Burger, Kelli N.

7562 Background: Lymphoma is the 6th most common cancer and a top 10 cause of cancer deaths. To date, there are no blood test approaches to population screening, and accurate surveillance markers are limited. Methylated DNA markers (MDMs) are broadly informative for early detection of cancer but have not been extensively studied for lymphomas. We sought to discover and validate MDMs in DNA extracted from lymphoma tissue, then test these MDMs in archival blood plasma specimens. Methods: Reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS) was performed on DNA extracted from a discovery set of frozen tissues of classic Hodgkin lymphoma (CHL, n=24), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL, n=78: T-cell-TCL (8); diffuse large B-cell-DLBCL (18); follicular-FL (12); mantle cell-MCL (20); marginal zone-MZL (15)), and lymphoma cell line samples (27); controls included benign lymph node (n=11) and healthy donor buffy coat (n=30). 30 MDMs were ranked by fold-change and AUC and used to design methylation-specific PCR assays for biological validation on independent DNA samples extracted from FFPE tissue from 13 normal lymph node and 63 lymphoma samples and 36 buffy coats from healthy patients. Target enrichment long-probe quantitative-amplified signal assays were developed for 16 MDMs and then assayed in plasma-extracted, bisulfite-converted DNA samples from 390 independent treatment-naïve lymphoma patients (100 CHL and 290 NHL:100 DLBCL, 73 FL, 41 MCL, 41 MZL, 35 TCL), and 210 controls without cancer. Lymphoma plasma samples and 159 controls were provided by the Lymphoma SPORE (CA97274); 51 controls came from a 7-county population archive. Classification of lymphoma cases vs controls was modeled with random forest method and cross-validated across 500 bootstrap samples of each dataset. Results: For MDMs tested in DNA from independent biological validation samples, cross-validated random forest models identified 60/63 cases (95% sensitivity) and 12/13 normal controls (92% specificity). In plasmas, a panel of 16 MDMs ( ZNF503, VWA5B1, HOXA9_5195, GABRG3, ITGA5, MAX_chr17_793, BNC1_2407, CDK20, MAX_chr4_184, TPBG, DNAH14, SYT2, CACNG8, FAM110B, and NRN1) detected 78% (95% CI, 74-82%) of lymphoma cases at 90% specificity. Excluding MZL and TCL, sensitivity increased to 84% (80-88%) including 26/49 (53% (38-67%)) of stage I and 59/71 (83% (71-90%)) of stage II cases. Conclusions: MDMs show promise to detect lymphoma. These markers could be evaluated as part of multicancer early detection testing and could also be evaluated as response markers to treatment and subsequent surveillance.[Table: see text]

e17610 Background: Methylated DNA markers (MDMs) associated with sporadic ovarian cancer (OC) are detected in plasma from patients with treatment naïve tumors, but not cancer-free controls. To assess potential benefits to patients at risk for hereditary OC, the aim of this study was to measure the performance of validated sporadic OC MDMs in OC and benign ovarian tissue (BOT), surgically obtained from germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 ( BRCA1/2) mutation carriers. Methods: BRCA1/2 carriers with OC and BRCA1/2 carriers who had undergone risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (SO) were identified at a comprehensive cancer center. BRCA1/2 carriers in both OC and BOT groups were balanced on age and year of surgery with non- BRCA carriers with sporadic OC or benign indications for SO. OC and BOT formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissues were macrodissected following pathologist selection of representative sites; DNA was extracted, and bisulfite converted. 15 OC MDMs ( GDF6, IFFO1, MAX.chr1.147790358, MAX.chr6.10382190, MAX.chr11.14926602, C2CD4D, PDRM14, NCOR2, SKI, DSCR6, SIM2, PALLD, CDO1, GPRIN1, BCAT1) previously identified in sporadic OC were assayed by quantitative methylation specific PCR, normalized by β-actin, by blinded personnel. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were generated for each MDM to assess discrimination of OC from benign tissue and compared between BRCA1/2 and sporadic (non- BRCA) patients, using a z-test. Results: Among BRCA1/2 carriers, there were 48 OC ( BRCA-OC) and 48 BOT ( BRCA-BOT); among non- BRCA, we matched 48 OC (Sporadic-OC) and 48 BOT (non- BRCA-BOT). The median AUC for OC MDM discriminated between OC and BOT with AUCs in BRCA1/2 carriers was 0.87, (IQR, 0.83-0.93). Sporadic-OC vs non- BRCA-BOT median AUC was 0.88 (IQR, 0.83-0.92). AUCs were not significantly different for each MDM when stratified by BRCA or sporadic status. MDMs with an AUC of ≥0.9 in either group are shown (Table). Conclusions: OC MDMs identified and validated in sporadic OC are highly discriminant for OC from BOT in DNA extracted from tissues of people who carry a BRCA1/2 mutation. Testing the performance of these OC MDMs in plasma from BRCA1/2 carriers with and without OC may be of clinical value for high-risk patients and inform multi-cancer early detection testing strategies.[Table: see text]

