Citations

We have analyzed the presence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) and hepatitis G virus (HGV) sequences in bone marrow and serum samples from 48 patients of a hematologic outpatient clinic. HCV RNA was detected in 18 (38%) and 15 (31%) and HGV RNA was detected in 6 (13%) and 9 (19%) of serum and bone marrow samples, respectively. In 3 patients, HGV RNA was detectable in bone marrow but not in the serum; 2 of these patients were negative for the presence of specific antibodies. Using a highly strand-specific Tth-based reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), the presence of HCV RNA and HGV RNA negative strand was demonstrated in 4 and 5 bone marrow samples, respectively. Our study shows that HCV and HGV can replicate in bone marrow; in the case of HGV, analysis of serum may underestimate the true prevalence of infection.

Polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and primary myelofibrosis (PMF) are myeloproliferative disorders (MPDs) associated with activating mutations of Janus tyrosine kinase 2 (JAK2) gene. The most common mutation, JAK2 V617F, has been reported in ∼97% of patients with PV, ∼50% with ET, and ∼50% with PMF. The resultant JAK2 protein is continuously autophosporylated and therefore always active. It is believed that this mutated tyrosine kinase contributes to the existence and progression of MPDs. CEP701 is an orally available potent low nanomolar inhibitor of wild type and mutated JAK2 tyrosine kinase in enzymatic and cellular assays. Significant inhibition (growth stasis) was observed following CEP-701 subcutaneous administration to V617F-mutated JAK2-dependent HEL.92 xenografts grown in immunocompromised mice. These results indicate that CEP-701 is an attractive candidate for clinical evaluation in patients with MPD carrying a mutated, constitutively activated JAK2. CEP701 is also a potent inhibitor of FLT3 and is being evaluated as FLT3 inhibitor in Phase II/III studies in patients with acute myeloid leukemia, at the starting dose of 80mg PO BID. We designed a Phase II study of CEP701, at the dose of 80 mg PO BID, in patients with PMF and post PV/ET MF, who harbor JAK2 V617F mutation. Eleven patients have been treated so far, seven males, median age 56 years (range, 38–69), median 3 prior therapies (range 0–6); 7 with abnormal cytogenetics; 8 with enlarged spleen (2 had splenectomy); 4 with enlarged liver; 5 transfusion dependent. Five patients have been followed for at least 1 month and have had stable disease. Response will be evaluated using International Working Group for MF Consensus Response Criteria. JAK2 V617F allele burden is being measured monthly. Except for Grade 2 nausea in one patient, no toxicities have been noted so far. Updated results will be presented at the meeting.

Abstract Background: The recent discovery of JAK2V617F, as an activating mutation in the majority of patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms, has spurred development of JAK2-selective small molecule inhibitors for the treatment of these diseases. TG101348 is a potent (enzyme IC50=3 nM) and selective (35- and 334-fold selectivity over JAK1 and JAK3, respectively) orally bioavailable JAK2 inhibitor that is effective in treating a murine model of Polycythemia vera (PV) (Cancer Cell. 2008 13:311). TG101348 selectively inhibits growth of hematopoietic colonies harboring V617F, MPLW515K, or JAK2 exon 12 mutations (Leukemia. 2008 Mar 20, Epub). Methods: A Phase I dose-escalation study of TG101348 is ongoing for patients with high- or intermediate-risk (with symptomatic disease) primary myelofibrosis (PMF) and post-PV or post-essential thrombocythemia (ET) myelofibrosis (Cancer.2007109:2083). TG101348 was administered orally once daily in 28-day cycles in cohorts of at least 3 patients. Additional eligibility criteria included absolute neutrophil count of ≥1 × 109/L and platelet count of ≥50 × 109/L, but a JAK2 mutation was not required. Primary objectives were determination of safety and tolerability, as well as pharmacokinetic behavior of TG101348. The secondary objectives were evaluation of treatment response (Blood.2006108:1497), pharmacodynamic activity, and drug effect on V617F allele burden and plasma