Arca, Karissa N.

Abstract Objectives/Background This study was undertaken to review the published literature and provide a position statement from the American Headache Society regarding the safety, efficacy, and impact on access to care of telemedicine for the clinical management of patients with headache disorders. Access to specialized care in headache medicine is severely limited in the United States and worldwide. Telemedicine has been used as an approach to care delivery in headache medicine for more than a decade, with accelerated adoption during the COVID‐19 pandemic. There is now uncertainty regarding the extent to which telemedicine will be accepted by health systems and reimbursed by payers moving forward. The purpose of this position statement is to summarize evidence and clinical experience supporting the utility of telemedicine in headache medicine. Methods Evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of telemedicine, and patient and clinician satisfaction with the use of telemedicine for headache specialty care, was gathered from a variety of sources, including PubMed, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov . The results and conclusions based upon these results were reviewed and discussed by the authors and the Board of Directors of the American Headache Society to confirm consistency with clinical experience and to achieve consensus. Results Several randomized clinical trials and observational studies have been performed to compare telemedicine with in‐person visits in the management of patients with headache disorders. These studies showed consistently that telemedicine is noninferior to in‐person care based upon multiple outcome measures, including disability measures, patient satisfaction, and clinician satisfaction. In addition, these studies found that telemedicine rarely leads to a missed diagnosis of secondary headache or mismanagement of primary headache. Telemedicine has substantial advantages for patients, including improved access to care and reduced costs associated with obtaining care. Studies evaluating health care utilization indicate no significant differences between patients evaluated and treated virtually versus in person. Obvious limitations of telemedicine include the inability to perform an in‐person physical exam or to perform injections. For a substantial number of patients, however, these limitations are outweighed by its advantages. The experience with telemedicine reported in the literature is consistent with the experience of the Board of Directors of the American Headache Society, who endorse its use for patients when feasible and appropriate. Conclusion Telemedicine has significantly advanced the care of patients with headache disorders. Its further development and deployment should be supported and reimbursed.

Purpose: The prevalence and phenotype of capillaroscopic abnormalities in patients with autonomic nervous system dysfunction have not yet been investigated. Multiorgan involvement in dysautonomia entails abnormal vasoreactivity. We aim to correlate the diagnosis of autonomic dysfunction with certain clinical manifestations, which may provide prognostic or diagnostic information using a noninvasive technique, i.e., nailfold video capillaroscopy (NVC). Methods: Patients with autonomic nervous system dysfunction were recruited from rheumatology and neurology clinics with voluntary NVC procedures from 31 January 2024 to 10 January 2024, and a comparison with normal controls was performed. Additional recorded information include demographics and diagnoses of autonomic dysfunction types by autonomic testing, including, but not limited to, the following: reflex screen, sweat test, Valsalva maneuver, nerve fiber density, electromyography (EMG), serology, and history of autoimmune diseases. NVC was performed on a total of 27 patients. This study was approved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board. Results: The autonomic dysfunction group consisted of small-fiber neuropathy (37%), orthostatic hypotension (48%), autonomic neuropathy (30%), limited autonomic neuropathy (7%), postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) (7%), and connective tissue disease (7%), among other types. Patients with autonomic dysfunction had statistically significant increases in microhemorrhages, dilated capillaries, and ramifications when compared to controls. Conclusions: Autonomic dysfunction was associated with statistically significant microvascular abnormalities compared to normal controls with a distinct NVC pattern. There was a statistically significant correlation between age and BMI with microvascular abnormalities. Here, we demonstrate the diagnostic potential of NVC in autonomic dysfunction and advocate for further study of capillary structures in autonomic dysfunction.