5091 Background: Controversy surrounding prostate-specific antigen (PSA) based screening for prostate cancer (PCa) highlights the need for non-invasive assays that better discriminate patients with and without clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). Such distinction avoids overtreatment in patients with absent or indolent disease while capturing pathology that would derive benefit from intervention. We analyzed the presence of specific methylated DNA markers (MDMs) within urine samples of patients with biopsy proven PCa and assessed the ability to discriminate these patients from healthy controls with no clinical suspicion for PCa. Methods: 24 healthy volunteers with no clinical suspicion for PCa were age-matched to 24 patients with biopsy-confirmed disease across all Gleason scores. Urine collected from subjects was centrifuged with the cell-free supernatant analyzed in a blinded fashion for methylation signal within specific DNA sequences across 14 genes ( HES5, ZNF655, ITPRIPL1, MAX.chr3.193, SLCO3A1, CHST11, SERPINB9, WNT3A, KCNB2, GAS6, AKR1B1, MAX.chr3.727, GRASP, ST6GALNAC2) by target enrichment long-probe quantitative-amplified signal assays. A patient was considered to have a positive MDM panel if any individual marker exceeded the corresponding100% specificity cut-off value (overall MDM panel specificity of 100%). MDM panel positivity was used to evaluate the sensitivity for distinguishing patients with PCa (any Gleason score) from controls as well as discriminate csPCa cancers from PCa Gleason 6. Results: Median age of healthy controls and PCa patients was 70 years (IQR 67-72) and 65 years (IQR 61-71), respectively. Median PSA was 6.4 (IQR 4.9-9.0) among PCa patients, including median PSA of 5 (IQR 4.0-6.1) for Gleason 6, and 7.8 (IQR 5.1-9.2) for Gleason ≥7 disease. Gleason 6, Gleason 7, and Gleason 8+ cancer was noted in 8, 10, and 6 patients, respectively. Utilizing an overall specificity cut-off of 100% for discriminating normal controls from PCa cases across the MDM panel revealed an overall sensitivity of 83% (95% CI: 63-95%) for detection of PCa (6 of 8 Gleason 6, 9 of 10 Gleason 7, 5 of 6 Gleason 8+) and 88% (95% CI: 62-98%) for csPCa (Gleason ≥ 7). When considering a 100% specificity threshold for controls and Gleason 6 patients, the sensitivity the MDM panel was 69% (95% CI: 41-89%) for csPCa (6 of 10 Gleason 7, 5 of 6 Gleason 8+). Conclusions: We describe a panel of 14 MDMs within urine that offer high specificity and sensitivity for detection of prostate cancers as well as selective identification of clinically significant disease states. Prospective comparison between urine MDMs and PSA blood testing is necessary to discern the differential clinical impact of each screening methodology.

