Wolff, Antonio C.

PURPOSE Long-term outcomes of patients with stage I human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–positive breast cancer receiving adjuvant trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) remain undefined, and prognostic predictors represent an unmet need. METHODS In the ATEMPT phase II trial, patients with stage I centrally confirmed HER2-positive breast cancer were randomly assigned 3:1 to adjuvant T-DM1 for 1 year or paclitaxel plus trastuzumab (TH). Coprimary objectives were to compare the incidence of clinically relevant toxicities between arms and to evaluate invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) with T-DM1. Correlative analyses included the HER2DX genomic tool, multiomic evaluations of HER2 heterogeneity, and predictors of thrombocytopenia. RESULTS After a median follow-up of 5.8 years, 11 iDFS events were observed in the T-DM1 arm, consistent with a 5-year iDFS of 97.0% (95% CI, 95.2 to 98.7). At 5 years, the recurrence-free interval (RFI) was 98.3% (95% CI, 97.0 to 99.7), the overall survival was 97.8% (95% CI, 96.3 to 99.3), and the breast cancer-specific survival was 99.4% (95% CI, 98.6 to 100). Comparable iDFS was observed with T-DM1 irrespective of tumor size, hormone receptor status, centrally determined HER2 immunohistochemical score, and receipt of T-DM1 for more or less than 6 months. Although ATEMPT was not powered for this end point, the 5-year iDFS in the TH arm was 91.1%. Among patients with sufficient tissue for HER2DX testing (n = 187), 5-year outcomes significantly differed according to HER2DX risk score, with better RFI (98.1% v 81.8%, hazard ratio [HR], 0.10, P = .01) and iDFS (96.3% v 81.8%, HR, 0.20, P = .047) among patients with HER2DX low-risk versus high-risk tumors, respectively. CONCLUSION Adjuvant T-DM1 for 1 year leads to outstanding long-term outcomes for patients with stage I HER2-positive breast cancer. A high HER2DX risk score predicted a higher risk of recurrence in ATEMPT.

TPS614 Background: Strategies to optimize treatment decision-making in early stage HER2-positive breast cancer are a priority. Recent studies suggest that early metabolic changes on FDG-PET/CT predict response to HER2-directed therapy. The TBCRC026 trial showed that participants not obtaining a 40% reduction in SULmax by cycle 1 day 15 (C1D15) following neoadjuvant trastuzumab/pertuzumab (HP) were unlikely to obtain pCR [negative predictive value (NPV) 91%]. This trial aims to validate FDG-PET/CT as a neoadjuvant interim (niFDG-PET/CT) imaging integral biomarker in patients treated with standard HER2-directed regimens (NCT05710328). Methods: Trial design: EA1211/DIRECT is a multicenter, single-arm, primary imaging phase 2 study enrolling patients with stage II/III HER2-positive breast cancer. Patients undergo standard skull base-thigh FDG-PET/CT at baseline and C1D15 and receive standard of care pertuzumab-based neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery. Eligibility: Age ≥18 years, ECOG performance status 0-2, stage IIa-IIIc, untreated HER2-positive breast cancer with known hormone receptor status, suitable to undergo FDG-PET/CT imaging and neoadjuvant therapy. Statistical methods: ΔSULmaxD15 will be computed as: (D15 SULmax – baseline SULmax)/baseline SULmax. The primary objective is to estimate the NPV of niFDG-PET/CT for pCR using ΔSULmaxD15 of the primary breast cancer at a threshold of 40%. NPV is defined as the probability that pCR will not be achieved by participants with ΔSULmaxD15 <40%. Secondary endpoints include evaluating sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of ΔSULmaxD15 of the primary breast cancer at a threshold of 40% and ability of the niFDG-PET/CT biomarker to predict 3-year event free survival (EFS). Sample size: We expect that 50% of patients will not reach the ΔSULmax threshold of 40% and a pCR rate of 40-60%. The proposed sample size is 210 participants, adjusted to 235 to account for missing data in 10% of cases. Computation of exact, two-sided 95% confidence intervals (CI) for NPV determined the lower limit of the CI is at least 80% when the true NPV is at least 88%. The lower limit is 84% when the true NPV has the value of 91%, which was estimated in the TBCRC026 study. Current status: EA1211/DIRECT was activated in May 2023 across the NCI National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN) and is anticipated to complete in March 2025. Those interested in the clinical trial can email ea1211team@ecog-acrin.org. The EA1211/DIRECT trial is the first step in implementing a Response-Guided Treatment Strategy by validating the ΔSULmax threshold of 40% as the optimum cut point across standard of care HER2-directed neoadjuvant regimens. If EA1211/DIRECT meets its objectives, the results will be used to design clinical utility studies, thus hoping to change practice. Clinical trial information: NCT05710328 .

