Citations

AbstractIntroductionSystemic bevacizumab is a novel targeted therapy for severe epistaxis and chronic gastrointestinal bleeding in hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT), but published data are very limited.AimWe conducted a survey‐based study to characterize current treatment practices and physician‐reported safety and effectiveness of systemic bevacizumab for bleeding in (HHT).MethodsA 27‐item survey was sent to physician centre directors of 31 International HHT Centers of Excellence.ResultsResponse rate was 84%. Approximately half of centres had treated >10 HHT patients with systemic bevacizumab for chronic bleeding for a total of 291 patients treated. All centres utilize a 5 mg/kg dose for induction treatment and most administer six doses (range, 4‐8) every 2 weeks. However, maintenance regimens varied considerably between centres. Bevacizumab was highly effective, with 86% reporting significant (>50%) improvement in GI bleeding and/or epistaxis and haemoglobin rise in most patients treated with bevacizumab; 52% reported haemoglobin normalization in most patients. All centres reported adverse event rates <30% and two‐thirds of centres reported adverse event rates <10%. Discontinuation for adverse events or inefficacy was rare. Bleeding severity thresholds for initiation of bevacizumab were highly variable, and it is typically administered by haematologists (76% of centres). Two‐thirds of centres reported obtaining insurance approval for bevacizumab for most or all patients but 48% reported difficulty in obtaining coverage.ConclusionSystemic bevacizumab is widely used to treat bleeding in HHT with excellent physician‐reported effectiveness and safety. There is considerable variation in maintenance treatment practices and thresholds for initiation of bevacizumab among HHT centres.

Purpose of review The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) provides a comprehensive review and guidance for clinicians managing patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, adherence to GOLD guidelines has been suboptimal over the years. The current review summarizes the current body of literature addressing the multitude of reasons for the lack of adherence to GOLD guidelines in clinical practice. Recent findings There continue to be several reasons for suboptimal adoption of GOLD guidelines in clinical practice. A primary and recurrent theme appears to be both delayed as well as missed diagnosis of COPD. There are several reasons for this including lack of awareness about current COPD guidelines, lack of availability as well as utilization of office spirometry and improper symptom assessment. Other issues include improper selection of proper pharmacotherapy options, misdiagnosis/mislabeling of COPD phenotypes, lack of smoking cessation counselling as well as enrollment in pulmonary rehabilitation. Potential solutions include adoption of clinical decision support systems, self-care models and careful phenotyping of COPD patients. Summary There are currently several barriers for the adoption of GOLD guidelines into routine clinical practice. These barriers are all amenable to systematic solutions that will increase adherence to current GOLD guidelines.

