Citations

BACKGROUND: The American Board of Anesthesiology administers the APPLIED Examination as a part of initial certification, which as of 2018 includes 2 components—the Standardized Oral Examination (SOE) and the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). The goal of this study is to investigate the measurement construct(s) of the APPLIED Examination to assess whether the SOE and the OSCE measure distinct constructs (ie, factors). METHODS: Exploratory item factor analysis of candidates’ performance ratings was used to determine the number of constructs, and confirmatory item factor analysis to estimate factor loadings within each construct and correlation(s) between the constructs. RESULTS: In exploratory item factor analysis, the log-likelihood ratio test and Akaike information criterion index favored the 3-factor model, with factors reflecting the SOE, OSCE Communication and Professionalism, and OSCE Technical Skills. The Bayesian information criterion index favored the 2-factor model, with factors reflecting the SOE and the OSCE. In confirmatory item factor analysis, both models suggest moderate correlation between the SOE factor and the OSCE factor; the correlation was 0.49 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.42-0.55) for the 3-factor model and 0.61 (95% CI, 0.54-0.64) for the 2-factor model. The factor loadings were lower for Technical Skills stations of the OSCE (ranging from 0.11 to 0.25) compared with those of the SOE and Communication and Professionalism stations of the OSCE (ranging from 0.36 to 0.50). CONCLUSIONS: The analyses provide evidence that the SOE and the OSCE measure distinct constructs, supporting the rationale for administering both components of the APPLIED Examination for initial certification in anesthesiology.

BACKGROUND: Anesthesiology residents’ experiences and perspectives about their programs may be helpful in improving training. The goals of this repeated cross-sectional survey study are to determine: (1) the most important factors residents consider in choosing an anesthesiology residency, (2) the aspects of the clinical base year that best prepare residents for anesthesia clinical training, and what could be improved, (3) whether residents are satisfied with their anesthesiology residency and what their primary struggles are, and (4) whether residents believe their residency prepares them for proficiency in the 6 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Core Competencies and for independent practice. METHODS: Anesthesiologists beginning their US residency training from 2013 to 2016 were invited to participate in anonymous, confidential, and voluntary self-administered online surveys. Resident cohort was defined by clinical anesthesia year 1, such that 9 survey administrations were included in this study—3 surveys for the 2013 and 2014 cohorts (clinical anesthesia years 1–3), 2 surveys for the 2015 cohort (clinical anesthesia years 1–2), and 1 survey for the 2016 cohort (clinical anesthesia year 1). RESULTS: The overall response rate was 36% (4707 responses to 12,929 invitations). On a 5-point Likert scale with 1 as “very unimportant” and 5 as “very important,” quality of clinical experience (4.7–4.8 among the cohorts) and departmental commitment to education (4.3–4.5) were rated as the most important factors in anesthesiologists’ choice of residency. Approximately 70% of first- and second-year residents agreed that their clinical base year prepared them well for anesthesiology residency, particularly clinical training experiences in critical care rotations, anesthesiology rotations, and surgery rotations/perioperative procedure management. Overall, residents were satisfied with their choice of anesthesiology specialty (4.4–4.5 on a 5-point scale among cohort-training levels) and their residency programs (4.0–4.1). The residency training experiences mostly met their expectations (3.8–4.0). Senior residents who reported any struggles highlighted academic more than interpersonal or technical difficulties. Senior residents generally agreed that the residency adequately prepared them for independent practice (4.1–4.4). Of the 6 ACGME Core Competencies, residents had the highest confidence in professionalism (4.7–4.9) and interpersonal and communication skills (4.6–4.8). Areas in residency that could be improved include the provision of an appropriate balance between education and service and allowance for sufficient time off to search and interview for a postresidency position. CONCLUSIONS: Anesthesiology residents in the United States indicated they most value quality of clinical training experiences and are generally satisfied with their choice of specialty and residency program.

