Citations

Background: Several special tests for detecting medial ulnar collateral ligament (MUCL) injuries of the elbow have been described, but data on the clinical utility of these tests are limited. Purpose: To determine the clinical utility of selected elbow special tests to detect MUCL injuries in an athletic population. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 84 consecutive patients with sports-related elbow pain underwent a standardized clinical examination. Overall, 6 special tests (moving valgus stress test, static valgus stress test, modified valgus stress test, milking maneuver, pronation flexion resistance test, and temple/cheek press test) were performed. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive/negative predictive value, and positive/negative likelihood ratio (LR+ and LR–, respectively) were calculated for individual tests and combinations of tests to detect MUCL injuries. Higher values for the LR+ and lower values for the LR– represent stronger clinical utility. Results: For detecting MUCL injuries, the moving valgus stress test resulted in the highest sensitivity (98%) and accuracy (93%) with the lowest LR– (2%). The milking maneuver had the highest LR+ (5.1) with the second highest sensitivity (77%) and accuracy (79%). The pronation flexion resistance test and the temple/cheek press test had the lowest LR+ (1.5 and 1.8, respectively) and highest LR– (94% and 95%, respectively) in addition to the lowest sensitivity (16% and 9%, respectively) and accuracy (33% and 30%, respectively). No combination of tests resulted in increased clinical utility. Conclusion: The moving valgus stress test and milking maneuver demonstrated acceptable clinical utility in which the moving valgus stress test was better for ruling out MUCL injuries and the milking maneuver was better at ruling in MUCL injuries. There was no added value when combining the 2 tests together or with other maneuvers.

Objectives: There is a paucity of research comparing the outcomes of medial ulnar collateral ligament (MUCL) repair with internal bracing to isolated MUCL reconstruction in professional baseball players. Further, the practice of supplementing a MUCL reconstruction with an internal brace, a "hybrid" reconstruction, has increased in the surgical treatment of MUCL injuries for professional baseball players, without any currently known published research defining the clinical outcomes of this modification. We sought to investigate the trends and outcomes of MUCL repair with internal bracing and "hybrid" MUCL reconstruction with internal bracing. Using a matched cohort analysis, we also sought to compare the clinical outcomes of both MUCL repair with internal bracing and "hybrid" MUCL reconstruction with internal bracing to isolated MUCL reconstructions, without internal bracing, in professional baseball players. Methods: The MLB Health and Injury Tracking System was used to identify all professional baseball players who underwent MUCL surgery, regardless of surgery technique, from 2010 to 2023. Professional players of all levels (MLB and MiLB) and players of all positions were included. Player demographics, injury characteristics, surgical details, and postoperative outcomes were obtained. Player demographics included age at surgery, position of play, professional level of play and surgical technique. Outcomes assessed were return to play (RTP) status, time to RTP, return to same level of play (RTSL), time to RTSL, revision MUCL surgery, and time to revision MUCL surgery, with a minimum of 2 years of follow up. Players were considered to have RTP if they participated in at least one game at any professional level. RTSL was defined as returning to the same league of professional play or higher. Patients undergoing MUCL repair and "hybrid" MUCL reconstruction with internal bracing were independently compared to propensity matched patients undergoing isolated MUCL reconstruction, without internal bracing, to assess for a difference in postoperative outcomes. Four subgroup analyses were conducted by further categorizing patients to MLB players, MiLB players, pitchers, and position players. Results: 76 patients underwent MUCL repair with internal bracing from 2016-2021 and were successfully propensity matched to 76 patients undergoing isolated MUCL reconstructions. Baseline patient demographic variables of MUCL repairs were statistically similar to those of controls except for age at time of surgery (24.5 vs 21.8; p<0.001). 