Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

2 citation(s) found for "Bush, Andrew".

Vaccines, Bias, and the Perils of Non-peer-reviewed Studies: Fueling Misinformation and Vaccine Hesitancy
Munblit, Daniel , Semple, Malcolm G. , Genuneit, Jon , Ashkenazi‐Hoffnung, Liat , Poland, Gregory A, Bush, Andrew, Boaventura, Viviane, Ulloa‐Gutiérrez, Rolando , Buonsenso, Danilo , Semple, Malcolm G , Genuneit, Jon , Ashkenazi-Hoffnung, Liat , Sultan, Faisal , Putri, Nina Dwi , Apfelbacher, C J , Ulloa-Gutierrez, Rolando , Watson, Hugh R , Oliveira, Carlos R , Reyes, Luis Felipe , Olliaro, Piero , Greenhawt, Matthew , Wilder‐Smith, Annelies , Warner, John O. , Chang, Aileen Y. , Poland, Gregory A. , Boaventura, Viviane Sampaio , Apfelbacher, Christian , Oliveira, Carlos R.

Clinical Infectious Diseases | July 3, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1093/cid/ciag403 | PMID 42554662 Get It

Abstract Unvetted scientific claims about vaccines can spread rapidly and undermine decades of progress in immunization and public trust. A recent non-peer-reviewed analysis, promoted at political hearings, in the documentary “An Inconvenient Study,” and on social media, has been used to suggest that vaccinated children experience higher rates of chronic illness than unvaccinated peers. Despite standard regression models, critical flaws - uncontrolled confounding, exposure misclassification, unequal follow-up, and outcome multiplicity, invalidate causal inference. An independent group of international experts critically appraises this analysis and contrast its claims with the consistent evidence confirming vaccine safety and effectiveness. We also show how poorly designed studies can distort public discourse, amplify misinformation, and fuel vaccine hesitancy. We outline actions to strengthen research integrity, such as transparent data sharing, labeling of non-peer-reviewed content, and evidence-based communication. Safeguarding public health demands that vaccine evidence be methodologically sound, reviewed, and interpreted by qualified experts.
Asthma Inception: Epidemiologic Risk Factors and Natural History Across the Life Course
Zar, Heather J. , Siroux, Valérie , Saglani, Sejal , Koppelman, Gerard H. , Gern, James E. , Gaston, Benjamin , Zein, Joe , Gern, James E , Melén, Erik , Shaw, Dominick E. , Hartert, Tina V. , Bush, Andrew

American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine | July 9, 2024 | Volume: 210 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 737-754

10.1164/rccm.202312-2249so | PMID 38981012 Get It

Abstract Asthma is a descriptive label for an obstructive inflammatory disease in the lower airways manifesting with symptoms including breathlessness, cough, difficulty in breathing, and wheezing. From a clinician’s point of view, asthma symptoms can commence at any age, although most patients with asthma—regardless of their age of onset—seem to have had some form of airway problems during childhood. Asthma inception and related pathophysiologic processes are therefore very likely to occur early in life, further evidenced by recent lung physiologic and mechanistic research. Herein, we present state-of-the-art updates on the role of genetics and epigenetics, early viral and bacterial infections, immune response, and pathophysiology, as well as lifestyle and environmental exposures, in asthma across the life course. We conclude that early environmental insults in genetically vulnerable individuals inducing abnormal, pre-asthmatic airway responses are key events in asthma inception, and we highlight disease heterogeneity across ages and the potential shortsightedness of treating all patients with asthma using the same treatments. Although there are no interventions that, at present, can modify long-term outcomes, a precision-medicine approach should be implemented to optimize treatment and tailor follow-up for all patients with asthma.