BACKGROUND: A temporary decrease in anesthesiology residency graduates that occurred around the turn of the millennium may have workforce implications. The aims of this study are to describe, between 2005 and 2015, (1) demographic changes in the workforce of physicians trained as anesthesiologists; (2) national and state densities of these physicians, as well as temporal changes in the densities; and (3) retention of medical licenses by mid- and later-career anesthesiologists. METHODS: Using records from the American Board of Anesthesiology and state medical and osteopathic boards, the numbers of licensed physicians aged 30–59 years who had completed Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education–accredited anesthesiology residency training were calculated cross-sectionally for 2005, 2010, and 2015. Demographic trends were then described. Census data were used to calculate national and state densities of licensed physicians. Individual longitudinal data were used to describe retention of medical licenses among older physicians. RESULTS: The number of licensed physicians trained as anesthesiologists aged 30–59 years increased from 32,644 in 2005 to 36,543 in 2010 and 36,624 in 2015, representing a national density of 1.10, 1.18, and 1.14 per 10,000 population in those years, respectively. The density of anesthesiologists among states ranged from 0.37 to 3.10 per 10,000 population. The age distribution differed across the years. For example, anesthesiologists aged 40–49 years predominated in 2005 (47%), but by 2015, only 31% of anesthesiologists were aged 40–49 years. The proportion of female anesthesiologists grew from 22% in 2005, to 24% in 2010, and to 28% in 2015, particularly among early-career anesthesiologists. For anesthesiologists with licenses in 2005, the number who still had active licenses in 2015 decreased by 9.6% for those aged 45–49 years, by 14.1% for those aged 50–54 years, and by 19.7% for those aged 55–59 years. CONCLUSIONS: The temporary decrease in anesthesiology residency graduates around the turn of the 21st century decreased the proportion of anesthesiologists who were midcareer as of 2015. This may affect the future availability of senior leaders as well as the future overall workforce in the specialty as older anesthesiologists retire. National efforts to plan for workforce needs should recognize the geographical variability in the distribution of anesthesiologists.

Abstract Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) lacks consensus regarding treatment, and no prior studies assess treatment satisfaction in PG. The objective of this study was to determine patient‐reported satisfaction in the treatment of PG, and associations with satisfaction. Methodology was a multicenter cross‐sectional survey for patients who received systemic medication(s) to treat PG. Thirty‐five patients completed the survey (mean age: 54.0 years, 65.7% female, response rate: 81.4%). Mean (± SD) SATMED‐Q score was 75.0 (±16.2, range: 67.6‐85.3). Older patients (72.6 ± 23.6 for 18‐39 years, 74.4 ± 16.1 for 40‐59, 77.1 ± 11.6 for 60+), plus those with higher incomes (72.9 ± 20.3 for $0‐49 000; 74.0 ± 17.6 for $50 000‐99 000; 79.0 ± 14.6 for $100 000+) and education status (69.4 ± 14.3 for high school equivalent, 72.9 ± 15.9 for undergraduate, 91.7 ± 10.6 for graduate), were more satisfied with treatment. Ulcerative PG had higher SATMED‐Q scores (79.0 ± 13.2) than other subtypes (66.2 ± 19.3). For local therapy, wound care, or pain control, 63.2%, 100%, and 75% were satisfied, respectively. The mean DLQI was 8.6 (±7.6, range: 0‐29), and higher DLQI was associated with decreased satisfaction. Satisfaction with providers was positively correlated with global satisfaction (Pearson's r = 0.638). The presence of pain and/or depression influenced both SATMED‐Q (72.8 ± 18.8 with pain, 78.3 ± 11.2 without; 68.2 ± 18.8 with depression, 80.1 ± 12.2 without) and DLQI scores (12.1 ± 8.1 with pain, 3.9 ± 3.4 without; 10.3 ± 7.1 with depression, 7.4 ± 8.0 without). To optimize the patient experience, non‐modifiable associations should be individually considered, and potentially modifiable associations such as satisfaction with specific providers, pain, and depression, may be targeted for management.

