Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

7 citation(s) found for "Evans, Andrew".

Genomic and transcriptomic landscape of extranodal marginal zone lymphoma
Lossos, Izidore S., Biral, Leo, Thakkar, Devang, Naresh, Kikkeri N, Ondrejka, Sarah, Hsi, Eric, Xu, Mina, Koff, Jean, Jaye, David, Nørgaard, Peter, Breinholt, Marie Fredslund, Leeman-Neill, Rebecca, Shingleton, Jennifer, Happ, Lanie, Love, Cassandra, Mason, Emily F., Louissaint, Abner, Ong, Choon Kiat, Cheng, Chee Leong, Pillai, Raju, Pedersen, Mette, Yin, C. Cameron, Au-Yeung, Rex, Karjalainen-Lindsberg, Marja-Liisa, Chadburn, Amy, McKinney, Matthew, Sojitra, Payal, Evans, Andrew, Czader, Magdalena, Jiong, Yan, Dave, Sandeep, Chapman, Jennifer, Lossos, Izidore S., Biral, Leonardo P. A. , Thakkar, Devang, Naresh, Kikkeri N, Ondrejka, Sarah, Hsi, Eric, Xu, Mina, Koff, Jean, Jaye, David, Nørgaard, Peter, Breinholt, Marie Fredslund, Leeman-Neill, Rebecca, Shingleton, Jennifer, Happ, Lanie, Love, Cassandra, Mason, Emily F., Louissaint, Abner, Ong, Choon Kiat, Cheng, Chee Leong, Pillai, Raju, Pedersen, Mette, Yin, C. Cameron, Au-Yeung, Rex, Karjalainen-Lindsberg, Marja-Liisa, Chadburn, Amy, McKinney, Matthew, Sojitra, Payal, Evans, Andrew, Czader, Magdalena, Jiong, Yan, Dave, Sandeep, Chapman, Jennifer

Blood | December 4, 2025 | Volume: 146 | Issue: Supplement 1 | Pages: 1761-1761

10.1182/blood-2025-1761 Get It

Abstract Marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) is an uncommon non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma accounting for 7-10% of lymphoma diagnoses. Extranodal MZL (EMZL) of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) is the most common subtype (61%) of MZL. While the mutational landscape, chromosomal aberrations and transcriptome of nodal and splenic MZL have been extensively evaluated, the mutational landscape of EMZL has only been evaluated in a small number of patients and mainly by targeted sequencing. Consequently, the comprehensive genomic landscape of EMZL remains largely uncharacterized. Herein, we performed whole exome sequencing followed by targeted sequencing of potential tumor driver genes, copy number and/or RNA transcriptome analyses in 165 patients with pretreatment EMZL tumors involving 16 anatomic locations. All samples were collected and underwent expert review as part of the Atlas of Blood Cancer Genomes consortium. The most common anatomic locations were ocular adnexa (OAMZL) (n=35), gastric (n=25, including 6 positive for Helicobacter pylori), salivary glands (n=25), and lungs (n=24). Using common criteria for variant mutation calling and significant focal copy number (CN), we identified 1218 variants (1030 missense and 188 truncation mutations) across 174 genes and 2837 CN focal alterations (1614 copy gains and 1223 copy number losses). Of these genes, 44 and 11 were mutated in >5% and >10% of specimens, respectively. We detected variants identified previously by targeted sequencing in EMZL from different locations (e.g. TNFAIP3 (A20) (12%), TBL1XR1 (13%), SPEN (10%), CARD11 (7%), TET2 (7%) and CREBBP (6%)). We detected mutations in KLF2 (10 mutations in 8 EMZL patients) and PTPRD (7 mutations in 7 EMZL patients) that were previously suggested to be specific for splenic and nodal MZL, respectively. We also detected variants not previously reported in EMZL, including a transcriptional factor ZEB2, LRP1B,and others. The most frequently mutated gene in our study (25% of tumors) was IGLL5. Some mutations were limited to specific locations (e.g. ZEB2 mutations seen exclusively in gastric and salivary gland EMZL), while most were observed across all anatomic locations. There was no association between specific mutations and clonal IGHV, in contrast to previous reports. Using Enrichr tool, we observed enrichment of mutations in genes belonging to the B cell receptor activation, NOTCH signaling, Wnt-beta catenin signaling, NF-kB signaling , PI3K AKT signaling, DNA repair and other pathways. Chromosomal and copy number changes were also commonly observed including previously reported trisomy of chromosomes 3 and 18. Combining DNA mutations and CN alterations, the number of genetic lesions per tumor sample in the 174 mutated genes ranged from 0 to 95, with an average load of 17 lesions per case. RNA sequencing was successful in 159 EMZL tumors from 16 distinct anatomic locations. Unsupervised clustering using all genes with a median log2-normalized gene expression value greater than 5 and a standard deviation greater than 1 (1323 genes) demonstrated that the majority of gastric EMZL with and without H. pylori infections clustered together on 2 dendrograms as did most of the samples of OAMZL. Since the clustering could be forced by organ-specific and not tumor-specific gene expression, we next focused on the expression of the 345 genes from the LM22 matrix that passed our transcriptomic row filtering. Unsupervised clustering resulted in clustering of most gastric EMZL irrespective of H. pylori positivity together in the same dendrogram branch, accompanied by few additional EMZL from other anatomic locations. Most of the EMZL samples from other locations did not show preferential co-clustering together. On comparison of gene expression between gastric and OAMZL, there was enrichment of the B-cell receptor signaling pathway, B-cell activation, B-cell naïve and B-cell memory cells, B-cell proliferation and NF-kB signaling in the latter. Immune microenvironment analysis showed a statistically significant increase in resting mast cells and decrease in M1 macrophages in gastric EMZL and increase in regulatory T cells in salivary EMZL. The broad genomic studies reported here underscore the biological similarity of EMZL across anatomical sites with the potential exceptions of gastric EMZL (regardless of H. Pylori status). These data provide valuable genomic and transcriptomic resources to inform future diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.
Fracture nonunions
Le, Vu , Jones, Clifford B. , Working, Zachary M. , Duda, Georg N. , Evans, Andrew R. , Evans, Christopher, Evans, Chris

