Jazieh, Khalid

678 Background: Financial toxicity (FT) represents a challenge for cancer patients that impacts treatment decisions, patient satisfaction, and quality of life. Social determinants of health (SDoH) screening may predict who is at risk of FT and could potentially benefit from financial interventions. Methods: This is a retrospective study of all cancer patients presenting to Mayo Clinic sites between Sept 2023 – Jun 2024. Patients completed SDoH questionnaires and were given risk scores of Low Risk, Medium Risk, and High Risk for SDoH categories: Financial Strain Risk, Transportation Risk, and Food Insecurity Risk. Patient financial data including active debt amounts, insurance coverage, and financial aid were collected. Patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) were compared to those with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNET) and patients with other cancers (Others). Categorical variables were compared with Pearson's Chi-squared test, continuous variables with Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test. P values < 0.05 were considered significant. Results: Data was obtained from 88,039 patients, 2,607 of whom had PDAC and 449 had PNET. Compared to PDAC patients, PNET patients and Others were more likely to have Medium/High risk scores for Financial Strain Risk (6% vs 6.5% and 8.5%, respectively) and Food Insecurity (1.7% vs 3.8% and 3.2%) (Table). There was no statistically significant difference in median medical debt and need of financial assistance between the groups. Among PDAC patients, there were differences in distributions among race, primary language spoken, and patient electronic record access depending on Financial Risk categories. African American patients had the greatest proportion of Medium/High risk (12.9%) compared to Asian (4.4%) and White (5.8%) patients (P<0.001). Among patients with English as their primary language, 64.9% had Low Risk scores compared to 27.7% with other primary languages (P<0.001). Patients with electronic record access were more likely to report High Risk scores (6.9%) compared to those without access (1.6%). Conclusions: Per patient responses collected, PDAC patients presenting to our center have lower risk of financial strain and similar medical debt levels compared to the remainder of cancer patients. Among PDAC patients, higher financial strain was experienced by non-whites (7.9% vs 5.8%). Diagnosis PDAC (N=2607) PNET (N=449) Other (N=84983) p value Current Financial Risk (Grouped) < 0.001 - Low Risk 1662 (63.8%) 304 (67.7%) 59298 (69.8%) - Medium/High Risk 157 (6.0%) 29 (6.5%) 7209 (8.5%) - Unknown/Missing 788 (30.2%) 116 (25.8%) 18476 (21.7%) Food Insecurity Risk < 0.001 - Low Risk 1764 (67.7%) 308 (68.6%) 63235 (74.4%) - Medium Risk 45 (1.7%) 17 (3.8%) 2703 (3.2%) - Unknown/Missing 798 (30.6%) 124 (27.6%) 19045 (22.4%) Median Active Debt in USD 1102.230 1020.010 1141.135 0.593

770 Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is associated with poor prognosis and limited treatment options. A 584 bp deletion in CTRB2 , which impairs chymotrypsin B2 function, has been linked to increased PDAC risk. This study investigates the impact of this deletion on progression and survival outcomes in patients with PDAC. Methods: There were 633 patients in whom CTRB2ex6 deletion was genotyped; 263 patients received chemotherapy and had time to progression (TTP) information. TTP was calculated from diagnosis date until earliest of 1) progression date (event), 2) surgery, death, or next chemotherapy date (competing risk), or 3) date last known to be alive (censor). Overall survival (OS) was calculated for the cohort from diagnosis until date of death (event) or date last known to be alive (censor). TTP was analyzed using cumulative incidence methods accounting for competing risks; OS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods. Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for age and sex were used to test associations and compute hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Median TTP in those with CTRB2ex6 deletion negative carrier status (n=209) was 1.3 years vs 5.9 years for those with positive carrier status (n=54). Estimated 3-year progression rates were 54.2% for patients with no CTRB2ex6 deletions, 43.7% for patients with one deletion (n=48), and 33.3% for patients with two CTRB2ex6 deletions (n=6). TTP was not associated with CTRB2 deletion carrier status (HR: 0.8, 95% CI: 0.6-1.3). Median OS for CTRB2ex6 deletion negative carriers (n=514) was 1.0 year vs 0.9 years for positive carriers (n=119); within deletion carriers, heterozygous carriers (n=110) had a median OS of 0.9 years, and homozygous carriers (n=9) had a median OS of 2.6 years. OS was not associated with CTRB2 deletion carrier status (HR: 1.0, 95% CI: 0.9-1.3). Conclusions: Although we did not detect statistically significant differences in TTP and OS by CTRB2ex6 deletion carrier status, there was an interesting trend toward longer TTP and OS in the small number of patients who carried homozygous CTRB2ex6 deletions. Larger studies are warranted to validate these findings.

