Citations

TPS2618 Background: MEDI-573 is an investigational dual-targeting human antibody that neutralizes IGF-I/-II ligands and inhibits IGF‑1R and insulin receptor-A (IR-A) signaling pathways. By sparing IR-B and its hybrid receptors, MEDI-573 may achieve antitumor activity without perturbing glucose homeostasis. Objectives of this phase 1 dose-escalation and expansion study are to evaluate safety and determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), optimal biologically effective dose, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity of MEDI-573 in adult patients with solid tumors. Methods: Patients with advanced solid tumors, Karnofsky status ≥60, and adequate organ function were treated with escalating doses of MEDI-573 IV once weekly (0.5 to 15 mg/kg) or every 3 weeks (30 or 45 mg/kg q3w) using a 3+3 design. Three patients per dose level were evaluated for safety. A biomarker-rich dose-expansion arm tested weekly 5 or 15 mg/kg MEDI‑573 in patients with advanced bladder cancer. Results: Preliminary data are presented for 43 patients (25 M, 18 F), median age 64 years. No dose-limiting toxicities or serious toxicity patterns occurred at any dose level. Drug-related adverse events occurring in ≥10% of patients were fatigue (28%), decreased appetite (23%), nausea (16%), diarrhea (14%), and anemia (12%); the majority were ≤ grade 2. Perturbations in insulin and growth hormone were not observed. Clinically significant changes in serum glucose were rare. The MTD was not reached after completely enrolling patients through the highest dose, 45 mg/kg IV q3w. Serum exposure of MEDI-573 increased with increasing dose. Full suppression of IGF‑I/-II was achieved with weekly and q3w dosing. No neutralizing antibodies against MEDI‑573 were detected. Of 43 patients, 8 (19%) had stable disease ≥12 weeks. The longest exposure was 21 months in a patient with well-differentiated liposarcoma. Conclusions: MEDI-573 demonstrated an acceptable safety profile at all doses tested. No dose-limiting toxicity or serious toxicities, including those related to glucose homeostasis, were detected. These preliminary results support further clinical development.

Abstract Despite the rapid progress in personalized cancer therapy (PCT) for breast cancer, no previous studies have used genomic predictors to choose among multiple chemotherapy regimens. It is unclear that given the current regimens how much PCT can improve the response rate for patients who will receive chemotherapy. In this study, we reanalyzed data from published studies of 1111 breast cancer patients who were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapies. Those patients were divided into three regimen groups: an anthracycline alone, anthracycline plus paclitaxel, and anthracycline plus docetaxel. We developed a new strategy called PRES (Personalized REgimen Selection) to reassign the optimal regimen to each of the patients. First, a variable selection scheme was developed to identify significant genetic predictors for chemotherapy response. The selected genetic variables were then combined with clinical variables to build random forest models to predict the response of a patient to each regimen using pCR (pathological complete response) as the measure of response. The models were used to assign an optimal regimen to each patient to maximize the chance of pCR. We found that the expected rate of pCR was improved from 21.2% to 39.6% (95% CI: 34.6% - 43.0%). We also found that 31.1% of the patients may have been overtreated and 8.2% patients undertreated. A validation study on 21 cell lines showed that our prediction agrees with their paclitaxel-sensitivity profiles. We performed additional analysis on the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data and found that 18 of the 19 genes identified are significantly differentially expressed between normal and tumor tissues, and 2 of them, TAF6L and METRN (meteorin), are associated with overall survival. In conclusion, PRES could substantially increase response rates for breast cancer patients who will receive one of the widely-accepted chemotherapy regimens at present. Citation Format: Jinfeng Zhang, Kaixian Yu, Qingxiang Amy Sang, Winston Tan, Mayassa B. Dargham, Jun S. Liu, Ty Lively, Cedric Sheffield. Personalized chemotherapy regimen selection for breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 2034.

Abstract Purpose: This phase I, multicenter, open-label, single-arm, dose-escalation, and dose-expansion study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and antitumor activity of MEDI-573 in adults with advanced solid tumors refractory to standard therapy or for which no standard therapy exists. Experimental Design: Patients received MEDI-573 in 1 of 5 cohorts (0.5, 1.5, 5, 10, or 15 mg/kg) dosed weekly or 1 of 2 cohorts (30 or 45 mg/kg) dosed every 3 weeks. Primary end points included the MEDI-573 safety profile, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and optimal biologic dose (OBD). Secondary end points included MEDI-573 pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity, and antitumor activity. Results: In total, 43 patients (20 with urothelial cancer) received MEDI-573. No dose-limiting toxicities were identified, and only 1 patient experienced hyperglycemia related to treatment. Elevations in levels of insulin and/or growth hormone were not observed. Adverse events observed in >10% of patients included fatigue, anorexia, nausea, diarrhea, and anemia. PK evaluation demonstrated that levels of MEDI-573 increased with dose at all dose levels tested. At doses >5 mg/kg, circulating levels of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I and IGFII were fully suppressed. Of 39 patients evaluable for response, none experienced partial or complete response and 13 had stable disease as best response. Conclusions: The MTD of MEDI-573 was not reached. The OBD was 5 mg/kg weekly or 30 or 45 mg/kg every 3 weeks. MEDI-573 showed preliminary antitumor activity in a heavily pretreated population and had a favorable tolerability profile, with no notable perturbations in metabolic homeostasis. Clin Cancer Res; 20(18); 4747–57. ©2014 AACR.