Bonikowske, Amanda R.

Abstract Introduction Sleep disordered breathing (SDB) is associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes and decreased cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF). The risk of long-term major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) when SDB and decreased CRF co-occur has not been determined. Methods We included consecutive patients that underwent a symptom-limited cardiopulmonary exercise test followed by first-time diagnostic polysomnography within 6 months. Patients were stratified based on the presence of moderate-severe SDB (apnea/hypopnea index ≥15/hour) and decreased CRF defined as <70% predicted peak oxygen consumption (VO2). MACE was a composite outcome of myocardial infarction (MI), coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) and death. Cox-proportional hazard models adjusting for factors known to influence CRF and MACE were constructed. Results Of 498 included patients (60±13 years, 28.1% female), 175 (35%) had MACE (MI=17, PCI=14, CABG=13, stroke=20, TIA=12, deaths=99) at a median follow-up of 8.7 years (interquartile range=6.5-10.3 years). After adjusting for age, sex, beta-blockers, systemic hypertension, diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, cardiac arrhythmia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, smoking and positive airway pressure (PAP) usage, decreased CRF alone (HR=1.91, 95%CI=1.15-3.18, p=0.012), but not SDB alone (HR=1.26, 95%CI=0.75-2.13, p=0.389) was associated with increased risk of MACE. Those with SDB and decreased CRF had increased risk of MACE compared to patients with decreased CRF alone (HR=1.85, 95%CI=1.21-2.84, p<0.005) after accounting for these confounders; the risk was attenuated after additionally adjusting for adequate adherence to PAP (HR=1.85, 95%CI=0.99-3.05, p=0.05). Conclusion The incidence of MACE, including mortality, was high in this sample. Moderate-severe SDB with concurrent decreased CRF was associated with higher risk of MACE than decreased CRF alone. These results highlight the importance of including CRF in the risk assessment of patients with SDB, and conversely, that of screening for SDB in patients with low peak VO2. Support None.

Body mass index (BMI) does not differentiate fat and lean mass or the distribution of adipose tissue. The purpose of this study was to examine the prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) among patients entering outpatient cardiac rehabilitation (CR) across fat mass index (FMI) categories compared with BMI. This retrospective cross-sectional study evaluated dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in 483 CR patients from 1 January 2014, through 31 December 2017. Clinical data were extracted from the electronic health record. Patients were grouped by FMI and BMI categories. Mean (SD) age of patients was 64.3 (14) years. The normal FMI category had 15 patients; excess fat, 74; and obese, 384. In contrast, 93, 174, and 216 were in the normal, overweight, and obese BMI categories, respectively. Prevalence of MetS was 0 (0%) in normal, 5 (1%) in excess fat, and 167 (54%) in obese FMI, with 97% in the obese category. MetS prevalence was 4 patients (0.8%) in normal, 39 (8%) in overweight, and 129 (27%) in obese BMI categories, with 75% of MetS in the obese category. FMI more accurately classified CR patients with metabolically abnormal fat (p < 0.001). FMI is a more sensitive index than BMI for metabolically abnormal fat of outpatient CR patients.

Background The benefits of aerobic exercise are well-studied; there is no consensus on the association between resistance training and major adverse cardiovascular outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to address this issue. Design and methods We searched for randomized trials and cohort studies that evaluated the association between resistance training and mortality and cardiovascular events. Two investigators screened the identified abstracts and full-texts independently and in duplicate. Cochrane tools were used to assess the risk of bias. We calculated hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals using random effect models. Results From the 1430 studies identified, 11 (one randomized trial and 10 cohort studies) met the inclusion criteria, totaling 370,256 participants with mean follow-up of 8.85 years. The meta-analysis showed that, compared with no exercise, resistance training was associated with 21% (hazard ratio (95% confidence interval (CI)), 0.79 (0.69–0.91)) and 40% (hazard ratio (95% CI), 0.60 (0.49–0.72)) lower all-cause mortality alone and when combined with aerobic exercise, respectively. Furthermore, resistance training had a borderline association with lower cardiovascular mortality (hazard ratio (95% CI), 0.83 (0.67–1.03)). In addition, resistance training showed no significant association with cancer mortality. Risk of bias was low to intermediate in the included studies. One cohort study looked at the effect of resistance training on coronary heart disease events in men and found a 23% risk reduction (risk ratio, 0.77, CI: 0.61–0.98). Conclusion Resistance training is associated with lower mortality and appears to have an additive effect when combined with aerobic exercise. There are insufficient data to determine the potential beneficial effect of resistance training on non-fatal events or the effect of substituting aerobic exercise with resistance training.