Citations

Abstract Background Immunosuppression is a recognized risk factor for severe and disseminated coccidioidomycosis; however, data describing outcomes in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) receiving advanced therapy, including biologics and small molecules, remain limited. We aim to describe the prevalence, clinical presentation, treatment patterns, and outcomes of coccidioidomycosis in IBD patients receiving advanced therapy at an endemic tertiary care center. Methods We performed a retrospective observational study of adult patients with IBD at Mayo Clinic Arizona diagnosed with coccidioidomycosis between 2023 and 2026. Patients were included if IBD diagnosis preceded coccidioidomycosis diagnosis and advanced therapy had been active for at least 4 weeks before infection. Cases were classified as proven, probable, or possible based on microbiologic, clinical, radiographic, and serologic criteria. Clinical outcomes included antifungal treatment duration, hospitalization related to coccidioidomycosis or IBD, IBD treatment modification after diagnosis, re-emergence of coccidioidomycosis symptoms, and IBD-related surgery. Results A total of 48 patients met inclusion criteria. Among 1083 tested IBD patients receiving advanced therapy, coccidioidomycosis positivity prevalence was 4.4% when including all serologically positive patients and 1.9% when restricted to proven or probable cases. The median age at coccidioidomycosis diagnosis was 40 years (range 19-87 years), and 30 (62.5%) of 48 had Crohn’s disease. Proven or probable infection was identified in 21 (43.8%) of 48 patients, while 14 (29.2%) of 48 patients were classified as possible. Antifungal therapy was prescribed in 32 (66.7%) of 48 patients, including all proven cases, 15 (88.2%) of 17 probable cases, 9 (64.3%) of 14 possible cases, and 3 (25.0%) of 12 nondiagnostic cases. Among proven/probable/possible cases, the median antifungal treatment duration was 174 days (range 8-831 days). Advanced IBD therapy was continued in 3 (75.0%) of 4 proven cases, 9 (52.9%) of 17 probable cases, 12 (85.7%) of 14 possible cases, and all nondiagnostic cases. Hospitalization occurred in 6 (12.5%) of 48 of the cohort, all of which were proven/probable cases. Most patients remained on advanced therapy after diagnosis, although tumor necrosis factor α inhibitors were the most interrupted or discontinued agents. Conclusions In this endemic tertiary care cohort, management decisions varied according to diagnostic certainty. Patients with proven or probable coccidioidomycosis were more likely to receive antifungal therapy and undergo advanced IBD therapy modification, whereas most patients with possible or nondiagnostic serologic findings remained on advanced therapy without major IBD-related complications. Prolonged antifungal treatment was common, highlighting the complexity of managing coccidioidomycosis in immunosuppressed patients with IBD.

ABSTRACT Background Strongyloides stercoralis is an intestinal parasitic nematode that can infect humans with a 2%–7% prevalence in the United States. Immunosuppression is a crucial risk factor for disseminated infection. Diagnosis is often delayed and targeted treatment is frequently initiated late. We therefore sought to review the prevalence of positive Strongyloides antibody results and undertook a descriptive analysis of such patients. Methods We retrospectively reviewed patients with positive Strongyloides IgG serology from August 2012 to April 2023 across geographically distinct academic medical centers. Study period pre‐dated universal donor and recipient Strongyloides screening recommendation by the Organ Procurement and transplantation network (OPTN). Clinical presentation was classified into three categories: chronic infection (positive Strongyloides IgG serology without additional clinical manifestations), hyperinfection syndrome (positive serology with involvement of the skin, gastrointestinal tract, or lungs), and disseminated infection (positive serology with involvement beyond those typically involved in hyperinfection). Results A total of 412 patients were identified; median age was 59 years and 66% (272) were male. The primary indication for testing was pretransplant evaluation in 230 (56%), eosinophilia workup in 84 (20%), suspicion of symptomatic infection in 74 (18%), testing based on travel history in 27 (7%), and pre‐immunosuppression screening in 27 (7%). Furthermore, 401 patients (97.3%) were categorized as having chronic infection, 10 patients (2.42%) had hyperinfection, and one patient (0.24%) had disseminated infection, presenting with Escherichia coli bacteremia and meningitis. Symptomatic infection was more common at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester and Mayo Clinic Health Sciences than at the Arizona and Florida Mayo Clinic sites (6% vs. 2%, p = 0.079). Treatment was administered to 366/412 (89%) patients. Conclusion Most patients with positive Strongyloides serology were asymptomatic, and treatment regimens were not uniform. Patients who tested positive should be treated prior to immunosuppression initiation, though this was not systematically assessed in this cohort. The observed variability in treatment regimens highlights the need for standardized protocols.

