Citations

Background COVID‐19 and other respiratory viral infections can cause cardiovascular complications. SARS‐CoV‐2 virions are found in the blood, and circulating viral RNA levels are associated with death. We hypothesized that viremia can induce thrombotic endotheliopathy that contributes to death and studied this relationship in patients hospitalized for COVID‐19 and enrolled in the ACTIV‐4a (Accelerating COVID‐19 Therapeutic Interventions and Vaccines) randomized trial of antithrombotic therapy. Methods We quantified SARS‐CoV‐2 nucleocapsid RNA and protein in plasma and measured their associations with clinical outcomes and biomarkers of thromboinflammation and endotheliopathy. We used Cox regression and Fine–Gray competing risk models to analyze survival and thrombosis. We conducted causal mediation analysis to explore whether thrombotic endotheliopathy mediates the relationship between viral RNA and death. Results In 93 patients, SARS‐CoV‐2 RNA and N‐antigen were higher in nonsurvivors. Baseline viral RNA levels were associated with increased 90‐day death (hazard ratio [HR], 1.31 [95% CI, 1.17–1.46]) and thrombosis (HR, 1.35 [95% CI, 1.24–1.47]). Viral RNA more effectively predicted survivorship than N‐antigen levels. Soluble thrombomodulin, a biomarker of thrombotic endotheliopathy, positively correlated with viral RNA levels. Mediation analysis revealed that soluble thrombomodulin accounts for 12.2% (95% CI, 0.1%–32.3%; P =0.048) after adjustment for age and sex of the relationship between viral RNA and the 90‐day mortality rate. Conclusions Elevated plasma SARS‐CoV‐2 RNA levels are associated with death in ACTIV‐4a, which is causally mediated in part by soluble thrombomodulin. We propose that lung–blood viral dissemination is a potential mechanism for cardiovascular complications of respiratory viruses. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique Identifier: NCT04505774.

Multiple organizations around the world have issued evidence‐based exercise guidance for patients with cancer and cancer survivors. Recently, the American College of Sports Medicine has updated its exercise guidance for cancer prevention as well as for the prevention and treatment of a variety of cancer health‐related outcomes (eg, fatigue, anxiety, depression, function, and quality of life). Despite these guidelines, the majority of people living with and beyond cancer are not regularly physically active. Among the reasons for this is a lack of clarity on the part of those who work in oncology clinical settings of their role in assessing, advising, and referring patients to exercise. The authors propose using the American College of Sports Medicine's Exercise Is Medicine initiative to address this practice gap. The simple proposal is for clinicians to assess, advise, and refer patients to either home‐based or community‐based exercise or for further evaluation and intervention in outpatient rehabilitation. To do this will require care coordination with appropriate professionals as well as change in the behaviors of clinicians, patients, and those who deliver the rehabilitation and exercise programming. Behavior change is one of many challenges to enacting the proposed practice changes. Other implementation challenges include capacity for triage and referral, the need for a program registry, costs and compensation, and workforce development. In conclusion, there is a call to action for key stakeholders to create the infrastructure and cultural adaptations needed so that all people living with and beyond cancer can be as active as is possible for them.