Citations

57 Background: Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) show frequent and durable responses to programmed cell death -1 (PD-1) blockade. While the majority of these tumors are sporadics and observed in elderly patients, first-line data are limited to the KEYNOTE-177 study. Here, we report a consecutive series of elderly patients with dMMR mCRC treated with pembrolizumab in routine clinical practice that includes analysis of clinical outcome based on metastatic site. Methods: Patients with dMMR mCRC received first-line pembrolizumab (200 mg every 3 weeks) (N = 41) at Mayo Clinic and Mayo Clinic Health System (2015-2022). Clinicopathological features including metastatic site and molecular data ( BRAFV600E, KRAS) were analyzed in relationship to tumor response rate (RECIST version 1.1). Furthermore, these variables were also analyzed in relationship to patient progression-free survival (PFS) using Kaplan-Meier methodology and multivariable stepwise Cox regression. Results: Among patients with dMMR mCRC, 29/41 (70.7%) were female, 30 (78.9%) harbored BRAFV600E, and 32 (80%) were sporadic. Median age at start of treatment was 80.6 years (IQR of 75.9, 85.9) and median number of treatment cycles was 9 (IQR: 4, 20). At a median follow-up of 23 months (range, 3.0 to 88.5), patient median PFS was 21.3 months (95% CI: 6.4, 38.5). An overall response was observed in 48.8% (20 of 41) of patients including 13 (31.7%) complete (CR) and 7 (17.1%) partial responses (PR). The median duration of response was 42.2 months (95%CI: 8.6, NR). Patients with metastases that included liver had significantly poorer PFS compared to those with non-liver metastases (HRadj 3.40 (95%CI: 1.27-9.13); Padj= 0. 01). In this regard, responses (CR, PR) to pembrolizumab were observed in 3 (21.4%) patients with liver metastasis compared to 17 (62.9%) of those with non-liver metastases. Treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events were observed in 9 (22.0%) patients of whom two discontinued therapy, and there was one treatment-related death. Conclusions: First-line therapy with pembrolizumab for dMMR mCRC significantly prolonged survival in an elderly patient population with manageable toxicity in routine clinical practice. Moreover, the survival benefit of pembrolizumab was significantly attenuated in patients with liver vs non-liver metastases.

559 Background: Cabozantinib, a multikanase inhibitor, is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treatment of advanced stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) following progression on sorafenib. The CELESTIAL study which demonstrated benefit from cabozantinib following sorafenib included only patients with Child Pugh class A liver function. Recently, bevacizumab plus atezolizumab has replaced sorafenib as the first line treatment for HCC. It is unclear whether there is benefit from using Cabozantinib following progression on immunotherapy as CELESTIAL trial included very few patients who received prior immunotherapy. We describe the outcomes of individuals with advanced stage HCC treated with Cabozantinib following progression on immunotherapy. Methods: This was a multicenter, retrospective analysis of patients with advanced HCC diagnosed between 2010-2021 at Mayo Clinic Arizona, Florida, and Minnesota. Progression free survival (PFS) and median overall survival analysis were performed using Kaplan-Meier method. Results: We identified a total of 26 patients with advanced stage HCC who received cabozantinib following progression on immunotherapy. The median age of patients was 61 years (range, 39 – 81) and the majority were male (85%). Eighteen (72%) patients had Child Pugh A at initiation of cabozantinib therapy. Four (15%) patients received cabozantinib as second line therapy, the rest received it as third line or later. PFS on cabozantinib was 2.1 months (95% CI: 1.3 – 3.9) and median overall survival from time of cabozantinib initiation was 7.7 months (95% CI: 5.3 – 14.9). PFS was shorter with Child Pugh Class B, 1.3 months (95% CI: 0.9 – NE) compared to those with Child Pugh Class A, 2.1 months (95% CI: 1.5 – 4); although this difference was not significant (p=0.55). Common adverse events included fatigue (50%), anorexia (35%), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) elevation (35%), and diarrhea (31%); 7 (26%) patients experienced Grade 3 or greater adverse events including hypertension, diarrhea, anorexia, and bowel obstruction. Two patients discontinued cabozantinib due to side effects including one for uncontrolled blood pressure elevations and the other due to fatigue. Conclusions: The optimal sequencing of therapy for patients with advanced HCC following progression on immunotherapy is unknown. Treatment with cabozantinib may improve clinical outcomes following progression on immunotherapy with similar adverse event profile. This study included patients with Child Pugh class B liver disease (28%) and heavily pretreated population and demonstrated mPFS and mOS similar to other work examining outcomes of cabozantinib in real world setting after progression on sorafenib. Further studies to determine optimal treatment sequencing for this patient population are needed.