81 patients underwent "hybrid" MUCL reconstructions with internal bracing from 2016-2021 and were successfully propensity matched to 81 patients undergoing isolated MUCL reconstructions. Baseline demographic variables of "hybrid" MUCL reconstructions were statistically similar to those of controls except for age at time of surgery (24.3 vs. 23.3; p=0.006). Compared to isolated MUCL reconstruction controls, all patients undergoing MUCL repair demonstrated significantly shorter time to RTP (mean 421.2 vs. 546.2 days; p<0.001), shorter time to RTSL (mean 436.2 vs. 558.8 days; p<0.001), and shorter time to revision (mean 465.2 vs.1648 days; p=0.036). The number of patients who RTP at any level, RTSL, and number of revision surgeries were not significantly different. Compared to isolated MUCL reconstruction controls, all patients undergoing "hybrid" MUCL reconstructions demonstrated no significant differences with respect to the number of patients who RTP, time to RTP, number of patients who RTSL, days to RTSL, number of revision surgeries, and time to revision surgery. In MLB players only, compared to isolated MUCL reconstruction controls, patients who underwent MUCL repairs demonstrated significantly shorter time to RTP (mean 282.8 vs 507.3 days; p=0.008) and shorter time to RTSL (mean 299.7 vs. 598.0 days; p = 0.024). No other outcomes were significant. In MLB players only, compared to isolated MUCL reconstruction controls, patients who underwent "hybrid" MUCL reconstructions demonstrated significantly shorter time to RTP (mean 436.2 vs. 525.3 days; p=0.026). No other outcomes were significant. In MiLB players only, compared to isolated MUCL reconstruction controls, patients who underwent MUCL repairs demonstrated significantly shorter time to RTP (mean 444.3 vs 550.7 days; p<0.001) and shorter time to RTSL (mean 451.7 vs. 556.5 days; p<0.001). No other outcomes were significant. In MiLB players only, compared to isolated MUCL reconstruction controls, patients who underwent "hybrid" MUCL reconstructions demonstrated no significant differences in outcomes. In evaluating pitchers only, compared to isolated MUCL reconstruction controls, patients undergoing MUCL repair demonstrated significantly shorter time to RTP (mean 421.7 vs. 578.6 days; p<0.001), shorter time to RTSL (mean 434.8 vs. 591.6 days; p <0.001), and shorter time to revision surgery (mean 465.2 vs.1648 days; p=0.036). No other outcomes were significant. In pitchers only, compared to isolated MUCL reconstruction controls, patients undergoing "hybrid" MUCL reconstructions demonstrated significantly shorter time to RTP (mean 488.1 vs. 549.0 days; p=0.013) and shorter time to RTSL (mean 505.7 days vs. 577.0 days, respectively; p=0.021). No other outcomes were significant. Notably, all revision surgeries in occurred in pitchers only. Conclusions: Based on a matched cohort anaylsis of professional baseball players undergoing MUCL surgery, when compared to an isolated MUCL reconstruction, MUCL repair with internal bracing may allow for a shorter time to RTP and RTSL, with a shorter time to revision surgery. For pitchers, "hybrid" MUCL reconstruction may allow for a shorter time to RTP and RTSL. For MLB players, "hybrid" MUCL reconstruction may allow for a shorter RTP.

Objectives: The number of medial ulnar collateral ligament (MUCL) reconstructions are increasing. The epidemiology surrounding revision MUCL reconstructions in professional baseball players has not been well defined. The purpose of this study was to report the epidemiology of revision MUCL reconstruction in professional baseball players. The authors hypothesized that the number of revision MUCL reconstructions would increase over time and that the return to sport rate at the same level of play would be less than 70%. Methods: All professional baseball pitchers who underwent revision MUCL reconstruction between 2010-2023 were identified using the MLB Health and Injury Tracking System (HITS). Rate of return and time to return to play (RTP) and return to same level of play (RTSL) was recorded and analyzed for pitchers with a minimum follow up of 2 years. Surgical variables including technique and graft choice were also recorded. Results: Overall, 191 pitchers (avg age 26.0 years), underwent revision MUCL reconstruction. The average time between primary and revision surgery was 1,381 days (45 months). 130 (68%) of these players were MLB pitchers and the other 61 (32%) were MiLB pitchers. 59% of pitchers were able to RTSL at an average of 604 ± 250 days after surgery. 2023 was the year with most revision MUCL reconstructions (n = 27) and the fewest reconstructions were performed in 2010 and 2011 (n = 4). Monthly distribution demonstrates the highest surgery months to be May (17%), June (20%), and July (17%). Hamstring tendon autograft was found to be the most commonly used graft source (n = 90, 47%), compared to palmaris longus autograft (n = 67, 35%). No significant differences were found in the types of grafts used over time ( P = .238 for palmaris and P = .133 for hamstring). In terms of tunnel configuration, both the Modified Jobe and Docking techniques were used in equal occurrence (n = 70, 37%) Conclusions: Following revision MUCL reconstruction, only 72% of professional baseball pitchers were able to return to play at any level at an average of 556 days (18 months), and only 59% were able to return to the same level of play at an average of 604 days (20 months). The average time between primary and revision MUCL reconstruction was 45 months (3.75 years). Pitchers should be counseled on the relatively low RTSL rate and the prolonged time to RTSL.