Introduction : Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT, Osler-Weber-Rendu disease) is a rare hereditary multisystem vascular disease of disordered angiogenesis. Pathologic elevations in vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) result in fragile, abnormal vessels in nasal and gastrointestinal (GI) mucosa causing recurrent epistaxis, chronic GI bleeding, and anemia that is often transfusion-dependent. Bevacizumab is a monoclonal IgG1 antibody that neutralizes circulating VEGF and is a potential targeted anti-angiogenic treatment in HHT, which has no FDA-approved therapy. Data for use of intravenous (IV) bevacizumab in HHT is currently limited to case reports and small single-center retrospective case series. The International HHT Intravenous Bevacizumab Investigative Team study of Bleeding (InHIBIT-Bleed) is an international collaboration of HHT Centers seeking to more definitively describe the safety and effectiveness of systemic bevacizumab to treat chronic bleeding and anemia in HHT. Methods : The following data was retrospectively collected at each participating center for all HHT patients treated for at least 3 months with off-label systemic bevacizumab for chronic bleeding: demographics, baseline HHT characteristics, epistaxis severity score (ESS, a validated 10-point scale to evaluate epistaxis in HHT), bevacizumab dosing, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), hemoglobin (Hgb), red blood cell (RBC) transfusions, and IV iron infusions. Hgb and ESS at baseline were compared with post-bevacizumab values at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months with the paired t-test. RBC transfusion and iron infusion requirements before and after bevacizumab treatment were compared with the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Results : 140 HHT patients were treated with IV bevacizumab for chronic bleeding for a median of 23 (range, 3-96) months with a median of 12 (range, 2-74) total infusions. Bevacizumab was dosed at 5 mg/kg every 2 weeks for the first 2 months, then monthly for 4 months; following this, maintenance dosing practices varied depending on center. Baseline patient characteristics are given in Table 1. After bevacizumab initiation, patients with baseline anemia (Hgb<11, N=104) had an increase in mean Hgb from 8.6 g/dL to 11.9 g/dL at 3 months (P<0.0001) up to 12.5 g/dL at 12 months (P<0.0001) (Table 2, Figure 1). For patients with epistaxis as an indication for treatment (N=119), mean ESS dropped from 6.8 at baseline to ≤3.5 on treatment (P<0.0001) (Table 2, Figure 2). In patients requiring RBC transfusion prior to bevacizumab (N=81), transfusion requirements decreased from a median of 8 units in the 6 months before treatment to a median of 0 units in the first 6 months after treatment (P<0.0001); similarly, in patients requiring iron infusion prior to bevacizumab (N=99), requirements decreased from a median of 4 infusions to 2 infusions (P<0.0001) (Table 2). RBC transfusion and iron infusion requirements continued to improve with ongoing bevacizumab treatment (Table 2) and improvement occurred regardless of baseline bleeding severity; Figure 3 illustrates the dramatic reduction in RBC transfusion and iron infusion requirements in a severe patient sub-cohort. Overall, compared with pretreatment, RBC transfusion and iron infusion requirements decreased by 86% and 66%, respectively, on bevacizumab. On subgroup analysis by underlying mutation (ENG vs. ACVRL1), there were no significant differences in baseline parameters or bevacizumab response. Bevacizumab was well-tolerated; TEAEs felt to be likely or possibly related to bevacizumab occurred in 36% of patients (Table 3), with new or worsened hypertension (16%) and fatigue (9%) most common. No patient developed venous thromboembolism on bevacizumab. Only 5 patients (4%) discontinued bevacizumab for TEAEs and only 3 patients (2%) discontinued bevacizumab for lack of effectiveness. Conclusions : We present results of IV bevacizumab treatment of chronic bleeding and anemia in a large cohort of 140 HHT patients, demonstrating that bevacizumab was highly effective, with an improvement in mean Hgb of 3.9 g/dL, dramatic reduction in ESS, and decrease in RBC transfusion and iron infusion requirements by 86% and 66%, respectively. Effectiveness was maintained over time. Safety analysis included a total of 194 patient-years of IV bevacizumab administration to HHT patients and had low TEAE rates with only 4% discontinuing treatment due to TEAEs. Disclosures Al-Samkari: Agios: Consultancy, Research Funding; Moderna: Consultancy; Dova: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kuter:Caremark: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Dova: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kyowa-Kirin: Consultancy, Honoraria; Zafgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Platelet Disorder Support Association: Consultancy, Honoraria; Shinogi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Up-to-Date: Consultancy, Honoraria, Patents & Royalties: 3 Up-to-Date chapters; Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Platelet Disorder Support Association: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS): Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Caremark: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck Sharp Dohme: Consultancy, Honoraria; Merck Sharp Dohme: Consultancy, Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Argenx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS): Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kezar: Research Funding; Shire: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kezar: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Principia: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Zafgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Alnylam: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Actelion (Syntimmune): Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Actelion (Syntimmune): Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Principia: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Protalex: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Protalix: Consultancy, Honoraria; Protalix: Consultancy, Honoraria; Rigel: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Rigel: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; UCB: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda (Bioverativ): Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Up-to-Date: Consultancy, Honoraria, Patents & Royalties: 3 Up-to-Date chapters; UCB: Consultancy, Honoraria; Kyowa-Kirin: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genzyme: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genzyme: Consultancy, Honoraria; Protalex: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Argenx: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Shinogi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda (Bioverativ): Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Shire: Consultancy, Honoraria; Alnylam: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Dova: Consultancy, Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Momenta: Consultancy, Honoraria; Momenta: Consultancy, Honoraria. OffLabel Disclosure: The presentation will discuss off-label use of systemic bevacizumab for the treatment of chronic bleeding and anemia in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia.