TPS632 Background: Male breast cancer is a rare disease, and most cases are hormone receptor-positive (HR+). Due to a lack of clinical trials, male breast cancer has historically been treated based on data extrapolated from women. However, there are substantial knowledge gaps in the comparative efficacy, safety, and patient-reported outcomes of endocrine therapies for male breast cancer. While tamoxifen is the current standard of care, additional data are warranted for aromatase inhibitors (AI), gonadal suppression, and cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors. Methods: This is an open-label, multicenter, randomized, phase II trial designed to evaluate different endocrine therapies in men with HR+ and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer. A total of 60 men will be enrolled across nine (9) sites within the Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium (TBCRC). Key eligibility criteria include male sex and stage I, II, or III HR+/HER2- breast cancer before surgical resection of the primary tumor and axillary nodes. Key exclusion criteria include prior anti-cancer therapy for the current breast cancer or any other malignancy within the past 12 months, and inflammatory breast cancer. The trial has two phases. The first phase is a window of opportunity component in which newly diagnosed men are randomized 1:1:1 to either tamoxifen (Arm A), anastrozole (Arm B), or anastrozole plus degarelix (Arm C) given for three weeks. The primary endpoint for the window phase is Ki-67 reduction from the baseline diagnostic biopsy to the research biopsy at the end of the window phase. The second phase consists of neoadjuvant treatment, in which the tamoxifen group is randomized 1:1 to tamoxifen (Arm D) versus tamoxifen plus abemaciclib (Arm E), and the anastrozole alone (Arm B) and anastrozole plus degarelix (Arm C) groups are merged and then randomized 1:1 to anastrozole plus degarelix (Arm F) versus anastrozole plus degarelix plus abemaciclib (Arm G). The duration of the neoadjuvant phase is four (4) months, and the primary endpoint of this phase is residual cancer burden (RCB) index at time of surgery. The trial is powered for the RCB endpoint in a 2 x 2 factorial design to detect a 0.6 unit decrease in RCB index with 80% power and alpha=10%. For the Ki-67 endpoint, we assume an approximately 50% reduction in Arms A and B; Arm C will be of interest if it leads to ≥80% reduction in Ki-67. Secondary endpoints include: estradiol and testosterone levels at baseline, end of window, and during neoadjuvant phase; preoperative endocrine prognostic index (PEPI) score at surgery; adverse events; and patient-reported outcomes (including quality of life). Tumor tissue will be collected for correlative analyses. The study opened to enrollment at Dana-Farber in October 2023, and additional sites will open in 2024. Clinical trial information: NCT05501704 .

530 Background: Robust biomarkers are needed to personalize treatment in early stage HER2-positive breast cancer. The TBCRC026 trial (n=83) demonstrated that early metabolic changes on FDG-PET/CT [>40% decline in SULmax at day 15 post treatment initiation (C1D15); C1D15 SULmax] were associated with response to neoadjuvant trastuzumab/pertuzumab (HP), without chemotherapy, in an ER-negative, HER2-positive cohort (NCT01937117). We investigated the association of RNA sequencing (RNAseq)-based gene expression signatures (GES) at baseline and on-treatment (C1D15), with early metabolic change on PET/CT and clinical outcomes. Methods: RNAseq (664 GES) was performed on baseline (n=56) and C1D15 (n=31) tumor biopsies (25 paired samples available). Association with pCR following HP (secondary), PET/CT parameters and survival (exploratory) was studied. Gene expression changes between baseline and C1D15 samples were tested by Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Association between GES and PET/CT parameters and GES with pCR were evaluated using logistic regression models. Cox regressions were performed to study the association between PET/CT SULmax at C1D15 and a B cell signature and relapse-free survival (RFS). The likelihood ratio test was used to compare the prognostic ability of two nested Cox models. Results: Both RNAseq and clinical outcomes were available in 53/83 patients. HER2-enriched (HER2-E) intrinsic subtype comprised 71% (40/56) of cases at baseline and 61% (19/31) at D15; basal subtype for 27% (15/56) and 39% (12/31), respectively. pCR rate was 19% (10/53) with all but one exhibiting HER2-E subtype. One basal-like sample underwent pCR, with downregulation of HER2 amplicon and IgG signatures slightly more prominent. Gene expression changes from baseline to C1D15 were analyzed; ERBB2was downregulated after HP (p = 0.007), B cell signatures, CD4, CD8, natural killer cells and Treg cells were significantly upregulated at C1D15. GES associated with 40% decline in SULmax at C1D15 included ERBB2 amplicon genes ( ERBB2, GRB7) and correlation to the HER2-E subtype, whereas basal-like signatures were significantly associated with lack of response on PET at C1D15. Univariate logistic regression analysis suggested that FOS-JUN, fibroblast and B cell GES at baseline were significantly associated with pCR (p=<0.05). Finally, the addition of a B cell signature improved the prognostic value of C1D15 SULmax on PET/CT for RFS (p < 0.05). Conclusions: In this unique cohort with ER-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant HP without chemotherapy, HER2-E tumors and those with increased immune signaling were more likely to respond to HER2-directed therapy. Combining C1D15 SULmax on PET/CT and a B cell signature provided improved prognostic information and should be further explored as candidate biomarkers in this setting. Clinical trial information: NCT01937117 .

