Citations

Abstract BCMA-directed CAR T-cell and T-cell engager (TCE) therapies produce high response rates in relapsed multiple myeloma, yet most patients progress. Prior work identified TNFRSF17 alterations mediating antigen escape in up to 43% of TCE progressions. To evaluate the generalizability of these findings and examine antigen-loss-independent resistance, we performed whole-exome sequencing on 32 paired pre- and post-treatment progression bone marrow samples from 15 patients (5 CAR T, 10 TCE); two patients received both agents. TNFRSF17 alterations were infrequent and restricted to TCE recipients (one concurrent frameshift and missense mutation; two heterozygous copy-number losses); no biallelic loss or CAR T-associated events were observed. In contrast, deleterious/loss-of-function variants in NF-κB, PI3K-AKT-mTOR, and MAPK/ERK pathways were universal in pre-treatment samples and acquired or clonally enriched in 80% of patients at progression. Acquired events included loss-of-function alterations in CYLD , activating mutations in KRAS , NRAS and BRAF , and acquired TP53 mutations. In this series, antigen escape via TNFRSF17 /BCMA alteration was uncommon. Instead, pre-existing, acquired and clonally enriched pathogenic variants in NF-κB, PI3K-AKT-mTOR and MAPK cascades, together with TP53 mutation, emerged as a frequent finding. These alterations suggest that deregulation of BCMA-downstream survival signaling, enhanced proliferative fitness, and elevation of apoptotic threshold constitute antigen-loss-independent mechanisms of resistance.

ABSTRACT The prognostic relevance of multiple myeloma (MM)‐defined high‐risk (HR) cytogenetic abnormalities in AL amyloidosis is incompletely defined. We retrospectively evaluated 517 newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis patients seen at Mayo Clinic between 2012 and 2021 who had baseline plasma cell FISH. HR cytogenetics were defined as t (4;14), t (14;16), t (14;20), del(17p), or 1q gain/amplification (+1q). HR abnormalities were identified in 151 patients (29%); +1q accounted for most HR cases (122/151, 81%). Compared with standard‐risk (SR), patients harboring +1q demonstrated a greater clonal disease burden, including higher dFLC and bone marrow plasma cells, greater intact immunoglobulin secretion, higher plasma cell proliferative index, and enrichment for modified SLiM‐CRAB features. Hematologic and organ response patterns of +1q patients were generally comparable to SR patients, whereas non‐1q HR patients had a higher proportion of early hematologic responses. Patients harboring +1q demonstrated significantly inferior overall survival (OS) compared with both non‐1q HR patients and SR patients (median OS 57 months vs. not reached vs. 120 months, p = 0.02). In multivariable piecewise Cox analysis, the adverse prognostic impact of +1q was most evident beyond 24 months from diagnosis (HR 2.89, 95% CI 1.64–5.09, p < 0.001), whereas non‐1q HR lesions were not independently prognostic. These findings suggest that +1q identifies a biologically distinct AL amyloidosis subset characterized by plasma cell–dominant features and inferior long‐term disease control. In contrast, other MM‐defined HR cytogenetic abnormalities appear to have limited prognostic relevance in AL amyloidosis.

ABSTRACT Diagnosis The diagnosis of multiple myeloma requires ≥ 10% clonal bone marrow plasma cells or a biopsy proven plasmacytoma plus evidence of one or more multiple myeloma defining events (MDE): CRAB (hypercalcemia, renal failure, anemia, or lytic bone lesions) attributable to the plasma cell disorder, bone marrow clonal plasmacytosis ≥ 60%, serum involved/uninvolved free light chain (FLC) ratio ≥ 100 (provided involved FLC is ≥ 100 mg/L and urine monoclonal protein is ≥ 200 mg/24 h), or > 1 focal lesion on magnetic resonance imaging. Risk Stratification High‐risk multiple myeloma is defined by the presence of del(17p), p53 mutation, or bi‐allelic del(1p); t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20) in combination with gain(1q) or del(1p); or gain(1q) plus del(1p). Initial Therapy Initial therapy consists of a quadruplet regimen consisting of anti‐CD38 monoclonal antibody (daratumumab or isatuximab) plus bortezomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone (VRd) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation in eligible patients. Selected standard risk patients can delay transplant until first relapse. Frail patients who are not candidates for transplant are treated with a triplet regimen, either anti‐CD 38 antibody plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone, or VRd. Maintenance Therapy Standard maintenance is lenalidomide in combination with daratumumab or isatuximab. Lenalidomide is discontinued after 2 years in standard‐risk patients. Bortezomib plus lenalidomide is an alternative option for high‐risk myeloma. Management of Relapsed Disease Major options are chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR‐T) cell therapy, bispecific antibodies, various triplet regimens, and belantamab mafadotin. Management of Smoldering Multiple Myeloma Daratumumab for 3 years should be considered in high‐risk smoldering multiple myeloma.