Abstract Background Strongyloides stercoralis is an intestinal parasitic nematode with a 2% - 7% prevalence in the United States. Immunosuppression can predispose to disseminated infection, concurrent bacterial sepsis and significant morbidity and mortality. We sought to review positive Strongyloides serology (PSS) results across 3 academic medical centers. Methods Electronic medical records of patients with PSS were reviewed between 2012 and 2023. Extracted data included demographics, country of origin, travel history, testing indication, clinical presentation, treatment regimen and duration. Patients were classified into chronic infection (PSS without additional clinical manifestations), hyper infection syndrome (cutaneous, gastrointestinal tract, or lung involvement), and disseminated infection (evidence of involvement of distant sites beyond hyper infection such as the brain, liver, kidneys, or bloodstream). Results Overall PSS rate across the 3 sites was 5.5%. A total of 412 patients with PSS were identified with a mean age of 56.7 years (SD ±14.2); 272 (66%) were male. The primary indication for testing was transplant evaluation in 230 (56%), eosinophilia workup in 84 (20%), suspicion of active infection in 74 (18%), travel history in 27 (7%), and pre-immunosuppression screening in 27 (7%). 401 (97.3%) were categorized as chronic infection,10 (2%) as hyper infection, and one patient (0.2%) as disseminated infection. Treatment was administered to 366 (89.3%) patients: 226 (61.7%) received 2 doses of Ivermectin on consecutive days, 94 (25.7%) received a single dose, 26 (7.1%) received 2 doses repeated 2 weeks later, and 20 (5.5%) received alternative regimens. The patient with disseminated infection received 2 weeks of Ivermectin followed by monthly dosing. Conclusion Majority of the patients with PSS were asymptomatic, and treatment regimens were not uniform. Screening should be considered for patients currently receiving or initiating long-term immunosuppression that can potentiate Strongyloides dissemination. Developing a targeted testing algorithm based on epidemiologic factors, clinical suspicion, laboratory parameters and nature of immunosuppression can help identify at-risk patients who can receive pre-emptive therapy if infected. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Abstract Description Coccidiomycosis is an endemic fungal infection caused by Coccidioides spp., and diagnosis is often made with serology. Coccidiomycosis is especially problematic for immunocompromised patients, with greater risk for disseminated infection and mortality. This study evaluated current strategies for detecting antibodies to Coccidioides, including enzyme immunoassay (EIA), immunodiffusion (ID) and complement fixation (CF) and applied a new ID assay for improved sensitivity and specificity. Clinical sensitivity and specificity studies were done using 1544 unique serum specimens for which Coccidioides EIA testing was clinically requested. A full panel of EIA IgG, EIA IgM, ID and CF was performed on each, comparing our in-house immunodiffusion assay using reagents from Cactus Bio, LLC to our current reference laboratory. Full method validation was completed, as prescribed by CLIA. Using existing reference lab testing as the standard, a sensitivity of 96.9%, specificity 85.9%, PPV 54.9%, NPV 99.4% was achieved. Additional chart review demonstrated the in-house ID improved to 98.0% sensitivity, 94.6 specificity, 84.2% PPV, 99.4% NPV. Such high NPV supports using reflex testing, which allowed our lab to eliminate hundreds of unnecessary CF referrals each month, saving diagnostic time, financial waste and lab resources. A reflexive testing algorithm paired with this enhanced ID assay is especially useful for the immunosuppressed, for which Coccidioides infections carry a greater risk. Topic Categories Translational and Interventional Immunology (TI)

