Citations

Objective There are few data regarding the effect of the Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis (SAMMPRIS) trial results on the management of intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD). We sought to understand the impact of the SAMMPRIS trial on current ICAD clinical practices and future trial design. Methods During the ICAD symposium at the 2012 International Stroke Conference, electronic data were collected regarding attendees’ clinical management of ICAD and opinions on the feasibility of future trials post-SAMMPRIS. Results 217 attendees from different specialties, including neurologists (57%), neurointerventionalists (9%) and neurosurgeons (5%), participated in the session. The majority of respondents (77%) indicated that the results of SAMMPRIS have impacted their consideration for intracranial stenting. Post-SAMMPRIS, 84% selected ‘SAMMPRIS-style’ medical management for the treatment of ICAD. For patients with ICAD who failed aggressive medical therapy, 82% would consider an alternative approach to continuing medical therapy (30% considered clinical trial enrollment, 28% suggested angioplasty and stenting and 24% angioplasty). The majority of participants (85%) were willing to randomize patients with symptomatic ICAD in future trials. For the next ICAD trial, 29% indicated that angioplasty alone should be compared with aggressive medical therapy. Conclusions Our polling results suggest that the SAMMPRIS trial has had an impact on the current treatment of ICAD. Treatment of patients who failed medical therapy varied widely from aggressive medical therapy to balloon angioplasty, stenting or enrollment in future clinical trials. The willingness to continue clinical trials and randomize patients supports the need for future ICAD studies.

Objectives/HypothesisTo describe the presentation and clinical course of cerebellopontine angle (CPA) and internal auditory canal (IAC) lipomas.Study DesignRetrospective cohort study at a tertiary academic referral center.MethodsAll patients presenting with a CPA or IAC mass radiographically consistent with a lipoma on high‐resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were identified. Data including presenting symptomatology, tumor characteristics, management strategy, and patient course were collected.ResultsBetween 1996 and 2012, 15 patients were diagnosed with a CPA or IAC lipoma at the authors' institution and were included in the analysis. The mean duration of radiological and clinical follow‐up was 3.4 years and 5.1 years, respectively. Eight lesions were confined to the IAC, while seven involved the CPA. The median tumor size at diagnosis was 7.2 mm; one patient demonstrated tumor growth on serial MRI while the remaining subjects did not have radiological progression. The most common presenting symptoms were sensorineural hearing loss (40%) and tinnitus (33%); five patients were diagnosed after incidental discovery on MRI. Fourteen patients were managed with observation, while one subject underwent subtotal resection. None of the observed patients reported worsening symptoms at last follow‐up.ConclusionsWhile rare, lipomas should be included in the differential diagnosis of CPA and IAC lesions. Owing to a generally benign clinical course and high morbidity associated with resection, microsurgery should only be considered in cases of definite tumor enlargement with intractable symptoms from mass effect. Careful radiological evaluation is critical for establishing an accurate diagnosis in order to prevent unnecessary morbidity associated with resection.Level of Evidence2b.

Objectives/HypothesisTo describe the natural history of primary inner ear schwannomas (PIES) and evaluate management outcomes and relationship between PIES location, clinical presentation, and time to diagnosis.Study DesignRetrospective chart review and systematic review of the literature.MethodsVestibular schwannoma confined to or arising from the inner ear were included. PIES classification was based on anatomic subsite(s) involved. Detailed clinical history and outcomes were recorded.ResultsIn a systematic review (1933–2011), including 14 patients from the authors' institution (1999–2009), a total of 72 studies comprising 234 patients were evaluated. Mean follow‐up was 32.8 ± 39.1 months (range, 0–183 months). The cochlea was the most commonly involved subsite (51%). Hearing loss was the most frequent presenting symptom (99%). Vertigo and abnormal balance were more common among tumors involving the vestibular system (P < .01). Average delay between symptom onset and diagnosis was 7.0 ± 8.0 years (median, 5 years; range, 0–40 years). Recent onset hearing loss was more likely to elicit an earlier diagnosis (P = .01). The majority of patients were observed without treatment (53%). Tumor progression was seen in 52% of patients.Conclusions PIES are rare tumors and most commonly involve the cochlea. Tumor location is often associated with clinical presentation and correlates with delay between symptom onset and diagnosis. A watch‐and‐scan approach is the management strategy of choice in the absence of intractable vertigo or extensive tumor growth. The majority of patients report stable or improved symptoms over time, regardless of treatment. Laryngoscope, 123:1957–1966, 2013