Background. Liver arteriovenous malformations (AVM) in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) can necessitate liver transplantation. There is limited data on HHT patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT) in the United States. Methods. Two sources of data were used: (1) Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) database (1998-2016) (2) Single center liver transplant database (Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN). The aims of this study were (1) to determine trends in LT for HHT-related liver involvement in the United States using the SRTR database; (2) to identify clinical characteristics, indications, and outcomes for LT in HHT. Results. Thirty-nine HHT patients were listed for LT in the SRTR database from 1998-2016 to 1998-2001 (n = 1); 2002-2005 (n = 4); 2006-2010 (n = 10), and 2011-2016 (n = 24). Twenty-four underwent LT at a median age of 47.5 years (interquartile range, 37.0-58.5 years). Median calculated MELD score at time of LT was 8.0 (interquartile range, 7.0-9.5), and 75% received an exception MELD score. Two status-1 patients died during transplant surgery. Nineteen (86%) patients were alive after a median post-LT follow-up of 48 months, whereas 2 patients were lost to follow-up. Five of the aforementioned HHT patients underwent LT at Mayo Clinic, 4 with high output cardiac failure, and 1 with biliary ischemia. All 5 were alive at the time of last follow-up with good graft function and resolution of heart failure. Conclusions. Outcomes after LT for HHT patients are excellent with 86% survival after a median follow-up of 48 months and resolution of heart failure. LT listing for HHT has increased in substantially in more recent eras.

Background: Weight-based dosing strategy for norepinephrine in septic shock patients with extremes of body mass index has been lesser studied. Methods: This historical study of adult septic shock patients was conducted from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2015, at all intensive care units (ICUs) in Mayo Clinic, Rochester. Patients with documented body mass index were classified into underweight (body mass index <18.5 kg/m 2 ), normal weight (18.5-24.9 kg/m 2 ), and morbidly obese (≥40 kg/m 2 ) patients. Patients with repeat ICU admissions, ICU stay <1 day, and body mass index 25 to 39.9 kg/m 2 were excluded. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, and secondary outcomes included cumulative norepinephrine exposure acute kidney injury, cardiac arrhythmias, and 1-year mortality. Two-tailed P < .05 was considered statistically significant. Results: From 2010 to 2015, 2016 patients met inclusion—145, 1406, and 466 patients, respectively, in underweight, normal weight, and morbidly obese cohorts. Underweight patients used the highest peak dose and absolute exposure was greatest for morbidly obese patients. In-hospital mortality decreased with increasing log 10 body mass index: 41.4% (underweight), 28.4% (normal weight), and 24.7% (morbidly obese), respectively ( P < .001); however, this relationship was not noted at 1 year. Unadjusted log 10 norepinephrine cumulative exposure (mg) was associated with higher in-hospital mortality, acute kidney injury, cardiac arrhythmias, and 1-year mortality. After adjustment for demographics, body mass index, comorbidity, and illness severity, log 10 norepinephrine exposure was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 2.4 [95% confidence interval, 2.0-2.8]; P < .001) and 1-year mortality (odds ratio 1.7 [95% confidence interval, 1.5-2.0]; P < .001). In a propensity-matched analysis of 1140 patients, log 10 norepinephrine was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 2.2 [95% confidence interval, 1.8-2.6]; P < .001). Conclusions: Morbidly obese patients had lower in-hospital mortality but had higher 1-year mortality compared to normal weight and underweight patients. Cumulative norepinephrine exposure was highest in morbidly obese patients. Total norepinephrine exposure was an independent mortality predictor in septic shock.