Objectives: There are few studies that have closely evaluated the outcomes of ulnar collateral ligament repair and reconstruction (UCLR) in position players (PP). The objective of this study was to determine the outcome of UCLR in professional baseball players who play in non-pitcher positions, i.e. PP. Methods: The approval of the Major League Baseball (MLB) Research Committee was obtained. All PP who underwent surgery for their UCL while active on an MLB or Minor League Baseball (MiLB) team were identified using The MLB Health and Injury Tracking System. PP who underwent UCLR from 2010 to 2023 were analyzes, however for data that concerned PP time to return to professional play, only players who underwent UCL surgery from 2010 to 2021 were evaluated in order to ensure the presence of a minimum of 2-year follow-up data. Return to play (RTP) was defined as a player who played in at least 1 game at any professional level (A, AA, AAA, or MLB). Players were deemed to return to the same level of play (RTSLP) if they played in at least 1 game at the same competition level or higher that they played in prior to their UCL surgery. PP who had a time to RTP or a time to RTSLP that exceeded 800 days were excluded from any analysis that concerned the time to return to play. PPs were also compared to a cohort of professional baseball pitchers who had also undergone UCL surgery. Results: From 2010 to 2023, 241 PP underwent surgery for their UCL at a mean age of 23.4 ± 4.3 years old (Table 1). Overall, PP had their UCL surgery at approximately a mean of 3.7 ± 3.3 years after the start of their professional career (Table 1). Further, apart from the year 2020, the annual number of UCL surgeries performed in MLB and MiLB PP demonstrated an upward trend from 2010 to 2023, although no trends in the distribution of UCL surgeries across position type or between major and minor players exist. No statistically significant differences in RTP nor RTSLP rates following UCL surgery in PP existed when comparing across position type (catcher vs. infielder vs. outfielder) and across surgery type (repair vs. reconstruction vs. reconstruction with augmentation) (Table 2). PP who underwent repairs were able to RTP at a median of 221 days (IQR: 81), which was sooner than PP who underwent reconstruction surgery (median: 383 days, IQR: 316) or reconstructions with augmentation (median: 456 days, IQR: 219) (P = 0.002) (Table 3). PP with UCL repairs were also able to RTSLP sooner (median: 234 days, IQR: 64) than PP who underwent reconstructions (median: 394 days, IQR: 305) or reconstructions with augmentation (median: 462 days, IQR: 242) ( P = 0.003) (Table 3). Further, infielders RTP sooner (median: 335 days, IQR: 157) than catchers (median: 396 days, IQR: 283) and outfielders (median: 412 days, IQR: 366) ( P = 0.036) (Table 3). Similarly, infielders RTSLP sooner (median: 334 days, IQR: 162) than catchers (median: 470 days, IQR: 281) and outfielders (median: 426 days, IQR: 354) ( P = 0.016) (Table 3). Following UCL surgery, PP were able to RTSLP, on average, more than 2 months sooner than pitchers (429 ± 177 days for PP vs 499 ± 153 days for pitchers, P < 0.001). PP who underwent repair of their UCL were able to RTSLP over 4.5 months, on average, sooner than pitchers who underwent UCL repair (269 ± 125 days for PPs vs 405 ± 153 days for pitchers, P < 0.001) and PP who underwent reconstruction of their UCL were able to RTSLP just under 50 days sooner than pitchers who had their UCLs reconstructed (450 ± 175 days for PPs vs 498 ± 151 days for pitchers, P < 0.001) (Figure 1). Conclusions: Few studies have examined PP outcome data following UCLR surgery. As such, there is little understanding as to the differences in return to game rates between various baseball non-pitcher positions as well as the differences in the time it takes to RTP and RTSLP. This study highlights that the annual number of UCLR surgeries demonstrates an upward trend. This retrospective analysis also highlights that PP with UCL repairs were able to RTP and RTSLP sooner than PP who underwent UCL reconstructions and UCL reconstructions with augmentation. Furthermore, infielders were able to RTP and RTSLP sooner than catchers as well as outfielders. The results of this study demonstrate that the type of UCL surgery as well as the player’s position does not seem to significantly impact whether or not a player actually returns to playing professional baseball, however it does impact the speed at whichthey are able to return (provided they do return to playing baseball). As such, the results of this study may be used to counsel PP regarding speed at which a return to playing baseball can be expected.

