Loftus, Edward V.

Abstract Background Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), together known as inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), affect approximately seven million people globally. The continuous rise in IBD prevalence and the aging of populations will inevitably lead to an increasing use of health care resources. In parallel with these trends, continuing innovations in IBD therapeutics, diagnostics, and preventatives are creating more options for IBD patients seeking to reduce their disease burden. These trends pose an imminent burden on health care systems and require that we identify modifiable cost drivers in IBD care and develop strategies for delivering equitable and affordable care for all patients. Methods This Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology Commission, consisting of a diverse faculty of health care professionals with expertise in the field of IBD and health economists, was formed to deliver an extensive summary of the literature and discuss key topics on the costs and cost-effectiveness of treating IBD in the present, and how this is likely to look in the future. Furthermore, it offers suggestions for how to deliver affordable IBD care in the coming years. The report’s focus was on high-income countries in Europe, North America, Australia and New Zealand, and Asia. Results The Commission drew together a wide range of expertise to discuss the current costs of IBD care, the drivers of increasing costs, as well as how to deliver affordable care for IBD in the future. The key conclusions are that (i) increases in health care costs must be evaluated against improved disease control and reductions in indirect costs, and (ii) that overarching systems for data interoperability, registries, and big data approaches must be established for continuous assessment of effectiveness, costs, and cost-effectiveness of care. International collaborations should be sought in order to evaluate novel models of care (such as value-based health care, including integrated health care and participatory health care models), as well as to improve the education and training of clinicians, patients, and policymakers. Measures to reduce the costs of IBD care are summarised in Table 1. Conclusion Increases in health care costs must be evaluated against improved disease control and reductions in indirect costs. Evaluations should be systematically aligned between countries and regions. Detailed analysis of the current epidemiology and the likely effects of changing IBD management on disease course and socioeconomic outcomes is essential; and will become even more imperative in the era of precision medicine, where complex biotechnologies will require expensive analyses, highly skilled personnel, and drug development for what may sometimes be relatively small patient groups.

Abstract Background Ustekinumab (UST) is an approved treatment for adults with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD: Crohn’s disease [CD] and ulcerative colitis [UC]), psoriasis (PsO), and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Here, we present pooled safety analyses in these approved indications of patients (pts) with active tuberculosis (TB) and opportunistic infections (OIs) through 5 years (yrs) of UST treatment. Methods Pooled data included 13 Phase 2/3 UST studies through 5 yrs of CD and PsO, 2 yrs of UC, and 1 yr of PsA. OIs were identified by clinician review. Herpes zoster (HZ) was evaluated separately. Event rates per 100 pt yrs (PYs) are presented. Concomitant immunomodulators/corticosteroids were permitted in IBD and PsA pts. All pts who received ≥1 UST dose were included. In IBD, placebo (PBO) pts included data up to the first UST dose for pts initially treated with PBO, or >16 weeks after the last UST dose for UST pts who switched to PBO. Results Across all approved indications, 19 OIs including TB were reported, with rates in PBO of 0.40 and UST of 0.10 through 5 yrs in 13807 PYs of follow-up (Table 1); rates of HZ were 1.21 and 0.63, respectively. Of 19 OIs, 18 were in IBD pts and 1 in a PsO pt. Overall, 14/16 pts (12/13 UST) with OIs excluding TB were also receiving confounding concomitant medications. A total of 3 active TB cases (2 pts with CD and 1 pt with UC) were reported in PBO (n=2; 1 in a Hungarian CD pt 10 months after receiving last UST dose) and UST (n=1) pts (Table 1). One active TB case was reported in an asymptomatic South African CD pt treated with UST who had a positive QuantiFERON®-TB Gold test on routine screening and bronchial brushings positive for M. tuberculosis. Both CD pts completed TB treatment with disease resolution. The most common OIs were esophageal candidiasis (UST n=3; PBO n=2) and cytomegalovirus colitis (UST n=3; PBO n=1). Conclusion Rates of OIs, including active TB, in UST-treated pts were low across approved indications through up to 5 yrs with 13807 PYs of follow-up and not higher in UST pts vs PBO pts, suggesting no increased risk of OI with long-term UST treatment.

