Citations

Disease response and progression assessment in multiple myeloma (MM) is based on various measurements of monoclonal protein (serum and urine protein electrophoresis, serum free light chain (FLC, and or quantitative immunoglobulins). Currently, the IMWG consensus response criteria require two sequential assessments of any one marker made at any time before confirmation of disease progression and the institution of any new therapy. However, this can be cumbersome in clinical trials. Herein, we hypothesized that if two markers meet the progression criteria simultaneously, a repeat of either will not be necessary for confirmation. We retrospectively studied all sequential patients with myeloma enrolled in clinical trials at Mayo Clinic. We identified 583 episodes of confirmed progression in our study. Among the 583 progression episodes, nearly 70% (sensitivity of the simultaneous criteria) met the two simultaneous variable criteria at the first testing, indicating progression. Conversely, among 413 patients who met progression criteria by two simultaneous values, 98% (specificity of the simultaneous criteria) of patients subsequently had confirmed progression by sequential values. In summary, for patients with two disease burden markers meeting the simultaneous progression criteria, sequential assessment either one for confirmation may not be necessary to determine disease progression.

e19531 Background: Effective treatment and elimination of clonal plasma cells (PC) in multiple myeloma (MM) are typically associated with recovery of polyclonal (normal) plasma cells (PPC). Studies suggest that robust PPC recovery is associated with better outcomes. However, it is unclear if this remains valid in the context of monoclonal antibodies, such as Daratumumab, that selectively target plasma cells, and in turn, may adversely impact PPC recovery. Methods: We identified patients with MM who underwent MRD testing using Euroflow method at 6-12 months after treatment initiation. Eight patients had disease progression prior to MRD testing and were excluded from further analysis. PPC was quantitated by the proportion of total events acquired during flow examination. Patients were considered MRD-negative if they had <1 clonal PCs in 10 5 cells, as detected in the marrow. We first examined the impact of initial therapy (Daratumumab vs. non-Daratumumab based regimens) and MRD status on PPC recovery. Subsequently, we analyzed impact of PPC recovery on patient outcomes in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: We identified 572 patients who had MRD testing by flow at a median of 9 months (range 6-12) after treatment initiation. The median age was 63 years, 58% were male. Daratumumab was part of initial therapy in 17% of patients; the most common induction therapies were PI-IMiD triplets (73%), and dara-PI-IMiD quads (15%). In our cohort, 74% of patients were MRD-negative. In our practice, only samples with no monotypic PCs identified on initial low-sensitivity flow proceed to MRD testing, hence, the proportion of MRD-negative patients appears higher in our study than previously reported. Median PPC was 0.02% and was similar between MRD-negative and -positive patients. We found the median PPC was significantly low in patients who received Daratumumab compared to the non-Daratumumab treated cohort (0.011% vs. 0.023%; p<0.01). There was a trend towards lower PFS and OS among the lowest PPC quartile group compared to the upper 3 quartiles, although this was not significant (p=0.07 for PFS and OS, Wilcoxon). This trend was more evident among patients who did not receive Daratumumab. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates negative impact of anti-CD38 therapy with Daratumumab on recovery of PPCs after initial treatment, consistent with the persistent hypogammaglobulinemia seen in clinical practice among these patients. However, unlike the observation with the non-Daratumumab treated cohort, the low proportion of PPCs does not significantly impact patient outcomes among patients who received Daratumumab.

7541 Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) is characterized by recurrent cytogenetic abnormalities, including translocations involving the immunoglobulin heavy chain locus on chromosome 14 and trisomies, which are considered primary and clonal. Throughout disease progression, MM cells may acquire additional abnormalities, which include chromosome 1 abnormalities (gain or amplification of 1q or deletion of 1p) and chromosome 17 abnormalities (del 17p or monosomy 17p). All these factors are considered high-risk markers that predict below-average outcomes. While outcomes related to 1q have been documented, their relationship with other abnormalities and clinical characteristics is less clearly defined. Methods: We created a cohort of newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) patients from April 1996 to December 2023 for whom FISH testing was performed using a panel that included 1q findings. Data on clinical and laboratory characteristics, other FISH abnormalities, and survival outcomes were collected from existing databases and the electronic medical record (EMR). Results: The cohort included 875 patients, with a median age of 65. Of these patients, 60% were male and 91% identified as white. A 1q abnormality was observed in 443 patients (51%); 87% exhibited a gain of 1q, while 13% showed amplification of 1q. Among those tested, other abnormalities included del13 (58%), t(11;14) (25%), t(4;14) (17%), t(14;16) (6%), del 17p (13%), and trisomies (51%). The distribution of abnormalities concerning the presence of 1q is presented in the table. Patients with 1q abnormalities were more likely to present with additional high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities. The median overall survival (OS) for those with a 1q abnormality was 73 months, compared to 105 months for those without it. Among these, patients with 1q amplification tended to have worse outcomes than those with a 1q gain, though this observation did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions: Abnormalities of chromosome 1, including 1q gain and amplification, can be seen in nearly 50% of patients with NDMM who are tested. 1q abnormalities are associated with other high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities. Measures of disease burden are higher among those with a 1q abnormality. Interestingly, we observed a higher proportion of patients with lambda light chain and those with IgA among those with a 1q abnormality. The presence of a 1q abnormality was associated with inferior survival, with a trend towards worse outcomes among those with 1q amplification compared to 1q gain. Clinical characteristics and cytogenetic associations of multiple myeloma patients with and without 1q abnormalities. 1q abnormality present 1q abnormality absent P del13 78% 39% <0.01 t(4;14) 25% 8% <0.01 t(11;14) 22% 27% NS t(14;16) 15% 3% <0.01 Trisomies 48% 53% NS 17p del 24% 12% <0.01 Lambda light chain 45% 26% <0.01 IgA 32% 16% <0.01 Hemoglobin 10.3 g/dL 11.2 g/dL <0.01