Citations

Background: Flow diverters (FD) are increasingly used in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. The risk of distal thromboembolic complications with FD is high, even in patients treated with dual antiplatelet therapy. The aim of the study was to understand the downstream vascular wall changes, by measuring the pulse wave velocity and vascular contractility following flow diverter treatment in a rabbit model. Methods: FD (Pipeline Embolic Device, Medtronic) were implanted in normal rabbits and sham-operated aorta were used as controls (n=5 for each group). Pulse wave imaging with ultra-fast ultrasound at 1600 frames per second (Vantage, Verasonics, Inc.) was performed in the vessel wall distal to FD, prior to device implantation and at 8 weeks follow up to measure the pulse wave propagation. Force contraction studies were conducted in the aortic rings using organ bath to assess the vascular functions. Results: The difference in pulse wave velocity (PWV) in the follow-up compared to pre-implantation was significantly higher (p=0.03,Fig 1A) in the distal vessels compared to sham controls (mean difference of PWV was 1.18 m/s and -0.37m/s, respectively as shown in Fig 1B). Conversely, the distal aortic segments to FD exhibited 55% increase in the level of vascular contractility compared to that of proximal segments (p=0.002). There is a significant positive correlation between mean PWV and mean vascular contractility. Conclusion: Our study found changes in the PWV after implantation of the FD, which correlated with vascular contractility. These results could explain vascular wall changes downstream following FD implantation.

TPS8584 Background: The first-line standard of care for the majority of patients (pts) with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) is platinum-based chemotherapy with etoposide, but survival outcomes remain poor (median OS, < 1 year) despite initial response rates ranging from 50-70%. Atezolizumab (atezo), an anti–PD-L1 mAb, prevents the binding of PD-L1 with its receptors PD-1 and B7.1 and restores anticancer T-cell activity. Tolerable safety with promising durability of response has been shown with atezo in pts with ES-SCLC: confirmed ORR was 6% (n = 1/17 [partial response]; DOR of 7 mo) by RECIST v1.1 and 24% by immune-related response criteria (irRC; n = 4/17, with 2 pts on atezo for ≥ 12 mo). Preliminary data also indicate the potential synergy between atezo and platinum-based chemotherapy in NSCLC, whereby durable responses may translate into improved survival over atezo alone. IMpower133 (NCT02763579), a global, Phase I/III, randomized, multicenter, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial will evaluate the efficacy and safety of 1L atezo + carboplatin + etoposide compared with placebo + carboplatin + etoposide in treatment-naive pts with ES-SCLC. Methods: Pts with measurable (RECIST v1.1) ES-SCLC, who have ECOG PS 0-1 and no prior systemic anticancer treatment, are eligible for the study. Exclusion criteria include untreated CNS metastases and history of autoimmune disease. The study requires submission of tumor tissue, but pts will be enrolled regardless of biomarker status. Pts will be stratified by sex, ECOG PS and presence of treated brain metastases. Eligible pts will be randomized 1:1 to receive four 21-day cycles of atezo (1200 mg IV) or placebo in combination with carboplatin (AUC 5 mg/mL/min IV, d 1) and etoposide (100 mg/m2 IV, d 1-3), followed by maintenance therapy with atezo or placebo until PD per RECIST v1.1. Pts can continue with treatment until persistent radiographic PD, symptomatic deterioration or unacceptable toxicity. Co-primary endpoints are investigator-assessed PFS per RECIST v1.1 and OS. Secondary efficacy endpoints include investigator-assessed ORR and DOR. Safety and tolerability will also be assessed. Approximately 400 pts will be enrolled. Clinical trial information: NCT02763579.

e20502 Background: The CNS is often a site of first disease progression in CRZ-treated ALK+ NSCLC. The ALTA trial is assessing BRG, an investigational next-generation ALK inhibitor, in pts with CRZ-refractory advanced ALK+ NSCLC, including pts with baseline brain metastases. Methods: In ALTA (NCT02094573), pts were stratified by presence of baseline brain metastases and best response to prior CRZ and randomized 1:1 to receive BRG at 90 mg qd (arm A) or 180 mg qd with a 7-d lead-in at 90 mg (arm B). Here, we show data for pts with baseline brain metastases. An independent review committee (IRC) assessed intracranial efficacy. Results: Of 222 pts (112 in arm A; 110 in arm B), 80 (71%)/74 (67%) in A/B had baseline brain metastases per investigators, with median age 49/55 y; 74%/76% had received chemotherapy. As of May 31, 2016, 51%/59% of these pts continued to receive BRG in A/B; median follow-up was 9.6/11.4 mo. Intracranial efficacy is shown in the table. Among these pts, most common treatment-emergent adverse events were: nausea 35%/46% (A/B), headache 30%/31%, vomiting 29%/31%, diarrhea 21%/38%, cough 25%/32%; grade ≥3: increased blood CPK 1%/12%, hypertension 4%/7%, increased lipase 4%/3%. Conclusions: BRG yielded substantial intracranial responses with robust iPFS and acceptable safety in ALK+ NSCLC pts with baseline brain metastases in ALTA. 180 mg (with lead-in) showed consistently improved intracranial efficacy compared with 90 mg. Clinical trial information: NCT02094573. [Table: see text]