Abstract BACKGROUND: Anti-HER2 therapies have transformed the trajectory for patients with HER2-positive (HER2+) MBC. A subset of patients with HER2+ MBC do exceptionally well and remain on maintenance anti-HER2 therapy for many years. However, current therapy is non-curative and patients are treated indefinitely. While these therapies often are well-tolerated, they may cause significant toxicities, are expensive, and typically require frequent infusion and provider visits. Case reports and retrospective series demonstrate that some patients may do well after stopping anti-HER2 treatment. We currently lack prospective data on the likelihood of clinical impact of successful treatment discontinuation, outcomes among patients who progress and restart HER2-directed therapy, and tools to predict who may safely stop therapy. In this study, we will enroll pts with an exceptional response to anti-HER2 therapy. Pts may elect to either continue or stop anti-HER2 therapy and will be followed clinically and radiographically on a protocol-specified schedule. Considering the central role of patients in choosing the study intervention arm, and the unique nature of stopping therapy as a treatment intervention, patient advocates have been deeply involved in the study design to ensure patient concerns are being heard and addressed. We will retrospectively assess minimal residual disease (MRD), measured in plasma, as a biomarker of ongoing response, in a step toward shifting the treatment paradigm for pts with HER2+ MBC. METHODS: STOP-HER2 is a prospective, non-randomized, phase II, multicenter study of either continuation (cohort 1) or cessation (cohort 2) of anti-HER2 therapy in exceptional responders with HER2+ MBC. Eligible patients must have biopsy-proven HER2+ MBC by ASCO/CAP guidelines and must have been receiving first-line anti-HER2 therapy for MBC for at least 3 years without evidence of progressive disease (PD) as determined by the treating investigator. Patients with prior brain-only PD or oligo-PD outside the brain are eligible at least 2 years after local treatment to the central nervous system (CNS) and in absence of subsequent PD. Up to fifty-two participants will be enrolled into cohort 2, and an additional thirty participants enrolled into the cohort 1, at 10 US sites within the Translational Breast Cancer Research Consortium. Co-primary endpoints are the 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) in cohorts 2 and 1, separately. Secondary endpoints include the clinical benefit rate upon re-initiation of anti-HER2 therapy for patients in cohort 2 experiencing PD after treatment discontinuation; and 3-year overall survival in both cohorts. Correlative endpoints include MRD status at baseline and the correlation between MRD dynamics and outcomes. Patient-reported outcomes will be collected and analyzed, including quality of life, illness intrusiveness, financial toxicity, anxiety, and decision regret. The study will use a two-stage design to assess the primary objective of estimating the rate of participants who are free of progression at one year after discontinuing anti-HER2 therapy. If 50% or less are free of progression at one year, stopping HER2 therapy would not be considered a viable treatment plan (null hypothesis). The study is designed to have 80% power to reject the null hypothesis at the 10% type I error rate when 68% of exceptional responders are free of progression at one year after stopping HER2 therapy. STOP-HER2 began enrollment in Q2 2023 (NCT05721248). Citation Format: Heather Parsons, Kathryn Ruddy, Stefania Morganti, Karen Smith, Victoria Attaya, Eliza Kallfelz, Michelle DeMeo, Jamie LaScala, Shirley Mertz, Teri Pollastro, Patricia Spears, Adam Brufsky, Chau Dang, Susan Dent, Ahmed Elkhanany, WIlliam Gwin, Ciara O'Sullivan, Kathy Miller, Sara Nunnery, Elaine Walsh, Anna Maria Storniolo, Sara Tolaney, Nabihah Tayob, Antonio Wolff, Eric Winer, Mothaffar Rimawi, Ian Krop, Nancy Lin. The STOP-HER2 Trial: A Phase 2 Study of Stopping Trastuzumab - Outcomes in Patients with HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer (TBCRC 062) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-20-01.