Background: Major League Baseball (MLB) recently instituted a combine for their prospective players. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to report initial epidemiological findings for both physical examination and imaging findings for the MLB Combine. It was hypothesized that most players would have no significant abnormal physical examination findings, but most would have abnormal findings on their shoulder and elbow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. Study Design: Descriptive epidemiology study. Methods: All players who attended the 2023 MLB Combine were included. History was taken and physical examination was performed by an MLB team physician, and MRI of the shoulder, elbow, cervical spine, and lumbar spine was performed on all players and read by 1 of 2 musculoskeletal radiologists. Physical examination notes and imaging reports were reviewed by the authors and recorded. Data were analyzed separately for pitchers and position players. Results: Overall, 219 players (112 pitchers [51%], 107 position players [49%]) were included. The mean age was 20.4 ± 1.5 years. The majority of players (95%) had no current pain or limitations; 54 players (25%) had a history of previous surgery. For pitchers, 18% underwent previous elbow surgery. With regard to MRI, >80% of pitchers had some abnormality within their ulnar collateral ligament (UCL), the majority of which was UCL scarring/remodeling. 70% of pitchers and 60% of position players had evidence of an olecranon osteophyte. Increased signal within the ulnar nerve was common in pitchers (40%) but rare in position players (4%). For the shoulder, 95% of pitchers and 93% of position players had some rotator cuff abnormality (often tendinosis within the supraspinatus and infraspinatus muscles). Also, 75% of pitchers had MRI evidence of a superior labrum anterior to posterior (SLAP) tear, while 24% of position players demonstrated this. Lumbar spine MRI showed that 47% of position players had a disk protrusion and 46% had a previous pars fracture. Conclusion: Most baseball players who participated in the 2023 MLB Combine had MRI evidence of rotator cuff abnormalities, and many showed evidence of an olecranon osteophyte. Eighteen percent of pitchers had a previous history of elbow surgery. The majority of pitchers had some abnormality within their UCL and evidence of a SLAP tear on MRI scans.

Background: The number of medial ulnar collateral ligament (MUCL) reconstructions is increasing. The epidemiology surrounding revision MUCL reconstructions in professional baseball players has not been well defined. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to report the epidemiology of revision MUCL reconstruction in professional baseball players. The authors hypothesized that the number of revision MUCL reconstructions has increased over time and that the rate of return to sport at the same level of play is <70%. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: All professional baseball pitchers who underwent revision MUCL reconstruction between 2010 and 2023 were identified using the Major League Baseball Health and Injury Tracking System. Rates of return to play, time to return to play, and return to same level of play were recorded and analyzed for pitchers with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Surgical variables, including technique and graft choice, were also recorded. Results: Overall 191 pitchers (mean age, 26.0 years) underwent revision MUCL reconstruction. The mean time between primary and revision surgery was 1381 days (45 months). Of these players, 130 (68%) were Minor League Baseball pitchers. Hamstring tendon autograft was the most commonly used graft source (n = 90; 47%) when compared with palmaris longus autograft (n = 67; 35%). In terms of tunnel configuration, the modified Jobe and docking techniques were used in equal occurrence (n = 70; 37%). After revision MUCL reconstruction, only 72% of professional baseball pitchers were able to return to play at any level at a mean 556 days (18 months), and only 58% were able to return to the same level of play at a mean 604 days (20 months). The mean time between primary and revision MUCL reconstruction was 45 months (3.75 years). Conclusion: Revision MUCL surgery continues to be a challenging problem, where the procedure is complex, rehabilitation timelines are prolonged, and outcomes are not always optimal. Accordingly, the authors recommend that these procedures be performed by surgeons with high levels of experience.