9065 Background: BRG is a potent and selective ALK inhibitor with preclinical and clinical activity against wild-type ALK and a broad range of mutants associated with clinical CRZ resistance, including G1202R. Herein we examine the association between BRG efficacy and ALK mutation status using plasma specimens from the initiation of BRG treatment (baseline [BL]) and the end of BRG treatment (EOT) in CRZ-resistant ALK+ NSCLC pts enrolled in the BRG Ph1/2 or pivotal Ph2 (ALTA) trials. Methods: Plasma samples were analyzed using the Resolution Bioscience ctDx Lung Panel v3.0. BRG activity was described using the confirmed objective response rate (cORR) (RECIST v1.1). Data are reported as of May 31, 2016 for the Ph1/2 (NCT01449461) and ALTA (NCT02094573) trials. Results: Of 291 CRZ-resistant ALK+ NSCLC pts enrolled in the Ph1/2 (N = 69) and ALTA (N = 222) trials, evaluable plasma samples were obtained from 67 pts at BL. cORR to BRG in these pts was 49% (33/67). An ALK fusion was detected in plasma in 45% (30/67) of these pts (cORR 57% [17/30]), of whom 33% (10/30) had secondary ALK mutations (cORR 50% [5/10]) and 67% (20/30) did not (cORR 60% [12/20]). Best responses in pts with secondary ALK mutations were: 2 CR (ALK amplification [Amp] copy number [CN] = 10; T1151M); 3 PR (L1196M; E1408V; Amp CN = 6); 4 SD (L1196M; E1419K; F1174C; C1156Y+S1206F+G1269A); 1 PD (T1151R+C1156Y+E1161D+F1174L). Of 67 pts with evaluable plasma at BL, 35 discontinued BRG therapy, of whom 20 had evaluable samples collected at EOT. No new mutations were detected at EOT in 75% (15/20) of pts. Complex mutation patterns were associated with resistance in the remaining 25% (5/20): High-level ALK-Amp (CN = 58); ALK-Amp (CN = 14)+MET-Amp (CN = 6); ALK-S1206F+S1206C+Amp (CN = 6); ALK-G1202R+L1196M+L1198Q; ALK-G1202R+BRAF-V600E+KRAS-G12D. Conclusions: ALK fusions were detected in plasma in < 50% of CRZ-resistant ALK+ NSCLC pts. BRG had substantial activity in ALK fusion–positive pts with a range of CRZ-resistance mutations. Neither primary nor secondary resistance to BRG was associated with any single plasma ALK mutation. The therapeutic implications of complex secondary resistance patterns associated with BRG require further exploration. Clinical trial information: NCT01449461, NCT02094573.

7547 Background: E1412 statistical design is based on results of lenalidomide/RCHOP (R2CHOP) vs RCHOP in ABC-DLBCL as determined by NanoString gene expression profiling (GEP). Central pathology review (CPR) was conducted to confirm diagnosis and to ensure adequate tissue for GEP. Initially, CPR occurred after randomization and treatment initiation. Due to high ineligibility rate (IR), the protocol was amended to include real-time CPR to determine patient eligibility prior to study enrollment. We describe the revision and how it affected the IR. Methods: Pre-amendment, CPR was done retrospectively. Post-amendment, CPR was done prior to enrollment, in real time, on a submitted tissue block, H&E, and CD20 slides. Based on CPR, if a diagnosis of DLBCL was confirmed, and sufficient tissue remained for GEP, a patient was deemed eligible and the submitter was notified by fax. Protocol goal was notification within 2 working days (WD) of receipt of materials at the CPR site. Results: Pre-amendment, 219 patients were enrolled. Material was typically received at the CPR site 6-9 months after patient registration. The IR with CPR was 36% for all those enrolled, and 26% for patients with adequate tissue for GEP. Post-amendment, 218 patients were submitted for CPR: 145 (67%) were eligible; 73 (33%) were ineligible. Reasons for ineligibility included insufficient tissue (n=27) or a diagnosis other than de novo DLBCL (n=46). Notification of eligibility occurred in a median of 2 WD (Mean 2 WD; Range 1-5 WD). 90% were notified within the protocol goal of 2 WD. GEP for all enrolled was completed within 6 weeks of CPR. Conclusions: The success of this novel, real-time CPR serves as a model for the future of NCTN DLBCL trials. When CPR is performed rapidly prior to enrollment, study slots may more accurately reflect the target population and eliminate excess costs. In the precision medicine era, rapid collection of relevant pathology and biomarker data is essential to trial success. Study Coordinated by ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (Robert L. Comis, MD and Mitchell D. Schnall, MD, PhD, Group Co-Chairs), supported by NCI grant # CA180820, CA180794, CA180790, CA180799, CA180833.