Abstract A 40-yr-old male with no significant past medical history presented with sudden onset right-sided retro-orbital headache associated with vision loss after a session of strenuous exercise. Initial assessment with noncontrast head computed tomography at the local emergency department revealed a right sided occipital intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). On arrival the patient ad a left quadrantopsia with Glasgow Coma Scale of 15 and an ICH score of 0. A computed tomographic angiography showed a high density 6 × 9 mm vascular lesion associated with 2 tortuous vessels. Cerebral angiography revealed a right sided dural arteriovenous fistula, Cognard Type IV, with arterial feeders arising from dural branches of the right vertebral artery, the posterior division of the right middle meningeal artery and meningeal branches distal to the neuromeningeal trunk of the left ascending pharyngeal artery. 1 Four days after the ICH event the patient was treated with endovascular Onyx embolization of the fistula, through a transradial approach. Immediate angiographic assessment showed complete obliteration of the dAVF. The patient was discharged home and recovered his visual field deficit over 3 mo. The following operative video includes a discussion of the endovascular technique and treatment nuances associated with the transarterial management of a dural arteriovenous fistula. Patient consent was given prior to the procedure and consent and approval for this operative video was waived due to the retrospective nature of this manuscript and the anonymized video material.

Abstract Wide-necked aneurysms often pose challenges for distal access to the distal vasculature. This 64-yr-old woman without neurological deficits presented with atypical headaches of gradual onset. MRI revealed a large, symptomatic, unruptured carotid terminus aneurysm incorporating the origin of both the middle (MCA) and anterior cerebral arteries (ACA). Its wide neck created significant risks to coil prolapse and parent vessel compromise, risking stroke. With other options of higher risks, we recommended an around-the-world technique. Standard transfemoral access was used to the right internal carotid artery (ICA) with a 6F-Shuttle sheath and intracranial carotid with a 6F-Sofia distal access catheter. With dual-microcatheter access, 1 catheter was placed in the aneurysm dome, a second in the MCA for stent placement. Advancing the wire around the aneurysm first formed a loop from the lateral to medial wall for access to the MCA. The microcatheter was then advanced around the wire into the MCA, keeping the loop within the dome. With the loop's distal tip anchored, the distal end of the stent was deployed and anchored into the MCA. Both pitfalls (ie, lack of sufficient distal access, collapse of stent device during deployment) were resolved using a balloon catheter. With the balloon positioned and inflated as the anchor, the wire and catheter were pulled together. The loop in the aneurysm's dome straightened out across the neck, the stent was advanced into the MCA, and coiling proceeded. A large neck remnant had partially closed on 6-mo follow-up angiogram. Patient consented to undergo the procedure. Illustrations in video published/printed with permission from Mayfield Clinic.

Abstract Sidewall aneurysm treatment often requires complex management strategies. These can include advanced clipping techniques or stent-assisted coiling techniques. Endovascular coiling alone has been associated with high recurrence rates and is often not feasible. 1-4 Flow-diversion embolization has recently become a standard of care for many aneurysms, demonstrating high occlusion rates. 4,5 However, the third generation of coil-assist stents can be delivered with 0.0165” microcatheters, being an ideal adjunct to manage this group of aneurysms in more distal locations. In this video, a 16-yr-old teenager with Parry-Romberg syndrome and congenital adrenal hyperplasia had an incidental finding of a 6.5-mm sidewall aneurysm arising off the angular branch of the left middle cerebral artery, found during the work-up of complex partial seizures. The patient consented to the procedure. Due to his young age and aneurysm size, a decision was made to treat the aneurysm through an endovascular approach. Under general anesthesia, a transfemoral approach was carried out using a 6-French short sheath. A 6-French guiding catheter was left in the distal cervical left internal carotid artery; a 0.0165” microcatheter was used to first deploy a 3.0 × 15 mm Neuroform Atlas stent, completely covering the length of the aneurysm. Then, the stent was traversed with the microcatheter to coil the aneurysm. Follow-up cerebral angiogram confirmed complete occlusion of the aneurysm.