Citations

Abstract Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is a lymphoid neoplasm associated with accumulation of lymphoplasmacytic cells in the bone marrow and an elevated monoclonal IgM in the serum. Although the genetic and molecular mechanisms behind the pathogenesis of WM are not well understood, losses of the long arm of chromosome 6 have been found as the only recurrent genomic aberration. These deletions, mostly starting at 6q21, are observed in upwards of 50% of patients and involve the majority of the clonal cells. To better characterize pathologic gene expression signatures in different types of WM at the molecular level (6q deleted versus not), we examined gene expression level changes of more than 20000 human gene probes in bone marrow tissues of clinically proven WM patients. We used Affymetrix HG-U133A v2 chips (n = 24). Clonal cells were purified using a combination of anti-CD138 and anti-CD19 Miltenyi™ magnetic microbeads. Based on cIgM-FISH results, we classified samples into two groups - 6q normal (ND) group and 6q deletion (D) group. We then proceeded to identify genes that showed differential expression between the two groups. We selected 165 differentially expressed genes (DEG) using SAM, and underwent further investigation of biological annotations of them using Gene Ontology™ (GO) terms. Among165 DEG, only 32 showed high level of expression in ND group compared to D group while 133 showed high level of expression in D group. As expected, all genes that reside in 6q region showed under-expression in D group, constituting 53% (17 genes) of genes under-expressed in D group (32 genes). According to GO analysis, the 6q-deletion-induced under-expression affects many biological processes, and is associated with a transcriptional upregulation of downstream genetic cascades. This likely indicates release of regulatory control by a tumor suppressor gene. Genes involved in cell growth and maintenance, cell communication and morphogenesis are also over-expressed in D group. Interestingly, a gene that is involved in innate immune response and inflammatory response shows under-expression in D group but is not accounted for by other mechanisms. In similar vein, a gene that is involved in negative regulation of cytokine biosynthesis showed over-expression in D group. We think these transcriptional characteristics can provide basic framework for differentiating subtypes of WM and search for genes associated with WM pathogenesis

Abstract Abstract 1824 Introduction. Chromosomal abnormalities are prevalent in multiple myeloma (MM) and have been useful in delineating disease subtypes and prognosis groups. Globally, a dichotomous developmental pathway based on ploidy status seems to exist. The accumulation of chromosomal abnormalities in MM often gives rise to complex copy number profiles which are difficult to be captured due to the limitations of karyotyping in a relatively non-proliferative tumor. It is therefore unclear if genomic complexity as a reflection of chromosomal instability (CIN) is of biological and clinical relevance in MM. In this study, we introduce a novel measure of CIN, chromosome instability genome event count (CINGEC), validated its prognostic relevance in myeloma, and subsequently derived a gene expression (GEP) signature, CINGECS, investigated the gene contents of it to elucidate biological mechanisms related to CIN, and assessed its association with survival in the context of other gene expression based prognostic factors. Method. The rationale for CINGEC is that the more unstable is a genome, the more genome events does it harbor irrespective of the size of altered segments. Hence, we first obtain a copy number level sequence from a segmentation result of copy number profile signals from aCGH or SNP chip. We developed an algorithm to estimate the minimum number of genome events to account for the observed complex genome profiles. CINGEC is the sum of genome event counts from all autosomal chromosomes. The GEP signature, CINGECS, is derived from a public dataset that has both aCGH and GEP (GSE26849 and GSE26760, n=246) by performing differential gene expression analysis (SAM, p<0.001, q<0.001, fold-change 2) using GEP data between samples grouped into the top and bottom quartiles based on their CINGEC obtained from the analysis of aCGH data. The biological mechanisms distinctive between high and low CINGEC samples are assessed with biological pathways such as Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) and Gene Ontology (GO). Results. We first show that CINGEC is associated with MM patient survival by analyzing a previously published Mayo Clinic aCGH dataset (n=64, Chng WJ et al. Leukemia 2010; 24: 833–842). Furthermore, CINGEC is a stronger prognostic factor than another aCGH-based measure of CIN derived from breast cancer, the Genome Instability Index (Chin et al. Genome Biol 2007;8; R215). The CINGECS comprise of 160 differentially expressed genes with 144 up-regulated and 16 down-regulated. KEGG pathway and GO analysis of this set of genes showed enrichment by those involved in (1) cell cycle checkpoints and