cytokine levels. The spleen response was documented as change in palpable spleen tip from the costal margin. For patients achieving less than a complete remission after 3 cycles of treatment at their initial dose, step-wise escalation was permitted at each cycle if a cohort had been shown to have tolerated that dose. Results: Fifteen patients (9 males; median age=66 years; range=53 to 79 years) have been enrolled in the study to date – 10 with PMF (8 V617F+) and 5 with post-PV MF (all V617F+). The median follow-up to date is 13 weeks (range 1–28). Treatment was discontinued in 1 patient, in cohort 1, on the 2nd day of dosing after it was discovered that the patient had baseline QTcF prolongation (Grade 1). In the remaining 14 patients, no dose-limiting toxicities or other significant non-hematological adverse events have been observed to date. The pharmacokinetic parameters of TG101348 in plasma were well characterized following single daily oral doses of 30 mg, 60 mg, 120 mg or 240 mg. Dose-proportional pharmacokinetics were observed following single and multiple doses of TG101348. Treatment response data are as follows: Cohort 1 (starting dose=30 mg; 3 patients; median follow-up=26 weeks): 2 of the 3 patients had improvement in constitutional symptoms including fatigue, night sweats and pruritus. No other benefits were noted. These patients have now been dose escalated to either 120 or 240 mg/day. Cohort 2 (starting dose=60 mg; 3 patients; median follow-up=18 weeks): 1 patient had a 40% decrease in spleen size (18 to 10 cm). All 3 patients have now been dose escalated to 120 or 240 mg/day. Cohort 3 (starting dose=120 mg; 3 patients; median follow-up=13 weeks): 2 of the 3 patients reported improvement in constitutional symptoms including fatigue, night sweats, and pruritus. 1 patient had a 25% decrease in spleen size (28 to 21 cm). 2 patients have been dose escalated to 240 mg/day. Cohort 4 (starting dose=240 mg; 3 patients; median follow-up=8 weeks): 1 patient developed Grade 3 anemia (baseline Grade 1) at the end of the first cycle. 1 patient reported decreased fatigue. All 3 patients have experienced a 20 to 53% reduction in spleen size; baseline measurements were 10, 13, and 17 cm. Cohort 5 (starting dose=360 mg; 2 patients; median follow-up=1 week). Both patients had decreased splenomegaly within 1 week of therapy, including 1 with disappearance of palpable splenomegaly from a baseline of 20 cm; this patient also reported significant improvement in constitutional symptoms. Conclusions: Preliminary findings indicate that TG101348 is well tolerated in patients with myelofibrosis. Although it is too early to make valid conclusions, a decrease in spleen size has been noted at higher dose levels. Similarly, improvement in constitutional symptoms has been reported by some patients. Updated results on current and future patients, including data on pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and changes in V617F allele burden and plasma cytokine levels will be presented at the meeting.

Abstract Background: Nilotinib, a 2nd-generation BCR-ABL inhibitor, is 20–30 times more potent than imatinib in vitro. A phase II, open-label study of safety/efficacy of nilotinib in pts with imatinib-resistant/intolerant Ph+ CML-CP or -AP was reported. Planned starting dose was 400mg BID, with escalation to 600mg BID if response was inadequate. The objective of the post-hoc analysis was to evaluate safety/efficacy of nilotinib 600mg BID in CML-CP pts who had dose escalation. Methods: Starting dose was 400mg BID. If response was inadequate (failure to achieve complete hematologic response [CHR] by 3 mos, minimal cytogenetic response [CyR] by 6 mos, or major cytogenetic response [MCyR] by 12 mos; loss of HR, CyR, or progression), nilotinib to 600mg BID dosing was permitted. Imatinib resistance was defined as treatment with imatinib ≥600 mg/d with disease progression (≥50% increase in WBC, blasts, basophils, or platelets) or no HR in peripheral blood and/or bone marrow after 4 wks. Results: Of 320 enrolled pts in CP, 269 remained on nilotinib 400mg BID; 51 pts were dose-escalated to 600mg BID for inadequate responses (mean age 57.7 yrs; 68.6% male). All pts met the study criteria for imatinib resistance. Prior imatinib dose was ≥600mg QD in 98% pts and ≥800 mg QD in 53%. 