Abstract Purpose The prevalence and phenotype of capillaroscopic abnormalities in patients with autonomic nervous system dysfunction has not been investigated. Multiorgan involvement in dysautonomia entails abnormal vasoreactivity. We aim to corelate the diagnosis of autonomic dysfunction with certain clinical manifestations that may provide prognostic or diagnostic information using a noninvasive technique: nailfold video capillaroscopy (NVC). Methods Patients with autonomic nervous system dysfunction were recruited from rheumatology and neurology clinic with voluntary NVC procedure from 1/31/24 to 10/1/24 and a comparison with normal controls was done. Additional information recorded includes demographics, diagnosis of type of autonomic dysfunction with autonomic testing including but not limited to reflex screen, sweat test, Valsalva maneuver, nerve fiber density, electromyography (EMG), serology, history of autoimmune disease. NVC was performed on a total of 27 patients. The study was approved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board. Results Autonomic dysfunction group consisted of small fiber neuropathy (37%), orthostatic hypotension (48%), autonomic neuropathy (30%), limited autonomic neuropathy (7%), POTS (7%) and connective tissue disease (7%) amongst other types. Patient with autonomic dysfunction had statistically significant increased microhemorrhages, dilated capillaries and ramifications compared to controls. There was statistically significant correlation of age with capillary ramifications and BMI with capillary density and dilated capillaries. Conclusion Autonomic dysfunction was associated with statistically significant microvascular abnormalities compared to normal controls with a distinct NVC pattern. There was statistically significant correlation of age and BMI with microvascular abnormalities. We demonstrate diagnostic potential of NVC in autonomic dysfunction and advocate for further study of capillary structure in autonomic dysfunction.

Abstract Objective To assess for improvement in comfort in participating in advocacy for migraine and headache disorders and knowledge needed for successful advocacy. Background The Advocacy Connection Team (ACT)‐Now program is an educational program offered through Miles for Migraine, a non‐profit advocacy organization. It is designed to teach headache fellows and patients advocacy skills. Methods In a cross‐sectional pre‐test–post‐test design, the 2021 ACT‐Now cohort of 98 participants were administered a set of 11 pre‐course survey questions identifying their role (healthcare provider/headache fellow or patient/caregiver), baseline knowledge of migraine‐related disability and stigma, and baseline engagement and comfort with advocating. The post‐course survey questions were the same as the pre‐course questions, with the addition of one question assessing knowledge of migraine‐related disability, additional questions addressing comfort levels advocating with insurance and policymakers, as well as creating an advocacy plan. Results For the pre‐course survey, 69 participants responded and for the post‐course survey, 40 participants responded. Compared to the pre‐course survey, participants were able to correctly identify epidemiological data about migraine following the ACT‐Now course (pre‐course 46% correct, post‐course 58% correct, p = 0.263). There was also an increase in the comfort level of participants in advocacy activities, including the creation of an advocacy action plan (pre‐course 23% were “very comfortable” advocating, post‐course 63%, p < 0.05). Conclusion These results demonstrate that ACT‐Now is effective at improving advocacy skills in a mixed cohort of patients and headache fellows, giving them the skills to create advocacy plans and engage with other patients and physicians, payers, and policymakers to create a more understanding, equitable and compassionate world for persons with migraine and other headache diseases.

Abstract Objective To improve the understanding of the role and utility of various neuroimaging modalities (clinical and research) for the evaluation of migraine aura (MA) and hemiplegic migraine during the ictal and interictal phases. Background MA is defined by reversible neurologic symptoms and is considered a manifestation of a primary condition. As such, most patients with MA do not require imaging. However, if there are atypical features, change in symptom pattern, or it is a first‐time presentation, neuroimaging may be used to evaluate for secondary conditions. Neuroimaging includes many modalities, and it is important to consider what information is being captured by these modalities (i.e., structural vs. functional). Imaging abnormalities may be noted both during (ictal) and between (interictal) MA attacks, and it is important for clinicians to be familiar with neuroimaging findings reported in migraine with aura (MWA) compared with other conditions. Methods With the assistance of a medical librarian, we performed a review of the literature pertaining to MWA and neuroimaging in PubMed. Search terms included were magnetic resonance imaging, positron‐emission tomography, single photon‐emission computed tomography, functional magnetic resonance imaging, and migraine with aura. We hand‐searched these references to inform our subsequent literature review. Results Acute MA can be associated with several unique neuroimaging findings—reversible cortical diffusion restriction, cortical venous engorgement, and a “biphasic” transition from hypoperfusion to hyperperfusion. Imaging findings during MA tend to span more than one vascular territory. Between acute attacks, neuroimaging in people with MWA can resemble migraine without aura in terms of white matter abnormalities and “infarct‐like lesions.” Research imaging modalities such as volumetric analysis and functional imaging have demonstrated unique findings in migraine with aura. Conclusion Although migraine is a clinical diagnosis, understanding of neuroimaging findings in MWA can help clinicians interpret imaging findings and improve patient care.