e15567 Background: Radiographic surveillance of colorectal cancer (CRC) after therapy is costly and insensitive. We have reported high cross-sectional performance of methylated DNA markers (MDMs) for detection of primary CRC and metastatic recurrence. This study evaluated MDMs to detect recurrence and measure response to anti-cancer therapy in a longitudinal cohort. Methods: This was a nested case-control study drawn from a prospective cohort of adult patients with CRC who completed definitive treatment and followed forward from the start of surveillance by cross-sectional imaging (CT or MRI) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), collected every 3-6 months under routine care. Blood was collected in LBgard® tubes (Biomatrica, San Diego CA). Cases had recurrent CRC (defined by RECIST v1.1 or radiographic findings that justify re-initiation of anti-cancer therapy as determined by treating clinicians). Controls remained NED (no radiographic recurrence and off therapy for ≥4 surveillance visits). From 6mL of plasma, MDMs ( CNNM1, ANKRD13B, FER1L4, ZNF568, CHST2, ZNF671, VAV3, QKI, GRIN2D, DTX1, PDGFD, SFMBT2, JAM3) were measured by target enrichment long-probe quantitative-amplified signal assays, normalized to B3GALT6, in blinded fashion. Previously published random forest models of MDMs +/- CEA, developed on independent patients with intact primary tumors, were used to develop a summary score. Results: With a median follow-up of 276 days (IQR 187-343) and 3 visits per patient (54 visits total), 18 patients had recurrence after start of surveillance. Another 18 patients remained NED after median 555 days (IRQ 469-662) and 4 surveillance visits per patient (76 visits total). Using a 90th %-ile cut-off summary score from 60 NED patients in a prior cross-sectional measurement, the MDM panel was positive in 15 of 18 patients who recurred and only 2 of the 18 NED patients (Table). Of the 76 patient visits for NED patients, 67 (88%) were below the threshold. The MDM panel score crossed the positivity threshold by a median of 127 days (IRQ 0-233) preceding clinical or radiographic documentation of recurrence. A random forest model with CEA was more sensitive but less specific (Table). In patients who resumed therapy, the MDM panel scores correlated closely with subsequent RECIST scores (not shown). Conclusions: Plasma MDMs rise in anticipation of recurrent CRC prior to radiographic detection and remain low in patients without radiographic disease over serial measurements, warranting further development of this tumor-agnostic liquid biopsy approach as a cost-effective tool to assist cancer surveillance.[Table: see text]

INTRODUCTION: Significant variability between colonoscopy operators contributes to postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers (CRCs). We aimed to estimate postcolonoscopy colorectal neoplasia (CRN) detection by multi-target stool DNA (mt-sDNA), which has not previously been studied for this purpose. METHODS: In a retrospective cohort of patients with +mt-sDNA and completed follow-up colonoscopy, positive predictive value (PPV) for endpoints of any CRN, advanced adenoma, right-sided neoplasia, sessile serrated polyps (SSP), and CRC were stratified by the time since previous colonoscopy (0–9, 10, and ≥11 years). mt-sDNA PPV at ≤9 years from previous average-risk screening colonoscopy was used to estimate CRN missed at previous screening colonoscopy. RESULTS: Among the 850 studied patients with +mt-sDNA after a previous negative screening colonoscopy, any CRN was found in 535 (PPV 63%). Among 107 average-risk patients having +mt-sDNA ≤9 years after last negative colonoscopy, any CRN was found in 67 (PPV 63%), advanced neoplasia in 16 (PPV 15%), right-sided CRN in 48 (PPV 46%), and SSP in 20 (PPV 19%). These rates were similar to those in 47 additional average risk persons with previous incomplete colonoscopy and in an additional 68 persons at increased CRC risk. One CRC (stage I) was found in an average risk patient who was mt-sDNA positive 6 years after negative screening colonoscopy. DISCUSSION: The high PPV of mt-sDNA 0–9 years after a negative screening colonoscopy suggests that lesions were likely missed on previous examination or may have arisen de novo . mt-sDNA as an interval test after negative screening colonoscopy warrants further study.