ABSTRACT Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) is an asymptomatic premalignant precursor to multiple myeloma (MM). While development of end‐organ damage in MM largely reflects increasing clonal burden, emerging evidence indicates that qualitative properties of the monoclonal immunoglobulins in MGUS can be directly pathogenic, leading to serious organ injury independent of disease burden. This has led to the recognition of a broader spectrum of disorders collectively termed monoclonal gammopathy of clinical significance (MGCS). MGCS can be further subclassified based on the organ system involved; for example, monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance specifically refers to monoclonal immunoglobulin‐driven renal injury. Along these lines, we propose monoclonal gammopathy of thrombotic significance (MGTS) as encompassing thrombotic disorders in which there is definitive, mechanistically supported evidence that a monoclonal (M)‐protein associated with a clonal plasma or B‐cell disorder directly contributes to thrombosis. Based on current evidence, monoclonal protein–induced immune thrombocytopenia and thrombosis is the only disorder that meets our criteria for MGTS. Other thrombotic disorders, such as thrombotic microangiopathy and antiphospholipid syndrome, may occur in the setting of a monoclonal protein and have biologically plausible M‐protein‐mediated mechanisms; however, direct evidence implicating the M‐protein in thrombosis is currently lacking. Accordingly, we provisionally classify these disorders as thrombotic syndromes associated with M‐proteins, pending causal validation. We also highlight thrombotic disease associations with multifactorial pathogenesis that should not be classified as MGTS. Broader recognition of MGTS is essential to advance consensus definitions, establish diagnostic criteria, and develop evidence‐based management strategies for this clinically important group of disorders.

Summary Iron deficiency (ID) is often overlooked in patients with haematological malignancies due to other potential aetiologies. Daratumumab, an anti‐cluster of differentiation 38 (anti‐CD38) monoclonal antibody, is commonly used for treating multiple myeloma (MM) in the upfront and relapsed/refractory settings. Although anaemia is a common haematological toxicity associated with daratumumab, the contribution of ID in MM patients has not been systematically investigated. We conducted a retrospective case–control study to evaluate the prevalence of ID in newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) patients. Cases were patients receiving daratumumab, ixazomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Dara‐IRD, n = 55). We compared this group with an age‐ and sex‐matched cohort of patients with NDMM who received bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (VRD, n = 20) as induction therapy. At 1‐year, nearly 50% of Dara‐IRD‐treated patients met the criteria for ID (ferritin <30 mcg/L) compared with none of the VRD‐treated controls. All Dara‐IRD‐treated patients had a decrease in ferritin at 1‐year from baseline compared with only 45% of VRD‐treated patients. These findings identify a marked clinical signal of ID among NDMM patients receiving daratumumab‐based treatment. Although the study design does not establish causality or exclude regimen‐related confounding, it highlights the need for increased awareness of the importance of monitoring iron status in MM patients treated with daratumumab‐containing regimens.

Abstract Frailty influences treatment outcomes in older patients with multiple myeloma (MM), yet existing frailty tools capture limited geriatric domains and are incompletely studied in the context of contemporary therapies. We prospectively evaluated patient-reported comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) domains and their associations with treatment toxicity and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) in older adults with MM. Patients aged ≥60 years with newly diagnosed or relapsed/refractory MM initiating a new therapy completed electronic CGA and PRO questionnaires at baseline and 4 months. Outcomes included clinician- and patient-reported treatment toxicity, treatment adaptations, health care use, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). A cumulative deficit frailty index (FI) was derived from CGA and HRQOL domains. Among 90 patients (mean age, 72 years), geriatric impairments were common, particularly physical function domains. High-grade nonhematologic toxicities were significantly associated with older age, comorbidities, patient-reported functional limitations, and anxiety. Toxicity rates on the PRO version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) were higher than on CTCAE, highlighting a discordance between physician- and patient-reported treatment toxicity. Frailty was present in 22% and associated with worse baseline HRQOL and increased high-grade nonhematologic toxicity but not treatment adaptations or health care use. Average CGA and HRQOL scores remained stable over 4 months, although individual trajectories varied. Patient-reported geriatric impairments are prevalent in older adults with MM and strongly associated with nonhematologic toxicities even in the contemporary treatment era. Physician-reported CTCAE may not fully reflect patients' symptom burden. Heterogeneity in individual geriatric trajectories during treatment emphasize the need for longitudinal assessment. This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT05918185.