Abstract Introduction: Analyses of multiple clinical trials have suggested racial and ethnic disparities in outcomes for early-stage, hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative (HR+HER2-) breast cancer, however, none of these studies examined the use of adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitors. The objective of this study was to explore racial and ethnic differences in toxicity, treatment duration, and disease outcomes in patients (pts) with early-stage HR+HER2- breast cancer treated with or without adjuvant palbociclib on the PALLAS trial. Methods: The PALLAS phase III, global, open-label trial randomized 5,796 pts with stage II-III HR+HER2- breast cancer to 2 years of palbociclib plus ongoing provider/patient choice adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET+palbo) vs. ET alone (ET). The analytic cohort was limited to pts enrolled in North America with known self-reported race and ethnicity (Non-Hispanic White, Non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, Asian or Pacific Islander). Descriptive statistics were used to examine treatment characteristics, early discontinuation, and toxicity by race and ethnicity. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate 3-year locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) stratified by racial and ethnic group. Cox proportional hazards models were used identify predictors of LRFS and IDFS. Results: 2,547 North American pts were randomized and included in the intent-to-treat population with a median follow-up of 59.8 months; 1,996 (78.4%) identified as Non-Hispanic White (NHW), 132 (5.2%) Non-Hispanic Black (NHB), 156 (6.1%) Hispanic, and 134 (5.3%) Asian or Pacific Islander (API). Stage, performance status, type of surgery, and prior radiation were similar across racial and ethnic groups. Age, body mass index, grade, and prior chemotherapy differed by race and ethnicity (p&lt; 0.05). Median age was lowest in API pts and highest in NHW pts (47.5 vs 53.0 years, respectively). Median body mass index was lowest in API and highest in NHB pts (24.4 vs 30.9). NHB pts were most likely to have high-grade disease (40.9% vs 26.9-30.5% in other groups). NHW pts were least likely to have received prior chemotherapy (81.0% vs 87.1-91.0%). Palbociclib early discontinuation was lowest in NHB pts (50.7%) and highest in Hispanic pts (65.9%), p=0.14. ET early discontinuation was similar across all groups (p=0.35). Palbociclib grade 3-4 overall toxicity was variable across groups (NHW 71.6%, NHB 79.1%, Hispanic 69.5%, API 85.2%), but this variation did not reach statistical significance (p=0.07). Neutropenia was highest in API pts (90.0% vs 57.3% in NHW, 58.2% in NHB, and 51.2% in Hispanic pts, p&lt; 0.01). Overall 3-year LRFS was 98% (95% CI 97-98%) and IDFS was 89% (95% CI 88-90%). LRFS and IDFS were statistically similar by race and ethnicity and within each study arm (Table). No differences in LRFS or IDFS were seen by race or ethnicity in adjusted models (p=0.95). Conclusions: In this clinical trial population of HR+HER2- breast cancer patients exposed to similar treatments, no racial/ethnic differences were seen in short-term LRFS or IDFS across study arms. Differences in palbociclib toxicity by racial and ethnic group, particularly neutropenia, were seen with the highest toxicity in API patients; however, this difference did not translate into early discontinuation of palbociclib or ET. Table: 3-year Kaplan-Meier Survival Outcomes Stratified by Race and Ethnicity Citation Format: Olga Kantor, Oluwadamilola (Lola) Fayanju, Amylou Dueck, Michael Gnant, Harold Burstein, Matthew Goetz, Claudine Isaacs, Lois Shepherd, Olwen Hahn, Daniel Anderson, Kathy Miller, Hope Rugo, Tiffany Traina, Zoneddy Dayao, Katherine Clifton, Eric Winer, Antonio Wolff, Norman Wolmark, Dongrui Lu, Patrick O'Brien, Sara Scovil, Angela DeMichele, Erica Mayer. Racial and Ethnic Differences in Clinical Outcomes among North American Patients with Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-negative, Early Breast Cancer in the PALLAS Trial (AFT-05) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO3-02-05.

