Citations

AbstractBackgroundAlzheimer’s disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder with significant environmental factors, including diet, that influence its onset and progression. While the ketogenic diet (KD) holds promise in reducing metabolic risks and potentially affecting AD progression, only a few studies have explored the KD’s molecular impact for markers of AD therapeutic potential. The BEAM diet study simultaneously profiled the KD’s effect on the lipidome, blood and cerebrospinal metabolome, and microbiome of both cognitively impaired and cognitively normal individuals. The findings summarized here assess the biological impact of a Modified Mediterranean KD in the context of Alzheimer’s disease treatment and prevention.MethodBEAM involved participants at risk for AD, either cognitively normal or with mild cognitive impairment. The participants consumed both a modified Mediterranean‐ketogenic diet (MMKD) and the American Heart Association diet (AHAD) for 6 weeks each, separated by a 6‐week washout period. We employed HPLC‐MS/MS lipidomics profiling in plasma, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)‐based metabolomics to profile serum and CSF, and metagenomics profiling on fecal samples before and after each diet to assess dietary‐induced changes.ResultThe MMKD led to significant alterations in the blood, CSF, and microbiome. These changes included a global elevation across all plasmanyl and plasmenyl ether lipid species, improved modifiable risk factors, like increased HDL‐C and reduced BMI, the reversal of serum metabolic disturbances linked to AD such as an increase in valine levels, and a reduction in systemic inflammation. Leveraging prior clinical studies on AD (n = 1,912), we found that MMKD was inversely associated with the peripheral lipidomic signature of prevalent and incident AD. In the CSF, the MMKD was linked to modified amino acid levels and the breakdown of branched‐chain amino acids (BCAAs). Importantly, we observed a strong correlation between metabolic changes in the CSF and serum, suggesting a systemic regulation of metabolism. In addition, participants with MCI on the MMKD had lower levels of GABA‐producing microbes and GABA, and higher levels of GABA‐regulating microbes.ConclusionOur findings highlight that MMKD can improve AD‐related risk factors, reverse some metabolic disturbances associated with AD, and align metabolic changes across the blood‐CSF barrier.Funding: Alzheimer’s Gut Microbiome Project, NIA U19AG063744

Abstract Objectives In the general hospital wards, machine learning (ML)-based early warning systems (EWSs) can identify patients at risk of deterioration to facilitate rescue interventions. We assess subpopulation performance of a ML-based EWS on medical and surgical adult patients admitted to general hospital wards. Materials and Methods We assessed the scores of an EWS integrated into the electronic health record and calculated every 15 minutes to predict a composite adverse event (AE): all-cause mortality, transfer to intensive care, cardiac arrest, or rapid response team evaluation. The distributions of the First Score 3 hours after admission, the Highest Score at any time during the hospitalization, and the Last Score just before an AE or dismissal without an AE were calculated. The Last Score was used to calculate the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) and the precision-recall curve (PRC-AUC). Results From August 23, 2021 to March 31, 2022, 35 937 medical admissions had 2173 (6.05%) AE compared to 25 214 surgical admissions with 4984 (19.77%) AE. Medical and surgical admissions had significant different (P <.001) distributions of the First Score, Highest Score, and Last Score among those with an AE and without an AE. The model performed better in the medical group when compared to the surgical group, ROC-AUC 0.869 versus 0.677, and RPC-AUC 0.988 versus 0.878, respectively. Discussion Heterogeneity of medical and surgical patients can significantly impact the performance of a ML-based EWS, changing the model validity and clinical discernment. Conclusions Characterization of the target patient subpopulations has clinical implications and should be considered when developing models to be used in general hospital wards.

