Citations

4514 Background: Maintenance avelumab is a standard of care in patients (pts) with la/mUC who do not progress after first-line PBC. Cabozantinib (CABO) is an oral inhibitor of MET, VEGFR and TAM, active in multiple solid tumors. We hypothesized that an avelumab (Av)-CABO combination would improve outcomes in pts with mUC with an acceptable safety profile compared to avelumab maintenance alone. Methods: MAIN-CAV (NCT05092958) is a phase III randomized, multicenter, international trial for la/mUC pts who did not progress after 4-6 cycles of any PBC (gemcitabine-cisplatin, gemcitabine-carboplatin, MVAC, ddMVAC). Pts were randomized 1:1 to Av 800 mg IV every 2 weeks alone or with CABO 40 mg daily for ≤2 years. Stratification factors were response to first-line PBC (complete response [CR] vs partial response [PR] vs stable disease [SD]) and visceral metastases. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), safety and quality of life. The target accrual was 654 pts; the trial closed early after enrollment of 68 pts following adoption of enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab as the new preferred first-line standard in the US. Results: From 3/2022 to 3/2024, 68 pts were randomized (Av n = 33; CABO-Av n = 35). Median OS was 24.8 months (mo) with Av and 23.0 mo with Avb-CABO (Hazard ratio 1.41; 95% CI 0.66–3.01; p = 0.186). Median PFS was 4.6 mo with Av vs 6.0 mo with Av-CABO (p = 0.343). Objective response rate among pts with PR or SD after first-line PBC was 20.8% with Av vs 11.5% with Av-CABO (p = 0.424). Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 24.2% pts on the Av arm vs 39.4% of pts on the Av-CABO arm and CABO dose reductions occurred in 63% of pts. Conclusions: Addition of CABO to Av did not improve OS or PFS compared with Av alone in this underpowered, prematurely closed phase III trial; safety was consistent with known profiles. U10CA180821,U10CA180882; U24CA196171, U10CA180863. (CCTG);U10CA180888 (SWOG); https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org. Clinical trial information: NCT05092958 .

TPS714 Background: 1st-line induction platinum-based chemotherapy followed by switch maintenance Av is the current preferred standard of care in patients (pts) with aUC who do not progress after platinum-based chemotherapy. There is an significant need to further improve outcomes by combining Av with an effective, non-cross resistant therapy with non-overlapping toxicity. CABO is an oral inhibitor of MET, VEGFR and TAM family receptors involved in tumor growth, angiogenesis and immune cell regulation and has shown efficacy in UC in combination with PD-1/PD-1L1 inhibitor. We hypothesized that CABO-Av combination would improve survival vs Av alone and have an acceptable safety profile as switch maintenance therapy in mUC. Methods: MAIN-CAV is a phase III randomized, multicenter, international trial for pts with locally advanced/metastatic UC (including cN3M0 only)) who do not progress after 4-6 cycles of any platinum-based chemotherapy (gem-cis, gem-carbo, MVAC or ddMVAC). 654 adults are randomized 1:1 within 3-10 weeks (wk) after last dose of chemotherapy to receive Av 800 mg IV every 2 wk or Av and CABO 40 mg daily for up to 2 yrs. Key eligibility criteria include ECOG PS 0-1, no prior use of anti-PD(L)1, no CNS metastases, no major surgery within 4 wks, no uncontrolled hypertension or cardiovascular disorders. Pts are stratified based on 1) best response to 1L chemotherapy: complete vs partial response vs stable disease and 2) presence vs absence of visceral metastases. The primary endpoint is overall survival (OS) with assumptions of 1-sided alpha 0.025, power 80%, median OS 21 months (mo) with Av and hazard ratio 0.75, thus hypothesizing median OS 28 mo on CABO-Av. Key secondary endpoints include progression-free survival, safety, tolerability, and efficacy of CABO-Av vs Av alone based on RECIST 1.1 and iRECIST criteria (and PD-L1 status).Quality of life (QOL) are assessed using EQ-5D-5L, PROMIS-Fatigue 4a, EORTC QLQ-C30, EORTC QLQ-BLM30 between pts on CABO-Av vs Av alone. Biomarkers of response and resistance to Av will be assessed using baseline archival tissues, baseline and serial blood, ctDNA, stool and urine. Imaging studies will test the correlation of established and new radiomic signatures with survival, adverse events and QOL and incorporate both radiologic and biologic features to assess their potential association with outcomes. This trial would be the first to systematically address whether adding the multitargeted TKI, CABO, to Av improves survival vs Av alone as 1L maintenance therapy. https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org . Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882; U24CA196171, U10CA180863 (CCTG); Clinical trial information: NCT05092958 .