499 Background: The impact of socioeconomic status on gastrointestinal (GI) cancer mortality in the United States (US) is not well-established. We hypothesized that socially vulnerable populations have disproportionately higher mortality rates. Hence, we assessed the association of the social vulnerability index (SVI) with GI cancer mortality across US counties. Methods: Social vulnerability indices were obtained from the agency for toxic substances and disease registry (ATSDR) from 2014-2018 to compute percentile ranking scores (PRS: ranging from 0-1) for each US county. PRS were further categorized into quartiles (Q: 1st: 0-0.25 [least vulnerable]; 4th:0.75-1.00 [most vulnerable]). The wide-ranging online data for epidemiological research (WONDER) database was queried to abstract county-level age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMR) per 100,000 person-years (PY) for populations diagnosed with GI cancers. AAMRs were then linked with quartile rankings. Rate ratios (RR) of AAMRs between 4th and 1st Q were subsequently estimated with 95% confidence intervals using population-weighted, Poisson regression. Results: A total of 3142 counties were included in this analysis. The AAMR for overall deaths (OD) and premature deaths (PD; defined as death at age <65) in the GI cancer population was 53.8 and 17.7 per 100,000 PY. A gradient increase in GI cancer-related mortality was observed from 1st Q to 4th Q (OD: 49.2 vs 59.3; PD: 14.1 vs 21.3). This stepwise increase in AAMR over the quartiles was consistent across gender, different racial/ethnic subgroups, and rural/urban categories of counties. The AAMRs for OD were significantly higher in the 4th Q as compared to the 1st Q for gastric (RR: 1.67 [95% CI, 1.51-1.86]), hepatocellular including intrahepatic biliary (1.52 [1.45-1.61]), colorectal (1.21 [1.16-1.26]) and biliary (1.17 [1.06-1.28]) cancer. Similarly, significantly higher AAMRs for PD were observed in 4th Q vs1st Q for gastric (1.81 [1.60-2.05]), hepatocellular including intrahepatic biliary (1.78 [1.58-2.00]), biliary (1.64 [1.35-1.99]), colorectal (1.29 [1.21-1.39]) and pancreatic (1.16 [1.07-1.25]) cancer. However, no significant differences were observed for esophageal and small intestinal cancers. Men with gastric (1.58 [1.41-1.78]) and hepatocellular cancer (1.54 [1.43-1.66]), non-Hispanic Black population (1.54 [1.31-1.80]) with hepatocellular cancer, and Hispanic population with colorectal cancer (1.50 [1.31-1.72]) were observed to have higher overall mortality in the 4th Q compared to the 1st Q. The findings were similar for premature mortality. Conclusions: Population-level data suggests that the US counties with higher socio-economic adversities may be at an increased risk of GI cancer-related mortality. Investigations using patient-level data are required to probe the impact of socioeconomic vulnerabilities on cancer-related mortality.

