Citations

Abstract Background SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complexes are frequently mutated across human cancers, including biliary tract cancers (BTC). Within the SWI/SNF complexes, loss-of-function (LOF) mutations in ARID1A and PBRM1 are the most common and frequently co-occur alongside PI3K/AKT pathway activation. Yet, how those mutations affect the intracellular signaling landscape and transcriptomic programs is underexplored and may yield novel therapeutic opportunities. Methods Clinicodemographic parameters and mutation profiles of 250 patients with BTC were retrospectively collected through electronic medical records. Advanced overall survival (OS) was assessed in a multivariable analysis. Transcriptomic data were obtained and differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and pathways associated with SWI/SNF mutation status were analyzed. Changes in the transcriptomic landscape were compared to a murine syngeneic model of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) initiated by loss of ARID1A and/or PBRM1 for cross-species validation. Results After adjusting for age, sex, and anatomical subtype, patients with SWI/SNF LOF mutations were found to have a 30% reduction in mortality risk (HR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.50-0.98, p = 0.037). The transcriptomic cohort of 233 BTC patients included 71 (30%) with SWI/SNF LOF mutations, 21 (9%) with variants of uncertain significance, and 141 (61%) with SWI/SNF wild-type tumors. Differential gene expression and pathway analysis revealed changes in adaptive immune response, extracellular matrix, and cancer-associated proteoglycans. RNA-sequencing of murine tumors revealed the dominant effect of ARID1A loss in single and double knock-out tumors and conserved pathway alterations between mouse and human tumors. Conclusion Both murine and human primary tumors with either ARID1A alone or ARID1A/PBRM1 co-mutations exhibited altered expression of critical genes and pathways associated with proteoglycan synthesis and extracellular matrix. Ongoing research is investigating how CCA cells depend on those pathways and their canonical regulators for tumor formation and progression.

Importance TMEM106B is a frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) genetic susceptibility factor, and TMEM106B protein aggregates are a feature of aging and neurodegeneration. Whether TMEM106B protein levels are associated with clinical features is unknown. Objective To investigate the clinical associations of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) TMEM106B in FTLD. Design, Setting, and Participants This cross-sectional study was conducted in 2 independent frontotemporal dementia (FTD) cohorts (recruitment from April 2009 through July 2023, with analyses from January 2025 through April 2026), with a 2-year follow up. This multicenter clinical study integrated clinical, genetic, biomarker, and neuroimaging data. Individuals were recruited through the University of California, San Francisco (n = 3733), or ALLFTD (n = 2343). Participants with available CSF were included. A discovery cohort (n = 271) included participants with sporadic neuropathology-confirmed FTLD; presymptomatic or symptomatic carriers of pathogenic variants in C9orf72 , GRN , or MAPT ; or controls. An independent validation cohort (n = 383) included participants with clinically diagnosed sporadic FTD, Alzheimer disease (AD), and controls. Exposures CSF samples for TMEM106B quantification with aptamer proteomics (SomaScan version 3.0 [discovery cohort] and SomaScan version 4.1 [validation cohort]). Main Outcomes and Measures Parametric tests compared the primary outcome, CSF TMEM106B, by disease severity, TMEM106B rs1990622 genotype, sex, clinical syndrome, pathological diagnosis, and pathogenic variant and determined associations with brain volume. Results In the discovery (n = 271; 136 women [51%]; median [IQR] age, 59 [38-80] years) and validation (n = 383; 183 women [48%]; median [IQR] age, 64 [50-78] years) cohorts, lower CSF TMEM106B was associated with more severe disease (β, −0.15; 95% CI, −0.24 to −0.04; P = .003), lower frontotemporal brain volumes (β, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.24-0.61; P < .001), and faster clinical progression (β, −2.21; 95% CI, −3.70 to −0.72; P = .001). Associations of TMEM106B with clinical disease severity were independent of those with neurofilament light chain. TMEM106B levels were influenced by TMEM106B rs1990622 genotype, where individuals with the protective G/G genotype had lower levels than the risk A/A genotype. CSF TMEM106B levels did not differentiate between FTLD subtypes or between FTLD and AD. Conclusions and Relevance Per the results of this cross-sectional study, TMEM106B is detectable in CSF and levels reflect disease severity in sporadic and genetic FTLD and AD, but levels are also influenced by the TMEM106B rs1990622 genotype. CSF TMEM106B could support further studies to understand the mechanisms of disease and develop clinical tools in FTLD and other neurodegenerative diseases.