Abstract Measurable residual disease (MRD) is a powerful prognostic tool in multiple myeloma, but predictors of achieving MRD negativity after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) are not well defined. We studied 814 patients who achieved at least a very good partial response after ASCT between January 2016 and January 2023 and underwent MRD assessment by next-generation flow cytometry. Overall, 387 (48%) achieved MRD negativity after ASCT. The presence of t(11;14) (odds ratio [OR], 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4–3.2; P&lt; .01) and pretransplant response less than complete remission (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.2-3.7; P&lt; .01) independently predicted MRD positivity. Patients who were MRD positive had inferior progression-free survival (PFS; hazard ratio [HR], 1.99; 95% CI, 1.53-2.58; P&lt; .001) and overall survival (HR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.10-2.28; P = .009). Despite lower MRD-negative rate, 5-year PFS was similar among t(11;14) MRD positive (58%) and patients who were MRD negative (63%; P = .12). In patients who were MRD negative, the 5-year PFS was 73% in those without ≥2 HRCA compared with 55% in those with ≥2 HRCA (HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.2–3.3; P = .01). In the MRD-positive cohort, 5-year PFS was 53% in patients without ≥2 HRCA vs 17% in those with ≥2 HRCA (HR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.6-3.6; P&lt; .01). In addition, higher residual clonal plasma cell burden within MRD-positive disease was associated with inferior PFS (HR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.2-6.9; P = .002). This study highlights that the presence of t(11;14) independently predicts MRD positivity after ASCT, although it does not significantly affect prognosis in this subgroup.

Solitary plasmacytomas (SPs) are rare localized tumors of clonal plasma cells, either in the bone (solitary bone plasmacytoma) or in soft tissue/extraosseous (extramedullary) with either no or with minimal bone marrow (BM) infiltration (<10% clonal plasma cells by immunohistochemistry) and no evidence of systemic involvement or myeloma defining events. Approximately 50% of SPs will progress to symptomatic myeloma within 5 years after initial definitive local radiotherapy. Increased availability of improved diagnostic and monitoring tools has increased the sensitivity of detection of additional lesions and marrow involvement and has implications for the follow-up strategy after treatment. Thus, the definitions and requirements for the diagnosis and follow-up of SPs are evolving. The diagnosis of SP requires the careful exclusion of multiple myeloma (MM) that would require systemic therapy, by using all the available methods to detect systemic disease (advanced imaging, sensitive BM assessment methods, blood and urine tests). Local radiotherapy remains the mainstay of therapy, and despite the availability of innovative drugs for MM, the clinical benefit of systemic therapy currently remains poorly defined. The International Myeloma Working Group provides here updated recommendations for the diagnosis, evaluation, treatment, and response assessment of patients with SPs, incorporating recent data and advances in diagnostic tools.

ABSTRACT Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta‐cel) has demonstrated excellent efficacy and long‐term disease control in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). However, a proportion of patients experience early treatment failures. We investigated clinical factors associated with early progression or death (within 12 months) in patients with RRMM receiving standard‐of‐care cilta‐cel across the three Mayo clinic centers. Patients with a follow‐up of at least 12 months or progression or death within 12 months from infusion were included. Of the patients with early treatment failure ( n = 52), 69% had progressive disease and 31% had a non‐relapse mortality (NRM) event. In patients without early treatment failure ( n = 164), 13% of events were NRM. Among pretreatment factors, prior BCMA‐directed therapy, presence of extramedullary disease and a CAR‐HEMATOTOX score of ≥ 2 were independent predictors of early progression or death. The utilization of cilta‐cel in earlier lines of treatment (1–3 vs. 4 or more) demonstrated comparable PFS (12‐month PFS 73% vs. 77%, p = 0.94). Measurable residual disease positivity in the bone marrow at 3 months (11/197 patients) identified a small but high‐risk group with an increased risk of early treatment failure (OR 5.68; p = 0.012). Patients with less than a complete response on a FDG PET/CT at 3 months also had an increased risk of early treatment failure (OR 11.8; p < 0.0001). Our findings may help identify patients at high‐risk for early adverse outcomes despite receiving highly effective therapy, and support consideration of novel therapeutic strategies within a clinical trial setting.