23 Background: Identification of factors associated with enrollment disparities in clinical trials can narrow cancer care inequities. Funding source can influence minority representation in clinical trials. Therefore, we aimed to assess the impact of funding sources on enrollment disparities in colorectal (CRC) clinical trials. Methods: CRC phase II/III randomized controlled trial (RCTs) identified through MEDLINE and EMBASE from each database’s inception through 2022 were considered eligible. Trial level enrollment incidence ratios (EIR) were computed; defined as the ratio of trial proportions of a gender, age, or racial/ethnic subgroup category and the global incidence in the corresponding gender/age subgroup (from the global burden of disease database), or the US-population-based incidence in the corresponding racial/ethnic subgroup (from SEER 21 database). EIRs were then meta-analyzed using a random-effects model for each funding source category (US- government, industry, others). Temporal trends were analyzed using a univariate meta-regression. Results: Using data from 287 RCTs, women were significantly under-represented in the industry sponsored trials (EIR: 0.85 [95% CI: 0.83 - 0.88]) but not in US-government sponsored trials (0.92 [0.84-1.00]). A total of 87 RCTs reported age proportions; older adults (above 65 years) were significantly under-represented in the industry sponsored (0.84 [0.74-0.96]) and as well as in US-government sponsored CRC trials (0.52 [0.44-0.61]). Only 56 and 15 trials reported race and ethnicity, respectively. Limited data on racial/ethnic enrollment revealed significant under-representation of Black (0.45 [0.36 -0.57]) and Hispanic (0.45 [0.31-0.66]) patients across industry sponsored CRC trials. In contrast, no significant disparity was observed in the inclusion of Asian race in the industry sponsored trials. The number of US-government sponsored trials reporting racial/ethnic subgroups were small ( < 10) which precluded any meaningful statistics. Trends show that the representation of women has improved ( P: 0.02) while the representation of Black ( P: 0.007) and Hispanic patients ( P: 0.04) has worsened over the last three decades in industry sponsored CRC trials. Conclusions: The reporting of race/ethnicity is suboptimal in CRC trials especially in those sponsored by US government. Older adults may be under-represented regardless of funding source. Women, Blacks and Hispanics may be under-represented in industry sponsored CRC clinical trials. While representation of women appears to be improving, representation of Black and Hispanic patients has worsened in industry sponsored CRC clinical trials over the last three decades.

227 Background: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) consists of small fragments of DNA released into the plasma from cancer cells. Tumor informed ctDNA testing by whole exome sequencing of the primary tumor coupled with multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based next generation sequencing of cell free DNA in serum, can detect and quantify ctDNA, allowing for detection of minimal residual disease (MRD). Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 120 patients with colorectal cancer who had at least one tumor-informed ctDNA MRD assay completed between May 6, 2019, and July 1, 2022, at Mayo Clinic, Rochester. Disease recurrence was defined as radiographic evidence consistent with recurrence with or without biopsy confirmation. Data are presented descriptively, including number of ctDNA assays completed, ctDNA positivity prior to disease recurrence, and ctDNA concordance with carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). The study protocol was exempt after review by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board. Results: One-hundred twenty patients were included in the study with median age at initial disease diagnosis of 67.0 years. Sixty-four percent were male and 94% were white. At time of initial diagnosis, 10 had stage I, 23 stage II, 60 stage III, and 25 stage IV disease. In 120 patients, 476 ctDNA assays were performed, and 110 recurrences were observed among 62 patients. There were 39 instances in which ctDNA was obtained prior to clinical detection of recurrence and of these, at least one ctDNA assay was positive in 28 cases (72%). CEA was obtained prior to recurrence in 88 instances and was elevated in only 39 cases (44%). Among 37 instances where both ctDNA and CEA testing were obtained prior to recurrence, ctDNA was positive in 27 cases (73%) while CEA was positive in 14 cases (38%). ctDNA was positive in 83% of recurrences involving liver and 62.5% of recurrences involving only the lungs. ctDNA and CEA positivity are shown by location of recurrence. ctDNA and CEA were discordant in 44% of instances in which the assays were completed within 2-weeks of each other. Results of a ctDNA assay impacted management decisions in 16% of cases. Conclusions: ctDNA detected 72% of recurrences with higher rates of detection in liver versus lung metastasis. ctDNA performed superiorly to serum CEA in detection of recurrence, suggesting a role in disease surveillance. However, ctDNA impacted disease management in only 16% of patients, suggesting need for better patient selection and further study for ctDNA-based disease management strategy (more details will be reported). [Table: see text]

