Citations

AbstractBackgroundLGI1‐antibody encephalitis (LGI1‐Ab‐E) is a common form of autoimmune encephalitis where most patients demonstrate ‘good’ clinician‐rated outcomes. However, more targeted questionnaires reveal numerous debilitating symptoms for many years. To better quantify these persistent features, we designed the LGI1‐Antibody Encephalitis Rating (LANTERN) scale, a quantified, disease‐specific patient‐reported outcome measure (PROM), adhering to FDA guidelines.MethodsA participant‐driven mixed‐methods approach to develop a clinically valid questionnaire over three stages: (1) Item generation through semi‐structured interviews; (2) Repeated cognitive debriefing rounds to advance comprehensibility, relevance and comprehensiveness; (3) Psychometric survey to condense the most sensitive and valid questions. Analyses incorporated sensitivity testing with multiple internal and external validations.ResultsFrom 73 items across six domains (Stage 1; n = 18), a questionnaire assessing the frequency and severity of 43 symptoms (80 questions), plus nine activities of daily living (ADL), was developed through cognitive debriefing (Stage 2; n = 15). This 89‐question survey was completed (Stage 3; n = 66 patients and 32 relatives) and distilled, using exploratory factor analyses, to a three‐factor symptom‐burden questionnaire comprising 41 questions (19 symptoms and 6 ADL), separated into physical, cognitive/behavioural and ADL domains. These factors demonstrated strong internal reliability (Cronbach alpha: 0.85–0.91), correlations with relative‐completed questionnaires (R = 0.73–0.85; p < 0.001), good‐to‐excellent intraclass re‐testing correlations (0.81–0.98; n = 19) and strong associations with numerous predefined external measures.DiscussionLANTERN represents a PROM for LGI1‐Ab‐E, with initial content, structural and construct validity and test–retest reliability. It can be used as a reliable, tailored, efficient and sensitive method to establish symptom burden in people with LGI1‐Ab‐E, both in clinical practice and trials.

Background: Disparities in diversity, equity and inclusivity are endemic in American society, and in the United States (US) healthcare system. As US population diversity increases, physical therapists (PTs) must be able to provide equitable care for all people, regardless of their cultural or personal identity. Culturally-humble Hospice and palliative Care (HPC) PT practice, with vigilant awareness of cultural complexities and commitment to approaching cultural understanding with humility, is essential to provide optimal end of life care for all persons. Purpose: This Perspective paper will 1) provide an overview of the role of PT in HPC, 2) describe culturally-related disparities in HPC, and 3) suggest evidence-based strategies for cultural humility in HPC PT best practice. Specific challenges in the delivery of culturally-humble end of life care will be discussed, including advanced care planning, truth telling, and death beliefs/practices.