Abstract Background Vedolizumab (VDZ) is a gut-selective humanised monoclonal anti-α4β7 integrin antibody for treatment of UC and CD. This post-authorization safety study (PASS) compared long-term safety in patients (pts) treated with VDZ or other biologics for UC or CD. Methods This was a prospective, observational, multicentre, cohort study in pts with UC or CD starting treatment with VDZ or other biologics (NCT02674308, EUPAS6469). Pts were biologic naïve (VDZ=35%, Other biologic=65%) or had prior exposure to biologics other than VDZ and were followed for up to 7 yrs. Pts were treated under usual standard of care as directed by their physician with no discontinuation from the study due to physician-directed treatment changes. The primary safety outcome was serious infections and was compared between cohorts using a Cox proportional hazards model adjusted by propensity score (with other biologics as reference). Secondary safety outcomes were adverse events (AE) of special interest (AESI) as listed in Tables 2 and 3. Results In total, 5208 patients were enrolled across 21 countries between Mar 2015 and Jul 2019. The full analysis set comprised 5008 pts (VDZ=2502; other biologic=2506) and mean (SD) study duration was 37.4 (14.1) months. Consistent with the observational nature of the study and the current standard of care, the baseline characteristics in the two cohorts were imbalanced (Table 1). The overall treatment-emergent Adverse Event (AE) rate was 61.3% (VDZ) and 59.5% (other biologic), with serious AEs in 27.5% (VDZ) and 25.7% (other biologic), respectively. In UC pts, the incidence rate (IR) of serious infections were: 0.014 (95% CI: 0.010, 0.019) [VDZ] and 0.015 (0.010, 0.023) [other biologic], with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.018 (0.931, 1.114), p=0.70 (Table 2). In CD pts, corresponding findings were 0.012 (95% CI: 0.008, 0.017) [VDZ] and 0.006 (95% CI: 0.004, 0.009) [other biologic] with HR of 1.035 (0.959, 1.117), p=0.38 (Table 3). The incidence of primary and secondary safety outcomes is reported in Table 2 for UC and Table 3 for CD. There were no safety issues relating to pregnancy and no cases of PML observed. There were 19 deaths in the VDZ cohort (1 case of pneumonia deemed as treatment-related); and 13 deaths in the other biologic cohort, 2 cases deemed treatment-related (one case septic shock and pneumonia; one case non-small cell lung cancer). Clinical outcomes and quality of life (QoL) measures were comparable between cohorts. Conclusion In this long-term, prospective, real-world observational study of a large multinational population under routine standard of care there was no new safety signal identified in relation to VDZ. Results are consistent with the known safety profile of VDZ.

Abstract Background Patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) experience reduced quality of life (QoL), and disease-related impact on work productivity, contributing to a high disease burden. This study evaluated the association of achieving endoscopic outcomes at week 12 and associated QoL at week 52 in patients with CD treated with upadacitinib (UPA). Methods This post-hoc analysis evaluated data from two Phase 3 UPA induction (U-EXCEED and U-EXCEL) trials and one maintenance (U-ENDURE) trial in patients with moderate to severe CD. Patients who responded to 12-week induction therapy with UPA (45 mg per day [QD]) in U-EXCEED or U-EXCEL and received maintenance therapy with UPA (15 or 30 mg QD) up to 52 weeks in U-ENDURE were included. Meaningful improvement in QoL outcomes (Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire [IBDQ] remission ≥170, IBDQ response increase ≥16, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy – Fatigue [FACIT-F] response increase ≥9, Short Form 36 [SF-36] Physical Component Score [PCS] and Mental Component Score [MCS] change ≥5, and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire [WPAI] change ≥7%) was evaluated at week 52 and compared between patients who achieved endoscopic response, endoscopic remission and ulcer-free endoscopy (absence of ulceration) at week 12 and those who did not using Chi-square test. Results Of 337 clinical responders included in the analyses, 152 (45.1%), 87 (25.8%), and 75 (22.2%) patients achieved endoscopic response, endoscopic remission, and ulcer-free endoscopy, respectively, at the end of induction. Significantly more patients who achieved an endoscopic response at end of induction (vs those who did not) attained a meaningful improvement in PROs by week 52 (IBDQ remission, 52.6% vs 30.3%; IBDQ response, 56.6% vs 36.8%; FACIT-F response, 46.7% vs 25.9%; SF-36 PCS 49.3% vs 30.8% and MCS 39.5% vs 25.9%; all P≤0.01, Table 1). Additionally, patients who achieved endoscopic response (vs those who did not) at the end of induction were more likely to attain meaningful improvement in WPAI overall work impairment by week 52 (47.1% vs 26.5%, P≤0.01, Table 1). Similar findings were observed in patients who achieved endoscopic remission (P≤0.01, Table 1) and ulcer-free endoscopy (P≤0.05, Table 1) vs those who did not at end of induction. Conclusion Achieving endoscopic outcomes at end of induction treatment was associated with meaningful improvement in quality of life and overall work productivity at 52 weeks for patients with CD receiving UPA. Endoscopic remission and ulcer-free endoscopy were associated with very similar long-term benefit.