43/51 (84%) pts had no baseline CHR; 38% had no prior history of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR). 35% had prior MCyR. Median time to dose escalation was 169 (114–211) d. 14 (27.5%) pts remain on therapy; median time to discontinuation from study was 307 (235–414) d. 5 pts with disease progression and no deaths were observed among pts who received 600mg BID. CHR was achieved in 58% of evaluable pts without CHR at baseline (n=43). MCyR occurred in 29% of evaluable pts (15/51) on 600mg BID; 10% (5/51) CCyR. Disease progression was low, occurring in 10% (5/51) of pts on 600mg BID. Median time to progression for CP pts on 600mg BID was 12 mos, substantially less than for pts who stayed on 400mg BID (median not observed yet, at least 20 mo). Nonhematologic AEs in 600mg BID pts were similar to those reported for the entire CP cohort from the phase II study. Grade 3/4 hematologic lab abnormalities were: anemia 13.8%, neutropenia 7.9%, thrombocytopenia 13.7%. Hyperglycemia and elevated bilirubin occurred in 6% and 10% of pts, respectively, on 600mg BID. Conclusions: Some HR and CyR after dose escalation to 600mg BID were observed. Safety/tolerability for 600mg BID were similar to the entire CP cohort. Based on these preliminary data, nilotinib dose escalation to 600mg BID in imatinib-resistant Ph+ CML-CP pts may be effective in pts with inadequate responses to 400mg BID. As might be expected in a more resistant population, response duration was shorter than reported for the phase II CP cohort. Additional follow-up is necessary. Use of 600mg BID is not currently recommended for imatinib-resistant CML-CP pts outside clinical studies.

Abstract Abstract 680 Cytogenetics play an essential role in determining the prognosis of patients with AML. However, there is still no validated cytogenetics grouping scheme that specifically applies to patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation, which hampers accurate prognostication and risk stratification. We studied 821 adult patients (median age 41, range 18–74) who underwent SCT between 1999 and 2004 for AML (excluding APL) in CR1 or CR2 and who were reported to the CIBMTR from centers with >20 patients meeting study criteria. 75% of patients received a myeloablative conditioning. 496 patients had a normal karyotype. The primary cytogenetics reports were manually reviewed for 92% of the patients with an abnormal karyotype. We compared the ability of the 6 existing grouping schemes (MRC, CALGB, EORTC/GIMEMA, SWOG/ECOG, DFCI, and Monosomal Karyotype (MK) classifications) to stratify patients, using both the Akaike Information Criterion in multivariable models and the C-statistic. Among all existing schemes, the DFCI system provided a marginally superior stratification for overall and leukemia-free survival. We also built a new classification using individual cytogenetic abnormalities in a Cox model that included other significant covariates (performance status, therapy-related disease, conditioning intensity, graft source, donor match, duration of CR1, and gender match). This CIBMTR scheme (see Table), which is similar to the DFCI scheme except for the inclusion of patients with t(8;21) in the intermediate group, could stratify patients into 3 groups with similar treatment-related mortality but significantly different overall survival, leukemia-free survival, and incidence of relapse. This scheme appeared to apply to both patients in CR1 and in CR2 (see FiguresF2). This transplant-specific scheme could be adopted for prognostication purposes and to stratify patients with karyotypic abnormalities entering transplantation clinical trials. Future studies may clarify the relative outcome of patients with t(8;21) and refine this scheme with the inclusion of molecular abnormalities. