Citations

Purpose: Literature on early mobilization and exercise training in patients recovering from acute heart failure (AHF) is promising. However, there lacks uniformity in the time of initiation, exercise prescription, safety criteria, and termination criteria. Thus, the aim was to develop a mobilization algorithm for patients recovering from AHF. Methods: A modified web-based Delphi process was undertaken involving 15 panelists from across the globe. In Round 1, new variables, modifications to suggested variables, and agreement-disagreement within the panelists were obtained. In Round 2, agreement on a 5-point Likert scale was obtained. In Round 3, the algorithm was compiled, and excluded statements were discussed via web-based calls. The new variables were grouped into themes via an inductive process. The level of agreement and rating for each statement were analyzed using descriptive statistics, including frequency and percentages. We used Kappa statistics to examine the level of agreement between the panelists for each criterion. The consensus criterion was defined a priori as statements with a mean rating of ≥4 on the 5-point Likert scale by ≥70% of the panelists and Kendall’s coefficient of concordance ( W ) of ≥0.3 between panelists. Results: From Round 1, 54 new variables were obtained. More than two-thirds (118/170, 69%) of statements reached consensus and reported a fair level of agreement between panelists ( W ≥ 0.3). The final algorithm with all its criteria received a 100% (13/13) consensus. Conclusion: Physician-referral criteria, physiotherapy assessment process, exercise prescription, safety criteria, and termination criteria were formulated for early mobilization and exercise training for patients recovering from AHF.

ABSTRACT Introduction Peak rating of perceived exertion (RPE) is measured during clinical cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) and is commonly used as a subjective indicator of maximal effort. However, no study to date has reported reference standards or the distribution of peak RPE across a large cohort of apparently healthy individuals. Purpose This study aimed to determine reference standards for peak RPE when using the 6–20 Borg scale for both treadmill and cycle tests. Methods The analysis included 9551 tests (8821 treadmill, 730 cycle ergometer) from 13 laboratories within the Fitness Registry and Importance of Exercise National Database (FRIEND). Using data from tests conducted January 1, 1980, to January 1, 2021, percentiles of peak RPE for men and women were determined for each decade from 20 to 89 yr of age for treadmill and cycle exercise modes. Two-way ANOVA was used to compare differences in peak RPE values between sexes and across age groups. Results There were statistically significant differences in RPE between age groups whether the test was performed on a treadmill or cycle ergometer ( P < 0.05). However, the mean and median RPE for each sex, age group, and test mode were between 18 and 19. In addition, 83% of participants met the traditional RPE criteria of ≥18 for indicating sufficient maximal effort. Conclusions This report provides the first normative reference standards for peak RPE in both male and female individuals performing CPX on a treadmill or cycle ergometer. Furthermore, these reference standards highlight the general consistency of peak RPE responses during CPX.