147 Background: PolyPEPI1018 is an off-the-shelf, multi-peptide vaccine containing 12 immunogenic epitopes derived from 7 cancer testis antigens (CTAs) frequently expressed in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). PolyPEPI1018 successfully induced anticancer immunity and triggered recruitment and infiltration of cytotoxic T cells into the tumor of MSS mCRC subjects demonstrating also early evidence of clinical activity, in first-line mCRC. Here we report the initial results of the phase Ib study of PolyPEPI1018 vaccine plus trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) in late-stage mCRC patients. Methods: Patients with MSS mCRC who have progressed on ≤2 lines of prior chemotherapy regimen for mCRC received PolyPEPI1018 subcutaneously on days 1 and 15 and TAS-102 orally twice daily on days 1-5 and 8-12 of a 28-day cycle. Treatment continued for up to 7 cycles until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Immunomonitoring was performed at both blood and tumor levels prior to- and on study treatment. The primary endpoint of the study was safety and tolerability. Data on objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and correlation studies will be also presented. Results: 15 patients (67% male) started treatment. At baseline, median age was 55 years (range 31–71), 73% had liver metastases and the primary tumor site was colon-sigmoid in 40% and rectum in 33%. The combination was well-tolerated; most common side effect related to PolyPEPI1018 was Grade (Gr) 1-2 local skin reactions in 93% of patients. Gr 3 events. There were no Gr 4 or 5 events. The ORR was 0% and the DCR was 50%. The mPFS was 2.5 months (95%CI 2.1-NR). At the data cut-off (September 7, 2022), the mOS has not been reached; median follow-up was 4.0 months (95% CI 2.2-4.4). Post-treatment, vaccine-specific T cell responses were detected ex vivo in the PBMC of 4/5 subjects tested. In addition, one subject who had no detectable T cell response at peripheral level, responded at the tumor level with more than 300% increase of both CD3+ and CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes compared to baseline. Patients with increased PFS (≥ 16 weeks) had robust vaccine-specific T cell responses. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first phase Ib study investigating combination of a cancer vaccine with TAS-102 chemotherapy in advanced MSS mCRC. Our results show that PolyPEPI1018 plus TAS-102 was well-tolerated with few grade 3 AEs beyond what is expected with TAS-102 monotherapy. PolyPEPI1018 induced immunological responses at both peripheral and tumor level, albeit no objective tumor responses could be detected. The study is on-going for the collection of overall survival data. Clinical trial information: NCT05130060 .

(1) Background: Cabozantinib, a multikinase inhibitor, is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) following progression on sorafenib. Recently, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab has been approved in the first line setting for advanced HCC and has become the new standard of care. Whether cabozantinib improves outcomes following progression on immunotherapy remains unknown. We describe the clinical outcomes following treatment with immunotherapy in patients with advanced HCC who received cabozantinib. (2) Methods: We conducted a multicentric, retrospective analysis of patients with advanced HCC diagnosed between 2010–2021 at Mayo Clinic in Minnesota, Arizona, and Florida who received cabozantinib. Median overall survival and progression free survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan–Meier method. Adverse events were determined using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). (3). Results: We identified 26 patients with advanced HCC who received cabozantinib following progression on immunotherapy. Median progression free survival on cabozantinib therapy was 2.1 months (95% CI: 1.3–3.9) and median overall survival from time of cabozantinib initiation was 7.7 months (95% CI: 5.3–14.9). (4) Conclusion: The optimal sequencing of therapy for patients with advanced HCC following progression on immunotherapy remains unknown. Our study demonstrates that patients may benefit from treatment with cabozantinib following progression on immunotherapy.