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 259 Despite recent progress, our understanding of the genomic basis of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is incomplete. We have performed massively parallel whole exome sequencing with deep coverage of 57 primary tumor samples from patients with DLBCL and compared them to matched normal tissue to gain insight into the genetic defects leading to DLBCL. We define genes that are significantly enriched for somatic mutations, and thus, may be drivers of the disease. In addition to identifying genes that are well established to be functionally relevant in DLBCL, such as MyD88, CARD11, EZH2, and BCL2, we also discovered new genes that are significantly mutated that have not been described to play a role in DLBCL previously, such as MLL2, 3 and4 genes and PCLO. One of the challenges for the understanding of DLBCL biology is to determine the relative contribution of different genes with somatic mutations to the pathogenesis of the disease in an individual patient. Identification of functionally relevant mutated genes that only occur in a small number of patients based on prevalence alone may require thousands of patient samples. We therefore devise several strategies to discover genes with a high likelihood of functionally relevant mutations independent of their prevalence. Genes that do not co-occur with other mutated genes in the same patients, i.e. are mutually exclusive, are more likely to represent strong drivers, and to occur early in the development of DLBCL. We determined that TP53, BCL2, PIM1, and CD79B fall into this group. We apply pathway-focused analysis to identify mutated genes with low prevalence that are highly likely to have a functional impact. For instance, we identified G13D mutations in KRAS in two patients, and mutations in BRAF, NOTCH1, SOCS1, and PTEN in other patients that were previously described in other malignancies. These mutated genes are identified as part of significantly enriched gene sets, including the B cell receptor signaling/NFkB pathway, JAK/STAT, and antigen processing gene sets. In addition to these pathways that are important for physiological B cell activation, we find that many histone methyltransferases are enriched as a geneset in addition to MLL2. We identified a number of hotspots that are subject to somatic mutation. Our data imply that many of these hotspots may be targets of activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID), which is usually involved in somatic hypermutation, suggesting a possible mechanism of how somatic mutation in DLBCL is mediated. In summary, our data define novel genetic defects in DLBCL by whole exome sequencing of 57 patients. Our data suggest that driver mutations may not be randomly distributed across the genome, but may occur in a directed fashion. We identified new genes not previously implicated in DLBCL, and have developed strategies to prioritize mutations that are most likely to be drivers of the disease. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Background The JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib (RUX) is approved for treatment of myelofibrosis (MF). However, some patients do not respond to RUX, while others lose responsiveness or develop intolerance to RUX over time. Preclinical data also suggest that certain JAK2 mutations (eg the gatekeeper mutation M929I) may confer resistance to RUX (Leukemia 2012;26:708). Options for these RUX resistant/intolerant patients, particularly with regard to further JAK inhibitor therapy, are unclear. Fedratinib (SAR302503) is a JAK2-selective inhibitor which has demonstrated clinically meaningful reductions in splenomegaly and symptom burden in patients with MF, with an acceptable and consistent safety profile (J Clin Oncol 2011;29:789. Haematologica 2013;98:S1113). Fedratinib sensitivity in vitro is unaffected by the M929I mutation. This pre-specified interim analysis of the JAKARTA-2 study (NCT01523171) investigated the efficacy and safety of fedratinib in MF patients previously treated with RUX. Methods JAKARTA-2 is a Phase II, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study of patients who previously received RUX for MF. Patients ≥18 yrs with splenomegaly and platelet count ≥50 ×109/L received fedratinib 400 mg orally, once daily for consecutive 4-wk cycles (permitted dose adjustment to 200–600 mg daily). Eligible patients had received ≥14 d RUX treatment, and had discontinued RUX for ≥14 d prior to starting fedratinib. Although there is no consensus definition of RUX resistance/intolerance, for the purpose