Abstract Rationale The impacts of COVID-19 vaccination and SAR-CoV-2 infection on brain tissues and structures remain controversial. This study examines whether COVID-19-related exposures are associated with measurable changes in structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using data from the US general population-based Collaborative Cohort of Cohorts for COVID-19 Research (C4R) Study. Methods The C4R study is an observational meta-cohort study of 14 NIH-funded population-based cohorts, with directly measured data on COVID-19-related exposures, including vaccination and infection. For this analysis, we included participants with C4R data and paired brain MRI scans from both before and after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic (defined as March 1, 2020) from two cohorts: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study (ARIC) and Framingham Heart Study (FHS). MRI features examined as outcomes were white matter volume (WMV), gray matter volume (GMV), total brain volume (BV), hippocampal volume (HV), and white matter hyperintensity volume (WMH), a marker of microvascular disease. Exposures included SARS-CoV-2 infections identified via questionnaires, serosurveys, and medical record reviews from 2020-2025. Infections resulting in hospitalization were classified as severe. Time-to-recovery, symptoms of long COVID, and vaccination status were self-reported by questionnaire. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) estimated associations between COVID-19-related exposures and pandemic MRI-measured outcomes, with adjustment for: the corresponding pre-pandemic MRI measure, the time between the two MRI scans, age, sex, systolic blood pressure, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Results Of 270 participants with available data, mean (SD) age was 80.6 years (10.6); 43.0% were male; and the mean (SD) interval between paired MRI scans was 4.2 (2.0) years. Most (90%) were vaccinated (of whom 6.7% vaccinated before infection) and 7.9% reported SARS-CoV-2 infection (of which 13.6% were severe infections) prior to their pandemic MRI (conducted March 2020 - June 2022). In fully adjusted models, there was no statistically significant association for change in WMV, GMV, BV, HV, or WMH with SAR-CoV2 infection status, infection severity, vaccination status, or vaccination timing (Table, P > 0.05 for all comparisons). Self-reported symptoms of long COVID and vaccine manufacturer were also not associated with MRI outcomes. Conclusions Based on repeated (pre-pandemic and pandemic era) structural MRI scans, we found no evidence that SARS-CoV-2 infection or COVID-19 vaccination were associated with changes in brain structure or brain microvascular disease. These findings are consistent with prior data supporting COVID-19 vaccine safety and suggest resilience of brain structures following SARS-CoV-2 exposures. Nonetheless, further research is warranted using more sensitive measures and assessing longer term effects. This abstract is funded by: OT2HL156812

Abstract Rationale Chronic bronchitis (CB), a common phenotype of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), is characterized by pathologic mucus hypersecretion and is associated with substantial morbidity, impaired quality of life, and progressive functional decline, with prior studies demonstrating an average worsening of approximately one point/year on the COPD Assessment Test (CAT). Bronchial rheoplasty (BR) with RheOx® combines mechanical mucous plug disimpaction with pulsed electric field (PEF) energy to ablate and restore the airway mucosa. The RheSolve study was designed to provide evidence of safety and efficacy versus mechanical disimpaction alone. Primary endpoint results have been previously reported; final 2-year outcomes are reported here. Methods RheSolve was a prospective, randomized, double-blind study enrolling 273 patients with COPD and moderate-to-severe CB across 37 centers in the United States and Europe. Participants were randomized 2:1 to BR (n = 185) or a mechanical control procedure (n = 88). Following unblinding at 12 months, 75% of control patients crossed over to BR, precluding valid randomized comparisons beyond that time point; therefore, longer-term outcomes were evaluated using within-patient changes from baseline in the BR cohort. Outcomes included CAT, St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), Cough and Sputum Assessment Questionnaire (CASA-Q), and pulmonary function tests (PFTs). Results Patients in the BR group represented a moderate to severe COPD CB phenotype at baseline (FEV1 60.9% predicted, emphysema (-950 HU) 11.0%, CAT 27.2 points, SGRQ 64.4) with most patients (93%) receiving a combination of ≥ 2 long-acting medications (LABA, LAMA, inhaled corticosteroids). The BR procedure was well-tolerated with no SAEs related to the device or procedure beyond 12 months. Both groups demonstrated clinically meaningful improvements in CAT, SGRQ, and CASA-Q at 12 months (P < 0.001), which were sustained in the BR group through 24 months. Follow-up was limited to 1 year in the mechanical control group, with outcomes demonstrating a modest regression towards baseline at 12 months (Figure). PFTs were also stable to improved in the BR group (changes from baseline to 24 months: FEV1 % Predicted 0.9 (±10.8) P = 0.319, FVC % Predicted 2.8% (±14.0) P = 0.02, FEV1/FVC -0.5% (±7.2) P = 0.449). Conclusions BR with RheOx® (e.g.,mechanical mucous plug disimpaction and PEF delivery) demonstrated clinically meaningful symptom improvement that was sustained through 24 months supporting BR as a therapeutic option for patients with persistent symptoms despite appropriate medical therapy. This abstract is funded by: Galvanize Therapeutics