progression such as cell cycle, cell division, spindle organization, mitosis, (2) DNA damage responses such as response to DNA damage stimulus, DNA repair, nucleotide-excision repair, DNA gap filling, and (3) generic cancer related processes such as DNA replication, cell proliferation. Finally, CINGECS is shown to be significantly associated with poorer overall as well as progression free survival in both newly diagnosed (UAMS TT2 dataset, n=351, GSE 2658) and relapsed patients (Millenium Apex Dataset, n=188, GSE9782). Furthermore, it is found to be a significant prognostic signature independent of diverse GEP signatures known to be associated with survival for MM patients, including the Proliferation Index, the Centrosome Index, the UAMS 70-gene High-Risk Signature, the IFM High-Risk Signature, the IL-6 signature derived from cell lines, as well as GEP-based signatures of genomic instability derived from other cancers such as the CIN70 signature (Carter et al. Nat Genet 2006; 38:1043–1048) and CINSARC67 (Chibon et al. Nat Med 2010; 16: 781–787). Conclusions. We conclude that CINGEC can account for CIN with high resolution copy number profile data. Also, its corresponding GEP signature, CINGECS, potentially encompasses changes reflective of both cause and consequences of the CIN phenotype and is an independent prognostic signature in MM. Disclosures: Fonseca: Consulting:Genzyme, Medtronic, BMS, Amgen, Otsuka, Celgene, Intellikine, Lilly Research Support: Cylene, Onyz, Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Abstract Background SGI-110 is second generation HMA formulated as a dinucleotide of decitabine (DAC) and deoxyguanosine delivered as a small volume, pharmaceutically stable SQ injection allowing longer half-life and more extended decitabine exposure than DAC IV infusion. SGI-110 differentiated pharmacokinetic profile resulted in potent hypomethylation and clinical responses in previously treated MDS and AML patients in the phase 1 trial (Kantarjian et al. 2012). Methods In a randomized Phase 2 study, relapsed/refractory AML, or elderly treatment naïve AML patients who were not suitable for induction chemotherapy (poor major organ function; poor cytogenetics; or secondary AML) were randomized to one of two SQ doses – the biologically effective dose (BED) of 60 mg/m2 QDx5 or 90 mg/m2 QDx5. The primary endpoint of the phase 2 study is the overall remission rate (CR, CRi, and CRp) based on the International Working Group Criteria 2003. Safety findings based on adverse events (AEs) as graded by the CTCAE v4 criteria and pharmacodynamic data on Long Interspersed Nucleotide Element (LINE-1) DNA methylation (an index of global DNA methylation) activity were also assessed and reported. Results As of June 30, 2013, sixty-seven patients (50 relapsed/refractory AML, 17 treatment naïve elderly AML) were treated and had a minimum follow up of 3 months. Patients were randomized to either 60 mg/m2 dose (32 patients) or 90 mg/m2 dose (35 patients). The median age was 66 years (range, 22–84), 69% were male, and ECOG PS of 0/1/2 was reported in 11/47/9 patients respectively. Median number of prior regimens was 2 (range, 0–10). Patients’ characteristics were well balanced between the 2 dose groups. The primary endpoint of overall remissions (CR, CRp, or CRi) was observed in 17/67 patients (25% with 95% CI, 16–37%). There were 8 complete remissions (CR, CRp, or CRi) in 50 patients with relapsed/refractory AML (16% with 95% CI, 7-29%); and 9 complete remissions (CR, CRp, or CRi) in 17 treatment-naïve elderly AML patients (53% with 95% CI, 28-77%). Five patients (4 relapsed/refractory, and one treatment-naïve elderly AML) subsequently received a stem cell transplant. There was no difference in the complete remission rate between 60 and 90 mg/m2 doses (8 remissions in 32 patients at 60 mg/m2, and 9 remissions in 35 patients at 90 mg/m2). LINE-1 DNA methylation data before and after treatment was available in 50 (75%) patients enrolled. LINE-1 demethylation ≥ 10% post treatment was observed in 83% and 78% in the 60 mg/m2 and 90 mg/m2, respectively. The median maximum LINE-1 demethylation for responders is 25% as compared to 19% for non-responders. The most common adverse events (AEs) regardless of relationship to SGI-110 ≥ Grade 3 include febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, leukopenia, neutropenia, and pneumonia. The 90 mg/m2 dose showed a greater frequency of Grade 3/4 related AEs ≥ 10% (anemia, febrile neutropenia, leukopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia) compared to the 60 mg/m2 dose. Conclusions SQ SGI-110 is a new HMA which is well tolerated and clinically active in the treatment of AML. Complete remissions and potent demethylation of ≥10% were equally observed at the 2 dose groups of 60 and 90 mg/m2. These data support further phase 3 investigation of this agent in the treatment of AML. Preliminary overall remission rate of 53% in treatment-naïve elderly AML seems to compare favorably with previous results reported for HMA treatment but this needs to be confirmed in a larger number of patients and randomized studies. Disclosures: Kantarjian: Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Jabbour:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Yee:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Kropf:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. O'Connell:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Stock:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Tibes:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Rizzieri:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Walsh:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Griffiths:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Roboz:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding. Savona:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Ervin:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Podoltsev:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Pemmaraju:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Daver:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Garcia-Manero:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Borthakur:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Wierda:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Ravandi:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Cortes:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Brandwein:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Odenike:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Feldman:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Chung:Astex Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Research Funding. Naim:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Choy:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Taverna:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Hao:Astex Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Employment. Dimitrov:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Azab:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Issa:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Abstract Background SGI-110 is a second generation HMA formulated as a dinucleotide of decitabine (DAC) and deoxyguanosine. The compound is delivered as a small volume, pharmaceutically stable subcutaneous (SQ) injection which allows longer half-life and more extended DAC exposure than DAC intravenous infusion. This pharmacokinetic profile offers the potential for improved biological and clinical activity and safety over currently available HMAs (Kantarjian et al. ASH, 2012). Methods A randomized Phase 1-2 first-in-human PK/PD-guided, dose-escalation study was conducted in patients with relapsed or refractory intermediate or high-risk MDS or AML. Patients were initially randomized to one of two SQ regimens - Dailyx5 or Weeklyx3, for 28-day courses. Subsequently, a Twice Weeklyx3 regimen (Monday, Thursday) was added for evaluation based on emerging LINE-1 demethylation data from the Weeklyx3 regimen. Results 93 patients (74 AML, 19 MDS) were treated in the dose escalation phase: 44, 34, and 15 patients were treated in the Dailyx5, Weeklyx3, and the Twice Weeklyx3 regimens, respectively. Across the three regimens, median age was 70 years (range, 29–86), 68% male, and 87% had ECOG PS of 0-1. The median number of prior regimens was 3 (range, 1–9) and 68% of patients had prior HMA treatment (59% AML, and 100% MDS). Of the 74 AML patients treated, 31 (42%) had secondary AML including antecedent MDS. Patients received a median of 2 courses of SGI-110 (range, 1-20). LINE-1 demethylation data at the 2 highest dose levels which were well tolerated and evaluated for all 3 regimens (60 and 90 mg/m2) are shown in the figure below. The Dailyx5 regimen demonstrated the most potent average LINE-1 demethylation, while the Twice Weeklyx3 achieved the most prolonged LINE-1 demethylation. The least potent demethylation was seen with the Weeklyx3 regimen. There was no additional demethylation at the 90 mg/m2 dose compared to 60 mg/m2in all 3 regimens. Responses were reported according to the IWG Criteria 2006 (MDS)/2003 (AML). Complete remissions were observed in 5 AML patients (2CRs, 1CRp, and 2CRi). Clinical responses (2 mCR and 3 HI-E, 1 HI-N, 1 HI-P) were observed in 6 MDS patients, all of whom had been previously treated with HMA. All AML responses and both mCR in MDS patients achieved ≥10% LINE-1 demethylation. Safety is reported based on Adverse Events (AEs) as graded by the CTCAE v4 criteria. Across regimens, the Twice Weeklyx3 demonstrated an increased number of related AEs compared to the other regimens. The most commonly reported related AEs ≥ 10% in the Dailyx5 regimen (injection site pain, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, anemia, fatigue), Weeklyx3 regimen (injection site pain and diarrhea), and Twice Weeklyx3 regimen (injection site pain, injection site reaction, fatigue, dizziness, febrile neutropenia, neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia). Conclusions SQ SGI-110 is a potent HMA using all 3 regimens evaluated. The most potent hypomethylation was achieved with Dailyx5 dosing and the most prolonged hypomethylation was achieved using the Twice Weeklyx3 regimen. All 3 regimens