of this study patients were classed (investigator assessment) as resistant (lack or loss of response) or intolerant to RUX. Primary endpoint for the interim analysis: spleen response rate (RR) (≥35% reduction in spleen volume from baseline at Wk 12 [MRI/CT blinded central review]) in the per-protocol (PP) population. Secondary endpoints: symptom RR (≥50% reduction in total symptom score [TSS: modified Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form] from baseline to Wk 12) and safety. Results At the cut-off date for this interim analysis, 27 patients had received fedratinib treatment (median RUX exposure 10.7 months [range 1.9–34.4]): median age 69 yrs; 56% male; 67% primary MF; 63% high-risk MF; 67% JAK2V617F positive; 41% platelet count <100 × 109/L; baseline median spleen volume 3190 mL [1072–7815]; baseline median TSS 19.6 [4.9–46.0]. Eighteen patients were considered resistant by the treating physician (8 lack of response, 3 disease progression, 7 loss of response; median RUX exposure 11.1 months [range 1.9–34.4]) and 9 intolerant (6 hematologic, 3 non-hematologic toxicity; median RUX exposure 9.2 months [2.9–33.2]) to RUX. Median fedratinib exposure to cut-off date: 4 cycles (range 1–10); 19 patients remain on treatment. Spleen RRs were 40% (8/20 PP patients) and 43% (3/7) in patients with baseline platelet count <100 ×109/L. Overall, 19% (5/26 evaluable patients) had a symptom response by Wk 12 (Table). The majority of patients had a reduction in TSS at Wk 12 (Figure). The most common non-hematologic treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were gastrointestinal (nausea 67%; diarrhea 56%; vomiting 48%). Grade 3/4 diarrhea occurred in 2 patients; no Grade 3/4 vomiting or nausea. Anemia was the most common hematologic AE (all grades, 93%; Grade 3, 41%; Grade 4, 0%). Thrombocytopenia (all grades) occurred in 19 (70%) patients; Grade 3 in 6 patients and Grade 4 in 2 patients. One patient had Grade 3 AST elevations and 1 patient had Grade 3 hyperbilirubinemia. Seven patients (26%) discontinued treatment due to AEs. There were 2 deaths on study, both due to disease progression. Conclusions Interim results from the JAKARTA-2 study indicate that once-daily fedratinib provides clinical benefit, through reduced splenomegaly and symptom burden, in MF patients previously treated with RUX. The safety profile was acceptable and manageable, with safety results to date consistent with those reported in previous trials of fedratinib. Sponsored by Sanofi. Disclosures: Harrison: Novartis: Research Funding; Novartis, Sanofi, YM Bioscience, Celgene, SBio, Gilead: Honoraria; Novartis, Sanofi, Shire: Speakers Bureau; Novartis, Sanofi, YM Bioscience, SBio, Gilead: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Jourdan:Sanofi: Honoraria. Kiladjian:Novartis, Celgene, AOP Orphan: Research Funding; Novartis, Sanofi, AOP Orphan: Honoraria; Novartis, Sanofi, AOP Orphan: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cervantes:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Novartis and Sanofi: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Niederwieser:Novartis Pharma: Consultancy. Cortes:Incyte, Sanofi: Consultancy; Incyte, Sanofi: Research Funding. Passamonti:Novartis, Celgene, Incyte, Sanofi, Roche: Honoraria. Reiter:Sanofi: Honoraria. Heidel:Novartis Inc.: Honoraria; Novartis Inc.: Research Funding; Novartis Inc.: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Silver:Sanofi: Consultancy; Sanofi: Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria. Winton:Sanofi: Research Funding. Gupta:Incyte, Novartis: Consultancy; Incyte, Novartis: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria. Gisslinger:AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Sanofi, Shire, Celgene, Janssen: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Sanofi, Shire, Celgene, Janssen: Honoraria. Vannucchi:Novartis: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Talpaz:Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Ariad, Deciphera: Research Funding; Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Ariad, Deciphera: Speakers Bureau. Zhang:Sanofi: Employment. Shi:Sanofi: Employment. Mesa:Incyte, Genentech, Lilly, MS Pharma, Gilead: Research Funding.

