Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

74 citation(s) found for "Bush, J".

Correlates of bone mineral density in the postmenopausal estrogen/progestin interventions trial
Marcus, Robert , Blunt, Barbara A., Bush, Trudy L., Sherman, Sherry, Sherwin, Roger, Wahner, Heinz W., Wells, Bradley, Greendale, Gail A.

Journal of Bone and Mineral Research | February 3, 2010 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 1467-1476

10.1002/jbmr.5650090920 | PMID 7817832 Get It

Abstract We assessed the cross-sectional relationship of age, menopausal years, body mass, previous estrogen use, and ethnic background to bone mineral status in a sample of 875 healthy postmenopausal women at the time they were recruited from the community to participate in a multicenter clinical trial. The women were 1-10 years postmenopause, 45-64 years of age, and had not received estrogen replacement therapy within 3 months of enrollment. Of the participants, 89% were white, 69% had a spontaneous menopause, and 53% had a history of previous estrogen replacement therapy. Bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine (L2-4) and proximal femur was measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Results were consistent with a significant negative linear regression of BMD on age or years from menopause. Body mass index (BMI) correlated significantly with BMD at all sites (L 2-4 r = 0.28; femoral neck r = 0.34, p < 0.0001). BMD adjusted for age and BMI were higher at both sites in women who had taken estrogen versus those who had not (L2-4 0.976 + 0.009 versus 0.932 + 0.01; femoral neck 0.740 + 0.006 versus 0.708 + 0.008, p < 0.05). Adjusted BMD also increased with duration of ERT. Parity was negatively associated with L2-4 BMD (p = 0.03) but did not correlate significantly with BMD at the femoral neck. Black women had the highest L2-4 BMD, and Hispanic women had the highest femoral neck BMD, even when results were adjusted for age and BMI. When data were corrected for differences in bone size, these interethnic differences were no longer significant. We conclude that increased body mass is positively correlated with BMD, and this may confer a degree of skeletal protection to heavier postmenopausal women. Exposure for 5 years to exogenous estrogen is associated with significantly increased age- and BMI-adjusted BMD.
A γ-secretase inhibitor and quinacrine reduce prions and prevent dendritic degeneration in murine brains
Spilman, Patricia , Lessard, Pierre, Sattavat, Mamta, Bush, Clarissa, Tousseyn, Thomas , Huang, Eric J. , Giles, Kurt, Golde, Todd E. , Das, Pritam , Fauq, Abdul H. , Prusiner, Stanley B. , DeArmond, Stephen J.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences | July 22, 2008 | Volume: 105 | Issue: 30 | Pages: 10595-10600

10.1073/pnas.0803671105 | PMID 18647832 Get It

In prion-infected mice, both the Notch-1 intracellular domain transcription factor (NICD) and the disease-causing prion protein (PrP Sc ) increase in the brain preceding dendritic atrophy and loss. Because the drug LY411575 inhibits the γ-secretase-catalyzed cleavage of Notch-1 that produces NICD, we asked whether this γ-secretase inhibitor (GSI) might prevent dendritic degeneration in mice with scrapie. At 50 d postinoculation with Rocky Mountain Laboratory (RML) prions, mice were given GSI orally for 43–60 d. Because we did not expect GSI to produce a reduction of PrP Sc levels in brain, we added quinacrine (Qa) to the treatment regimen. Qa inhibits PrP Sc formation in cultured cells. The combination of GSI and Qa reduced PrP Sc by ≈95% in the neocortex and hippocampus but only ≈50% in the thalamus at the site of prion inoculation. The GSI plus Qa combination prevented dendritic atrophy and loss, but GSI alone did not. Even though GSI reduced NICD levels to a greater extent than GSI plus Qa, it was unable to prevent dendritic degeneration. Whether a balance between NICD and dendrite growth-stimulating factors was achieved with GSI plus Qa but not GSI alone remains to be determined. Although the combination of GSI and Qa diminished PrP Sc in the brains of RML-infected mice, GSI toxicity prevented us from being able to assess the effect the GSI plus Qa combination on incubation times. Whether less toxic GSIs can be used in place of LY411575 to prolong survival remains to be determined.
Differential expression, distribution, and function of PPAR-γ in the proximal and distal colon
Su, Weidong, Bush, Craig R., Necela, Brian M. , Calcagno, Shelly R., Murray, Nicole R. , Fields, Alan P. , Thompson, E. Aubrey

Physiological Genomics | May 23, 2007 | Volume: 30 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 342-353

10.1152/physiolgenomics.00042.2007 | PMID 17519361 Get It

Suppression of colon carcinogenesis by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-γ is likely due to some effect of PPAR-γ on normal colonic epithelial cells. However, our understanding of the effects of PPAR-γ in such cells is limited. We analyzed the abundance, distribution, and function of PPAR-γ in epithelial cells isolated from the murine proximal and distal colon. Marked differences in PPAR-γ abundance and distribution were observed, suggesting tissue-specific responses. Analysis of PPAR-γ effects on DNA synthesis, formation of preneoplastic lesions, and activation of MAPK signaling in proximal and distal colonic epithelial cells in vivo indicates that PPAR-γ regulates both tissue-specific and common responses within the proximal and distal colon. Three major functional cohorts of PPAR-γ target genes were identified by genomic profiling of isolated colonic epithelial cells: genes that are involved in metabolism, in signaling, and in cellular adhesion and motility. Two subsets of PPAR-γ target genes were differentially expressed in the proximal and distal epithelium. Proximal target genes were primarily involved in metabolic activities, whereas signal transduction, adhesion, and motility targets were more pronounced in the distal colon. Remarkably, those target genes that are differentially expressed in the proximal colon were all induced on activation of PPAR-γ, whereas all target genes that are preferentially expressed in the distal colon were repressed. Our data indicate that PPAR-γ exerts both common and tissue-specific effects in the colon and challenge the general conclusions that PPAR-γ is induced on differentiation of colonic epithelial cells and that this receptor stimulates differentiated function in epithelial cells throughout the colon.