Citations

AbstractBackgroundAppropriate time for ejection fraction (EF) reassessment after revascularization in patients with left ventricular dysfunction has not been investigated comprehensively, although 3 months after revascularization is recommended to stratify the risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD).HypothesisEF reassessed within different timeframe after revascularization may have incosistent contribution for risk stratification of SCD.MethodsPatients who had EF ≤ 40% before revascularization and had EF reassessment at least once during follow‐up were included. The role of early (<3 months) versus late (3–12 months) EF measurements in prediction of all‐cause mortality and SCD were compared.ResultsA total of 1589 patients were identified. EF reassessed <3 months was lower than EF reassessed within 3–12 months (42.1 ± 9.7% vs. 45.8 ± 10.8%; p < .01). Among 1069 patients who had EF reassessed <3 months, EF ≤ 35% was associated with a higher risk of all‐cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.67; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22–2.29; p < .01), but had no association with the risk of SCD (HR, 1.44; 95% CI, 0.84–2.48; p = .18). By contrast, among 595 patients who had EF reassessed within 3–12 months, EF ≤ 35% was associated with higher risks of both all‐cause death (HR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.06–3.10; p = .03) and SCD (HR, 2.71; 95% CI, 1.31–5.61; p < .01). The relative contribution of SCD to all‐cause death was higher in patients with EF ≤ 35% than patients with EF > 35% when EF was reassessed within 3–12 months (p = .04). However, when EF was reassessed <3 months, the mode of death was similar in patients with EF ≤ 35% versus >35% (p = .85).Conclusions3 to 12 months after revascularization may be appropriate for cardiac function reassessment and SCD risk stratification.

Background: The role of minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production ( / CO2) slope, a ventilation efficiency marker, in predicting short-term and long-term health outcomes for patients with nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing lung resection has not been well investigated. Material and Methods: This prospective cohort study consecutively enrolled NSCLC patients who underwent a presurgical cardiopulmonary exercise test from November 2014 to December 2019. The association of / CO2 slope with relapse-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and perioperative mortality was evaluated using the Cox proportional hazards and logistic models. Covariates were adjusted using propensity score overlap weighting. The optimal cut-off point of the E/ CO2 slope was estimated using the receiver operating characteristics curve. Internal validation was completed through bootstrap resampling. Results: A cohort of 895 patients [median age (interquartile range), 59 (13) years; 62.5% male] was followed for a median of 40 (range, 1–85) months. Throughout the study, there were 247 relapses or deaths and 156 perioperative complications. The incidence rates per 1000 person-years for relapses or deaths were 108.8 and 79.6 among patients with high and low E/ CO2 slopes, respectively [weighted incidence rate difference per 1000 person-years, 29.21 (95% CI, 7.30–51.12)]. A E/ CO2 slope of greater than or equal to 31 was associated with shorter RFS [hazard ratio for relapse or death, 1.38 (95% CI, 1.02–1.88), P=0.04] and poorer OS [hazard ratio for death, 1.69 (1.15–2.48), P=0.02] compared to a lower / CO2 slope. A high E/ CO2 slope increased the risk of perioperative morbidity compared with a low E/ CO2 slope [odds ratio, 2.32 (1.54–3.49), P<0.001]. Conclusions: In patients with operable NSCLC, a high E/ CO2 slope was significantly associated with elevated risks of poorer RFS, OS, and perioperative morbidity.

