EXTENDED FOLLOW‐UP OF A PHASE I TRIAL OF IPILIMUMAB, NIVOLUMAB AND BRENTUXIMAB VEDOTIN IN RELAPSED HODGKIN LYMPHOMA: A TRIAL OF THE ECOG‐ACRIN RESEARCH GROUP (E4412)
AUGMENT PHASE III STUDY: LENALIDOMIDE/RITUXIMAB (R2) IMPROVED EFFICACY OVER RITUXIMAB/PLACEBO IN RELAPSED/REFRACTORY FOLLICULAR PATIENTS IRRESPECTIVE OF POD24 STATUS
ADDITION OF LENALIDOMIDE TO R‐CHOP (R2CHOP) IMPROVES OUTCOMES IN NEWLY DIAGNOSED DIFFUSE LARGE B‐CELL LYMPHOMA (DLBCL): FIRST REPORT OF ECOG‐ACRIN1412 A RANDOMIZED PHASE 2 US INTERGROUP STUDY OF R2CHOP VS R‐CHOP
ROBUST: First report of phase III randomized study of lenalidomide/R‐CHOP (R2‐CHOP) vs placebo/R‐CHOP in previously untreated ABC‐type diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma
HEALTH‐RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE (HRQoL) IN RELAPSED/REFRACTORY (R/R) INDOLENT NHL IN THE PHASE 3 AUGMENT TRIAL OF RITUXIMAB (R) PLUS LENALIDOMIDE (R2) VERSUS R PLUS PLACEBO
POST HOC ANALYSES OF PATIENTS WITH RELAPSED/REFRACTORY MARGINAL ZONE LYMPHOMA WHO RECEIVED LENALIDOMIDE PLUS RITUXIMAB (R2) VS RITUXIMAB/PLACEBO (AUGMENT)
AbstractBackground and ObjectivesTo build nomogram incorporating potential prognostic factors for predicting survival outcomes of testicular germ cell tumors (TGCT) patients after resection of the primary tumor.MethodsData of TGCT patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2010‐2016) who underwent resection of the primary tumor were collected. Overall survival (OS) and cancer‐specific survival (CSS) were analyzed by using Cox regression models, nomogram, Kaplan‐Meier method, and log‐rank test.ResultsWe identified 7272 TGCT patients. Age at diagnosis, histology, tumor size, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system, and number of metastases sites were independent prognostic factors and were integrated into nomograms. The nomograms had higher C‐indexes for both OS and CSS compared with the AJCC 7th staging system (0.881 vs 0.831 and 0.895 vs 0.856, respectively). Moreover, the new stratification of risk groups based on the nomograms showed a more significant distinction between Kaplan‐Meier curves for survival outcomes than the AJCC staging system. Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection was associated with statistically improved survival probability in the nomogram middle‐risk group in resected TGCT patients.ConclusionThe novel nomogram‐based staging system could provide satisfactory risk stratification and survival prediction ability beyond traditional AJCC staging systems.
Longitudinal toxicity analysis with novel summary metrics of lenalidomide maintenance in follicular lymphoma in ECOG-ACRIN 2408.
6511 Background: Conventional adverse event (AE) analysis (ToxC) focuses on incidence of grade (gr) 3+ toxicities, and fails to capture AE time profile. Novel metrics that reflect chronic low gr and overall AE burden are needed. We applied the Toxicity over Time (ToxT) approach to ECOG-ACRIN 2408 to depict time-dependent toxicity of lenalidomide (L) with rituximab maintenance (MR) in follicular lymphoma (FL), and we developed a novel summary metric of symptomatic AE burden, the maximum gr over time (MGOT). Methods: In E2408, high risk FL patients (pts) were randomized (1:2:2) to: A) bendamustine-rituxumab (BR) x 6 then MR x 2 years (yrs) vs B) BR-bortezomib x 6 then MR x 2 yrs vs C) BR x 6 then MR x 2 yrs + L x 1 yr (MRL). Analysis included 3 laboratory and 5 symptomatic AEs of highest incidence during maintenance on arms A and C. Treatment-related AEs of any gr were analyzed by ToxC and ToxT. Repeated measures, time-to-event (TTE) and area under the curve (AUC) analyses capture trends over time in ToxT. MGOT combines the 5 symptomatic AEs. Results: 104 randomized pts (30 MR, 74 MRL) were included. For the laboratory AEs, by ToxC, neutropenia incidence was significantly higher in MRL (84%) than MR (47%, p < .001). ToxT additionally shows neutropenia does not worsen over time (10/14/20% gr 1/2/3+ at c1, 6/21/12% gr 1/2/3+ at c12). For the symptomatic AEs, ToxC indicates 2% gr 3+ GI AEs. However, gr 1-2 GI AEs are more common on MRL (59%) than MR (26%, p < .001). ToxT AUC captures a higher burden of GI AEs over time on MRL(2.8) vs MR(1.4, p = .002). TTE depicts sooner GI AE onset in MRL (10% vs 0% gr 2+ GI by day 50, p = 0.03). Bar charts of incidence and grade by cycle illustrate this improves over time (34/7/4% gr 1/2/3+ at c1, 13/0/0% gr 1/2/3+ at c12). ToxT MGOT analyses demonstrate earlier time to gr 2+ symptomatic AE on MRL vs MR (63% vs 31% by day 50, p < .001) and suggest that overall AE burden over time is higher for patients on MRL(AUC 18.2) than MR(11.8, p < .001). Conclusions: ToxT depicts AE time profile and can guide AE interventions. Summary metrics suggest that symptomatic AEs occur earlier and their burden over time is higher on MRL. We are implementing ToxT in patient-reported AE data to better characterize pt tolerability.