Context: The quality and interprogram variability of publicly available throwing programs have not been assessed. Objective: To (1) identify publicly available interval throwing programs, (2) describe their components and structure, and (3) evaluate their quality, variability, and completeness. Data Sources: Google, Bing, Yahoo; keyword: “interval throwing program.” Study Selection: Baseball-specific publicly available programs. Study Design: Systematic review. Level of Evidence: Level 4. Data Extraction: Independent evaluation by 2 authors using a novel 21-item Quality Assessment Rubric (QAR). Results: Of the 99 included programs, 54% were designed for return from injury/surgery; 42% explicitly stated no expected timeline for completion, and approximately 40% did not provide criteria to initiate the program. Program construction was highly variable. There were broad-ranging shortest (mean: 40±8 ft, range: 20-45 ft) and longest (mean: 150±33 ft, range: 90-250 ft) long toss distances, and variable maximum numbers of mound pitches thrown before returning to game play (range: 40-120, mean: 85). Only 63% of programs provided guidelines for handling setbacks, and standardized warm-ups, arm care, and concomitant training were absent in 32%, 63%, and 47% of programs, respectively. Mean QAR completion rate and QAR item response rate were low (62 ± 4% [range, 24-91%], 62 ± 24% [range, 7-99%], respectively). Finally, only 20 (20%) programs provided at least 1 peer-reviewed reference, most of which were published >10 years ago. Conclusion: Publicly available interval throwing programs are readily available but demonstrate significant interprogram heterogeneity across multiple areas including target audience, program construction, progression, and execution. The quality and consistency of publicly available interval throwing programs is poor at this time, which may limit their utility and effectiveness for baseball players attempting to return to competition. This work identifies a multitude of deficiencies in currently available throwing programs that should be targets of future improvement efforts.

Background: Although pitch count and rest guidelines have been promoted for youth and adolescent baseball players for nearly 2 decades, compliance with guidelines remains poorly understood. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency of compliance with Major League Baseball (MLB) Pitch Smart guidelines as well as the association between compliance and range of motion (ROM), strength, velocity, injury, and pitcher utilization. It was hypothesized that pitchers in violation of current recommendations would have increased strength, velocity, and injury. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: This was a prospective, multicenter study of 115 high school pitchers throughout the United States. Pitchers were surveyed about their compliance with current off-season, rest-related guidelines, and history of injury. During the preseason, pitchers underwent standardized physical examinations, and pitch velocity was measured. Pitch counts were collected during the baseball season that followed. Dynamometer strength testing of shoulder forward flexion, and external rotation as well as grip strength was recorded. We compared pitchers who were compliant with recommendations with those who were noncompliant using Student t and Mann-Whitney U tests. Results: Based on preseason data, 84% of pitchers had violated current Pitch Smart guidelines. During the season, 14% had at least 1 violation of the Pitch Smart guidelines. Across both the preseason survey and in-season pitch counts, 89% of players had at least 1 violation of the Pitch Smart guidelines. While there were no significant differences in ROM or strength, the noncompliant group had higher maximum pitch velocity than the compliant group (74 ± 8 vs 69 ± 5 mph [119 ± 13 vs 111 ± 8 kph], respectively; P = .009). Players’ self-reported velocity differed significantly from the direct measurement, for both peak velocity (80 ± 6 vs 73 ± 8 mph [129 ± 9 vs 117 ± 13 kph], respectively; P < .001) and mean velocity (73 ± 8 vs 53 ± 27 mph [117 ± 13 vs 85 ± 43 kph], respectively; P < .001). Conclusion: Most high school pitchers were not fully compliant with current Pitch Smart guidelines, and they tended to overestimate their peak velocity by 7 mph (11 kph). Pitchers who threw with greater velocity were at higher risk for violating Pitch Smart recommendations.