were well tolerated. Clinical responses were observed in heavily pretreated patients, including those with prior HMA exposure. These results support the ongoing Phase 2 expansion study investigating the Dailyx5 dosing schedule in patients with MDS and AML who are either HMA treatment naïve or previously treated with HMAs. Disclosures: Roboz: Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding. Issa:Astex Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding. Rizzieri:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Stock:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. O'Connell:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Yee:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Tibes:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Griffiths:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Walsh:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Feldman:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Ritchie:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Rao:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Larson:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Garcia-Manero:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Ravandi:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Jabbour:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Cortes:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Schimmer:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Mesa:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Blum:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Chung:Astex Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Research Funding. Naim:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Taverna:Astex Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Employment. Hao:Astex Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Employment. Choy:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Azab:Astex Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Employment. Kantarjian:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding.

Abstract In an attempt to identify novel genetic abnormalities in multiple myeloma (MM) we analyzed 68 MM patient samples and 42 human myeloma cell lines (HMCL) with high-resolution (60kb) array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). We concentrated on bi-allelic genomic deletions with the expectation that these regions might contain novel tumor suppressor genes and identified a common abnormality at 14q32. Fine mapping of the 14q32 microdeletion by PCR demonstrated a 45 kb minimal deletion encompassing two genes; TRAF3, a negative regulator of the non-canonical NF-kB pathway, and AMN. To determine the frequency of copy number abnormalities of this region a cohort of 161 patients were screened with a FISH probe mapping to the minimally deleted region. This identified 7 (4.4%) patients with bi-allelic deletion and 19 (11.8%) patients with a single copy of the target region. Sequencing of all TRAF3 coding exons in 62 patients and 42 HMCL identified inactivating mutations in 9 patient samples and 4 HMCL. Overall, the incidence of TRAF3 inactivation, bi-allelic deletion or mutation, is 7/42 (16.7%) in HMCL and 12/62 (19.4%) in patients, making it one of the most common genetic abnormalities identified in MM. Importantly, dysregulation of NF-kB pathways is a common event in MM, but the mechanism for this dysregulation is largely unknown. Although TRAF3 is a negative regulator of the non-canonical NF-kB pathway it has not previously been implicated in cancer. Therefore, we tested the tumor suppressor function of TRAF3 by reintroducing TRAF3 into HMCL harboring TRAF3 abnormalities using an adenovirus gene transfer system. Expression of TRAF3 in HMCL with TRAF3 abnormalities rapidly reversed cellular processing of NFKB2 from p100 (an inactive isoform) to p52 (active) and additionally led to a 60% reduction in cellular proliferation (range, 10–89%) associated with Go/G1 cell cycle arrest and induction of cell death by apoptosis. At 48 hrs post infection the proportion of cells entering S-phase or G2/M declined by 31% (range, 8.1–56.1) and the proportion undergoing apoptosis increased by 28% (range 11.7–47.4%). In contrast, over-expression of TRAF3 in control HMCL without TRAF3 abnormalities had no effect. Overall, TRAF3 is identified as a novel tumor suppressor that regulates the non-canonical NF-kB pathway and is inactivated in ~ 20% of MM patients. Given the involvement of the NF-kB pathway in multiple human malignancies and the near constitutive expression of TRAF3 we propose that inactivation of TRAF3, a novel tumor suppressor identified for the first time in this study, may occur in other cancers. In this regard, we have recently identified a Burkitt lymphoma cell line that does not express TRAF3 and thus has constitutive processing of p100 to p52. The clinical and therapeutic consequences of this finding and its frequency in other tumor types are currently the focus of further investigation. In conclusion, the abnormalities identified in this study represent the first mutations identified that cause constitutive NF-kB activation in MM.