OTA International | October 6, 2025 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 5S | Pages: No page available

10.1097/oi9.0000000000000441 | PMID 41054623 Get It

Abstract The Fracture Nonunion Symposium presented at the 2024 Orthopaedic Trauma Association Basic Science Focus Forum featured invited speakers who discussed current perspectives on this topic. Clinical approaches, diagnostic advancements, basic science perspectives, and novel treatment strategies were discussed. This symposium was curated to highlight this common and challenging clinical problem faced by orthopaedic and musculoskeletal practitioners from around the globe.
Recommendations for Performance Evaluation of Machine Learning in Pathology: A Concept Paper From the College of American Pathologists
Hanna, Matthew G. , Zarella, Mark D. , Dash, Rajesh , Furtado, Larissa V. , Stram, Michelle , Hassell, Lewis , Mays, Alex, Sirintrapun, Joseph S. , Evans, Andrew, Glassy, Eric F., Singh, Rajendra, Souers, Rhona J., Baca, Monica E. de , Seheult, Jansen N. , Zarella, Mark, Seheult, Jansen N , Stram, Michelle N , Olson, Niels H. , Dash, Rajesh C., Herrmann, Markus D. , Raciti, Patricia M. , Mays, Alex, Pantanowitz, Liron , Krishnamurthy, Savitri , Parwani, Anil Vasdev , Lujan, Giovanni Mario , Bui, Marilyn M. , Singh, Rajendra

Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine | December 2, 2023 | Volume: 148 | Issue: 10 | Pages: e335-e361

10.5858/arpa.2023-0042-cp | PMID 38041522 Get It

Context.— Machine learning applications in the pathology clinical domain are emerging rapidly. As decision support systems continue to mature, laboratories will increasingly need guidance to evaluate their performance in clinical practice. Currently there are no formal guidelines to assist pathology laboratories in verification and/or validation of such systems. These recommendations are being proposed for the evaluation of machine learning systems in the clinical practice of pathology. Objective.— To propose recommendations for performance evaluation of in vitro diagnostic tests on patient samples that incorporate machine learning as part of the preanalytical, analytical, or postanalytical phases of the laboratory workflow. Topics described include considerations for machine learning model evaluation including risk assessment, predeployment requirements, data sourcing and curation, verification and validation, change control management, human-computer interaction, practitioner training, and competency evaluation. Data Sources.— An expert panel performed a review of the literature, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidance, and laboratory and government regulatory frameworks. Conclusions.— Review of the literature and existing documents enabled the development of proposed recommendations. This white paper pertains to performance evaluation of machine learning systems intended to be implemented for clinical patient testing. Further studies with real-world clinical data are encouraged to support these proposed recommendations. Performance evaluation of machine learning models is critical to verification and/or validation of in vitro diagnostic tests using machine learning intended for clinical practice.
Multiple B cell malignancies in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia: epidemiology, pathology, and clinical implications
Meacham, Philip J. , Evans, Andrew G., Parikh, Sameer A. , Zent, Clive S.