727 Background: PARP inhibition (PARPi) is a standard maintenance therapy for patients (pts) with germline BRCA1/2 mutations in pancreatic cancer. Combination of PARPi therapy and immunotherapy has potential to increase efficacy and may offer benefit beyond germline BRCA1/2 . Methods: We performed a multisite single-arm phase 2 study using the highly potent PARPi niraparib with anti-PD1 drug dostarlimab in pts with germline or somatic HRD mutations in BRCA1/2, PALB2, RAD51C/D, or BARD1 . Pts were required to have metastasis, progressed on ≥1 regimen, and prior platinum-exposure unless refused/intolerant. Pts were treated with niraparib 200 mg orally once daily continuously. Dostarlimab 500 mg was administered IV every 3 weeks for 4 cycles, then 1000 mg IV every 6 weeks. The primary endpoint was disease control rate (DCR) at 12 weeks (DCR12) using iRECIST criteria. At least 8 pts with DCR12 in the first 19 eligible pts (41%) would be considered promising for further trials. Results: 22 pts were enrolled from Dec 2020 to Oct 2023. Two pts withdrew prior to receiving therapy, and 2 were later found to be ineligible, leaving 18 eligible pts for final analyses. Median age was 63.0 yrs, 39% male, 94% non-Hispanic white, 1 black (6%). 17 pts were platinum exposed, 7 were platinum-refractory, and 5 had previously progressed on PARPi maintenance. Mutation distribution was: BRCA2 13/18 (72%), BRCA1 4/18 (22%), BARD1 2/18 (11%). One pt had both BRCA1 (somatic) and BRCA2 (germline) mutations. Germline mutations were identified in 14/18 (78%). DCR12 was achieved in 5/18 (27.8%), so the primary endpoint (>41%) was not met. Pts received a median 2 cycles (range 1-8) of niraparib + dostarlimab. No clinical factors were significantly associated with improved DCR12 (all p > 0.05) in subgroup analyses, but we did observe the following statistically nonsignificant associations. Pts who were platinum-refractory had a lower DCR12 compared to those not (14.3% vs. 36.4%). Counterintuitively, PARPi exposed/refractory pts had a higher DCR12 than non-exposed/non-refractory (50 vs 17% exposed/nonexposed and 40% vs 23% refractory/nonrefractory). Pts with germline mutations had a higher DCR12 compared to those without (38.5% vs. 0%). Non- BRCA2 mutations had a higher DCR12 than those with BRCA2 mutations (50% vs.17%), with highest DCR12 rates among BRCA1 patients (67%). Tolerability was in line with similar combinations, with 60% non-hematologic Gr3 or higher, including fatigue (15%), AST increase (10%), nausea/vomiting (10%), sepsis (10%). Two grade 5 events were not attributed to treatment. Conclusions: PARPi plus anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibition was not sufficiently active as later line therapy in metastatic pancreatic cancer for the majority of patients with HRD mutations. Additional molecular analyses to elucidate predictive markers of sensitivity/resistance are ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04493060 .

3519 Background: KRAS G12D commonly occurs in pancreatic (PDAC) and colorectal (CRC) cancers. Though developing KRAS G12D inhibitors is pertinent, it is expected that primary and acquired resistance will limit efficacy, similar to those seen with KRAS G12C inhibitors. Here, we assessed the prevalence and outcomes of candidate mutations co-occurring with KRAS G12D in PDAC and CRC using liquid biopsy data. Methods: Patients with advanced CRC and PDAC tested with Guardant360 genomic profiling from 2020 to 2023 (~2500 & 3500 samples) were included. Candidate resistance mutations were determined based on mutations reported following KRAS G12C inhibition. Patients with advanced CRC and PDAC tested with Guardant360 at Mayo Clinic (2016-2023) (1158 & 904 samples) were assessed for overall survival (OS). Patients were divided into three groups: KRAS G12D alone, KRAS G12D with candidate resistance alterations, and KRAS G12D not detected (ND). OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression was used for multivariable survival analyses. Results: The Guardant360 database reported KRAS G12D in 16.5% of CRC and 40.2% of PDAC samples. The Table below summarizes the most frequent candidate resistance alterations co-occurring with KRAS G12Dincluding point mutations of KRASand PIK3CAand amplifications of EGFR, KRAS, BRAFand MYC. In the Mayo cohort, 8.9% of CRC and 23.5% of PDAC patients had KRAS G12D. In CRC, those with KRAS G12Dand ≥1 candidate resistance alteration had a significantly lower OS (mOS 18.7m) than KRAS G12D alone (30.9m), and ND (37.3m) ( p=0.004). The presence of concurrent candidate resistance alterations with KRAS G12D remained a poor prognostic factor with HR 2.1 (95% CI: 1.3 – 3.2, p=0.001) after adjusting for age and other patient characteristics. Similarly, in PDAC, those with KRAS G12D and ≥1 resistance mutation had significantly lower OS (mOS 8.1m) than KRAS G12D alone (10.5m) and ND (16.1m) (p<0.0001). In multivariable analyses, both KRAS G12D with candidate resistance alterations (HR 2.1, 95% CI: 1.4-3.3, p<0.001) and G12Dalone (HR 1.6; 1.3–2.0, p<0.001) were poor prognostic factors. Among patients with serial Guardant360, treatment response trended with KRAS G12D variant allele frequency. Conclusions: Circulating tumor DNA testing is a useful tool to reveal candidate molecular alterations linked to potential resistance to KRAS G12D targeting in patients with KRAS G12D gastrointestinal cancers. KRAS G12D with these concurrent molecular alterations is a poor prognostic factor in both PDAC and CRC. [Table: see text]