Abstract Background SGI-110 is second generation HMA formulated as a dinucleotide of decitabine (DAC) and deoxyguanosine delivered as a small volume, pharmaceutically stable SQ injection allowing longer half-life and more extended decitabine exposure than DAC IV infusion. SGI-110 differentiated pharmacokinetic profile resulted in potent hypomethylation and clinical responses in previously treated MDS and AML patients in the phase 1 trial (Kantarjian et al. 2012). Methods In a randomized Phase 2 study, relapsed/refractory AML, or elderly treatment naïve AML patients who were not suitable for induction chemotherapy (poor major organ function; poor cytogenetics; or secondary AML) were randomized to one of two SQ doses – the biologically effective dose (BED) of 60 mg/m2 QDx5 or 90 mg/m2 QDx5. The primary endpoint of the phase 2 study is the overall remission rate (CR, CRi, and CRp) based on the International Working Group Criteria 2003. Safety findings based on adverse events (AEs) as graded by the CTCAE v4 criteria and pharmacodynamic data on Long Interspersed Nucleotide Element (LINE-1) DNA methylation (an index of global DNA methylation) activity were also assessed and reported. Results As of June 30, 2013, sixty-seven patients (50 relapsed/refractory AML, 17 treatment naïve elderly AML) were treated and had a minimum follow up of 3 months. Patients were randomized to either 60 mg/m2 dose (32 patients) or 90 mg/m2 dose (35 patients). The median age was 66 years (range, 22–84), 69% were male, and ECOG PS of 0/1/2 was reported in 11/47/9 patients respectively. Median number of prior regimens was 2 (range, 0–10). Patients’ characteristics were well balanced between the 2 dose groups. The primary endpoint of overall remissions (CR, CRp, or CRi) was observed in 17/67 patients (25% with 95% CI, 16–37%). There were 8 complete remissions (CR, CRp, or CRi) in 50 patients with relapsed/refractory AML (16% with 95% CI, 7-29%); and 9 complete remissions (CR, CRp, or CRi) in 17 treatment-naïve elderly AML patients (53% with 95% CI, 28-77%). Five patients (4 relapsed/refractory, and one treatment-naïve elderly AML) subsequently received a stem cell transplant. There was no difference in the complete remission rate between 60 and 90 mg/m2 doses (8 remissions in 32 patients at 60 mg/m2, and 9 remissions in 35 patients at 90 mg/m2). LINE-1 DNA methylation data before and after treatment was available in 50 (75%) patients enrolled. LINE-1 demethylation ≥ 10% post treatment was observed in 83% and 78% in the 60 mg/m2 and 90 mg/m2, respectively. The median maximum LINE-1 demethylation for responders is 25% as compared to 19% for non-responders. The most common adverse events (AEs) regardless of relationship to SGI-110 ≥ Grade 3 include febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, leukopenia, neutropenia, and pneumonia. The 90 mg/m2 dose showed a greater frequency of Grade 3/4 related AEs ≥ 10% (anemia, febrile neutropenia, leukopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia) compared to the 60 mg/m2 dose. Conclusions SQ SGI-110 is a new HMA which is well tolerated and clinically active in the treatment of AML. Complete remissions and potent demethylation of ≥10% were equally observed at the 2 dose groups of 60 and 90 mg/m2. These data support further phase 3 investigation of this agent in the treatment of AML. Preliminary overall remission rate of 53% in treatment-naïve elderly AML seems to compare favorably with previous results reported for HMA treatment but this needs to be confirmed in a larger number of patients and randomized studies. Disclosures: Kantarjian: Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Jabbour:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Yee:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Kropf:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. O'Connell:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Stock:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Tibes:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Rizzieri:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Walsh:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Griffiths:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Roboz:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding. Savona:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Ervin:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Podoltsev:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Pemmaraju:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Daver:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Garcia-Manero:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Borthakur:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Wierda:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Ravandi:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Cortes:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Brandwein:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Odenike:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Feldman:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Chung:Astex Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Research