Targeted Regional Optimization in Action: Dose-dependent End-organ Ischemic Injury with Partial Aortic Occlusion in the Setting of Ongoing Liver Hemorrhage
ABSTRACT Introduction: Targeted regional optimization (TRO) describes partial resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta strategy that allows for controlled distal perfusion to balance hemostasis and tissue perfusion. This study characterized hemodynamics at specific targeted distal flow rates in a swine model of uncontrolled hemorrhage to determine if precise TRO by volume was possible. Methods: Anesthetized swine were subjected to liver laceration and randomized into TRO at distal flows of 300 mL/min (n = 8), 500 mL/min (n = 8), or 700 mL/min (n = 8). After 90 min, the animals received damage control packing and were monitored for 6 h. Hemodynamic parameters were measured continuously, and hematology and serologic labs obtained at predetermined intervals. Results: During TRO, the average percent deviation from the targeted flow was lower than 15.9% for all cohorts. Average renal flow rates were significantly different across all cohorts during TRO phase (P < 0.0001; TRO300 = 63.1 ± 1.2; TRO500 = 133.70 ± 1.93; TRO700 = 109.3 ± 2.0), with the TRO700 cohort having less renal flow than TRO500. The TRO500 and TRO700 average renal flow rates inverted during the intensive care unit phase (P < 0.0001; TRO300 = 86.20 ± 0.40; TRO500 = 148.50 ± 1.45; TRO700 = 181.1 ± 0.70). There was higher blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, and potassium in the TRO300 cohort at the end of the experiment, but no difference in lactate or pH between cohorts. Conclusion: This study demonstrated technical feasibility of TRO as a strategy to improve outcomes after prolonged periods of aortic occlusion and resuscitation in the setting of ongoing solid organ hemorrhage. A dose-dependent ischemic end-organ injury occurs beginning with partial aortic occlusion that progresses through the critical care phase, with exaggerated effect on renal function.
Low-dose versus High-dose Carfilzomib with Dexamethasone (S1304) in Patients with Relapsed-Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Abstract Purpose: Treatment of multiple myeloma has evolved tremendously and optimal utilization of available therapies will ensure maximal patient benefits. Patients and Methods: We report the Southwest Oncology Group randomized phase II trial (S1304) comparing twice weekly low-dose (27 mg/m2; arm 1) to high-dose carfilzomib (56 mg/m2; arm 2), both with dexamethasone, administered for 12 cycles (11 months) for relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma with up to six prior lines of therapy (NCT01903811). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and patients on arm 1 could cross-over to arm 2 after progression on treatment. Results: Among 143 enrolled patients, of whom 121 were eligible and analyzable, the overall response rate was 42.8%, with no significant difference between the arms (P = 0.113). Also, neither the median PFS [5 months and 8 months, respectively; HR, 1.061; 80% Wald confidence interval (CI), 0.821–1.370; P = 0.384] nor the median overall survival were significantly different (26 and 22 months, respectively; HR, 1.149, 80% Wald CI, 0.841–.571; P = 0.284). Sixteen patients crossed over to arm 2 with a median PFS benefit of 3 months. Certain adverse events (AE) were more frequent in arm 2, including fatigue, thrombocytopenia, and peripheral neuropathy, but there was no significant difference in cardiopulmonary AEs. Conclusions: This randomized trial did not support a benefit of fixed duration, twice weekly 56 mg/m2 dosing of carfilzomib over the 27 mg/m2 dose for the treatment of relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma. However, treatment to progression in earlier patient populations with high-dose carfilzomib using different schedules should still be considered as part of the standard of care.
Low vs high dose carfilzomib (Cfz) with dexamethasone (Dex) for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): Results of SWOG S1304.