Abstract Introduction: Growing data established the importance of monitoring dynamic changes in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to identify early signs of therapeutic responses, allowing for timely management of treatment to achieve more effective personalized therapy. Higher assay accuracy and consistency, and lower assay cost will support more clinical validation trials and benefit more cancer patients with non-invasive ctDNA NGS tests that can simultaneously map multiple genomic alterations at an affordable price. Method: The NVIGEN X - Precision Cancer Profiling test is a next generation sequencing (NGS) based circulating tumor DNA detection assay using the hybridization capture approach with customized gene panels. Our ctDNA NGS assay was developed with the use of high performance magnetic nanobeads, which enhances assay workflow at key steps including cfDNA extraction, NGS library preparation, and target enrichment. Experiments with individual plasma samples and DNA mutant fragments spiked in plasma samples were carried out to establish the assay performance such as sensitivity, specificity, consistency and data efficiency. NGS data QC metrics of the NVIGEN assay were compared with other assays in peer reviewed publications. Results: We developed a focus 32 gene panel that covers 144 kb of gene regions of clinical significance for breast cancer treatment monitoring and guidance, such as AKT1, ERBB2, PIK3CA, EGFR, ESR1, BRCA1/2, and CD274. Our results demonstrated the capability of NVIGEN X ctDNA NGS assay to detect rare copies (8 cp) of gene mutation at 0.07% MAF from DNA mutant fragments spiked into plasma samples. The NVIGEN X ctDNA NGS assays consistently presented 2-5% duplication rate, >80% on-target rate, <10% CV for key NGS data metrics, and on average required 1.36X paired reads per 1X unique coverage. Compared with the Roche Avenio assays (targeted, expanded and surveillance panels) as published in 2020 which on average required 9.36X paired reads per 1X unique coverage, the NVIGEN X -precision cancer profiling assays demonstrated 85% reduction in NGS data need to generate each unique coverage. Compared with the original Capp-seq data as published in the 2014 Nature Medicine paper which required in average 13.78 or 27.56 paired reads per unique coverage, the NVIGEN X assay demonstrated >90% reduction in NGS data need per unique coverage. Conclusion: The NVIGEN X - Precision Cancer Profiling assay provided high NGS assay performance with high sensitivity, specificity, and consistency, and significantly improved NGS data efficiency. This allows for dramatically reduced assay cost and will help support routine applications of ctDNA NGS tests to improve cancer patient treatment. Experiments of applying NVIGEN X assays for clinical research with patient samples are ongoing and will be presented. Citation Format: Aihua Fu, Wenwu Cui, Minh V. Ton, Kevan Wang, Weiwei Gu, Tianhong Li, Heather A. Parsons, Minetta C. Liu, George W. Sledge. Developing highly sensitive high NGS data efficient ctDNA detection assays for breast cancer surveillance [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-01-15.

Abstract Acute rejection is commonly encountered for long-term survival in liver transplant (LT) recipients and may impact their long-term survival if rejection is severe or recurrent. The aim of this study is to examine the therapeutic potential of transforming growth factor (TGF-β)-overexpressing mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in inducing a local immunosuppression in liver grafts after transplantation. MSCs were transduced with a lentiviral vector expressing the human TGF-β1 gene; TGF-β1-overexpressing MSCs (designated as TGF/MSCs) were then transfused into the liver grafts via the portal vein of a rat LT model of acute rejection. Rejection severity was assessed by clinical and histologic analysis. The immunity suppression effects and mechanism of TGF/MSCs were tested, focusing on their ability to induce generation of regulatory T cells (Tregs) in the liver grafts. Our findings demonstrate that transfusion of TGF/MSCs prevented rejection, reduced mortality, and improved survival of rats after LT. The therapeutic effects were associated with the immunosuppressive effects of MSCs and TGF-β1. Their reciprocal effects on Tregs induction and function resulted in more CD4 + Foxp3 + Helios- induced Tregs, fewer Th17 cells, and improved immunosuppressive effects in local liver grafts. Thus, TGF/MSCs can induce a local immunosuppressive effect in liver grafts after transplantation. The immunomodulatory activity of TGF-β1 modified MSCs may be a gateway to new therapeutic approaches to prevent organ rejection in clinical transplantation.