Nardi, Valentina

Introduction: The carotid artery rim sign on CTA is characterized by soft-plaque components surrounded by a rind of thin, adventitial calcification and its role in plaque instability is not established yet. Intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH) and the inflammatory microenvironment in carotid atheroma are considered features of atherosclerotic plaque vulnerability leading to cerebrovascular events. Hypothesis: The association between rim sign on CTA and carotid IPH and inflammation remains scantly investigated. In this study, we aimed to determine whether rim sign is associated with IPH on MRA and with the extent of IPH and inflammation on histology. We hypothesized that rim sign may be a radiological predictor of carotid IPH and inflammation. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 100 consecutive patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and neck CTA before CEA. On CTA, the ipsilateral rim sign was defined as the presence of adventitial calcifications with internal soft-tissue plaque of ≥2 mm in maximum thickness. Of the included patients, 25 had MRA with 3D magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition with gradient echo (MPRAGE) sequence. Carotid plaque specimens were collected and stained with H&E to quantify IPH (%). Histologically, we defined IPH as an area of carotid plaque with blood elements, and inflammatory microenvironment as the presence of lymphocytes and plasma cells (chronic inflammation) and foam cells. Results: The rim sign on CTA was present in 56 (56%) of patients. IPH on MRA was present in 11 (44%) patients. The rim sign was significantly associated with the presence of IPH on MRA [9 (81.8%) vs 2 (14.3%); p=0.003]. On histology, the rim sign was associated with a higher extent of IPH [5.0 % (IQR 2.0-25.0) vs 5.0% (IQR 0.0-10.0); p=0.017], with chronic inflammation [44 (78.6%) vs 12 (21.4%); p=0.003], and foam cells [51 (91.1%) vs 5 (8.9%); p<0.001]. Conclusions: These findings suggest that rim sign on CTA may be proposed as a potential imaging marker of IPH as well as a histologic predictor of IPH extent and carotid plaque inflammatory microenvironment.

Abstract Background Carotid intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH) is considered a strong marker of histologically defined plaque vulnerability leading to cerebrovascular ischemic events. Cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) represent hemorrhage-prone small vessel disease and they are a common finding on brain MRI in patients with cerebrovascular disease. However, the potential mechanism and the risk for CMBs are not clear. The characteristics of carotid lesions have been considered relevant in the relationship between carotid artery atherosclerosis and the presence of CMBs. The potential association between carotid IPH histologically defined and CMBs has not been investigated yet. Purpose We have previously reported the prevalence of IPH in patients with non-obstructive carotid disease in patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy (CEA). In this study, we aimed to investigate whether the presence and the extent of carotid IPH are related to the existence of CMBs. We hypothesized that patients with carotid IPH would have a higher risk of CMBs. Methods This retrospective study enrolled 101 consecutive patients undergoing CEA with symptomatic (including ischemic stroke, TIA, and amaurosis fugax) or asymptomatic ipsilateral carotid artery disease. Carotid plaque specimens were collected at CEA from all the patients and stained with Movat Pentachrome to identify the presence and the extent (%) of IPH. Neck CTA was obtained to measure the degree of carotid stenosis. Brain MRI was pre-surgically performed and CMBs were studied using T2*-weighted gradient-recalled echo (GRE) or susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) sequence. The CMBs were counted and localized. Clinical and biochemical data, comorbidities, and medications were recorded. The association between carotid IPH and CMBs was examined adjusted for other risk factors. Results The presence of carotid IPH was in 57 (56.4%) patients. CMBs were more observed in patients with carotid IPH compared to those without IPH [19 (33.3%) vs 5 (11.4%); p=0.010]. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated an association between the extent of IPH in the carotid atheroma and the presence of CMBs [OR 1.051 (95% CI 1.012–1.090); p=0.009]. Moreover, the carotid IPH extent was associated with the number of CMBs (p=0.004). In patients with CMBs, the median degree of ipsilateral carotid stenosis was 40% (35–65%) and it was 70% (50–80%) in those without CMBs, with a significant difference between the two groups (p=0.049). Conclusions In patients undergoing CEA, the histologically defined presence of carotid IPH and its extent are associated with CMBs on brain MR imaging. CMBs may be a potential mechanism for cerebrovascular events in patients with carotid atherosclerotic IPH and they may be an imaging marker that can distinguish the severity of the carotid artery disease. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Other. Main funding source(s): Mayo Clinic Foundation