Abstract Background: Strategies to optimize treatment decision-making in early stage HER2-positive breast cancer are a current priority for the oncology and patient advocacy community. Recent studies suggest that early metabolic changes on FDG-PET/CT (imaging biomarker) predict response to HER2-directed therapy. The TBCRC026 trial showed that participants not obtaining a 40% reduction in SULmax by cycle 1 day 15 (C1D15) following neoadjuvant trastuzumab/pertuzumab (HP) were unlikely to obtain pCR [negative predictive value (NPV) 91%]. The ECOG-ACRIN EA1211/DIRECT trial aims to validate FDG-PET/CT as a neoadjuvant interim (niFDG-PET/CT) imaging integral biomarker in patients treated with standard HER2-directed regimens (NCT05710328). Design: EA1211/DIRECT is a multicenter, single-arm, primary imaging phase 2 study enrolling patients with stage II/III HER2-positive breast cancer. Patients undergo standard skull base-thigh FDG-PET/CT at baseline and C1D15 and receive standard of care pertuzumab-based neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery. Eligibility: Age ≥18 years, ECOG performance status 0-2, stage IIa-IIIc, untreated HER2-positive breast cancer with known hormone receptor status, suitable to undergo FDG-PET/CT imaging and neoadjuvant therapy. Methods: ΔSULmaxD15 will be computed as: (D15 SULmax – baseline SULmax)/baseline SULmax. The primary objective is to estimate the NPV of niFDG-PET/CT for pCR using ΔSULmaxD15 of the primary breast cancer at a threshold of 40%, in patients treated with neoadjuvant HER2-directed therapy. NPV is defined as the probability that pCR will not be achieved by participants with ΔSULmaxD15 &lt; 40%. Secondary endpoints include evaluating the sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of ΔSULmaxD15 of the primary breast cancer at a threshold of 40% and the ability of the niFDG-PET/CT biomarker to predict 3-year event free survival (EFS). Sample Size: We expect that 50% of patients will not reach the ΔSULmax threshold of 40% and a pCR rate of 40-60%. The proposed sample size is 210 participants, adjusted to 235 to account for missing data in 10% of cases. Computation of exact, two-sided 95% confidence intervals (CI) for NPV determined the lower limit of the CI is at least 80% when the true NPV is at least 88%. The lower limit is 84% when the true NPV has the value of 91%, which was estimated in the TBCRC026 study. Current Status: EA1211/DIRECT was activated in May 2023 across the NCI National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN), and accrual is anticipated to complete in March 2025. Those interested in the clinical trial can email ea1211team@ecog-acrin.org. Conclusion: The EA1211/DIRECT trial is the first step in implementing a Response-Guided Treatment Strategy by validating the ΔSULmax threshold of 40% as the optimum cut point across standard of care HER2-directed neoadjuvant regimens. If EA1211/DIRECT meets its objectives, the results will be used to design clinical utility studies, and thus hoping to change practice. Citation Format: Heather Jacene, Constantine Gatsonis, Roisin Connolly, Brian Burnette, Erica Stringer-Reasor, Maeve Hennessy, Justin Romanoff, Alexander Taurone, Ciara O'Sullivan, H. T. Carisa Le-Petross, Courtney Lawhn Heath, Vered Stearns, Amy Fowler, Shou-Ching Tang, Karla A Sepulveda, Angela DeMichele, David Mankoff, Antonio Wolff. ECOG-ACRIN EA1211: Interim FDG-PET/CT for predicting response of HER2-positive breast cancer to neoadjuvant therapy (DIRECT Trial) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-01-01.

