Back to Authors

Rodríguez‐Otero, Paula

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5236-7785

A5080959881 | I4210112085

Mayo Clinic

Navarre Institute of Health Research

Citations 41

Impact of treatment effect on MRD and PFS: an aggregate data analysis from randomized clinical trials in multiple myeloma

Blood Advances | August 28, 2023 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 219-223

10.1182/bloodadvances.2023010821 | PMID 37639322

P905: PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES IN TRIPLE CLASS EXPOSED, RELAPSED/REFRACTORY MULTIPLE MYELOMA (TCE RRMM) PATIENTS IN KARMMA 3 TRIAL (PHASE 3 RCT): IDECABTAGENE VICLEUCEL (IDE-CEL) VERSUS STANDARD REGIMENS

HemaSphere | August 22, 2023 | Volume: 7 | Issue: S3 | Pages: e031009e

10.1097/01.hs9.0000970524.03100.9e

P866: IDECABTAGENE VICLEUCEL (IDE-CEL) VS STANDARD REGIMENS IN PATIENTS WITH TRIPLE-CLASS–EXPOSED (TCE) RELAPSED AND REFRACTORY MULTIPLE MYELOMA (RRMM): KARMMA-3 SUBGROUP ANALYSIS BY PRIOR LINES OF THERAPY

HemaSphere | August 9, 2023 | Volume: 7 | Issue: S3 | Pages: e3385948

10.1097/01.hs9.0000970368.33859.48

P951: IMPACT OF MEASURABLE RESIDUAL DISEASE (MRD) DIFFERENCES ON PROGRESSION-FREE SURVIVAL (PFS): AN AGGREGATE DATA ANALYSIS FROM RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIALS IN MULTIPLE MYELOMA (MM)

HemaSphere | August 8, 2023 | Volume: 7 | Issue: S3 | Pages: e04566c4

10.1097/01.hs9.0000970708.04566.c4

S195: IDECABTAGENE VICLEUCEL (IDE-CEL) VS STANDARD REGIMENS IN PATIENTS WITH TRIPLE-CLASS–EXPOSED (TCE) RELAPSED AND REFRACTORY MULTIPLE MYELOMA (RRMM): A KARMMA-3 ANALYSIS IN HIGH-RISK SUBGROUPS

HemaSphere | August 8, 2023 | Volume: 7 | Issue: S3 | Pages: e369897b

10.1097/01.hs9.0000967692.36989.7b

Health related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with triple-class-exposed relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (TCE RRMM) treated with idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) versus standard regimens: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from KarMMa-3 phase 3 rand

Journal of Clinical Oncology | June 4, 2023 | Volume: 41 | Issue: 16_suppl | Pages: 8032-8032

10.1200/jco.2023.41.16_suppl.8032

8032 Background: Patients (pts) with TCE RRMM have few treatment (Tx) options and poor HRQoL. Ide-cel, the first in class CAR T cell Tx for pts with TCE RRMM, improved PFS versus standard (std) regimens in the KarMMa-3 trial. We report the PRO results comparing the Tx arms. PROs provide further understanding of Tx benefit of ide-cel from the pts’ perspective. Methods: KarMMa-3 (NCT03651128) is an open-label phase 3 RCT comparing the efficacy and safety of ide-cel with std regimens in pts with TCE RRMM, who had received 2–4 prior regimens. In addition to clinical endpoints, we evaluated the impact of ide-cel compared with std regimens on the changes in HRQoL, measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-MY20, and the EQ-5D-5L questionnaires. PROs were collected at baseline (screening), day of infusion and monthly from 2–24 months (mo) and thereafter every 3 mo. This interim analysis reports PROs through 20 mo. Comparisons were performed on least squares mean (LSM) changes from baseline over time between arms using constrained longitudinal data analysis (cLDA). Results: In total, 386 pts were randomized (ide-cel, 254; std regimens, 132). PRO compliance was high over time ( > 80%). At baseline, PROs were similar between arms. LSM changes from baseline to 20 mo showed significant differences ( P < 0.05), with effect sizes of 0.3–0.7, in favor of ide-cel for most domains, including global health status/QoL, cognitive functioning, fatigue, and pain (EORTC QLQ-C30); side effects of Tx (EORTC QLQ-MY20); and the EQ-5D-5L VAS. The difference in overall LSM change reached or exceeded the pre-specified between-groups minimal importance difference (MID) for improvement in most domains in favor of ide-cel (Table). Conclusions: Ide-cel showed statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in HRQoL, including key MM symptoms and functioning, for pts with TCE RRMM compared with std regimens. The PRO data for ide-cel expands upon the clinical outcomes observed in the KarMMa-3 trial. Clinical trial information: NCT03651128 . [Table: see text]
B08 IDECABTAGENE VICLEUCEL VERSUS STANDARD REGIMENS IN PATIENTS WITH TRIPLE-CLASS–EXPOSED RELAPSED AND REFRACTORY MULTIPLE MYELOMA: KARMMA-3 A PHASE 3 RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

HemaSphere | May 10, 2023 | Volume: 7 | Issue: S2 | Pages: 7-8

10.1097/01.hs9.0000936124.56965.24

Ide-cel or Standard Regimens in Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma

New England Journal of Medicine | February 10, 2023 | Volume: 388 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 1002-1014

10.1056/nejmoa2213614 | PMID 36762851

Enduring Responses after 1-Year, Fixed-Duration Cevostamab Therapy in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Early Experience from a Phase I Study

Blood | November 29, 2022 | Volume: 140 | Issue: Supplement 1 | Pages: 4415-4417

10.1182/blood-2022-157547

Trial in Progress: REGN5458, a BCMAxCD3 Bispecific Antibody, in a Phase Ib Multi-Cohort Study of Combination Regimens for Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood | November 29, 2022 | Volume: 140 | Issue: Supplement 1 | Pages: 4444-4446

10.1182/blood-2022-157713