5526 Background: HR-HPV DNA testing, with or without cervical cytology, provides excellent sensitivity for detection of cervical cancer (CC) and its precursors; negative test results indicate that risk of disease is extremely low and enable women to undergo reduced screening with safety. However, management of women who screen positive remains challenging as many will prove to have self-limited HR-HPV infections. DNA methylation is an early event in carcinogenesis that could enhance CC screening specificity. Methods: For discovery, DNA from 70 FFPE CC (36 squamous, 34 adenocarcinoma) tissues that were reviewed microscopically, 18 fresh frozen benign cervicovaginal (BCV) tissues collected at the time of benign hysterectomy, and 18 buffy coats from cancer-free women underwent reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS) to identify MDMs associated with CC. Candidate MDM selection was based on area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) discrimination, methylation fold change, and low background methylation among benign controls. Candidate MDMs were re-tested using methylation-specific PCR (MSP) to confirm performance. Blinded biological validation was performed using MSP on DNA extracted from independent FFPE CC (38 squamous, 43 adenocarcinoma) and BCV (40) tissues. The performance of CC MDMs was also tested in DNA extracted from cervical dysplasia (36 adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), 32 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2/3, 11 CIN 1) FFPE tissues. Results: From RRBS discovery and technical validation via MSP, 30 candidate MDMs showed marked methylation fold changes (10 to >1000) across both CC histologies compared to BCV tissue from cancer-free women. Each of the 30 MDMs highly discriminated CC from BCV tissue with 9 MDMs having an AUC >0.90 (Table). CC MDMs also highly discriminated AIS from BCV but did not perform well in CIN 2/3 and CIN 1 (Table). Conclusions: Whole methylome sequencing, stringent filtering criteria, and biological validation have yielded outstanding candidate MDMs for CC that highly discriminate CC from BCV, notably with high specificity. Performance in cervical dysplasias varied with higher positivity rates in AIS than in CIN 2/3 and CIN 1. Translation to testing these novel MDMs in lower genital tract biospecimens and the addition of HR-HPV to the CC panel are warranted.[Table: see text]

e15511 Background: Aberrantly methylated DNA marker (MDM) candidates are strongly associated with primary colorectal cancer (CRC) before treatment and detect CRC recurrence with high sensitivity when assayed from plasma. The relationship of these MDMs in association to chemotherapy treatment response is unknown. Methods: In a prospective cohort of patients receiving systemic therapy for advanced CRC, peripheral blood was collected serially during restaging visits. 15 patients were retrospectively identified to have partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) to treatment (n=5 for each group) based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. Using paired samples from each patient before and after response assessment, we analyzed 11 MDMs ( GRIN2D, ZNF671, ANKRD13B, QKI, VAV3, JAM3, SFMBT2, CHST2, ZNF568, FER1L4 and CNNM1) to assess correlation with treatment response. Cell-free DNA was extracted and bisulfite treated before MDMs were quantified by target enrichment long-probe quantitative-amplified signal assay and normalized to a methylated sequence of B3GALT6. Continuous variables are summarized as a median with corresponding interquartile ranges (IQR) and comparisons between subgroups were based on the Wilcox Rank Sums test. Results: The median interval between pre- and post-response assessment visits was 69 days (IQR: 63-83 days) and the level of tumor burden at pre-assessment was similar across all response types (Table 1). Patients with PD had higher levels of methylated GRIN2D, ZNF671 and ANKRD13B than those with PR or SD at baseline and may offer additional prognostic value over CEA which was similar in the PR and PD groups before treatment (Table 1). Elevation of pre-assessment MDMs preceded radiographic evidence of disease progression by 82 days (IQR 69-83 days). Conclusions: Three MDMs, GRIN2D, ZNF671 and ANKRD13B, were found to reflect treatment response (PD vs. PR + SD) as shown in the table. Although this pilot study was limited by a small sample size, it demonstrated the feasibility of using plasma-based MDMs in monitoring treatment response to systemic therapy for advanced CRC and should be compared to CEA in a larger study.[Table: see text]