ImportanceApproval by the US Food and Drug Administration of immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) for advanced gastroesophageal cancer (aGEC) irrespective of PD-L1 status has generated controversy. Exploratory analyses from individual trials indicate a lack of meaningful benefit from ICI in patients with absent or low PD-L1 expression; however, analysis of a single variable while ignoring others may not consider the instability inherent in exploratory analyses.ObjectiveTo systematically examine the predictive value of tissue-based PD-L1 status compared with that of other variables for ICI benefit in aGEC to assess its stability.Data SourcesMEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register (2000-2022).Study Selection, Data Extraction, and SynthesisRandomized clinical trials (RCTs) were included of adults with aGEC (adenocarcinoma [AC] or squamous cell carcinoma [SCC]) randomized to anti−PD-1 or PD-L1−containing treatment vs standard of care (SOC). Study screening, data abstraction, and bias assessment were completed independently by 2 reviewers. Of 5752 records screened, 26 were assessed for eligibility; 17 trials were included in the analysis.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe prespecified primary end point was overall survival. The mean hazard ratio (HR) for ICI vs SOC was calculated (random-effects model). Predictive values were quantified by calculating the ratio of mean HRs between 2 levels of each variable.ResultsIn all, 17 RCTs (9 first line, 8 after first line) at low risk of bias and 14 predictive variables were included, totaling 11 166 participants (5067 with SCC, 6099 with ACC; 77.6% were male and 22.4% were female; 59.5% of patients were younger than 65 years, 40.5% were 65 years or older). Among patients with SCCs, PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) was the strongest predictor of ICI benefit (HR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.53-0.68] for high TPS; and HR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.75-0.95] for low TPS), yielding a predictive value of 41.0% favoring high TPS (vs ≤16.0% for other variables). Among patients with AC, PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) was the strongest predictor (after microsatellite instability high status) of ICI benefit (HR, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.66-0.81] for high CPS; and HR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.84-1.07] for low CPS), yielding a predictive value of 29.4% favoring CPS-high (vs ≤12.9% for other variables). Head-to-head analyses of trials containing both levels of a variable and/or having similar design generally yielded consistent results.Conclusions and RelevanceTissue-based PD-L1 expression, more than any variable other than microsatellite instability-high, identified varying degrees of benefit from ICI-containing therapy vs SOC among patients with aGEC in 17 RCTs.

PURPOSE Patients with advanced biliary tract cancers (BTCs) have a dismal prognosis. This multisite, single-institution study analyzed the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with advanced BTC. MATERIALS AND METHODS The prospectively maintained institutional database was searched for patients with advanced BTC. Electronic medical records of the patients with advanced BTC treated with an ICI that included programmed death-1 or programmed death-ligand 1 blockers were retrospectively reviewed to obtain data on patient characteristics, tumor characteristics including molecular biomarkers, detailed treatment, response characteristics, survival, and toxicities. The analysis included overall response rate, survival, and correlation between survival and molecular biomarkers. RESULTS The institutional database query identified 47 patients with advanced BTC who received at least one dose of an ICI; 11 (24%) patients in the first-line setting and the rest of the patients had refractory disease. The median age of the cohort was 62 years, and 51% were female. The overall response rate was 10.6%, with a disease control rate of 53.2%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were 3.6 months and 6.9 months, respectively. Biomarker analysis revealed improved PFS in patients with tumor mutational burden > 5 mutations per megabase (median PFS: 6.4 v 2.2 months; P = .0027). No unexpected adverse events were observed. CONCLUSION ICIs are well tolerated and have modest antitumor activity in patients with advanced BTC. The study result supports the exploration of tumor mutational burden as a potential predictive biomarker for response to ICIs in patients with advanced BTC.