Artificial intelligence (AI) is now applied across oncology, including imaging, pathology, therapy selection, toxicity assessment, and survival modeling, and large language models (LLMs) have been adopted particularly quickly. Reported physician use of AI roughly doubled between 2023 and 2026. The frameworks used to evaluate these tools have not advanced at the same rate. Many are available, but each was designed for a single stage of the AI lifecycle, and none directly answers the question most relevant to a treating clinician: whether a given tool is appropriate for the individual patient under care. We reviewed the frameworks in current use, including TRIPOD+AI, PROBAST+AI, CLAIM, SPIRIT-AI, CONSORT-AI, DECIDE-AI, MINIMAR, and CREMLS, together with the oncology-specific ESMO EBAI and the newer LLM-specific guidance (TRIPOD-LLM, MI-CLEAR-LLM, CHART, and ESMO ELCAP). Each addresses part of the evaluation problem, but none is sufficient on its own for oncology, where the standard of care changes rapidly, assays drift, biomarker-defined subgroups are small, and a model validated in one period may perform poorly in the next. LLMs introduce additional challenges, including sensitivity to prompting, undisclosed vendor updates, behavioral drift, and hallucination rates approaching 50% on clinical quality-assurance tasks. The predictive-model frameworks were not designed to capture these failure modes. The central argument of this review is that the frameworks the field requires already exist; what is missing is their mandatory adoption. We propose that journals and regulators move from recommending these frameworks to requiring their use, and we outline a cancer-aware evaluation pathway together with the specific responsibilities of authors, reviewers, journals, and regulators in implementing it.

Abstract Objective To evaluate otolaryngology (ENT) residency match trends before and after the USMLE Step 1 transition to pass/fail. Study Design Observational longitudinal analysis of annual, publicly available specialty‐level data (2010‐2025). Setting National Resident Matching Program (NRMP). Methods Data from 2010 to 2025 were used to calculate applicants per PGY‐1 position, fill rate, and nonmatch‐in‐specialty rate. ENT was compared with plastic surgery, orthopedic surgery, neurological surgery, and general surgery. We used ordinary least squares (OLS), segmented regression with a 2023 breakpoint, and difference‐in‐differences (DID) models. Results From 2010 to 2025, ENT programs increased from 105 to 139 and positions from 280 to 394. Applicants per position ranged from 1.06 to 1.60 (mean 1.38). OLS showed no significant long‐term trend in applicants per position (+0.002/year, P = .86), fill rate (+0.03 percentage points/year, P = .68), or nonmatch‐in‐specialty rate (+0.04 percentage points/year, P = .94). Segmented regression showed no significant post‐2023 changes in applicants per position (slope change +0.03/year, P = .78), and no significant changes in applicant counts ( P = .7). ENT had the largest 2022 to 2023 decline in this cohort, in both applicants (−14.1%) and applicants per position (−16.9%). However, in two‐way fixed‐effects DID models, there was no ENT‐specific post‐transition change in applicants per position ( P > .05 in primary and sensitivity analyses). Conclusion ENT remained highly competitive but trend‐stable from 2010 to 2025. Although 2023 showed a notable drop in applicants, we found no consistent evidence of a sustained ENT‐specific competitiveness shift after the Step 1 pass/fail transition. Level of Evidence 4.

ABSTRACT First‐line therapy for mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) represents a critical opportunity for clinical benefit via sustained complete response. We conducted a phase 2 multicenter trial in the academic and community cancer research united (ACCRU) network, testing a multitargeted 1st line regimen. CARiBOU (ACCRU‐LY‐1804) employs alternating VR‐CAP and R‐cytarabine with continuous acalabrutinib, in six 21‐day cycles, for previously untreated MCL. The primary endpoint was complete metabolic response (CMR) rate. Secondary endpoints included safety, feasibility of stem cell collection, proportion proceeding to ASCT, and progression‐free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Peripheral blood measurable residual disease (MRD) was tested using the ClonoSEQ assay (Adaptive Biotechnologies). Of 41 patients enrolled, 39 (95%) responded to therapy, including 37 patients achieving CMR (90%). Two nonresponders discontinued therapy for toxicity early, prior to study‐defined restaging, and received alternate therapy. Undetectable MRD at a 10 6 threshold was achieved in 26/33 tested patients (79%), and 94% at 10 5 . 18‐month estimated PFS is 79% (95% CI 64%–97%), and OS is 96% (95% CI 88%–100%). Toxicities were primarily hematologic (grade 3 hematologic AE in 32 patients, [78%]). Twelve required platelet transfusions, and one grade 3 bleeding event occurred. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 4 patients, and 6 (14%) experienced SAEs. There were no treatment‐related deaths. CARiBOU is an efficient, highly effective outpatient 1st line MCL regimen, employing intermediate‐dose cytarabine and continuous acalabrutinib for 6 cycles. This multitargeted regimen addresses the biologic heterogeneity of MCL and permits flexible MRD‐guided decisions on consolidation and maintenance. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04626791