Objectives: Ulnar Collateral Ligament (UCL) tears are common in baseball players. When non-operative management fails; reconstruction or repair may be necessary to restore physical function. There is no clear consensus regarding the indications for surgery based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) tear characteristics, or the indications for selecting repair over reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to define the indications for UCL surgery based on MRI and to elucidate indications for UCL repair vs reconstruction. Methods: Twenty-six orthopaedic surgeons who treat baseball players were surveyed. Forty-five MRIs were reviewed: 15 without UCL tears, 15 with intra-operatively confirmed partial-thickness tears, and 15 with full-thickness tears. Factors investigated included ligament characteristics (peri-ligamentous or osseous edema, ligament hypertrophy, calcification, partial or full-thickness tearing) and location (proximal, mid-substance, or distal). Surgeons were given a clinical scenario and asked whether 1) surgery was indicated and 2) whether repair or reconstruction was recommended. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) helped identify significant predictors for both queries. Results: The odds of recommending surgical treatment compared to non-operative treatment were 2.4x more likely for a proximal partial-thickness tear, 3.2x for distal partial-thickness tear, 5.1x for distal full- thickness tear, and 7.0x for proximal full-thickness tear (p<0.001). Significant indications for repair included distal partial (OR=1.6, 95%CI 1.0, 2.1, p<0.001) and full-thickness tears (OR=1.7, 95%CI 1.1, 2.3, p<0.001). Repair was 3x less likely recommended for mid-substance full-thickness tears (OR=3.0, 95%CI - 5.0, -1.0, p=0.004). Ultrasound stress testing was requested in 78% of partial tears. Conclusions: Among surgeons surveyed, the highest odds for recommending operative treatment were proximal full-thickness tears, then distal full-thickness, distal partial-thickness, and proximal partial- thickness tears. Repair was most appropriate for partial and full-thickness distal tears, but relatively contraindicated for complete mid-substance UCL tears. Ultrasound stress testing was frequently requested for partial tears. Given the lack of consensus among surgeons, future prospective registries are necessary to determine whether these factors associate with clinical outcomes. [Table: see text]

Objectives: While pitch count and rest guidelines have been promoted for youth and adolescent baseball players for nearly two decades, compliance with guidelines remains poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency of compliance with Pitch Smart guidelines, as well as the association between compliance and range of motion, strength, velocity, injury, and pitcher utilization. Methods: This study was a prospective, multi-center study of high school pitchers, encompassing each region of the United States. Pre-season pitchers were surveyed about their compliance with current off- season rest-related guidelines and history of injury. Pre-season, pitchers underwent standardized physical examinations and pitch velocity was measured. During the high school season that followed, both pitch counts and injury incidence were collected. Results: One hundred and fifteen pitchers participated. Based upon pre-season data, 84% of pitchers had previously violated current pitch recommendation guidelines. During the season, 14% had at least one instance of a violation of the current pitch counts guidelines. Across both the pre-season survey and in-season pitch counts, 89% of players had at least one violation of the current Pitch Smart guidelines. While there were no significant differences in range of motion or strength, those pitchers who were non-compliant with guidelines in the pre-season had higher max pitch velocity (mean±standard deviation 74±8 miles per hour vs. 69±5 miles per hour, p=0.009). Pitchers self-reported their peak velocity at 7 MPH greater than the actual measured velocity. Only a single injury occurred during the season, precluding a comparison between groups. There were no significant differences in the incidence of a history of injury between those pitchers who were noncompliant with between-season rest guidelines (p=0.285). Conclusions: Most high school pitchers are non-compliant with current Pitch Smart guidelines, and they tend to overestimate their peak velocity by 7 MPH. Pitchers with greater velocity were at the highest risk for violating current pitch count recommendations. Since both increased throwing volume and pitch velocity are known risk factors for injury, these athletes may be at particular risk for subsequent injury. research is necessary to understand whether taking three consecutive month rest between seasons prevents pitching-related injury.