Leukemia & Lymphoma | January 11, 2020 | Volume: 61 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 1037-1051

10.1080/10428194.2019.1709830 | PMID 31928278 Get It

Utility of Pathology Imagebase for standardisation of prostate cancer grading
Egevad, Lars , Delahunt, Brett , Bostwick, David G., Cheville, John C. , Evans, Andrew , Fine, Samson W. , Grignon, David J. , Humphrey, Peter A. , Hörnblad, Jonas, Iczkowski, Kenneth A. , Kench, James G. , Leite, Kátia Ramos Moreira , McKenney, Jesse K. , Pan, Chin‐Chen , Samaratunga, Hemamali , Srigley, John R., Takahashi, Hiroyuki , True, Lawrence D. , Tsuzuki, Toyonori , Varma, Murali , Zhou, Ming , Clements, Mark , McKenney, Jesse K , Pan, Chin-Chen , Tsuzuki, Toyonori , Samaratunga, Hemamali , Berney, Daniel M. , Compérat, Éva , Kristiansen, Glen , Magi‐Galluzzi, Cristina , OXLEY, JON D. , Kwast, Theodorus van der

Histopathology | January 23, 2018 | Volume: 73 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 8-18

10.1111/his.13471 | PMID 29359484 Get It

AimsDespite efforts to standardise grading of prostate cancer, even among experts there is still a considerable variation in grading practices. In this study we describe the use of Pathology Imagebase, a novel reference image library, for setting an international standard in prostate cancer grading.Methods and resultsThe International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) recently launched a reference image database supervised by experts. A panel of 24 international experts in prostate pathology reviewed independently microphotographs of 90 cases of prostate needle biopsies with cancer. A linear weighted kappa of 0.67 (95% confidence interval = 0.62–0.72) and consensus was reached in 50 cases. The interobserver weighted kappa varied from 0.48 to 0.89. The highest level of agreement was seen for Gleason score (GS) 3 + 3 = 6 (ISUP grade 1), while higher grades and particularly GS 4 + 3 = 7 (ISUP grade 3) showed considerable disagreement. Once a two‐thirds majority was reached, images were moved automatically into a public database available for all ISUP members at www.isupweb.org. Non‐members are able to access a limited number of cases.ConclusionsIt is anticipated that the database will assist pathologists to calibrate their grading and, hence, decrease interobserver variability. It will also help to identify instances where definitions of grades need to be clarified.
Pathology Imagebase—a reference image database for standardization of pathology
Egevad, Lars , Cheville, John C. , Evans, Andrew , Hörnblad, Jonas, Kench, James G. , Leite, Kátia Ramos Moreira , Pan, Chin‐Chen , Samaratunga, Hemamali , Srigley, John R., True, Lawrence D. , Zhou, Ming , Clements, Mark , Delahunt, Brett , Panel, The ISUP Pathology Imagebase Expert, Cheng, Liang , López-Beltrán, Antonio , Távora, Fábio , Netto, George J. , Tsuzuki, Toyonori , Pan, Chin-Chen , Delahunt, Brett , Kristiansen, Glen , Magi‐Galluzzi, Cristina , Panel, The ISUP Pathology Imagebase Expert, Tsuzuki, Toyonori , Samaratunga, Hemamali , Cheng, Liang

Histopathology | July 19, 2017 | Volume: 71 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 677-685

10.1111/his.13313 | PMID 28722802 Get It

AimsDespite efforts to standardize histopathology practice through the development of guidelines, the interpretation of morphology is still hampered by subjectivity. We here describe Pathology Imagebase, a novel mechanism for establishing an international standard for the interpretation of pathology specimens.Methods and resultsThe International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) established a reference image database through the input of experts in the field. Three panels were formed, one each for prostate, urinary bladder and renal pathology, consisting of 24 international experts. Each of the panel members uploaded microphotographs of cases into a non‐public database. The remaining 23 experts were asked to vote from a multiple‐choice menu. Prior to and while voting, panel members were unable to access the results of voting by the other experts. When a consensus level of at least two‐thirds or 16 votes was reached, cases were automatically transferred to the main database. Consensus was reached in a total of 287 cases across five projects on the grading of prostate, bladder and renal cancer and the classification of renal tumours and flat lesions of the bladder. The full database is available to all ISUP members at www.isupweb.org. Non‐members may access a selected number of cases.ConclusionsIt is anticipated that the database will assist pathologists in calibrating their grading, and will also promote consistency in the diagnosis of difficult cases.