Abstract Background Glioblastoma (GBM) remains a devastating cancer with limited treatment options, largely due to its heterogeneity. While supramaximal resection has recently provided survival benefits, therapeutic profiling of different tumor compartments, particularly its infiltrative edge remains largely unexplored. Methods Here, we leveraged magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided multi-sampling, collecting 2 cores and 2 margins per case, to query GBM heterogeneity. Whole-exome and RNA-seq with drug testing in two patient-derived 3D models were used to reveal similarities and differences in genomic and transcriptomic makeups, cellular compositions, and drug responses across cores and margins. Bioinformatics interrogations further identified response biomarkers. Results Mutation analysis showed that oncogenes exhibited a higher degree of spatial heterogeneity than tumor suppressor genes, regardless of MRI status. While the mesenchymal transcriptional subtype with extracellular matrix remodeling, stress response, and immune programs were preferentially enriched in enhancing cores, proneural tumors with neurological processes favored non-enhancing margins. Using a 15-drug GBM-targeted panel, ERK (ulixertinib) and PI3K pathway (paxalisib, CC-115) inhibitors showed preferential efficacy in enhancing cores and non-enhancing margins, respectively. The anti-apoptosis, pan-Bcl2 agent navitoclax and the epigenetic drug trotabresib represented the most effective, tumor-wide monotherapies. Importantly, drug combinations generally outperformed single agents across all regions. Conclusions This work demonstrates the regional heterogeneity of therapeutic vulnerabilities in GBM ex vivo, showing various drugs with tumor-wide or MRI-enhancement informed activity. These findings offer preclinical bases of numerous monotherapies and drug combinations for future clinical trial design.

Background: Posterior medial meniscus root tears (PMMRTs) are frequently observed injuries that alter tibiofemoral biomechanics, yet the long-term outcomes are poorly described. Purpose: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current literature on long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of operatively managed PMMRTs. Study Design: Meta-analysis and systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A systematic review was performed with the inclusion criteria of English-language studies, diagnosis of PMMRT on magnetic resonance imaging, and minimum 5-year radiographic or patient-reported outcome (PRO) metrics. Data analysis included management strategy, surgical technique, meniscal extrusion, medial joint space, PROs, and radiographic measurements. Failure was defined as conversion to arthroplasty, subsequent partial medial meniscectomy (PMM) and/or proximal tibial osteotomy, or clinical failure on PROs. Continuous outcome variables were analyzed with a random effects meta-analysis of mean differences. Chi-square meta-analysis was also used to analyze categorical variables. Results: Twelve studies were identified with >5-year follow-up after PMMRT (mean ± SD, 84.1 ± 11.0 months). Five studies performed PMM, 6 performed medial meniscus root repair (MMR), and 1 utilized either meniscectomy or repair. There were 797 total patients (female, n = 667; 83.7%), with mean ages ranging from 47.2 to 65. Both interventions showed significant PRO improvements after surgery: PMM (pre- vs postoperative Lysholm, 56.1 vs 68.2; P < .01) and MMR (Lysholm, 52.1 vs 83.1; International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC], 40.0 vs 72.8; P < .01). MMR had significantly lower Kellgren-Lawrence grades (PMM vs MMR, 2.4 vs 1.8; P < .01) and superior IKDC scores (46.5 vs 72.8; P < .01) as compared with PMM. Additionally, PMM had a significantly higher failure rate (23% vs 5.3%) and conversion to knee arthroplasty (20.5% vs 3.5%) as compared with MMR, with odds ratios of 9.8 and 10.2, respectively. Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis of studies with >5-year minimum follow-up found that PMM was associated with a 10-fold increase in clinical failure and conversion to knee arthroplasty relative to MMR in observational studies. In addition, MMR demonstrated superior Kellgren-Lawrence grades and IKDC scores as compared with PMM. The findings of the current analysis suggest that MMR is associated with superior outcomes as compared with PMM at mid- to long-term follow-up.