Citations

Introduction: Swan neck deformity develops as a sequela of chronic mallet finger. Surgical management can include soft tissue reconstruction or distal interphalangeal joint (DIPJ) fusion. Studies examining the incidence and management of posttraumatic swan neck deformity following mallet fracture are limited. Methods: A retrospective, single-institution review of patients undergoing surgical management of swan neck deformity following a traumatic mallet finger from 2000 to 2021 was performed. Patients with preexisting rheumatoid arthritis were excluded. Injury, preoperative clinical, and surgical characteristics were recorded along with postoperative outcomes and complications. Results: Twenty-five patients were identified who had surgical intervention for swan neck deformity. Sixty-four percent of mallet fingers were chronic. Median time to development of mallet finger was 2 months. Twelve (48%) mallet fingers were Doyle class I, 6 (24%) were class III, and 7 (28%) were class IVB. Forty percent of injuries failed nonoperative splinting trials. Sixteen (64%) underwent primary DIPJ arthrodesis, 8 (32%) underwent DIPJ pinning, and 1 underwent open reduction and internal fixation of mallet fracture. The complication rate was 50% overall, and 33% of surgeries experienced major complications. The overall reoperation rate was 33%. Proximal interphalangeal joint hyperextension improved by 11° on average. Median follow-up was 61.2 months. Conclusions: The development of symptomatic swan neck deformity following traumatic mallet finger injury is rare. All patients warrant an attempt at nonsurgical management. Attempts at surgical correction had a high rate of complications, and DIPJ fusion appeared to provide the most reliable solution.

ObjectivesThis study examines oncologic outcomes in patients with HPV‐related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV(+)OPSCC) who had evidence of gross cranial nerve invasion (CNI) identified at the time of surgery.Study DesignRetrospective cohort study comparing demographics, clinical features, and outcomes of HPV(+)OPSCC patients with and without gross CNI.MethodsPatients with biopsy proven HPV(+)OPSCC involving the base of tongue, tonsil, or unknown primary site, who underwent surgery as a part of their treatment between 1/1/2006–12/31/2020 (n = 874), were included in this study. Gross CNI was identified during operative intervention (n = 36). Statistical analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4 and R version 3.6.2. P‐values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.ResultsHPV(+)OPSCC patients with gross CNI were nearly 5 times as likely to suffer death by cancer (HR = 5.41, 95% CI 2.51 to 11.67, p < 0.0001), over 4 times as likely to see disease progression (HR = 4.25, 95% CI 2.31 to 7.84, p < 0.0001), and nearly 5 times as likely to experience metastasis (HR = 4.46, 95% CI 2.20 to 9.06, p < 0.0001) when compared to patients without CNI. Patients with gross CNI had significantly lower overall survival, cancer‐specific survival, progression‐free survival, and distant‐metastasis free survival (p < 0.0001). Patients with gross CNI were significantly more likely to present with higher clinical N stage, higher pathological N stage and extracapsular spread than patients without gross CNI.ConclusionsOur findings indicate that the presence of CNI is associated with significantly poorer oncologic outcomes in HPV(+)OPSCC patients.Level of Evidence3 Laryngoscope, 134:170–177, 2024

Abstract Background For transgender women, there is often the innate assumption that surgical breast augmentation will increase perceived chest femininity beyond hormone therapy alone. Objectives This study aimed to evaluate whether lay individuals found surgically augmented breasts more feminine than breast development from hormone replacement therapy alone in transgender patients. Methods We obtained preoperative (maximal breast growth on hormone therapy) and postoperative chest (after primary augmentation) images of 22 transgender patients, and age- and BMI-matched cisgender male (n = 17) and female (n = 21) control patients. Survey respondents (n = 271) rated each image on a scale of 1 (very feminine) to 5 (very masculine). Results were compared by survey respondent gender identity and sexual orientation. Results There was a significant difference in mean femininity score between all image types. Mean score for transgender patients fell by 0.478 points after surgery (P &lt; .0001). Subgroup analysis looking at transgender participants revealed the same significance trend postoperatively. Transgender respondents also found no difference in femininity between female controls and postoperative transgender patients (P = .132). We also compared mean femininity scores across 4 self-identified respondent subgroups: cisgender and heterosexual, cisgender and lesbian, gay, or bisexual (LGB), transgender and heterosexual, and transgender and LGB. The cisgender and heterosexual subgroup rated the postoperative transgender patients more feminine than any of the other respondent subgroups (LGB P &lt; .001, transgender and LGB P &lt; .001, transgender only P = .018). Conclusions This study shows that breast augmentation significantly increased the perception of femininity. Furthermore, gender identity and sexual orientation are important in how lay persons perceive transgender patients. Level of Evidence: 4