Funding. Naim:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Choy:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Taverna:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Hao:Astex Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Employment. Dimitrov:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Azab:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Issa:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Abstract Background Fedratinib (SAR302503) is a JAK2-selective inhibitor that has provided clinically meaningful reductions in MF-associated splenomegaly and symptoms in Phase I and II studies (J Clin Oncol 2011;29:789. Haematologica 2013;98:S1113). Here, we present efficacy and safety data from the Phase III JAKARTA study of fedratinib versus placebo in patients with MF (NCT01437787). Methods In this international double-blind, placebo-controlled, 3-arm study, patients aged ≥18 years with IPSS intermediate-2 or high-risk MF, platelet count ≥50 × 109/L, and splenomegaly were randomized (1:1:1) to receive placebo or fedratinib 400 mg or 500 mg, orally, once daily, in consecutive 4-week cycles. Patients who received placebo were eligible to cross-over to fedratinib (randomized 1:1 to 400 mg or 500 mg) following 6 cycles of treatment, or prior to Cycle 6 if the patient had disease progression. The primary endpoint was spleen response rate (RR) (≥35% reduction in spleen volume from baseline measured by MRI or CT at Week 24, and confirmed 4 weeks later). Secondary endpoints included symptom RR (≥50% reduction in total symptom score from baseline at Week 24, measured through a daily electronic eDiary using the modified Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form [Cancer 2011;117:4869. Blood 2011;118:401]), and safety of fedratinib. Results A total of 289 patients were randomized: median age 65 years; 59% male; 63% primary MF; 48% high-risk MF; 67% JAK2V617F positive; 16% platelet count <100 × 109/L; median baseline spleen volume 2568 mL (range 316–8244); median baseline total symptom score 14.7 (0–57). Median (range) exposures for placebo, 400 mg and 500 mg groups were 24 (2–34), 30 (1–55) and 28 (1–60) weeks, respectively. Spleen RRs at Week 24 (placebo 1%; 400 mg 47%; 500 mg 49%), and confirmed at Week 28 (placebo 1%; 400 mg 36%; 500 mg 40%), were significantly (p<0.0001) higher in both fedratinib groups compared with placebo (Table). Nineteen patients had a spleen response at Week 24 not confirmed 4 weeks later (spleen reduction 25–35% [n=10]; image not available/evaluable [n=8]; image taken outside time window [n=1]). Spleen RRs by baseline platelet level are shown in the table. Patients treated with fedratinib had significantly (p<0.0001) greater improvements in MF symptoms compared with placebo (Table). The most common all grade non-hematologic treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was diarrhea (16%, 66% and 56% of patients in the placebo, 400 mg and 500 mg groups, respectively). Grade 3/4 diarrhea was reported in 5% of patients in both the 400 mg and 500 mg dose groups. The most common hematologic TEAE was anemia (any grade 91%, 99% and 98%; Grade 3/4 25%, 43% and 60% in the placebo, 400 mg and 500 mg groups, respectively). Rates of Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia were 9% (placebo), 17% (400 mg), and 27% (500 mg). Incidences of Grade 3/4 liver function tests (placebo/400 mg/500 mg) were: bilirubin, 2%/2%/1%; ALT, 0%/3%/3%; and AST, 1%/2%/2%. Overall treatment discontinuation rates up to 24 weeks of treatment were 25% (placebo), 22% (400 mg) and 32% (500 mg). Twenty-five patients died during the study (10, 5 and 10 in the placebo, 400 mg and 500 mg groups, respectively); the most common causes of death: disease progression (placebo [n=5]; 400 mg [n=3]; 500 mg [n=4]) and adverse events (placebo [n=4]; 400 mg [n=1]; 500 mg [n=4]). Conclusions In this Phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled, 3-arm study of 289 MF patients, treatment with fedratinib 400 mg or 500 mg once-daily demonstrated clinically meaningful and statistically significant reductions in splenic volume and MF-associated symptom burden versus placebo. Fedratinib had an acceptable safety profile, with the adverse events reported consistent with those observed in previous studies. This study was sponsored by Sanofi. Disclosures: Pardanani: Sanofi, Bristol Myers Squibb, PharmaMar and JW Pharma: Clinical trial support Other. Harrison:Novartis: Research Funding; Novartis, Sanofi, YM Bioscience, Celgene, SBio, Gilead: Honoraria; Novartis, Sanofi, Shire: Speakers Bureau; Novartis, Sanofi, YM Bioscience, SBio, Gilead: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cortes:Incyte, Sanofi: Consultancy; Incyte, Sanofi: Research Funding. Cervantes:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Novartis and Sanofi: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Mesa:Incyte, Genentech, Lilly, MS Pharma, Gilead: Research Funding. Jourdan:Sanofi: Honoraria. Vannucchi:Novartis: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Drummond:Sanofi, Novartis, Celgene: Honoraria; TargeGen, Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Sanofi, Novartis, Celgene: Consultancy. Passamonti:Novartis, Celgene, Incyte, Sanofi, Roche: Honoraria. Neumann:Sanofi: Employment. Gao:Sanofi: Employment.

