Lenz, Heinz‐Josef

Abstract Background Little is known about how complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is discussed in cancer care across varied settings in the U.S. Methods In two practices affiliated with one academic medical center in southern California (SoCal), and one in the upper Midwest (UM), we audio-recorded patient-clinician interactions in medical oncology outpatient practices. We counted the frequency and duration of CAM-related conversations. We coded recordings using the Roter Interaction Analysis System. We used chi-square tests for bivariate analysis of categorical variables and generalized linear models for continuous variables to examine associations between dialogue characteristics, practice setting, and population characteristics with the occurrence of CAM discussion in each setting followed by multivariate models adjusting for clinician clustering. Results Sixty-one clinicians and 529 patients participated. Sixty-two of 529 (12%) interactions included CAM discussions, with significantly more observed in the SoCal university practice than in the other settings. Visits that included CAM were on average 6 minutes longer, with CAM content lasting an average of 78 seconds. In bivariate tests of association, conversations containing CAM included more psychosocial statements from both clinicians and patients, higher patient-centeredness, more positive patient and clinician affect, and greater patient engagement. In a multivariable model including significant bivariate terms, conversations containing CAM were independently associated with higher patient-centeredness, slightly longer visits, and being at the SoCal university site. Conclusion The frequency of CAM-related discussion in oncology varied substantially across sites. Visits that included CAM discussion were longer and more patient centered. Implications for Practice The Institute of Medicine and the American Society of Clinical Oncology have called for more open discussions of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). But little is known about the role population characteristics and care contexts may play in the frequency and nature of those discussions. The present data characterizing actual conversations in practice complements a much larger literature based on patient and clinician self-report about CAM disclosure and use. It was found that CAM discussions in academic oncology visits varied significantly by practice context, that the majority were initiated by the patient, and that they may occur more when visit time exists for lifestyle, self-care, and psychosocial concerns.

PURPOSETo determine the predictive and prognostic value of the consensus molecular subtypes (CMSs) of colorectal cancer (CRC) that represent a merging of gene expression–based features largely in primary tumors from six independent classification systems and provide a framework for capturing the intrinsic heterogeneity of CRC in patients enrolled in CALGB/SWOG 80405.PATIENTS AND METHODSCALGB/SWOG 80405 is a phase III trial that compared the addition of bevacizumab or cetuximab to infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin or fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan as first-line treatment of advanced CRC. We characterized the CMS classification using a novel NanoString gene expression panel on primary CRCs from 581 patients enrolled in this study to assess the prognostic and predictive value of CMSs in these patients.RESULTSThe CMSs are highly prognostic for overall survival (OS; P < .001) and progression-free survival (PFS; P < .001). Furthermore, CMSs were predictive for both OS ( P for interaction < .001) and PFS ( P for interaction = .0032). In the CMS1 cohort, patients treated with bevacizumab had a significantly longer OS than those treated with cetuximab ( P < .001). In the CMS2 cohort, patients treated with cetuximab had a significantly longer OS than patients treated with bevacizumab ( P = .0046).CONCLUSIONThese findings highlight the possible clinical utility of CMSs and suggests that refinement of the CMS classification may provide a path toward identifying patients with metastatic CRC who are most likely to benefit from specific targeted therapy as part of the initial treatment.

PURPOSE CALGB/SWOG 80405 was a randomized phase III trial that found no statistically significant difference in overall survival (OS) in patients with first-line metastatic colorectal cancer treated with chemotherapy plus either bevacizumab or cetuximab. Primary tumor DNA from 843 patients has been used to discover genetic markers of OS. PATIENTS AND METHODS Gene mutations were determined by polymerase chain reaction. Microsatellite status was determined by genotyping of microsatellites. Tumor mutational burden (TMB) was determined by next-generation sequencing. Cox proportional hazard models were used, with adjusting factors. Interaction of molecular alterations with either the bevacizumab or the cetuximab arms was tested. RESULTS Patients with high TMB in their tumors had longer OS than did patients with low TMB (hazard ratio [HR], 0.73 [95% CI, 0.57 to 0.95]; P = .02). In patients with microsatellite instability–high (MSI-H) tumors, longer OS was observed in the bevacizumab arm than in the cetuximab arm (HR, 0.13 [95% CI, 0.06 to 0.30]; interaction P < .001 for interaction between microsatellite status and the two arms). Patients with BRAF mutant tumors had shorter OS than did patients with wild-type (WT) tumors (HR, 2.01 [95% CI, 1.49 to 2.71]; P < .001). Patients with extended RAS mutant tumors had shorter OS than did patients with WT tumors (HR, 1.52 [95% CI, 1.26 to 1.84]; P < .001). Patients with triple-negative tumors (WT for NRAS/ KRAS/ BRAF) had a median OS of 35.9 months (95% CI, 33.0 to 38.8 months) versus 22.2 months (95% CI, 19.6 to 24.4 months ) in patients with at least one mutated gene in their tumors ( P < .001). CONCLUSION In patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated in first line, low TMB, and BRAF and RAS mutations are negative prognostic factors. Patients with MSI-H tumors benefited more from bevacizumab than from cetuximab, and studies to confirm this effect of MSI-H are warranted.