Background Hispanic patients continue to be underrepresented in clinical trials. To better understand the factors that impact clinical trial participation, we surveyed patients with NHL receiving care at an academic institution on their perspectives on clinical trials, barriers to care, and helpful aids to encourage clinical trial participation. Here we report the findings of the Hispanic patients and non-Hispanic white patients; accrual is ongoing for other cohorts of patients. Methods Consecutive patients ≥ 18 years old with histologically confirmed NHL who received care at MD Anderson Cancer Center in the Texas Medical Center in Houston, Texas were invited to participate regardless of treatment status. A self-administered questionnaire was used to assess patient sociodemographic factors, perceptions and willingness to participate in different clinical trial scenarios as well as participant perceived barriers to care and facilitators of trial participation. The questionnaire included a total of 53 items with an additional 13 demographic items. The questionnaire was available in English and Spanish. Results Of the 1204 patients invited, 316 consented to participate and 285 ultimately completed the survey (participation rate 23.7%). Among the total participants, this cohort included 100 self-identified Hispanic (H) participants and 103 non-Hispanic white (NHW) participants diagnosed with NHL who completed the survey and were included here. The histology of our cohort included Follicular Lymphoma (FL) [35.6%]; Diffuse Large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) [18.2%], Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) [18.7%], T-cell Lymphoma (TCL) [9.4%] Marginal Zone Lymphoma [7.8%]. Compared with NHW participants, Hispanic patients were younger (Median age of 60 vs 66 years), less likely to be male (H 54% vs NHW 66%), less likely to commute more than an hour away from the doctor's office (54% vs 71.8%), had lower household income (income > $100,000 was 32% vs 41.7%) and less likely to have a bachelors' degree or higher (38% vs 50.5%). There were similar prevalence histologies such as DLBCL (H 20% vs NHW 16.5%) and FL (H 36% vs NHW 35%) compared to rarer histologies such as MCL (H 11.1% vs NHW 26.2%) and MZL (H 12% vs NHW 3.9% ) which had disproportional prevalences. Hispanic patients were less likely to have previously participated in a clinical trial (28% vs 51.5%) and less likely to have discussed clinical trials as an option (49% vs 70.9%). A majority of Hispanic (81.0%) and NHW (92.3%) respondents stated that they understood what was meant by a “clinical research study” or “clinical trial” somewhat well or very well. Less than half of Hispanic participants (38.0%) and NHW participants (48.5%) reported being very willing to participate in a cancer clinical trial as their initial course of treatment. The most prevalent concern of both Hispanic and NHW participants respectively was the cost of a clinical trial (34.0%, 22.3%). Other top concerns included distance to the treatment center (32.0%, 13.6%) and frequency of contact with the care team (26.0%, 14.6%). Participants identified access to written materials (69.0%, 60.2%), insurance aid (65.0%, 68.0%), and access to videos (64.0%, 51.5%) as extremely helpful resources that could reduce the burden of participating in a clinical trial. Participants identified that it was most important that a treatment may improve their quality of life by decreasing pain level, increasing activity level, or other symptoms (76.0%, 91.3%). Conclusions Although most Hispanic and NHW participants reported a very good understanding of clinical trials and similar facilitators/barriers for trial participation, Hispanic patients were less likely to have discussed trials as an option with their care teams and less likely to have previously participated in a trial. Evidence-based interventions to address various barriers to clinical trials exist but data on their effectiveness and application is limited. Implementing strategically designed evidence-based interventions to address identified barriers and facilitators will be necessary to improve participation in lymphoma clinical trials.

Background: Hypertriglyceridemia, a common lipid disorder linked to increased risks of cardiovascular diseases and metabolic syndrome, remains a global health challenge. Traditional treatments, though widely used, often have limited efficacy and adverse effects. Olezarsen, a novel antisense oligonucleotide, targets apolipoprotein C-III and shows promise in significantly reducing triglyceride levels. Aim: To conduct a meta-analysis comparing Olezarsen with placebo in patients with hypertriglyceridemia. Methods: We performed an extensive literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases up to May 2024 to identify studies comparing Olezarsen and placebo in patients with hypertriglyceridemia, irrespective of comorbid cardiovascular disease. Effect estimates were pooled using a random-effects model and reported as risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and standard mean differences (SMD) for continuous outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each. Results: Three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a total of 334 participants were included. Olezarsen significantly reduced triglyceride levels at 6 months (SMD: -1.69; 95% CI -2.22 to -1.17; P < 0.00001; Figure ) and 12 months (SMD: -1.64; 95% CI -2.22 to -1.07; P < 0.00001; Figure ). VLDL levels also decreased at 6 months (SMD: -1.95; 95% CI -2.38 to -1.51; P < 0.00001) and 12 months (SMD: -0.83; 95% CI -1.13 to -0.53; P < 0.00001). Lipid profile improvements included reductions in total cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, and apoB levels, with increases in HDL cholesterol and apoA-1. Adverse events were comparable between Olezarsen and placebo, although serious adverse events were significantly higher in the Olezarsen group (RR: 2.55; 95% CI 1.17 to 5.58; p = 0.02). Conclusion: Olezarsen demonstrates significant efficacy in reducing triglyceride and VLDL levels while improving overall lipid profiles in hypertriglyceridemia patients. Despite higher rates of serious adverse events, its overall safety profile remains acceptable.

This cross-sectional study examines the frequency of increased intracranial pressure and its association with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease in patients of various ages.