Background: Heart failure (HF) with improved ejection fraction (HFiEF) is defined as a new subset in addition to the subsets of HF with reduced EF (≤40%; HFrEF) and HF with preserved EF (>40%). The characteristics and outcomes of patients with ischemic HFiEF after coronary revascularization are unknown. Methods and Results: We identified 1,816 patients with coronary artery diseases and reduced EF (≤40%) in a large hospital in China, who underwent either coronary artery bypass graft surgery (n=1,126) or percutaneous coronary intervention with drug eluting stent (n=687) from January 2005 to December 2014. All patients had EF reassessment during follow-up. The improvement of EF peaked at 3 months and persisted for more than one year after revascularization. Thus, 589 patients who had EF reassessment between 3 to 12 months after revascularization were included in the definitions of HFiEF and HFrEF patient cohort and subsequent survival analysis. 367 (62.3%) patients had EF >40% which constituted HFiEF cohort while 222 (37.7%) patients with EF≤40% constituted HFrEF cohort. Using stepwise logistic regression, we identified preoperative EF (odds ratio [OR], 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.11; P =0.006), left ventricular end-systolic diameter (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.91-0.95; P =0.000) and history of myocardial infarction (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.42-0.88; P =0.008) were associated with being in HFiEF group. Using Cox proportional hazard models, HFiEF patients had lower risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratios [HR], 0.39; 95% CI, 0.23-0.68; P =0.001), sudden cardiac death (HR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.14-0.75; P =0.009) and death due to HF (HR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.03-0.52; P =0.004) compared to HFrEF patients. Nonproportional outcome of composite end points (i.e., combination of all-cause mortality, HF hospitalization and repeat revascularization) between HFiEF and HFrEF groups was detected by using the Schoenfeld residuals. By using flexible parametric model, patients with HFiEF had similar risk of composite end points in the first 5 years (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.53-1.31; P =0.433), but significantly lower risk during years 6 to 11(HR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.03-0.56; P =0.007). In the HFiEF group, the risk of death were age (HR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.02-1.12; P =0.008), current smoking (HR, 5.62; 95% CI, 1.93-18.18; P =0.002) and history of myocardial infarction (HR, 2.89; 95% CI, 1.05-7.93; P =0.039). By contrast, in the HFrEF group, the risk factors were moderate or severe mitral regurgitation (HR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.06-3.11; P =0.031) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.95-0.99; P=0.014). Conclusions: Patients with ischemic HFiEF have distinct clinical characteristics and favorable outcomes. Our data support HFiEF as a distinct HF category in ischemic HF patients after revascularization therapy.

Abstract Background the Xiangya Hospital circuit training (X-CircuiT), was developed to reverse pre-frailty in Chinese older adults and determine potential mechanisms through which pre-frailty is reversed. Methods this randomised controlled trial was performed at Xiangya Hospital, Changsha, China from September 2020 to May 2021. Forty-eight pre-frail older adults were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to X-CircuiT (46 min/session, three supervised sessions/week for 3 months at a community health centre) or control (1-time advice on physical activity without supervised exercise). The primary outcome was the proportion of participants with pre-frailty after 3-month intervention. The secondary outcomes included absolute risk reduction (ARR), number needed to treat (NNT), and the changes in senior fitness, body composition and clinical measures. Results among 48 participants (mean age, 72 years; women [65%]), 22 participants in the X-CircuiT (92%) and 21 participants in the control (88%) completed the study. After 3 months, the proportion of pre-frailty was significantly lower in the X-CircuiT group than the control (14% versus 95%, P &lt; 0.001). The ARR and NNT were 82% [95% CI, 65–99] and 1 [1–2], respectively. X-CircuiT was associated with significant improvements in senior fitness indicators and body composition. No significant difference in blood chemistry, carotid ultrasound and echocardiography parameters was found between groups. No significant interaction was detected between sex, BMI, baseline peak oxygen consumption and study groups. Conclusion this study demonstrates that X-CircuiT could significantly reverse pre-frailty in Chinese older adults. The underlying mechanisms may involve X-CircuiT-induced improvements in body composition and senior fitness. The trial is registered at Chictr.org.cn. Number: ChiCTR2100048125.

Background The prognostic significance of obstructive sleep apnea ( OSA ) in patients with acute coronary syndrome ( ACS ) in the contemporary era is unclear. We performed a large, prospective cohort study and did a landmark analysis to delineate the association of OSA with subsequent cardiovascular events after ACS onset. Methods and Results Between June 2015 and May 2017, consecutive eligible patients admitted for ACS underwent cardiorespiratory polygraphy during hospitalization. OSA was defined as an apnea‐hypopnea index ≥15 events·h −1 . The primary end point was major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event ( MACCE ), including cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, ischemia‐driven revascularization, or hospitalization for unstable angina or heart failure. OSA was present in 403 of 804 (50.1%) patients. During median follow‐up of 1 year, cumulative incidence of MACCE was significantly higher in the OSA group than in the non‐ OSA group (log‐rank, P =0.041). Multivariate analysis showed that OSA was nominally associated with incidence of MACCE (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.55; 95% CI, 0.94–2.57; P =0.085). In the landmark analysis, patients with OSA had 3.9 times the risk of incurring a MACCE after 1 year (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.87; 95% CI, 1.20–12.46; P =0.023), but no increased risk was found within 1‐year follow‐up (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.67–2.09; P =0.575). No significant differences were found in the incidence of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and ischemia‐driven revascularization, except for a higher rate of hospitalization for unstable angina in the OSA group than in the non‐ OSA group (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.09–4.05; P =0.027). Conclusions There was no independent correlation between OSA and 1‐year MACCE after ACS . The increased risk associated with OSA was only observed after 1‐year follow‐up. Efficacy of OSA treatment as secondary prevention after ACS requires further investigation.