Abstract Abstract 3838 Background: SAR302503 (SAR503, formerly TG101348), a potent, oral JAK2-selective inhibitor was studied in a Phase I/II trial for the treatment of patients with high- or intermediate-risk primary, post-polycythemia vera (PV) and post-essential thrombocythemia (ET) myelofibrosis (MF). SAR503 was administered orally once daily in 28-day cycles. Eligibility criteria included platelet count of ≥50 × 109/L. Interim safety and efficacy data from this study up to April 2010 have been previously published (JCO 2011, 29(7):789–796). The aim of this presentation is to report updated safety and efficacy of ongoing patients as well as an analysis of the JAK2V617F allele burden in this cohort. Results: Overall, 59 subjects (median age 64 years) were treated. Forty four patients had PMF, 12 post-PV MF and 3 post-ET MF; 86% were JAK2 V617F-positive. Median palpable spleen size was 18 cm at study enrollment. Twenty eight patients were treated in the dose-escalation cohort (30–800 mg administered as a single daily dose); thirty one patients were treated at the MTD (680 mg) in the dose confirmation cohort. 43/59 patients (73%) completed 6 cycles of treatment and continued treatment on the extension study. Currently, 22 patients (37%) remain on treatment with a median number of 28.5 cycles (24–41 range) and a median of last dose of 440 mg/day. Safety: Treatment-emergent toxicities in cycle 1–6 have been previously reported; toxicities were dose-dependent and generally alleviated with dose-reduction. Five patients discontinued treatment beyond cycle 6 for treatment-related adverse events: thrombocytopenia, depression, mental status changes, creatinine elevation and subdural hematoma. For the subgroup of patients with a baseline platelet count between 50–100 × 109/L (n =13; median 73, range 51–94); the platelet count at defined times points during follow up was: cycle 3; median 50, range 21–138 (p=0.09) and cycle 6; median 47, range 13–85 (p=0.01). Despite 7 of the 13 patients being treated at ≥680 mg/day, only 2 instances of Grade 4 thrombocytopenia were noted in this group Spleen response: As previously reported, spleen responses were seen early, usually within first 3 cycles, with half or more patients in each dose level ≥240 mg/day showing a durable ≥50% decrease in palpable spleen size. Spleen size (mean, median, range, and proportion with ≥50% reduction) at the following time points was: Baseline (n=58; 18.33cm, 18cm, 4–38cm, NA) ; 6 months (n=57; 9.05cm, 9cm, 0–30cm, 54.4%;) 12 months (n=42; 8.55cm, 9cm, 0–28cm, 66.7%) 18 months (n=36; 8.03cm, 8.5cm, 0–33cm, 52.8%); 24 months (n=31; 8.10cm, 8cm, 0–30cm, 54.8%,) 30 months (n=18; 6cm, 7.5cm, 0–16cm, 61.1%,and) 36 months (n=9; 5.89cm, 3cm, 0–16cm, 66.7%). JAK2V617F allele burden: We previously reported a significant decrease in JAK2V617F allele burden at the end of cycles 6 and 12. A durable decrease was also demonstrable after 24 cycles of treatment (n =21; median 9%, range 0–100%) relative to baseline (n =51; median 20%, range 3–100%) (p=0.03). Similarly, for patients with JAK2 V617F allele burden >20% at baseline; there was a significant decrease after cycle 24 (n =12; median 21%, range 6–100%) relative to baseline (n =23; median 60%, range 23–100%) (p=0.03). Conclusions: SAR503 is safe and efficacious treatment with long term effect on spleen size and JAK2V617F allele burden in patients with high- and intermediate-risk myelofibrosis. Additional follow up information will be updated at the time of meeting. Disclosures: Jamieson: Wintherix: Equity Ownership; Pfizer Oncology: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria. Gao:Sanofi-Aventis: Employment. Zhang:Sanofi-Aventis: Employment. Neumann:Sanofi-Aventis: Employment.