Background: Uric acid (UA) concentration within carotid plaque and its association with cerebrovascular events have not been detected or quantified. Systemically, serum UA is a marker of inflammation and risk factor for atherosclerosis. However, its association with carotid plaque instability and stroke pathogenesis remains unclear. In patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy, we aimed to determine whether UA is present differentially in symptomatic versus asymptomatic carotid plaques and whether serum UA is associated with cerebrovascular symptoms (stroke, transient ischemic attack, or amaurosis fugax). Methods: Carotid atherosclerotic plaques were collected during carotid endarterectomy. The presence of UA was assessed using Gomori methenamine silver staining as well as anti-UA immunohistochemical staining and its quantity measured using an enzymatic colorimetric assay. Clinical information was obtained through a retrospective review of data. Results: UA was more commonly detected in symptomatic (n=23) compared with asymptomatic (n=9) carotid plaques by Gomori methenamine silver (20 [86.9%] versus 2 [22.2%]; P =0.001) and anti-UA immunohistochemistry (16 [69.5%] versus 1 [11.1%]; P =0.004). UA concentration was higher in symptomatic rather than asymptomatic plaques (25.1 [9.5] versus 17.9 [3.8] µg/g; P =0.021). Before carotid endarterectomy, serum UA levels were higher in symptomatic (n=341) compared with asymptomatic (n=146) patients (5.9 [interquartile range, 4.6–6.9] mg/dL versus 5.2 [interquartile range, 4.6–6.2] mg/dL; P =0.009). Conclusions: The current study supports a potential role of UA as a potential tissue participant and a systemic biomarker in the pathogenesis of carotid atherosclerosis. UA may provide a mechanistic explanation for plaque instability and subsequent ischemic cerebrovascular events.

Background Elevated plasma ceramides are independent predictors of cardiovascular disease and mortality in patients with advanced epicardial coronary artery disease. Our understanding of plasma ceramides in early epicardial coronary artery disease, however, remains limited. We examined the role of plasma ceramides in early coronary atherosclerosis characterized by coronary endothelial dysfunction. Methods and Results Participants presenting with chest pain and nonobstructive epicardial coronary artery disease underwent coronary endothelial function. Patients (n=90) demonstrated abnormal coronary endothelial function with acetylcholine (≥20% decrease in coronary artery diameter or ≤50% increase in coronary blood flow). A total of 30 controls had normal coronary endothelial function. Concentrations of plasma ceramide 18:0 ( P =0.038), 16:0 ( P =0.021), and 24:0 ( P =0.019) differed between participants with normal and abnormal coronary endothelial function. Ceramide 24:0 (odds ratio [OR], 2.23 [95% CI, 1.07–4.66]; P =0.033) and 16:0 (OR, 1.91×10 6 [95% CI, 11.93–3.07×10 11 ]; P =0.018) were independently associated with coronary endothelial dysfunction. Among participants with endothelium‐dependent coronary dysfunction (n=78), ceramides 16:0 (OR, 5.17×10 5 [95% CI, 2.83–9.44×10 10 ]; P =0.033), 24:0 (OR, 2.98 [95% CI, 1.27–7.00]; P =0.012), and 24:1/24:0 (OR, 4.39×10 −4 [95% CI, 4×10 −7 –0.48]; P =0.030) were more likely to be elevated. Conclusions The current study demonstrated an association between increased circulating ceramide levels and coronary endothelial dysfunction in the absence of epicardial coronary artery disease. This study supports the role of plasma ceramides as a potential biomarker or a therapeutic target for early coronary atherosclerosis in humans.

Object We sought to determine the safety and efficacy in secondary stroke prevention of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in patients with symptomatic non-stenotic carotid artery disease (SyNC). Methods This was a single-centre retrospective case series. All patients who underwent CEA for unilateral anterior circulation cerebrovascular events with ipsilateral <50% carotid stenosis from 2002 to 2020 were included. Imaging hallmarks including the degree of luminal stenosis and the presence of various vulnerable plaque characteristics (eg, intraplaque haemorrhage (IPH) on MR angiography, ulceration or low-density plaque on CT angiography) were assessed. The presence of vulnerable plaque characteristics was compared between arteries ipsilateral to the ischaemic event and contralateral arteries. The prevalence of perioperative/intraoperative complications, as well as recurrent ischaemic events at follow-up was determined. Results Thirty-two patients were included in the analysis, of which 25.0% were female. Carotid arteries ipsilateral to an ischaemic event had a significantly higher prevalence of IPH when compared with contralateral arteries (80.0% vs 0.0%; p<0.001). There were no intraoperative complications. One patient (3.1%) developed symptoms of transient ipsilateral ischaemia 1 day following CEA which resolved without treatment. In a median follow-up of 18.0 months (IQR 5.0–36.0), only one patient (3.1%) experienced a transient neurologic deficit with complete resolution (annualised rate of recurrent stroke after CEA of 1.5% for a total follow-up of 788 patient-months following CEA). All other patients (31/32, 96.9%) were free of recurrent ischaemic events. Conclusion CEA appears to be safe and well-tolerated in patients with SyNC. Additional studies with larger cohorts and longer follow-up intervals are needed in order to determine the role of CEA in this patient population.