Abstract Background In 2021, the state of Arizona experienced the largest focal outbreak of West Nile virus (WNV) in US history. Timely and accurate diagnostic testing remains a challenge for WNV due to transient viremia and limited immunoassay specificity. Recent studies have identified whole blood (WB) and urine as more sensitive specimen types for the detection of WNV RNA. Methods We evaluated ordering practices, test performance, and patient characteristics of probable and confirmed cases. In total, we identified 190 probable and proven cases, including 127 patients (66.8%) with neuroinvasive disease. Results Among all cases, only 29.5% had WNV polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing ordered on WB, of which 80.3% resulted as positive, including 7 cases in which WNV serologic testing was negative and 5 cases for which serologic testing was not ordered. In comparison, only 23.7% of cases that had cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) PCR ordered had a positive result, including 3 cases that were negative by PCR on WB. In contrast, WNV PCR on WB detected 12 neuroinvasive cases that were CSF PCR negative. WNV PCR testing in urine was only ordered on 2 patients, both of whom were positive. Crossing cycle threshold (Ct) values were not significantly different between WB and CSF specimen types, nor was there a correlation between Ct value and days from symptom onset at the time of sample collection; all specimen types and time points had Ct values, with 98% above 30. WB was positive by WNV PCR in several patients for >7 days (range, 7–25 days) after symptom onset, as was the CSF PCR. Conclusions Taken together, these findings indicate that WNV PCR testing on WB may be the best initial test for timely diagnosis of WNV infection, irrespective of clinical manifestation; however, if negative in patients with suspected neuroinvasive disease, WNV PCR testing on CSF should be ordered.

ABSTRACTCoccidioidesspp. are dimorphic fungi that are capable of infecting human and non-human mammals and can cause diverse manifestations of coccidioidomycosis or Valley fever (VF). In combination with clinical symptoms and radiographic findings, antibody-based diagnostic tests are often used to diagnose and monitor patients with VF. Chitinase 1 (CTS1) has previously been identified as the seroreactive antigen used in these diagnostic assays to detect anticoccidial IgG. Here, an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to detect IgG to CTS1 demonstrated 165 of 178 (92.7%) patients with a positive result by immunodiffusion (ID) and/or complement fixation (CF) had antibodies to the single antigen CTS1. We then developed a rapid antibody lateral flow assay (LFA) to detect anti-CTS1 antibodies. Out of 143 samples tested, the LFA showed 92.9% positive percent agreement [95% confidence interval (CI), 84.3%–96.9%] and 97.7% negative percent agreement (95% CI, 87.9%–99.6%) with ID and CF assays. Serum or plasma from canines, macaques, and dolphins was also tested by the CTS1 LFA. Test line densities of the CTS1 LFA correlated in a linear manner with the reported CF and ID titers for human and non-human samples, respectively. This 10-min point-of-care test for the rapid detection of anti-coccidioidal antibodies could help to inform healthcare providers in real-time, potentially improving the efficiency of healthcare delivery.

In southwestern and western regions of the United States, at least half a million diagnostic tests for coccidioidomycosis (valley fever) are run annually. Enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) are blood tests which require precise dilution of patient serum prior to testing.

Abstract Background While evaluating COVID-19 vaccine responses using a rapid neutralizing antibody (NAb) test, we observed that 25% of RNA vaccine recipients did not neutralize >50%. We termed this group “vaccine poor responders” (VPRs). The objective of this study was to determine if individuals who neutralized <50% would remain VPRs, or if a third dose would elicit high levels of NAbs. Methods 269 healthy individuals ranging in age from 19 to 80 (Average age = 51; 165 females and 104 males) who received either BNT162b2 (Pfizer) or mRNA1273 (Moderna) vaccines were evaluated. NAb levels were measured: i) 2-4 weeks after a second vaccine dose, ii) 2-4 months after the second dose, iii) within 1-2 weeks prior to a third dose and iv) 2-4 weeks after a third RNA vaccine dose. Results Analysis of vaccine recipients revealed that 25% did not neutralize above 50% (Median neutralization = 21%, titers <1:80) within a month after their second dose. Twenty-three of these VPRs obtained a third dose of either BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 vaccine 1-8 months (average = 5 months) after their second dose. Within a month after their third dose, VPRs showed an average 20-fold increase in NAb levels (range: 46%-99%). Conclusions The results suggest that VPRs are not permanently poor responders; they can generate high NAb levels with an additional vaccine dose. Although it is not known what levels of NAbs protect from infection or disease, those in high-risk professions may wish to keep peripheral NAb levels high, limiting infection, and potential transmission.

We conducted a community seroprevalence survey in Arizona, from September 12 to October 1, 2020, to determine the presence of antibodies to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). We used the seroprevalence estimate to predict SARS-CoV-2 infections in the jurisdiction by applying the adjusted seroprevalence to the county’s population. The estimated community seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infections was 4.3 times greater (95% confidence interval = 2.2, 7.5) than the number of reported cases. Field surveys with representative sampling provide data that may help fill in gaps in traditional public health reporting. (Am J Public Health. 2022;112(1):38–42. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306568 )