Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

2 citation(s) found for "Vyskocil, J".

Endoscopic‐assisted transorbital extended orbital exenteration: A multi‐institutional preclinical study
Roccuzzo, Giuseppe , Vyskocil, Erich , Kandathil, Sam Augustine , Peris‐Celda, Maria , Leong, Samuel , Herman, Philippe , Vérillaud, Benjamin , Bresson, Damien, Schreiber, Alberto , Arosio, Alberto Daniele , Valentini, Marco , Pozzi, Fabio , Volpi, Luca , Nicolai, Piero , Ferrari, Marco , Kandathil, Sam Augustine , Borsetto, Daniele , Taboni, Stefano , Mattavelli, Davide , Ferrari, Marco , Schreiber, Alberto , Hirtler, Lena , Agosti, Edoardo , Kuan, Edward C , Wang, Eric W , Sharma, Rishi , Vinciguerra, Alessandro , Bresson, Damien , Erović, Boban M. , Vural, Alperen , Dallan, Iacopo , Doglietto, Francesco , Mattavelli, Davide , Rampinelli, Vittorio , Battaglia, Paolo , Turri‐Zanoni, Mario , Bignami, Maurizio , Castelnuovo, Paolo

Head & Neck | July 3, 2024 | Volume: 46 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 2327-2339

10.1002/hed.27858 | PMID 38958177 Get It

Abstract Background Sinonasal malignancies with orbital invasion have dismal prognosis even when treated with orbital exenteration (OE). Sugawara et al. developed a surgical strategy called “extended‐OE (EOE),” showing encouraging outcomes. We hypothesized that a similar resection is achievable under endoscopic guidance through the exenterated orbit (endoscopic‐EOE). Methods The study was conducted in three institutions: University of Vienna; Mayo Clinic; University of Insubria; 48 orbital dissections were performed. A questionnaire was developed to evaluate feasibility and safety of each step, scoring from 1 to 10, (“impossible” to “easy,” and “high risk” to “low risk,” respectively), most likely complication(s) were hypothesized. Results The step‐by‐step technique is thoroughly described. The questionnaire was answered by 25 anterior skull base surgeons from six countries. Mean, median, range, and interquartile range of both feasibility and safety scores are reported. Conclusions Endoscopic‐EOE is a challenging but feasible procedure. Clinical validation is required to assess real‐life outcomes.
Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonia
Flaherty, Kevin R. , Andrei, Adin‐Cristian , King, Talmadge E. , Raghu, Ganesh , Colby, Thomas V. , Wells, Athol U. , Bassily, Nadir, Brown, Kevin K. , Bois, Roland du, Flint, Andrew , Gay, Steven E., Gross, Barry H., Kazerooni, Ella A. , Knapp, Robert H., Louvar, Edmund, Lynch, David A. , Quick, John S., Vyskocil, J , Wadenstorer, Frazer A., Wilt, Jeffrey, Toews, Galen B., Murray, Susan , Nicholson, Andrew G. , Thannickal, Victor J. , Travis, William D. , Martínez, Fernando J.

American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine | January 25, 2007 | Volume: 175 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 1054-1060

10.1164/rccm.200606-833oc | PMID 17255566 Get It

Abstract Rationale Treatment and prognoses of diffuse parenchymal lung diseases (DPLDs) varies by diagnosis. Obtaining a uniform diagnosis among observers is difficult. Objectives Evaluate diagnostic agreement between academic and community-based physicians for patients with DPLDs, and determine if an interactive approach between clinicians, radiologists, and pathologists improved diagnostic agreement in community and academic centers. Methods Retrospective review of 39 patients with DPLD. A total of 19 participants reviewed cases at 2 community locations and 1 academic location. Information from the history, physical examination, pulmonary function testing, high-resolution computed tomography, and surgical lung biopsy was collected. Data were presented in the same sequential fashion to three groups of physicians on separate days. Measurements and Main Results Each observer's diagnosis was coded into one of eight categories. A κ statistic allowing for multiple raters was used to assess agreement in diagnosis. Interactions between clinicians, radiologists, and pathologists improved interobserver agreement at both community and academic sites; however, final agreement was better within academic centers (κ = 0.55–0.71) than within community centers (κ = 0.32–0.44). Clinically significant disagreement was present between academic and community-based physicians (κ = 0.11–0.56). Community physicians were more likely to assign a final diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis compared with academic physicians. Conclusions Significant disagreement exists in the diagnosis of DPLD between physicians based in communities compared with those in academic centers. Wherever possible, patients should be referred to centers with expertise in diffuse parenchymal lung disorders to help clarify the diagnosis and provide suggestions regarding treatment options.