ABSTRACT Despite ocular adverse events from immune checkpoint inhibitors being uncommon, they are still important complications to be aware of. We present the case of metastatic melanoma on ipilimumab/nivolumab in a patient who developed immunotherapy complications with delayed diagnosis because the only presenting symptom was unilateral ptosis. We reviewed the literature for relevant and important ocular and neurological complications of immune checkpoint inhibitors.

170 Background: KRAS-mutant colorectal cancer (CRC) has a worse prognosis and greater resistance to therapy, attracting tremendous efforts to develop both allele-specific and pan-KRAS targeting agents including KRAS G12C and G12D inhibitors. CRC has demonstrated both primary and acquired resistance to KRAS G12C inhibitors, which can be better evaluated by circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-based next generation sequencing (NGS) methods without tissue sampling bias. Here, we utilized clinical ctDNA data to delineate the landscape of candidate alterations associated with primary resistance to KRAS G12D targeting in CRC. Methods: Samples from advanced CRC patients with Guardant360 data in 2021 were categorized into a KRAS G12D group and comparator groups of KRAS G12C and KRAS not detected (ND) according to KRAS mutation status. Demographics, MSI-H status, and blood tumor mutational burden (bTMB) were summarized and compared between groups using t-test for continuous variables and Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables. Co-occurrence patterns of alterations between KRAS and other genes were assessed. Primary resistance mutations were inferred by acquired resistance findings to KRAS G12C inhibitors reported by Awad et al. N Engl J Med. 2021 and Tanaka et al. Cancer Discov. 2021. Results: Among approximately 2500 samples, 16.8% had KRAS G12D, the most common KRAS mutation in CRC. The mean allele frequency of KRAS G12D (11.4%) is comparable to that of KRAS G12C (10.9%). Mean age (61.6 years), MSI-H frequency (3.8%), and mean bTMB (14.2 Mut/Mb) of KRAS G12D group is comparable to those of KRAS ND group. This contrasts with KRAS G12C with significantly lower mean age (60.2 years, p=0.01), lower MSI-H frequency (0.56%, p=0.03), and higher mean bTMB (16.3 Mut/Mb, p=0.02) compared to KRAS ND. Both KRAS G12D and G12C significantly co-occur with APC, PIK3CA, and SMAD4 alterations. FBXW7, AR, and KEAP1 alterations were unique co-occurrences to KRAS G12D, while KIT was unique to KRAS G12C. Candidate alterations associated with primary resistance in KRAS G12D CRC included simultaneously present mutations of KRAS Q61H (14.1%), G12V (6.4%), G12C (5.9%), G13D (3.6%), BRAF V600E (2.7%) and others, amplification of MET (2%), MYC (1.6%), and KRAS (1.4%), and FGFR3-TACC3 translocation (Table). Conclusions: KRAS G12D is associated with unique co-occurring molecular alterations compared to KRAS G12C in CRC. ctDNA-based NGS platforms can survey candidate alterations associated with primary resistance to KRAS G12D targeting in CRC. Further validation in preclinical models is needed. [Table: see text]

