loss was associated with prolonged survival (HR: 0.75, P &lt; 0.001) compared to patients with RB1-positive tumors. Furthermore, co-occurrence of germline mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 and RB1 loss was associated with a significantly longer overall survival compared to patients with retained RB1 protein expression and no germline BRCA mutation (HR: 0.44, P &lt; 0.001). Multiplexed immunohistochemical analysis with immune cell panels demonstrated distinct associations with long-term survivors. This study delineates the full landscape of genomic alterations in HGSC of long-term survivors. Our findings indicate that specific mutations are associated with enhanced host immune responses and long-term survival. Citation Format: Dale Garsed, Ahwan Pandey, Sian Fereday, Kathryn Alsop, Maartje Wouters, Flurina Saner, Catherine Kennedy, Celeste Pearce, Malcolm Pike, Susan Ramus, Martin Kobel, Anna deFazio, Ellen Goode, Brad Nelson, David Bowtell. Molecular analysis of exceptional response in high-grade serous ovarian cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Advances in Ovarian Cancer Research; 2019 Sep 13-16, 2019; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2020;26(13_Suppl):Abstract nr IA05.

Abstract Improving risk prediction and prevention strategies through identifying new susceptibility genes for non-high-grade serous ovarian cancer (non-HGS) would represent an important advance in reducing incidence and mortality. Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) has five main histotypes that have distinct pathologies, molecular changes, clinical characteristics, and tissues of origin. They are classified as high-grade serous (HGS), low-grade serous (LGS), clear-cell (CCC), endometrioid (END), and mucinous (MUC). A family history of breast or ovarian cancer is the strongest single risk factor for EOC. Germline mutations in the high-penetrance susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 confer EOC risks of 44% and 17% by age 80, respectively. Only 40% of the excess familial risk is known, suggesting there are many other susceptibility genes yet unidentified. The non-HGS histotypes are poorly studied due to limited sample size within individual studies. Thus, families of cases with non-HGS tumors have few risk prediction options. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) analysis was performed on 251 non-HGS cases (56 LGS, 55 CCC, 117 END, 23 MUC). Cases were screened negative for BRCA1/2 mutations and selected for a family history of ovarian or breast cancer, or young onset (&lt;45 years) of ovarian cancer. WES identified 1,278 genes with rare predicted truncating mutation in at least one case. Predicted truncating mutations in cases were compared to 171,584 controls from the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) and the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). Gene-set enrichment analysis showed enrichment for genes involved in the DNA repair pathway (p=3.08 × 10−7). Twenty-five candidate genes (including 4 DNA repair genes) were selected for validation by targeted sequencing. Five genes important in HGS (BRIP1, FANCM, PALB2, RAD51C, RAD51D) as well as two additional candidates (XRCC2 and XRCC3) were also sequenced. Targeted sequencing was performed on 1,779 cases (669 END, 356 CCC, 327 LGS, 427 MUC) and 1,863 controls from studies in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC). Library preparation and target enrichment was performed using the Fluidigm Juno System and Illumina sequencing was performed on a NovaSeq 6000 Sequencing System. A case-control analysis of predicted truncating variants in the 32 genes was performed. Using a minimum alternate allele frequency of 30%, we identified a higher frequency of mutations in non-HGS cases than controls in ERCC6 (p=0.034) and IL31RA (p=0.034). ERCC6 is involved in DNA repair and IL31RA is a cytokine receptor. Sanger sequencing validation of variants to confirm these results is ongoing. Several other genes showed suggestive higher frequencies of mutations in cases than controls. A larger case control analysis will be performed to confirm those findings. Identifying novel susceptibility genes for non-HGS may have clinical impact by reducing disease-associated mortality through improving risk prediction, identifying prevention strategies, and developing new targeted treatments. Citation Format: Marina Pavanello, Ed Dicks, Honglin Song, Amir Ariff, Adelyn Bolithon, Maria P. Intermaggio, Mark Pinese, Kirsten Moysich, Kunle O. Odunsi, Ellen Goode, David D. Bowtell, Peter Fasching, Jennifer A. Doherty, Francesmary Modugno, Susanne K. Kjær, Penelope M. Webb, Anna Wu, Anna deFazio, Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium, Paul James, Deepak Subramanian, Ian Campbell, Simon A. Gayther, Paul D.P. Pharoah, Susan J. Ramus. Germline mutations in new susceptibility genes for non-high-grade serous ovarian cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Advances in Ovarian Cancer Research; 2019 Sep 13-16, 2019; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2020;26(13_Suppl):Abstract nr B37.

Abstract Background: High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) is the most common and aggressive epithelial ovarian cancer. HGSOC has poor survival, with five-year survival of less than 40%, as it is often diagnosed at a late stage. The median overall survival (OS) is approximately four years. Prognostic gene expression signatures for HGSOC have been inconsistent and have not been translated into clinical practice. The aim of this study was to develop a robust prognostic signature for HGSOC, in order to identify high-risk patients requiring alternative treatments. Methods: A meta-analysis of 1,455 tumors was performed and 200 prognostic genes were selected for expression profiling. An additional 315 candidate genes were selected from the literature, drug-targetable pathways, and other hypotheses. NanoString expression analysis of the 513 genes was performed on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissue from 3,769 women with HGSOC from the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis (OTTA) Consortium. A prognostic model for 5-year survival was developed using regression-based and machine learning methods. The model was trained on 2,702 tumors and evaluated on an independent set of 1,067 tumors. A NanoString expression analysis was performed on 2,692 additional tumors, for a subset of 218 of the genes, including the prognostic signature. Results: Expression of 276 genes was associated with OS (false discovery rate (FDR) &lt; 0.05) in single-gene analyses adjusted for age, stage, and race. The top five genes were TAP1, ZFHX4, CXCL9, FBN1, and PTGER3 (p &lt;&lt; 0.001). A 101-gene prognostic signature was established, where a gain of one standard deviation in the gene expression score conferred a greater than two-fold increase in risk of death (HR (hazard ratio) = 2.35 [2.02, 2.71]; p &lt;&lt; 0.001). Median survival by quintile group was 9.5, 5.4, 3.8, 3.2, and 2.3 years. Sensitivity analyses, applying the signature to specific patient groups, showed that the prognostic power of the signature is not explained by residual disease, treatment, BRCA status, or CD8 score. The prognostic signature was enriched in pathways with treatment implications, such as PI3K, GPCR, and immune. This signature is suitable for use in FFPE tumor material and future cases can be assigned an HR from the gene expression score. The signature was developed in cases that did not receive neoadjuvant treatment (NACT); however, application to NACT cases was assessed in the second NanoString expression analysis. Conclusion: The OTTA-SPOT (Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium – Stratified Prognosis of Ovarian Tumors) gene expression signature may improve risk stratification in clinical trials by identifying patients who are least likely to achieve 5-year survival. Citation Format: Joshua Millstein, Timothy Budden, Ellen L. Goode, Michael S. Anglesio, Aline Talhouk, OTTA consortium, David G. Huntsman, David D. Bowtell, James D. Brenton, Jennifer A. Doherty, Paul P.D. Pharoah, Susan J. Ramus. The Ovarian Tumour Tissue Analysis Consortium: Stratified Prognosis of Ovarian Tumors (OTTA-SPOT) signature for high-grade serous ovarian cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Advances in Ovarian Cancer Research; 2019 Sep 13-16, 2019; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2020;26(13_Suppl):Abstract nr IA12.