Introduction: Uric acid (UA) level within carotid plaque specimens and its association with cerebrovascular events has not been detected or quantified. Systemically, serum uric acid (SUA) is a marker of inflammation and risk factor for atherosclerosis. However, its association with carotid plaque instability and subsequent cerebrovascular events remains unclear. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that UA may play a role in carotid artery atherosclerosis and stroke pathogenesis. In patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA), we aimed to determine whether UA is present differentially in carotid plaques of symptomatic versus asymptomatic patients and whether SUA is associated with cerebrovascular symptoms before surgery and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in the follow-up to CEA. Methods: We prospectively collected 32 carotid plaques during CEA. We qualitatively assessed the presence of UA by using Gomori methenamine silver (GMS) staining and immunohistochemistry with anti-UA antibodies. We extracted and measured the quantity of UA in carotid plaques by using an enzymatic colorimetric assay. A retrospective analysis of a clinical database of 534 consecutive patients who underwent CEA was performed. We defined as symptomatic those patients with history of stroke, TIA and amaurosis fugax. Results: UA positive staining was detected in higher number of carotid plaques from symptomatic compared to asymptomatic patients on both staining, GMS [20 (86.9%) vs 2 (22.2%); p=0.001] and immunohistochemistry anti-UA [16 (69.5%) vs 1 (11.1%); p=0.004]. Moreover, we found a significantly higher concentration of UA in carotid plaque from symptomatic compared to asymptomatic patients [25.1 (9.5) μg/g vs 17.9 (3.8) μg/g; p=0.021]. SUA level in patients prior to CEA was significantly higher in the symptomatic compared to the asymptomatic group [6.0 (4.8-7.1) mg/dL vs 5.2 (4.4-6.3) mg/dL; p<0.001] and it was significantly higher in patients who developed MACE after CEA versus those that did not [6.0 (4.8-7.1) mg/dL vs 5.4 (4.5-6.6) mg/dL; p=0.021]. Conclusions: UA may provide a mechanistic explanation as systemic biomarker and potential tissue contributor for carotid plaque instability and subsequent cerebrovascular and cardiovascular symptoms.

Carotid plaque vulnerability features beyond the degree of stenosis may play a key role in the pathogenesis and recurrence of ischemic cerebrovascular events. This study sought to compare intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH) as a marker of plaque vulnerability in symptomatic patients with mild (<50%), moderate (50%–69%), and severe (≥70%) carotid artery stenosis. We included patients who experienced ischemic cerebrovascular events with no other identifiable sources and underwent carotid endarterectomy for mild (n=32), moderate (n=47), and severe (n=58) carotid artery stenosis. The degree of stenosis and imaging hallmarks were assessed by computed tomography angiography or magnetic resonance angiography. Plaque specimens were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and Movat pentachrome staining. Carotid plaques of patients with mild stenosis had a higher extent of IPH (%) on tissue analysis compared with patients with moderate (mild, 15.7% [interquartile range, 7.8%–26.7%]; moderate, 3.9% [0.0%–9.2%]; P <0.001) and severe carotid artery stenosis (mild, 15.7% [interquartile range, 7.8%–26.7%]; severe, 2.5% [interquartile range, 0.0%–11.2%]; P <0.001). When considering the degree of carotid artery stenosis as a continuous variable, a lower lumen narrowing was associated with higher extent of IPH ( P <0.001; R, −0.329). Our major finding is the association of IPH with mild carotid artery stenosis based on histological analysis. The current study may suggest that IPH potentially plays a role in the mechanism of stroke in patients with nonobstructive carotid stenosis.

The role of calcium in atherosclerosis is controversial and the relationship between vascular calcification and plaque vulnerability is not fully understood. Although calcifications are present in ≈50% to 60% of carotid plaques, their association with cerebrovascular ischemic events remains unclear. In this review, we summarize current understanding of carotid plaque calcification. We outline the role of calcium in atherosclerotic carotid disease by analyzing laboratory studies and histopathologic studies, as well as imaging findings to understand clinical implications of carotid artery calcifications. Differences in mechanism of calcium deposition express themselves into a wide range of calcification phenotypes in carotid plaques. Some patterns, such as rim calcification, are suggestive of plaques with inflammatory activity with leakage of the vasa vasourm and intraplaque hemorrhage. Other patterns such as dense, nodular calcifications may confer greater mechanical stability to the plaque and reduce the risk of embolization for a given degree of plaque size and luminal stenosis. Various distributions and patterns of carotid plaque calcification, often influenced by the underlying systemic pathological condition, have a different role in affecting plaque stability. Modern imaging techniques afford multiple approaches to assess geometry, pattern of distribution, size, and composition of carotid artery calcifications. Future investigations with these novel technologies will further improve our understanding of carotid artery calcification and will play an important role in understanding and minimizing stroke risk in patients with carotid plaques.