The AML14 cell line and its AML14.3D10 subclone was established as a model cell system that exhibits phenotypic characteristics similar to that of human eosinophils. We investigated the effects of purinergic receptor stimulation on the physiological response of the AML 14.3D10 cell line to better evaluate its role as a suitable model for eosinophils using both molecular and functional approaches. Ca 2+ imaging experiments using Fura‐2 demonstrated the existence of purinergic receptors responsive to UTP (EC 50 of 8.9 x 10 −8 ), ATP γ‐s (EC 50 of 1.87 x 10 −7 ), and UDP (EC 50 of 7.44x 10 −6 ). Molecular identification of the purinergic receptor subtypes was confirmed by QRT‐PCR which demonstrated the presence of P2Y 1 , P2Y 2 , P2Y 4 , and P2Y 6 receptors. Ratio imaging experiments using the membrane potential sensitive indicator DiBAC‐3 showed that stimulation with UTP produced a membrane hyperpolarization of approximately 10 mV that returned to the original resting potential within 10 minutes after stimulation. Whole cell perforated patch clamp experiments using amphotericin B revealed the presence of voltage‐gated potassium channel currents that were stimulated following treatment with UTP. Analysis of mRNA by QRT‐PCR indicated the existence of several voltage‐gated potassium channel α subunits including, Kv1.2, Kv1.3, Kv1.4, and Kv1.6. Previous studies of Kv1.3 channel function in T‐lymphocytes showed that the channel was involved in activation and proliferation, suggesting the possibility of a similar role related to tumorogenesis in the AML 14.3D10 cell line.
Consensus guidelines: best practices for detection, assessment and management of suspected acute drug‐induced liver injury occurring during clinical trials in adults with chronic cholestatic liver disease
SummaryBackgroundImproved knowledge of the molecular pathophysiology and immunopathogenesis of cholestatic liver diseases in recent years has led to an increased interest in developing novel therapies. Patients with cholestatic liver disease often require different approaches to assessment and management of suspected drug‐induced liver injury (DILI) compared to those with healthy livers and those with parenchymal liver diseases. At present, there are no regulatory guidelines or society position papers, that systematically address best practices pertaining to detection of DILI in these patients.AimsTo outline best practices for detection, assessment and management of suspected acute DILI during clinical trials in adults with the cholestatic liver diseases – Primary Biliary Cholangitis (PBC) and Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis (PSC).MethodsThis is one of the several papers developed by the IQ DILI Initiative, which is comprised of members from 16 pharmaceutical companies, in collaboration with DILI experts from academia and regulatory agencies. The contents are the result of an extensive literature review, as well as in‐depth discussions among industry, regulatory and academic DILI experts, to achieve consensus recommendations on DILI‐related issues occurring during clinical trials for cholestatic liver diseases.ResultsRecommended best practices are outlined pertaining to hepatic eligibility criteria, monitoring of liver tests, approach to a suspected DILI signal, and hepatic discontinuation rules.ConclusionsThis paper provides a framework for the approach to detection, assessment and management of suspected acute DILI occurring during clinical trials in adults with cholestatic liver disease.