Woodard, Genevieve A.

AbstractThere are very few true breast emergencies. While infrequent, women do present to emergency departments or urgent care centres with breast‐related concerns. In this case‐based review, both common and uncommon urgent and emergent breast lesions are presented, emphasising ultrasound characteristics and imaging optimisation to improve accurate diagnosis and appropriate recommendations.

Abstract Objective Data on breast imaging in symptomatic pregnant women are limited. Our aim was to assess the value of targeted breast US for the primary evaluation of breast symptoms in pregnant women of all ages. Methods This IRB-approved retrospective study included all pregnant patients who underwent targeted US for focal breast symptoms at an academic imaging facility over an 18-year period (2000–2018). Clinical, imaging, and pathology results were reviewed. Malignant outcomes were determined by histology. Benign outcomes were confirmed by pathology or ≥2 years of follow-up. Descriptive statistics and 2 × 2 contingency table analyses were performed at the presentation level. Results The study cohort comprised 178 presentations in 175 pregnant women. Mean age was 34.7 years (standard deviation, 5.2). The majority (153/178, 86.0%) were more than 30 years old. At presentation, 42.1% (75/178) were in the first trimester of pregnancy, 27.0% (48/178) in the second, and 29.8% (53/178) in the third. The most common presenting symptom was a palpable lump (162/178, 91.0%), followed by focal pain (7/178, 3.9%). The vast majority (174/178, 97.8%) of cases were non-malignant. However, targeted US detected all 4 malignancies (cancer detection rate, 22/1000; negative predictive value 136/136, 100%). Sensitivity and specificity were 100% (4/4) and 78.2% (136/174), respectively. Conclusion Benign causes of symptoms in pregnant women were far more common; malignancy was rare, accounting for only 2.2% (4/178) of cases. Targeted breast US detected all malignancies, supporting US as the primary imaging modality for evaluating symptomatic pregnant women, regardless of age.

AbstractClinically, acute mastitis presents as a red, swollen, and painful breast. Targeted ultrasound can be performed to evaluate the extent of infection and for an underlying abscess. Noncomplicated mastitis or a small fluid collection may respond to oral antibiotics without further intervention, but a larger or more complex abscess may require single or serial percutaneous aspiration. Breast infections, particularly those complicated by an abscess, can have a prolonged clinical course, and close follow-up is required. Since the clinical presentation and imaging features of acute infectious mastitis can overlap with other etiologies, such as inflammatory breast cancer and idiopathic granulomatous mastitis, a percutaneous biopsy may be indicated to accurately diagnose patients.

Objective: The purpose of this study is to assess the outcomes of symptomatic and asymptomatic solitary dilated ducts detected on mammography, ultrasound, and MRI. Methods: All cases of isolated solitary dilated ducts between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2016 in non-lactating females were reviewed. Clinical data, including patient’s age, breast cancer history, and pathology results were collected. Imaging was reviewed, and indication for the exam, breast density, maximum diameter of the dilated duct on ultrasound, presence of an intraductal mass, presence of intraductal vascularity, presence of intraductal echogenicity, and subareolar or peripheral location of the dilated duct were recorded. Results: 87 cases of solitary dilated ducts were assessed in this study, of which 3 were malignant, resulting in a positive predictive value of 3.5% (3/87). No malignancy was identified in asymptomatic screening patients. The three malignant cases were seen in patients presenting with a palpable lump (n = 1) or bloody nipple discharge (n = 2). There was a statistically significant association observed between the dilated duct diameter (p = 0.049) and presence of intraductal vascularity (p = 0.0005) with presence of malignancy. Conclusion: Rate of malignancy is low in solitary dilated ducts, especially among asymptomatic patients. Patient’s presenting with clinical symptoms, larger dilated duct diameters, and/or intraductal vascularity may require additional evaluation including biopsy to exclude malignancy. Advances in knowledge: Clinical and imaging factors can assist in better identifying patients with solitary dilated ducts who should undergo biopsy.