Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

2 citation(s) found for "Dallas, Sarah L".

Women’s musculoskeletal health: insights from the 2024 National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine report on chronic conditions
Matthews, M, Cooper, R, Dallas, S L, Khosla, Sundeep , Lengyel, K, Nizar, N, South, S M, Meulen, M C H van der, Alliston, T, Bouxsein, Mary , Wysolmerski, John J. , Dallas, Sarah L , Bouxsein, Mary L , Khosla, Sundeep , South, Sanique M. , Meulen, Marjolein C. H. van der , Alliston, Tamara N.

Journal of Bone and Mineral Research | June 18, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1093/jbmr/zjag092 | PMID 42315116 Get It

Abstract In 2024, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) published a report entitled Advancing Research on Chronic Conditions in Women. A major purpose of this report was to summarize the current state of research into a series of 21 chronic conditions that affect women differently or that are more common in women. The American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) established a working group to evaluate the NASEM report’s implications for women’s musculoskeletal (MSK) health. This perspective summarizes key research gaps identified in the NASEM report, including the lack of sex-specific data, underrepresentation of women in clinical studies, and minimal integration of MSK health with other chronic conditions. The NASEM report underscores the need for more comprehensive study designs that consider hormonal, genetic, and social determinants of health across the lifespan. In addition to osteoporosis, in this perspective, the ASBMR working group highlights emerging but poorly understood evidence of detrimental effects on musculoskeletal biology in non-MSK, chronic diseases that were identified in the NASEM report to disproportionately affect women. To advance the field, we advocate for better diagnostics, increased investment, and stronger representation of women in research studies. Addressing these gaps is critical for improving prevention, care, and outcomes for chronic conditions that uniquely or disproportionately affect women.
Safety and Activity of Varlilumab, a Novel and First-in-Class Agonist Anti-CD27 Antibody, in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors
Burris, Howard A. , Infante, Jeffrey R., Ansell, Stephen M. , Weiss, Geoffrey R. , Villalobos, Víctor M. , Šikić, Branimir I. , Northfelt, Donald W. , Carson, William E. , Hawthorne, Thomas, Davis, Thomas A., Yellin, Michael , Keler, Tibor , Infante, Jon , Nemunaitis, John J, Hawthorne, Thomas R, Yellin, Michael J, Bullock, Timothy, Nemunaitis, John , Taylor, Matthew H. , Bullock, Timothy N J , Carson, William E , Infante, Jon

Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 2, 2017 | Volume: 35 | Issue: 18 | Pages: 2028-2036

10.1200/jco.2016.70.1508 | PMID 28463630 Get It

Purpose CD27, a costimulatory molecule on T cells, induces intracellular signals that mediate cellular activation, proliferation, effector function, and cell survival upon binding to its ligand, CD70. Varlilumab is a novel, first-in-class, agonist CD27 antibody that stimulates the CD27 pathway, which results in T-cell activation and antitumor activity in tumor models. This first-in-human, dose-escalation and expansion study evaluated the safety, pharmacology, and activity of varlilumab in patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods In a 3 + 3 dose-escalation design (n = 25), patients received a single dose of varlilumab (0.1, 0.3, 1.0, 3.0, or 10 mg/kg intravenously) with a 28-day observation, followed by up to five multidose cycles (one dose per week for 4 weeks), depending on tumor response. Expansion cohorts were initiated at 3.0 mg/kg in patients with melanoma (n = 16) and renal cell carcinoma (RCC; n = 15). Primary objectives were to assess the safety and the maximum tolerated and optimal biologic doses of varlilumab. Secondary objectives were to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical antitumor activity of varlilumab. Results Exposure to varlilumab was linear and dose proportional across dose groups. Only one patient experienced a dose-limiting toxicity—grade 3 transient asymptomatic hyponatremia at the 1.0-mg/kg dose level. Treatment-related adverse events were generally grade 1 or 2 in severity. Evidence of biologic activity consistent with CD27 stimulation—chemokine induction, T-cell stimulation, regulatory T cell depletion—was observed at all dose levels. A patient with metastatic RCC experienced a partial response (78% shrinkage, progression-free survival > 2.3 years). Eight patients experienced stable disease > 3 months, including a patient with metastatic RCC with progression-free survival of > 3.9 years. Conclusion Dose escalation of varlilumab to 10 mg/kg was well tolerated without identification of a maximum tolerated dose. Varlilumab was biologically and clinically active.