Abstract The identification of mutations in BRAFV600E and other kinases in systemic histiocytoses changed our understanding of the pathophysiology of these disorders from inflammatory non-malignant conditions to clonal disorders driven by altered MAP kinase signaling. In addition, BRAFV600E mutations have recently been noted in bone marrow (BM) CD34+ cells of patients with Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis (LCH), suggesting that LCH represents a clonal disorder arising from hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs). However, it is unknown if HSPCs from LCH or other histiocytoses patients can functionally give rise to these disorders. Moreover, whether or not patients with histiocytosis have additional hematological disorders related to the presence of HSPC-based mutations is unclear. Here we attempted to understand the spectrum of hematological disorders in patients with histiocytoses and the cell-of-origin of histiocytic neoplasms by functionally analyzing HSPCs from histiocytoses patients. We first analyzed a multicenter cohort of 190 adult histiocytoses patients. This unexpectedly identified a high frequency of patients with a co-existing myeloid malignancy. Of the 190 patients, 9.5% (18/190) were diagnosed with Erdheim-Chester Disease (ECD) and/or LCH concomitantly with a classic MPN (3.7%; 7/190), MPN/MDS overlap (4.7%; 9/190), or MDS (1.1%; 2/190) (Figure). This clinical observation was confirmed by detection of co-existing histiocytoses-associated kinase mutations (including BRAF, MAP2K1, NRAS, or KRAS mutations) with JAK2 or CALR mutations, as well as other mutations recurrently found in myeloid malignancies (such as IDH1/2, ASXL1, and TET2 mutations (Figure)). These data therefore reveal a heretofore-unrecognized clinical overlap of adult-onset systemic histiocytoses and WHO-classified myeloid malignancies while further highlighting the possibility of an aberrant HSPC origin for histiocytic neoplasms. In most cases, the BRAF/MAP2K1/RAS mutation predominated in the histiocytic lesion while the JAK2/CALR mutation predominated in the BM/peripheral blood suggesting likely distinct clones driving each clinical condition. Next, to test the self-renewal and differentiation capacity of HSPCs from histiocytoses patients, CD34+ cells were purified from 8 patients including 6 with ECD or LCH plus a concomitant myeloid neoplasm, and 2 with ECD alone. 0.1-0.8x106 CD34+ cells from each patient were transplanted by intrafemoral injection into sublethally irradiated NOD/SCID IL2Rγ transgenic human GM-CSF, IL-3, and SCF expressing (NSG-SGM3) mice. Human engraftment was monitored by monthly flow cytometric analysis of peripheral blood until mice became moribund. Thereafter, animals were sacrificed and tissues were analyzed using flow cytometry, histology, immunohistochemistry, and sequencing analyses to detect driver mutations identified in the histiocytosis/co-occurring myeloid neoplasm. Successful engraftment of human myeloid cells was verified in grafts generated from 2/8 patients after a mean of 90 days (range: 60-120 days). This included lethal engraftment of KRAS-mutated ECD patient cells at 90 days manifested by infiltration of human hCD45+ cells co-expressing human myeloid and monocyte lineage markers hCD33 and hCD14 in the bone marrow, spleen, liver, lung, and kidney (Figure). Immunostains revealed that tissues were infiltrated by an hCD45+hCD163+hCD68+ population of foamy histiocytes, characteristic of ECD (Figure). Furthermore, genomic analysis of DNA from the engrafted animals BM and spleen revealed the same KRASG12S mutation found in the donor patients ECD lesion. Engraftment of a patient diagnosed with concomitant BRAFV600E-mutant ECD and ASXL1/TET2-mutant CMML was seen at 60 days. In this case, however, only engraftment of human CMML was detected without evidence of the BRAFV600E-mutant ECD component. This study suggests that adult histiocytic neoplasms frequently co-occur with other myeloid neoplasms. Moreover, histiocytosis disease-driver mutations are present in the CD34+ HSPCs, which we show for the first time can initiate disease that resembles human histiocytosis in a patient-derived xenograft. Importantly, however, even though the CD34+ compartment gives rise to both the histiocytic and myeloid neoplasm disease component, each disease is likely initiated by distinct precursors. Figure. Figure. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Background: SGI-110 is a second generation HMA formulated as a dinucleotide of decitabine (DAC) and deoxyguanosine delivered as a small volume SC injection that yields longer half-life and more extended DAC exposure than DAC IV infusion. A phase 1 clinical trial of SGI-110 demonstrated a differentiated pharmacokinetic profile from DAC IV, potent hypomethylation, and clinical responses in previously treated patients with MDS and AML (Kantarjian et al. 2012). Phase 1 established 60 mg/m2 QDx5 as the biologically effective dose (BED), and 90 mg/m2QDx5 as the Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in MDS patients given in 28-day cycles. Phase 2 is conducted to evaluate dose response between the BED and MTD in MDS patients. Methods: Int, or HR MDS, and CMML patients who were either treatment-naïve or previously treated were randomized to either 60 mg/m2 or 90 mg/m2QDx5 every 28 days. Efficacy was evaluated by the clinical responses of CR, PR, marrow CR (mCR), and Hematological Improvement (HI) based on the International Working Group Criteria 2006 as well as transfusion-independence. Adverse events (AEs) as graded by the CTCAE v4 criteria and pharmacodynamic biological activity as measured by Long Interspersed Nucleotide Element LINE-1 (an index of global DNA methylation) were also assessed. Patients are being followed for overall survival. Results: The study completed target enrolment with 102 patients: 53 who were refractory or have relapsed on prior treatment, and 49 previously untreated. Fifty three patients were randomized to 60 mg/m2 and 49 patients to 90 mg/m2 QDx5 with a median follow up of 8.2 months (range 1-21). Most baseline patient characteristics were well balanced between the 2 treatment arms with no significant differences in median age (71.7 vs. 72.5 y); male gender (70 vs. 61%); ECOG PS 2 (15 vs. 12%); HR MDS (28 vs. 37%); transfusion-dependence (57 vs. 55%), median baseline Hb (9.25 vs. 9.3 g/dL); platelets count (42.5 vs. 45 x109/L), and neutrophils count (1.19 vs. 1.16 x109/L) for the 60 and 90 mg/m2 QDx5 respectively. However, there were 15 CMML patients (28%) randomized to 60 mg/m2 vs. only 7 CMML patients (14%) randomized to 90 mg/m2(p=0.097). All but 2 patients in the previously treated group received one or more HMA. At the time of the data cutoff, 38 of 102 patients (37%) were still on treatment. Median number of treatment cycles was 4 for previously treated patients, and 5 for the treatment naïve group (range 1-22 cycles). CR+mCR were observed in 10/53 (19%), and 11/49 (22%) in the 60 and 90 mg/m2 arms respectively (p=0.8). CR was observed in 7/49 treatment naïve patients (14%) while CR+mCR were observed in 11/53 previously treated patients (21%) with no significant differences between 60 and 90 mg/m2 arms. Transfusion independence for at least 8 weeks was reported in 32% and 24% for platelets and RBCs respectively with no difference between the 2 treatment arms. Treatment naïve patients benefited from higher rate of transfusion-independence (58% and 46% for platelets and RBCs respectively). Potent demethylation was achieved in both treatment arms with a mean LINE-1 DNA demethylation of 27.3 and 30.5% for 60 and 90 mg/m2 respectively (p=0.12). Overall incidence of Grade ≥3 AEs regardless of relationship to treatment was reported in 81 vs. 88% for 60 and 90 mg/m2 treatment arms respectively (p=0.42).There was a slightly higher but non-significant difference in Grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia (51 vs 38%) and pneumonia (20 vs. 13%) for the 90 mg/m2 arm compared to 60 mg/m2. Early 8-week any-cause mortality occurred in 3/102 patients treated (3%), 2 at 60 and 1 at 90 mg/m2. Follow up for survival is still ongoing. Conclusions: SC SGI-110 is a well-tolerated novel HMA with biological and clinical activity in the treatment of Int and HR MDS, and CMML patients with particularly promising activity in patients previously treated with azacitidine or decitabine. Clinical responses, transfusion independence, DNA demethylation as assessed by LINE-1, and Safety did not significantly differ between the 2 treatment doses. Disclosures Tibes: Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Rosenblat:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Yee:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Griffiths:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Issa:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Naim:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Taverna:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Hao:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Azab:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Roboz:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy.