606 Background: Between 3-5% of CRC patients have BRCA1/2 pathogenic mutations. This study aims to identify associations between BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations and clinical characteristics in CRC. Methods: A total of 6396 CRC tumor samples were tested with Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) on a 592-gene panel, pathogenic or presumed pathogenic variants were counted as mutations (mt). Microsatellite instability (MSI) and tumor mutational burden (TMB) were tested by NGS. Statistical correlations were investigated using ANOVA, Chi-square and t-test. Results: Among tumors sampled, 53% derived from male patients and median age was 60 years. BRCA1 mt were detected in 1.1% (n = 72) of tumors, while BRCA2 in 2.8% (n = 179). BRCA1 mt were more frequent in women (W;65%) than men (M;35%) (p = 0.0019) while no relationship with sex was seen for BRCA2 mt (42% F vs. 58% M). No significant associations with age were noticed. Majority of pathogenic mt in BRCA1 (52%; n = 34) and BRCA2 (62%; n = 103) occurred in MSI-High (MSI-H) cases. MSI-H pts had more frameshift mt in both BRCA1/2 than MSS pts. MSS cases had lower rates of BRCA1 and 2 pathogenic mt (44% and 37%, respectively). Right-sided tumors were significantly associated with BRCA1 (p = 0.0056) and BRCA2 (p < 0.0001) mt in MSI-H cases only. BRCA1/2 mt were associated with higher TMB in all CRCs, including MSI-H and MSS cases (p < 0.001). POLE mt (n = 31) were associated with higher BRCA1/2 mt rates (9.6%, 55% respectively). Among MSS cases with POLE wild-type status, BRCA1 (p = 0.0269) and BRCA2 (p = 0.0151) mt were associated with high TMB and combining both BRCA1/2 mutations led to an even higher TMB (3.6%; p = 0.001). Conclusions: This is the first study to show that BRCA1/2 mutations are more frequent in MSI-H, and independently associated with higher TMB, pathogenic POLE mutations, and right-sided tumors in MSI-H CRCs. Given their relationship with TMB, the presence of BRCA1/2 mutations may be potential predictive biomarkers for checkpoint or PARP inhibitors in CRC, a finding that should be prospectively evaluated.

60 Background: DDR mutations are associated with higher neoantigen load and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, and are a potential biomarker for immunotherapy. We investigated the association of DDR mutations in gastric (GC), esophageal (EC), and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancers with MSI, PD-L1, and TMB, known predictors for immune checkpoint inhibitors. Methods: 20 DDR mutations were tested by Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) with a 592-gene panel on a total of 1935 (709 EC; 831 GC; 355 GEJ) cancers. TMB was assessed by NGS, MSI by NGS or fragment analysis, and PD-L1 by IHC (22c3 for CPS or SP142). Results: GC had the highest DDR mutation rate compared to EC and GEJ (27% vs. 20%, p = 0.0005 and 17%, p = 0.0002, respectively). MSI-High (MSI-H) was significantly more common in the DDR mutated cohort (DDR-M) compared to non-mutated cancers (18% vs. 1%; p < 0.0001). TMB-High (≥ 10 mutations/megabase [mt/MB]) was higher in DDR-M (35% vs. 21%; p < 0.0001); in DDR-M cohort, GC had the highest TMB compared to DDR-M EC and GEJ (mean: 13.8 vs. 9.4 vs. 10 mt/MB, respectively; p < 0.0001). DDR mutations were more frequent in the PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 50 group than CPS 0 (42.9% vs. 24%; p = 0.037) and CPS 1-9 (42.9% vs. 20.6%; p = 0.005). ARID1A, ATRX, BRCA2, and PTEN were the most prevalent DDR mutations in MSI-H (87%, 31%, 25%, 24%, respectively); ARID1A, ATRX, BRCA2, and PTEN in TMB-High (47%, 7.7%, 6.7%, 6.8%) and ARID1A, BRCA2, RAD50, and WRN in PD-L1 high (CPS ≥ 10) (48.5% vs. 5.2% vs. 2.5% vs. 3.4%). Conclusions: MSI-H, TMB-high and high PD-L1 expression were significantly more prevalent in the DDR-M cohort compared to non-DDR-mutated cancers, most pronounced in GC. Alterations in ARID1A, ATRX, BRCA2, and PTEN were correlated with MSI-H and TMB-high while ARID1A, BRCA2, RAD50, and WRN were correlated with increased PD-L1 expression. Our findings may help identify patients for tailored immunotherapy approaches in future clinical trials.