Abstract Purpose: We have previously identified tissue methylated DNA markers (MDMs) associated with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). In this case–control study, we aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of plasma MDMs for PDAC. Experimental Design: Thirteen MDMs (GRIN2D, CD1D, ZNF781, FER1L4, RYR2, CLEC11A, AK055957, LRRC4, GH05J042948, HOXA1, PRKCB, SHISA9, and NTRK3) were identified on the basis of selection criteria applied to results of prior tissue experiments and assays were optimized in plasma. Next, 340 plasma samples (170 PDAC cases and 170 controls) were assayed using target enrichment long-probe quantitative amplified signal method. Initially, 120 advanced-stage PDAC cases and 120 healthy controls were used to train a prediction algorithm at 97.5% specificity using random forest modeling. Subsequently, the locked algorithm derived from the training set was applied to an independent blinded test set of 50 early-stage PDAC cases and 50 controls. Finally, data from all 340 patients were combined, and cross-validated. Results: The cross-validated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the training set was 0.93 (0.89–0.96) for the MDM panel alone, 0.91 (95% confidence interval, 0.87–0.96) for carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) alone, and 0.99 (0.98–1) for the combined MDM-CA19-9 panel. In the test set of early-stage PDAC, the AUC for MDMs alone was 0.84 (0.76–0.92), CA19-9 alone was 0.87 (0.79–0.94), and combined MDM-CA19-9 panel was 0.90 (0.84–0.97) significantly better compared with either MDMs alone or CA19-9 alone (P = 0.0382 and 0.0490, respectively). At a preset specificity of 97.5%, the sensitivity for the combined panel in the test set was 80% (28%–99%) for stage I disease and 82% (68%–92%) for stage II disease. Using the combined datasets, the cross-validated AUC was 0.9 (0.86–0.94) for the MDM panel alone and 0.89 for CA19-9 alone (0.84–0.93) versus 0.97 (0.94–0.99) for the combined MDM-CA19-9 panel (P ≤ 0.0001). Overall, cross-validated sensitivity of MDM-CA19-9 panel was 92% (83%–98%), with an observed specificity of 92% at the preset specificity of 97.5%. Conclusions: Plasma MDMs in combination with CA19-9 detect PDAC with significantly higher accuracy compared with either biomarker individually.

Abstract Purpose: We aimed to assess the concordance of colorectal cancer–associated methylated DNA markers (MDM) in primary and metastatic colorectal cancer for feasibility in detection of distantly recurrent/metastatic colorectal cancer in plasma. Experimental Design: A panel of previously discovered colorectal cancer–associated MDMs was selected. MDMs from primary and paired metastatic colorectal cancer tissue were assayed with quantitative methylation-specific PCR. Plasma MDMs were measured blindly by target enrichment long-probe quantitative-amplified signal assays. Random forest modeling was used to derive a prediction algorithm of MDMs in archival plasma samples from primary colorectal cancer cases. This algorithm was validated in prospectively collected plasma samples from recurrent colorectal cancer cases. The accuracy of the algorithm was summarized as sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC). Results: Of the 14 selected MDMs, the concordance between primary and metastatic tissue was considered moderate or higher for 12 MDMs (86%). At a preset specificity of 95% (91%–98%), a panel of 13 MDMs, in plasma from 97 colorectal cancer cases and 200 controls, detected stage IV colorectal cancer with 100% (80%–100%) sensitivity and all stages of colorectal cancer with an AUC of 0.91 (0.87–0.95), significantly higher than carcinoembryonic antigen [AUC, 0.72 (0.65–0.79)]. This panel, in plasma from 40 cases and 60 healthy controls, detected recurrent/metastatic colorectal cancer with 90% (76%–97%) sensitivity, 90% (79%–96%) specificity, and an AUC of 0.96 (0.92–1.00). The panel was positive in 0.30 (0.19–0.43) of 60 patients with no evidence of disease in post-operative patients with colorectal cancer. Conclusions: Plasma assay of novel colorectal cancer–associated MDMs can reliably detect both primary colorectal cancer and distantly recurrent colorectal cancer with promising accuracy.