Abstract Background Network meta-analysis (NMA) using randomised controlled trial (RCT) data can provide indirect evidence on comparative efficacy of various treatments.1 The NMA reported herein was conducted to evaluate infliximab (IFX) and vedolizumab (VDZ) comparative efficacy during maintenance treatment of moderate-to-severe Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), covering various dosing regimens and administration routes for each biologic. Methods Studies were identified by literature searches that included publications up to 1 November 2022. Parallel-group RCTs evaluating IFX or VDZ (intravenous [IV] or subcutaneous [SC]) for maintenance treatment of adult patients with moderate-to-severe CD or UC that reported clinical remission rates were included. Eligible studies treated patients for a minimum of 22 weeks, with follow-up of 30–60 weeks for maintenance. Clinical remission rates in tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi)-naïve patients from each study were analysed in a Bayesian NMA fixed-effect model. Results Overall, 13 RCTs were identified and included in the analysis (Table 1 for CD and Table 2 for UC). The difference in study design between IFX (treat-through) and VDZ (re-randomisation of induction responders only) was noted. A connected network of evidence could be generated using CD and UC studies (Figures 1A and 1B, respectively). In both CD and UC, IFX SC 120 mg had the highest odds ratio (95% confidence interval [CI]) vs. placebo for clinical remission during the maintenance phase (CD: 5.90 [1.90–18.2]; UC: 5.45 [1.94–15.3]), albeit with the CIs overlapping with the CIs of the other tested regimens (Figures 2A and 2B). In both CD and UC, IFX SC 120 mg ranked highest for clinical remission among the biological agents, dosing regimens, and routes of administration tested. Conclusion In both CD and UC, IFX SC showed a favourable efficacy profile for achieving clinical remission during maintenance treatment of TNFi-naïve adult patients, when compared with the other IFX IV or VDZ IV/SC regimens tested. References: 1 Rouse B et al., Intern Emerg Med 2017;12(1):103-111.