Abstract Abstract 414 Background: SGI-110 is a dinucleotide of decitabine (DAC) and deoxyguanosine formulated as a low volume and pharmaceutically stable SQ injection allowing more extended decitabine exposure than DAC IV infusion. The anticipated differentiated PK profile offers the potential of improved biological and clinical activity and safety over currently available HMAs. Methods: A randomized Phase 1–2 FIH Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics (PK/PD)-guided, dose-escalation study has been conducted in patients with relapsed/refractory intermediate or high-risk MDS or AML. The objective of the first stage (dose escalation) is to determine safety and tolerability and to establish the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) and Biologically Effective Dose (BED). Patients were randomized to one of two SQ regimens (dailyx5 or once weeklyx3, 28-day courses). PD is evaluated by LINE-1 global DNA hypomethylation. The second stage (dose expansion) is to determine the clinical activity and safety in AML and MDS using the established BED and MTD. We report here the results of the dose escalation phase which has completed enrolment. Results: 78 patients (64 AML, 14 MDS) were enrolled in the dose escalation phase: 44 patients in the dailyx5 regimen and 34 in the weeklyx3 regimen. Median age was 69 years (range 29–86), 65% were male, and 82% had ECOG PS of 0–1. Median number of prior regimens was 3 (range 1–9), 59% of patients had prior HMA treatment (50% of AML patients, and 100% of MDS patients). Six patients are still ongoing treatment. The PK profile demonstrated efficient conversion of SGI-110 to decitabine as predicted from the SGI-110 rational design, resulting in longer decitabine exposure window (beyond 8 hrs) compared to DAC IV (3–4 hrs). At SGI-110 dose range of 60–125 mg/m2, observed mean decitabine AUCs (88–231 ng*hr/mL) reach or exceed the therapeutic range seen with 20 mg/m2 DAC IV (115 ng*hr/mL) while achieving only a small fraction of the Cmax (26–64 ng/mL vs 146 ng/mL for DAC IV). The effective half-life for decitabine after SQ SGI-110 injection appeared to be prolonged (up to 4-fold or ∼2.4 hrs) compared to DAC IV (0.58 hrs). Decitabine exposures (AUC) increased in a dose-proportional manner regardless of the regimen and no accumulation was observed. Dose-related LINE-1 hypomethylation was observed in patients treated with the daily regimen between 18 and 60 mg/m2; a plateau in maximum average hypomethylation (∼25%) was evident at higher daily doses (90-125 mg/m2) and therefore the BED for the dailyx5 schedule is established at 60 mg/m2. The 25% average hypomethylation of LINE-1 compares favorably with that observed historically after DAC IV at the dose of 20 mg/m2 dailyx5. The extent of LINE-1 hypomethylation after weeklyx3 SGI-110 was inferior as the maximum average hypomethylation plateaued at ∼8% from baseline. Starting at 36 mg/m2 daily and 60 mg/m2 weekly (44 AML, and 7 MDS patients), clinical responses were observed: 2CRs, 1CRp, and 1CRi in heavily pretreated AML patients; 1 mCR and 1 HI in MDS patients previously treated with azacitidine. All responses were in patients who achieved >10% LINE-1 hypomethylation. The most common Adverse Events (AEs), regardless of relationship to SGI-110, were diarrhea (21%), febrile neutropenia (17%), fatigue/injection site pain/nausea at 15% each. The most common drug-related AEs were injection site pain (15%), fatigue (8%), nausea (6%), and thrombocytopenia (5%). MTD was not reached with the weekly regimen up to 125 mg/m2 weeklyx3. With the daily regimen, 125 mg/m2dailyx5 resulted in 2 Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) of febrile neutropenia in 3 MDS patients (1 associated with bacteremia, and the other with sepsis and thrombocytopenia Grade 4) while none of the 9 patients with AML had DLT at that dose. Conclusions: SGI-110 is well tolerated at doses higher than BED which is established at 60 mg/m2 dailyx5 where average hypomethylation of ∼25% was achieved. MTD estimated to be 90 mg/m2 dailyx5 for MDS and 125 mg/m2dailyx5 for AML patients. SQ administration of SGI-110 achieved efficient conversion to decitabine resulting in an improved PK profile over DAC IV. Clinical responses were observed in this heavily pretreated population and they seem to correlate with the extent of LINE-1 hypomethylation. Study is currently enrolling patients in the dose-expansion Phase 2 stage. Disclosures: Kantarjian: Astex Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Roboz:Astex Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Rizzieri:Astex Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Stock:Astex Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. O'Connell:Astex Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Griffiths:Astex Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Yee:Astex Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Tibes:Astex Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Garcia-Manero:Astex Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Ravandi:Astex Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Walsh:Astex Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Feldman:Astex Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Ritchie:Astex Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Rao:Astex Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Decastro:Astex Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Schimmer:Astex Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Mesa:Astex Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Syed:Astex Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Choy:Astex Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Oganesian:Astex Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Taverna:Astex Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Azab:Astex Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Chung:Astex Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Issa:Astex Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Background: The number of total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) procedures performed annually is increasing as a result of an aging population and an increased access to subspecialty-trained upper extremity arthroplasty surgeons. An up-to-date analysis of the incidence of, risk factors for, and reasons for 90-day readmissions in primary anatomic TSA has yet to be performed. Purpose: To characterize 90-day readmissions on a national level. An understanding of these data will help to predict resource utilization and expenses in shoulder arthroplasty. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: All adult patients undergoing elective primary TSA in 2014 who were included in the National Readmission Database were included in the analysis. Two cohorts were created according to 90-day readmission status. Multivariable analysis was then performed to determine predictors of 90-day readmissions. Reasons for 30-, 60-, and 90-day readmissions were identified, and total hospital resource utilization was calculated. Results: An estimated 26,023 patients were identified. The 30-, 60-, and 90-day rates of readmissions were 0.6%, 1.2%, and 1.7%, respectively. There was no difference in comorbidity burden between the cohorts. Medicare payer status (odds ratio [OR], 1.63; 95% CI, 1.00-2.65; P = .05), transfer to a skilled nurse facility (OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.05-2.14; P = .02), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.04-1.66; P = .02) were identified as predictors of 90-day readmission. Female sex decreased odds of 90-day readmission (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59-0.87; P = .001). Ninety-day readmissions were associated with significant cost increases ( P < .001). The most common identifiable reason for related readmissions was a hardware-related complication at all time points. Conclusion: While uncommon, 90-day readmissions after primary TSA are associated with significant patient morbidity and ultimately substantial hospital costs. Truncating readmission analysis at a 30-day period will miss most arthroplasty-related hospital readmissions.

Objective: The aim of this study was to develop and externally validate the first evidence-based guidelines on minimally invasive pancreas resection (MIPR) before and during the International Evidence-based Guidelines on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection (IG-MIPR) meeting in Miami (March 2019). Summary Background Data: MIPR has seen rapid development in the past decade. Promising outcomes have been reported by early adopters from high-volume centers. Subsequently, multicenter series as well as randomized controlled trials were reported; however, guidelines for clinical practice were lacking. Methods: The Scottisch Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) methodology was used, incorporating these 4 items: systematic reviews using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases to answer clinical questions, whenever possible in PICO style, the GRADE approach for assessment of the quality of evidence, the Delphi method for establishing consensus on the developed recommendations, and the AGREE-II instrument for the assessment of guideline quality and external validation. The current guidelines are cosponsored by the International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association, the Americas Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association, the Asian-Pacific Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association, the European-African Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association, the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery, Pancreas Club, the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgery, the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, and the Society of Surgical Oncology. Results: After screening 16,069 titles, 694 studies were reviewed, and 291 were included. The final 28 recommendations covered 6 topics; laparoscopic and robotic distal pancreatectomy, central pancreatectomy, pancreatoduodenectomy, as well as patient selection, training, learning curve, and minimal annual center volume required to obtain optimal outcomes and patient safety. Conclusion: The IG-MIPR using SIGN methodology give guidance to surgeons, hospital administrators, patients, and medical societies on the use and outcome of MIPR as well as the approach to be taken regarding this challenging type of surgery.