Citations

AbstractGynecological malignancies are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality across the globe. Due to delayed presentation, gynecological cancer patients are often referred late in the disease's course, resulting in poor outcomes. A considerable number of patients ultimately succumb to chemotherapy‐resistant disease, which reoccurs at advanced stages despite treatment interventions. Although efforts have been devoted to developing therapies that demonstrate reduced resistance to chemotherapy and enhanced toxicity profiles, current clinical outcomes remain unsatisfactory due to treatment resistance and unfavorable off‐target effects. Consequently, innovative biological and nanotherapeutic approaches are imperative to strengthen and optimize the therapeutic arsenal for gynecological cancers. Advancements in nanotechnology‐based therapies for gynecological malignancies offer significant advantages, including reduced toxicity, expanded drug circulation, and optimized therapeutic dosing, ultimately leading to enhanced treatment effectiveness. Recent advances in nucleic acid therapeutics using microRNA, small interfering RNA, and messenger RNA provide novel approaches for cancer therapeutics. Effective single‐agent and combinatorial nucleic acid therapeutics for gynecological malignancies have the potential to transform cancer treatment by giving safer, more tailored approaches than conventional therapies. This review highlights current preclinical studies that effectively exploit these approaches for the treatment of gynecological malignant tumors and malignant ascites.

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and therapeutic effects of orally administered AKST4290 (formerly BI 144807 and ALK4290) in treatment-naive patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Methods: In this prospective, multicenter, open-label Phase 2a pilot clinical study, 30 patients with newly diagnosed neovascular age-related macular degeneration self-administered AKST4290 (400 mg) orally twice daily for 6 weeks. Patients were examined weekly for safety, to measure best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and to perform exploratory morphologic assessments. The primary endpoint was the mean change in BCVA from baseline to end of treatment, and the secondary endpoint was safety. Exploratory endpoints investigated potential changes in macular morphology. Results: Mean BCVA improved by +7.0 letters (95% CI, 2.2–11.7); 24 patients (82.8%) had stable or improved BCVA, with 6 (20.7%) gaining ≥15 letters. No patients experienced severe or serious adverse events. Conclusion: In this 6-week study, AKST4290 treatment was associated with improved BCVA scores in patients with treatment-naive neovascular age-related macular degeneration. All adverse events were mild or moderate in severity and no safety issues were identified. Treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration with AKST4290 warrants further investigation in randomized, placebo-controlled trials.