Abstract Background In 2008, bevacizumab received accelerated Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for use in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Based on the preclinical and preliminary clinical activity of the trastuzumab and bevacizumab combination, ECOG-ACRIN E1105 trial was developed to determine if the addition of bevacizumab to a chemotherapy and trastuzumab combination for first-line therapy would improve progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with HER2-positive MBC. Findings: 96 patients were randomized to receive standard first-line chemotherapy and trastuzumab with or without bevacizumab between November 2007 and October 2009, and 93 began protocol therapy. Induction therapy was given for 24 weeks, followed by maintenance trastuzumab with or without bevacizumab. 60% (56/93) began carboplatin and 74% (69/93) completed 6 cycles of induction therapy. Primary endpoint was PFS. Median PFS was 11.1 and 13.8 months for placebo and bevacizumab arms, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 95%, Confidence Interval [Cl] for bevacizumab vs. placebo: 0.73 [0.43–1.23], p = 0.24), and at a median follow-up of 70.7 months, median survival was 49.1 and 63 months (HR [95% Cl] for OS: 1.09 [0.61–1.97], p = 0.75). The most common toxicities across both arms were neutropenia and hypertension, with left ventricular systolic dysfunction, fatigue, and sensory neuropathy reported more frequently with bevacizumab. Conclusions In this trial, the addition of bevacizumab did not improve outcomes in patients with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer. Although the trial was underpowered due to smaller than anticipated sample size, these findings corroborated other clinical trials during this time.

AbstractBackgroundBreast cancer patients experienced heightened anxiety during the pandemic. Also, modifications to clinical trial activities allowing for virtual platforms, local assessments, and greater flexibility were introduced to facilitate participation. We sought to evaluate the association between pandemic‐related anxiety and willingness to participate in trials and how pandemic‐era modifications to trial activities affect the decision to participate.MethodsWe conducted an online survey from August to September, 2021 of patients with breast cancer assessing pandemic‐related anxiety; clinical trials knowledge and attitudes; willingness to participate during and before the pandemic; and how each modification affects the decision to participate. Fisher's exact tests evaluated differences in proportions and two‐sample t‐tests evaluated differences in means. The association of pandemic‐related anxiety with a decline in willingness to participate during compared to prior to the pandemic was modeled using logistic regression.ResultsAmong 385 respondents who completed the survey, 81% reported moderate–severe pandemic‐related anxiety. Mean willingness to participate in a trial was lower during the pandemic than prior [2.97 (SD 1.17) vs. 3.10 (SD 1.09), (p < 0.001)]. Severe anxiety was associated with higher odds of diminished willingness to participate during the pandemic compared to prior (OR 5.07). Each of the modifications, with the exception of opting out of research‐only blood tests, were endorsed by >50% of respondents as strategies that would increase their likelihood of deciding to participate.ConclusionsWhile pandemic‐related anxiety was associated with diminished willingness to participate in trials, the leading reasons for reluctance to consider trial participation were unrelated to the pandemic but included worries about not getting the best treatment, side effects, and delaying care. Patients view trial modifications favorably, supporting continuation of these modifications, as endorsed by the National Cancer Institute and others.

AbstractBackgroundPatient‐reported outcomes (PROs) are a better tool for evaluating the experiences of patients who have symptomatic, treatment‐associated adverse events (AEs) compared with clinician‐rated AEs. The authors present PROs assessing health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) and treatment‐related neurotoxicity for adjuvant capecitabine versus platinum on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group‐American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ECOG‐ACRIN) EA1131 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02445391).MethodsParticipants completed the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Breast Cancer Symptom Index (NFBSI‐16) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Gynecologic Oncology Group neurotoxicity subscale (platinum arm only) at baseline, cycle 3 day 1 (C3D1), 6 months, and 15 months. Because of early termination, power was insufficient to test the hypothesis that HRQoL, as assessed by the NFBSI‐16 treatment side‐effect (TSE) subscale, would be better at 6 and 15 months in the capecitabine arm; all analyses were exploratory. Means were compared by using t‐tests or the Wilcoxon rank‐sum test, and proportions were compared by using the χ2 test.ResultsTwo hundred ninety‐six of 330 eligible patients provided PROs. The mean NFBSI‐16 TSE subscale score was lower for the platinum arm at baseline (p = .02; absolute difference, 0.6 points) and for the capecitabine arm at C3D1 (p = .04; absolute difference, 0.5 points), but it did not differ at other times. The mean change in TSE subscale scores differed between the arms from baseline to C3D1 (platinum arm, 0.15; capecitabine arm, −0.72; p = .03), but not from baseline to later time points. The mean decline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Gynecologic Oncology Group neurotoxicity subscale scores exceeded the minimal meaningful change (1.38 points) from baseline to each subsequent time point (all p < .05).ConclusionsDespite the similar frequency of clinician‐rated AEs, PROs identified greater on‐treatment symptom burden with capecitabine and complemented clinician‐rated AEs by characterizing patients’ experiences during chemotherapy.