Citations

Abstract Lifestyle interventions are pivotal for successful management of type 2 diabetes (T2D), however, the proportion of people with T2D adhering to physical activity advice has not been thoroughly studied. The purpose of this systematic review was to summarise the evidence on adherence to exercise or physical activity components in lifestyle interventions in those with T2D. We searched MEDLINE EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Scopus on 12 November 2019. Eligible studies enrolled adults with T2D and reported the proportion of adherence to lifestyle interventions as a primary or secondary outcome. We included 11 studies (nine randomised controlled trials (RCTs) enrolling 1717 patients and two nonrandomised studies enrolling 62 patients). Only one of the studies had low risk of bias. The proportion of participants adhering to physical activity varied from 32% to 100% with a median of 58%. Adherence was higher in interventions using supervised training and lowest in interventions using remote coaching and the adherence rate in observational studies was higher compared to RCTs (92% vs. 55%; p < 0.01). Study duration, risk of bias, or participants' sex, were not associated with adherence to physical activity. The proportion of those with T2D adhering to physical activity interventions for T2D varies widely and most of the included studies had a high risk of bias. These findings have important implications for planning and power analysis of future trials and when counselling patients about lifestyle interventions including physical activity or exercise components.

Abstract This study presents a single center experience with livedoid vasculopathy (LV). A rare disease that can lead to severe quality of life impairment. Characterize clinical data of LV patients at the Dermatology Division at the University of São Paulo. A retrospective and transversal study was conducted, from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2019. About 75 patients diagnosed as LV and confirmed by skin biopsy were included. Epidemiology, clinical appearance, histopathology data, and treatment history were observed. There were 78.66% Caucasian women, with a mean age of 39.9 years. Frequent cutaneous manifestations were ulcers, atrophic blanche‐like scars, hyperpigmentation, purpuras, telangiectasias, and livedo racemosa. Pain, pruritus, and hypoesthesia were the main symptoms. After treatment, almost 40% of cases relapsed during spring and summer months. About 66% of cases had thrombophilia factors associated, such as high levels of lipoprotein(a). Frequent treatments included acetylsalicylic acid, pentoxifylline, and diosmin with hesperidin. Not being a prospective study. This research provides useful data on Latin American LV patients, indicating multifactorial conditions involved in LV pathogenesis. An extensive work‐up including autoimmune laboratory tests, thrombophilia factors, and other conditions associated with venous stasis should be part of LV investigation and controlled to improve treatment response.

AbstractThe severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) represents a new public health problem, with a total of 10.577.263 documented COVID‐19 cases worldwide and 513.441 deaths up to the present date. Few cases of disease‐related cutaneous manifestations have been reported in the literature, and such manifestations are scarce. Integumentary manifestations from COVID‐19 include exanthemas and papular dermatoses, urticarial eruptions, atopic dermatitis, vesiculobullous lesions and skin signs of hypercoagulable states, such as acral ischaemia, livedo and retiform purpura. Most common extracutaneous manifestations from the disease include headache, cough, anosmia, ageusia, fever, dyspnoea, nausea, diarrhoea and cardiovascular events. The objectives of this review were to discuss the role of human cell receptors described as interaction targets of SARS‐CoV‐2, as well to understand the current state of knowledge on skin expression of these receptors, in order to substantiate future research. The authors present a thorough literature review on SARS‐CoV‐2 and its possible interaction with cell receptors and human tissues including the skin. They discuss a molecular hypothesis to explain the lower prevalence of dermatological manifestations from direct SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. Distinct human cell receptors binding the virus appear to be less expressed in the skin compared to other organs. Additionally, the presence of resolvins and the disintegrin metalloprotease ADAM17 provide a putative protection to the skin, explaining the majority of COVID‐19 manifestations to be extracutaneous. This review represents an excellent opportunity for future studies using skin biopsies from COVID‐19 patients to investigate molecular expression in the pathophysiology of cutaneous manifestations of the disease.

Objectives This analysis investigated nomogram use to evaluate metastatic pancreatic cancer prognosis. Methods Thirty-four baseline factors were examined in the Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Clinical Trial (MPACT) (nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine vs gemcitabine) data set. Factors significantly (P < 0.1) associated with overall survival (OS) in a univariable model or with known clinical relevance were tested further. In a multivariable model, factors associated with OS (P < 0.1) were selected to generate the primary nomogram, which was internally validated using bootstrapping, a concordance index, and calibration plots. Results Using data from 861 patients, 6 factors were retained (multivariable analysis): neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, albumin level, Karnofsky performance status, sum of longest diameter of target lesions, presence of liver metastases, and previous Whipple procedure. The nomogram distinguished low-, medium-, and high-risk groups (concordance index, 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.65–0.69; median OS, 11.7, 8.0, and 3.3 months, respectively). Conclusions This nomogram may guide estimates of the range of OS outcomes and contribute to patient stratification in future prospective metastatic pancreatic cancer trials; however, external validation is required to improve estimate reliability and applicability to a general patient population. Caution should be exercised in interpreting these results for treatment decisions: patient characteristics could differ from those included in the nomogram development.