Abstract Background Corticosteroids (CS) may be used for induction of remission in Crohn’s disease (CD); however, side effects, toxicities, and low rates of mucosal healing may limit their long-term use. Safety and efficacy of upadacitinib (UPA), an oral selective Janus kinase inhibitor, were evaluated among patients with CD receiving UPA with CS at baseline in phase 3 clinical trials. Methods In 2 phase 3 studies (U-EXCEL, NCT03345849; U-EXCEED, NCT03345836), patients with moderate-to-severe CD were randomized to 12-week induction with UPA 45 mg once daily (QD) or placebo (PBO). Patients who achieved clinical response to UPA 45 mg were rerandomized in U-ENDURE (NCT03345823) to UPA 30 mg QD, UPA 15 mg QD, or PBO for a 52-week maintenance period. Patients taking CS at baseline or week 0 of maintenance (end of induction) were included. A CS taper began at induction week 4 and continued during maintenance. Endpoints included the proportion of patients who discontinued CS use (CS-free) at week 12 or for ≥ 90 days prior to week 52, and achieved clinical remission by stool frequency/abdominal pain score or by Crohn’s Disease Activity Index (CDAI), enhanced clinical response, decrease of at least 100 points in CDAI from baseline, endoscopic remission, and endoscopic response at week 12 and week 52. CS daily dose (in prednisone equivalent doses) was recorded. Safety was assessed through induction and maintenance. Results Of 1021 patients evaluated, 358 (35.1%) were taking CS at baseline (mean daily prednisone equivalent dose, 23.0 mg). Greater changes from baseline in mean CS daily dose were observed with UPA vs PBO at induction week 12 (−17.3 mg vs −10.7 mg); these changes were sustained at maintenance week 52 (UPA 30 mg, −16.4 mg; UPA 15 mg, −17.4 mg; PBO, −14.7 mg). The proportion of patients who achieved a ≥ 50% reduction in CS daily dose was higher with UPA vs PBO at induction week 12 among patients taking CS at baseline (72.6% vs 48.4%) and at week 52 among patients taking CS at baseline or week 0 of maintenance (UPA 30 mg, 49.2%; UPA 15 mg, 44.4%; PBO, 11.1%). A significantly higher proportion of patients taking UPA vs PBO were CS-free and achieved clinical remission, clinical response, endoscopic response, and endoscopic remission at week 12 (Fig 1A) and week 52 (Fig 1B). Rates of adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and discontinuation were comparable between groups (Table 1). Serious infections, opportunistic infections, and herpes zoster events were numerically higher with UPA vs PBO (Table 1). Conclusion Patients with CD taking CS were able to taper and discontinue their CS regimen and experience clinical and endoscopic improvements with UPA treatment during the induction and maintenance periods.

Abstract Background We evaluated the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) benefits of upadacitinib (UPA) induction and maintenance treatment in a phase 3 study of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) across a broad range of patient-centered outcomes. Methods Patients received UPA 45 mg once daily or placebo as induction treatment for 8 weeks. Patients who achieved clinical response were rerandomized to receive once daily UPA 15 mg, 30 mg, or placebo as maintenance treatment for 52 weeks. The percentages of patients reporting a clinically meaningful within-person change from baseline in the Ulcerative Colitis Symptoms Questionnaire, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire, Work Productivity and Impairment Questionnaire, 36-Item Short Form Survey, and European Quality of Life-5 Dimension 5 Levels were evaluated at weeks 2 and 8 of induction and at weeks 0 and 52 of maintenance. Results Significant improvements from baseline in all HRQoL measures except the Work Productivity and Impairment Questionnaire–absenteeism were achieved with UPA (P < .001) vs placebo as early as week 2 of induction. These improvements were sustained at week 52 with significantly more patients treated with either 15 mg or 30 mg UPA vs placebo achieving meaningful within-person change in the Ulcerative Colitis Symptoms Questionnaire; Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire; overall work impairment, presenteeism, and activity impairment; both 36-Item Short Form Survey Physical and Mental Component Summaries; and European Quality of Life-5 Dimension 5 Levels (P < .001). Conclusions Induction treatment with UPA 45 mg significantly improved HRQoL measures. A significantly higher percentage of patients who responded to induction treatment with UPA maintained clinically meaningful improvements consistently across a wide range of HRQoL outcomes after 52 weeks of maintenance therapy with UPA (15 mg and 30 mg) compared with placebo. (ClinicalTrials.gov, Numbers: NCT02819635, NCT03653026).

Abstract Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which comprises Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, is an idiopathic inflammatory condition of the gastrointestinal tract. The incidence and prevalence of IBD are rapidly increasing worldwide, particularly in newly industrialized regions such as Asia. Although a large medical armamentarium is available for treating this chronic disease, IBD imposes a marked global disease burden. To understand the complex etiopathogenesis of this condition, it is important to consider the rapidly changing trends in its epidemiology in Asia. During the past few decades, the incidence and prevalence of IBD have significantly increased in both Asian countries and Asian immigrants in Western countries. In this review, we aimed to study and update the epidemiology of IBD in diverse Asian regions and among Asian immigrants in North America and Europe. Moreover, we highlighted that this population exhibits a unique disease phenotype, such as male predominance and high frequency of perianal fistula in Crohn's disease. Also, a different disease phenotype including more complicated disease such as perianal complications was noted in Asian Americans and Asian Europeans.