9135 Background: Bronchial carcinoid (BC) is often categorized into multifocal (MBC) or solitary (SBC). MBC, excluding tumorlet and diffuse idiopathic pulmonary neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia, is considered a relatively uncommon subgroup of BC, with much of the MBC literature stemming from case reports/small series. Our study analyzes MBC among a large cohort of 569 patients with BC and argues for change to the current clinical understanding of MBC. We suggest using the term bronchial neuroendocrine tumor (bNET) to more accurately represent its cells of origin and move away from “carcinoid” (historically meaning “carcinoma-like”) and the outdated associated connotation that carcinoids all have a similar, benign clinical and biological behavior. Methods: Using the Mayo Clinic Epidemiology and Genetics of Lung Cancer Database with Institutional Review Board approval, we retrospectively reviewed 569 patients with bNET (204 males, 365 females) presenting to Mayo Clinic Rochester between 1/1997-12/2012. We used univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses to evaluate factors affecting overall survival. Results: 80 patients (of 569, 14.1%) were diagnosed with multifocal (MbNET) and 489 with solitary (SbNET). Two-sided Fisher’s exact tests found that older age, female gender, never having smoked cigarettes, and tumorlets were associated with MbNET diagnosis. Family lung cancer history, histopathologic grading (pathology: typical vs. atypical), Ki67, and presence of syndromes (carcinoid, Cushing, and MEN1 syndromes) were similar between MbNET and SbNET groups. Most MbNET cases were stage III-IV at the time of diagnosis, while the majority of SbNET cases were stage I. 5-year OS (83%) and 5-year PFS (75%) of MbNET patients were higher than those of their SbNET counterparts (74% and 68%, respectively). Metastasis status was an independent prognostic factor of poor OS in SbNET (P<0.001) but not in MbNET (P=0.71)(Table). Conclusions: Clinical, radiologic, and histopathologic characteristics and prognostic factors differed between SbNET and MbNET. MbNET arose as a new entity often with advanced stage disease, but good prognosis, which does not follow the NSCLC TNM staging system as in the 2009 NCCN guidelines (used during this study) or the updated 2021 NCCN guidelines which continue to stage lung carcinoid similarly to NSCLC. It may be beneficial to consider multifocal lung carcinoid instead as multifocal bNET, a new clinical entity, warranting a novel staging approach that more accurately reflects prognosis.[Table: see text]

Background The landmark study of durvalumab as consolidation therapy in NSCLC patients (PACIFIC trial) demonstrated significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with locally advanced, unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with durvalumab (immunotherapy, IO) therapy after chemoradiotherapy (CRT). In clinical practice in the USA, durvalumab continues to be used in patients across all levels of programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression. While immune therapies have shown promise in several cancers, some patients either do not respond to the therapy or have cancer recurrence after an initial response. It is not clear so far who will benefit of this therapy or what the mechanisms behind treatment failure are. Methods A total of 133 patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC who underwent durvalumab after CRT or CRT alone were included. Patients treated with durvalumab IO after CRT were randomly split into training (D1=59) and test (D2=59) sets and the remaining 15 patients treated with CRT alone were grouped in D3. Radiomic textural patterns from within and around the target nodules were extracted. A radiomic risk score (RRS) was built and was used to predict PFS and overall survival (OS). Patients were divided into high-risk and low-risk groups based on median RRS. Results RRS was found to be significantly associated with PFS in D1 (HR=2.67, 95% CI 1.85 to 4.13, p<0.05, C-index=0.78) and D2 (HR=2.56, 95% CI 1.63 to 4, p<0.05, C-index=0.73). Similarly, RRS was associated with OS in D1 (HR=1.89, 95% CI 1.3 to 2.75, p<0.05, C-index=0.67) and D2 (HR=2.14, 95% CI 1.28 to 3.6, p<0.05, C-index=0.69), respectively. RRS was found to be significantly associated with PFS in high PD-L1 (HR=3.01, 95% CI 1.41 to 6.45, p=0.0044) and low PD-L1 (HR=2.74, 95% CI 1.8 to 4.14, p=1.77e-06) groups. Moreover, RRS was not significantly associated with OS in the high PD-L1 group (HR=2.08, 95% CI 0.98 to 4.4, p=0.054) but was significantly associated with OS in the low PD-L1 group (HR=1.61, 95% CI 1.14 to 2.28, p=0.0062). In addition, RRS was significantly associated with PFS (HR=2.77, 95% CI 1.17 to 6.52, p=0.019, C-index=0.77) and OS (HR=2.62, 95% CI 1.25 to 5.51, p=0.01, C-index=0.77) in D3, respectively. Conclusions Tumor radiomics of pretreatment CT images from patients with stage III unresectable NSCLC were prognostic of PFS and OS to CRT followed by durvalumab IO and CRT alone.

Abstract Background: Tumor surface PD-L1 (B7-H1) signals through T-cell surface receptor PD-1 to suppress antitumor immunity. PD-1 inhibitors like pembrolizumab block this pathway to prevent tumor escape from immunosurveillance. These PD-1 checkpoint inhibitors achieve objective response in 20-30% of patients with melanoma (1-3). As the majority of these patients are resistant to this treatment, there is a critical need to combat PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor resistance in melanoma. What is the mechanism of PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor resistance in melanoma? Our group has reported that soluble PD-L1 (sPD-L1, sB7-H1) is elevated in the serum of patients with PD-1 inhibitor-resistant melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (4). We have also shown that soluble PD-L1 is produced by cleavage from other tumor types and leads to apoptosis in CD8+ T-cells (5). The aim of this study is to confirm the source of sPD-L1 in human melanoma and its relation to outcomes. Methods: B7H1-expressing transgenic melanoma cells (Mel-B7H1) were treated with an array of protease inhibitors over 24 hours. Cells were then pelleted and supernatants were analyzed by ELISA for sPD-L1 (sB7-H1) production. Tumor serum samples were also analyzed by ELISA for sPD-L1 production.Tumor pathology slides from patients with melanoma (serum donors from the above study) were stained by immunohistochemistry with antibodies against proteases ADAM10 or ADAM17. Slides were visualized by microscopy for the presence of these antigens. Activated human CD8+ T-cells were cultured with recombinant human B7-H1 (PD-L1) protein, sPD-L1-rich, or sPD-L1-depleted supernatants from a tumor cell line in the presence of placebo or PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor antibodies. Cell survival was measured at 48 hours by flow cytometry.Results: ADAM10 inhibitor GI254023X, ADAM17 inhibitor TAPI-0, and broad metalloprotease inhibitor TAPI-2 inhibited Mel-B7H1 production of sB7H1 (p&lt;0.001, 0.095, and 0.001 respectively). Specific inhibitors of other metalloproteases did not significantly alter sB7H1 production. PD-L1 transcription levels were not significantly altered. Tumor pathology slides from patients with high serum sPD-L1 exhibited high ADAM10 and/or ADAM17 staining. Conversely, tumors from patients with low-sPD-L1levels tended to exhibit low ADAM10 and/or ADAM17 staining. Recombinant PD-L1 and PD-L1-rich supernatants induced cell death of CD8+ T-cells, whereas PBS control solution and PD-L1-depleted supernatants did not. Supraphysiologic doses of pembrolizumab decreased cell death in PD-L1-rich supernatant-treated CD8+ T-cells. Conclusions: Matrix metalloprotease inhibitors ADAM10 and ADAM17 mediate sPD-L1 production from melanoma cells. In samples from patients with melanoma, immunohistochemical staining of these proteases in tumor tissue correlates with serum sPD-L1 levels. As we have shown previously, sPD-L1 induces apoptosis of activated CD8+ T-cells, which may explain PD-1 inhibitor resistance in most patients with melanoma.We posit that sPD-L1 outcompetes PD-1 inhibitors to suppress tumor immunosurveillance. Our results suggest that the combination of ADAM10/17 inhibitor and PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor may overcome this mechanism of PD-1 resistance in melanoma and other cancers. Future studies will determine (A) how a combined ADAM10/17 inhibitor and PD-1 inhibitor may function in clinical use, (B) how tumor-derived sPD-L1 signals downstream to cause apoptosis in T-cells, and (C) whether surface ADAM10/17 predict surface PD-L1 staining in melanoma. References: 1. Ribas et al., Lancet Oncol 2015;16(8):908–18. 2. Hamid et al., Ann Oncol 2016;27:6. 3. Weber et al., Lancet Oncol 2015:16(4):375–84. 4. Dronca et al., J Clin Oncol 2017:35(15):11534. 5. Orme et al., AACR Adv Malig Lymphoma 2018. Citation Format: Jacob J. Orme, Khalid Jazieh, Susan Harrington, Matthew Ball, Tariq U. Azam, Xin (Cindy) Liu, Tiancheng Xie, Aaron Mansfield, Roxana S. Dronca, Haidong Dong. Tumor-associated ADAM10 and ADAM17 produce soluble PD-L1 (sPD-L1, sB7-H1) and affect downstream tumor immunity – A resistance mechanism to PD-1 checkpoint blockade in melanoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Fourth CRI-CIMT-EATI-AACR International Cancer Immunotherapy Conference: Translating Science into Survival; Sept 30-Oct 3, 2018; New York, NY. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2019;7(2 Suppl):Abstract nr A210.