Citations

8549 Background: Bronchial carcinoid tumors are a rare group of neoplasms that usually have an indolent clinical behavior. Surgical resection is the main treatment modality for patients with early stage disease, however it is unclear if lobectomy with mediastinal lymph node dissection (L) is superior compared to partial lobectomy (PL). Methods: Utilizing the National Cancer Database from 2004-2012, 1551 patients diagnosed with T1N0 or T2N0 typical carcinoid tumors (CT), and 167 atypical carcinoid tumors (ACT), who underwent L or PL (segmental or wedge resection) as initial treatment strategy, and did not receive chemotherapy or radiation were identified. All patients had pathologically confirmed diagnosis, negative surgical margins, and complete follow up data. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed utilizing Kaplan-Meier curves, and log-rank tests were used for statistical comparisons. Cox proportional hazards were performed to control for age, sex, race, grade, year of diagnosis, Charlson/Deyo Score, insurance, income, and facility type. T-test was used to compare post-surgical hospital stay. Results: The entire cohort median age was 61 years (range 18-90), and male to female ratio was 0.43. 75% of patients with CT and 78% of ATC underwent L. The 90 day mortality following surgery was < 1 % in both surgical groups. Patients who underwent L had longer post-operative hospitalization stay (mean 5.3 vs. 4.3 days; p < 0.001). The 5 year survival for patients with CT was 95% in the L versus 93% in the PL group (p = 0.62), and for ACT 89% in the L versus 81% PL group (p = 0.28). In a multivariate analysis increasing age was the only prognostic factor, and was associated with inferior survival. The HR for death comparing PL to L was 1.09 (95% CI: 0.65-1.78; p = 0.71) for CT and 1.25 (95% CI: 0.45-3.23; p = 0.65) for ACT. Conclusions: Patients with localized node-negative CT and ACT have excellent 5 year survival. Performing a lobectomy with mediastinal node dissection may not provide additional benefit compared to partial lobectomy, but this may increase the length of hospital stay.

8533 Background: BNET are a rare and frequently indolent group of neoplasms. Lobectomy is frequently done for patients with non-metastatic disease, and the role of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with node positive disease (N+) is debated. Methods: Utilizing the National Cancer Database from 2004-2012 we identified 1682 patients with N+ non-metastatic BNET. All patients underwent primary resection, had pathologically confirmed diagnosis, complete follow up data, and were alive > 30 days following surgery. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed utilizing Kaplan-Meier curves, and log-rank tests were used to compare 2 groups of patients that differed based on receiving or not adjuvant chemotherapy. Subgroup analyses were performed based on histologic subtypes. Cox proportional hazards was performed to control for age, sex, race, grade, surgical margins, type of surgery, year of diagnosis, Charlson/Deyo Score, insurance, facility type, and location. Results: 651 patients with typical carcinoid (CT), 239 atypical carcinoid (ACT), 426 large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC), and 366 neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) were analyzed. The cohort median age was 61, and the female:male ratio was 1.8 for CT, ACT and NEC, and 1 for LCNEC 90% of patients were White and there were no significant differences amongst histologic subtypes. 6% of patients with CT received ADJ-CT, compared to 40% ACT, 42% NEC, and 70% LCNEC. In a multivariate analysis, only increasing age was associated with worse prognosis across all histologic subtypes, and non-academic facility for CT, and male sex for NEC. ADJ-CT was not associated with OS benefit for patients with ACT (HR 1.1; 95% CI 0.68-1.78; p:0.6), was associated with inferior OS in CT (HR: 3.8 (95% CI 1.9-7.0; p = 0.004) and NEC (HR: 2.15; 95% CI 1.5-3.0; p < 0.001), and may provide benefit for LCNEC (HR: 0.67; 95% CI 0.5-0.9; p = 0.009). Conclusions: Adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with survival benefit for patients with node positive and non-metastatic BNET except for LCNEC, and may be harmful for patients with CT and NEC.

Abstract Background: In stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), survival has significantly improved with the use of novel therapies and better supportive care. Despite such trends, it has been noted that patients (pts) frequently refuse cancer treatment. Therefore, we explored the factors associated with treatment refusal in pts with stage IV NSCLC. Methods: Utilizing the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we identified all incident cases with stage IV NSCLC from 2004 to 2014. Patients who received cancer treatment outside of the reporting facility or died before receiving treatment were excluded. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine associations with treatment refusal. Results: A total of 341,993 pts were identified. On average, 5.4% of pts refused radiation therapy and 10.3% refused chemotherapy despite provider recommendations. The proportion of pts refusing radiation and chemotherapy increased over the study period from 4.2% to 7.3% and 7.9% to 15%, respectively (p&lt;0.001 for both). In multivariable analysis, men were less likely to refuse radiation or chemotherapy compared to women (OR: 0.82, 95%CI: 0.76-0.83, p&lt;0.001; OR: 0.84, 95%CI: 0.81-0.86, p&lt;0.001, respectively). Factors associated with radiation therapy refusal included: Medicaid or Medicare as primary insurance (OR: 1.95, 95%CI: 1.76-2.15, p&lt;0.001; OR: 1.25, 95%CI: 1.17-1.34, p&lt;0.001, respectively) or a &gt;2 Charlson Comorbidity Index (OR: 1.97, 95%CI: 1.85-2.10, p&lt;0.001). Moreover, receiving care at an academic center (OR: 0.57, 95%CI: 0.53-0.62, p&lt;0.001) was associated with less likelihood of refusing radiation. Regarding chemotherapy, uninsured pts (OR: 2.45, 95%CI: 2.26-2.66, p&lt;0.001), pts with Medicaid as primary insurance (OR: 2.17, 95%CI: 2.03-2.32, p&lt;0.001) or with a high comorbidity index (OR: 1.76, 95%CI: 1.68-1.84, p&lt;0.001) were more likely to refuse chemotherapy. Contrary to findings from previous studies, Non-Hispanic Blacks and Hispanics were less likely to refuse chemotherapy compared to non-Hispanic whites (OR: 0.86, 95%CI: 0.82-0.91, p&lt;0.001; OR: 0.78, 95%CI: 0.72-0.89, p&lt;0.001). Patients receiving care at an academic center and residing in high income neighborhoods were less likely to refuse chemotherapy (OR: 0.76, 95%CI: 0.72-0.80, p&lt;0.001; OR: 0.76, 95%CI: 0.71-0.81, p&lt;0.001, respectively). Distance from residence to treating facility and living in a rural county did not affect treatment refusal. Conclusions: Socioeconomic factors rather than race/ethnicity appear to influence refusal of cancer treatment in pts with stage IV NSCLC in the NCDB. Assessing socioeconomic challenges should be an essential part of patients' evaluation when discussing treatment options. Citation Format: Narjust Duma, Urshila Durani, Ryan Frank, Jonas Paludo, Gustavo Westin, Yanyan Lou, Leventakos Konstantinos, Julian Molina, Ronald Go, Aaron Mansfield, Sikander Ailawadhi, Alex Adjei. Influence of sociodemographic factors on treatment decisions in lung cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4230.

Abstract Background: Racial disparities in the treatment of lung cancer are well documented. However, research in disparities in palliative care is limited. Early integration of palliative care in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been proven to improve quality of life and overall survival in this subset of patients. We proposed to study the use of palliative treatments for stage IV NSCLC among Hispanic patients (pts). Methods: Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we identified all Hispanic pts (self-reported) diagnosed with stage IV NSCLC from 2005 to 2013. Cases with incomplete data, unknown life/death status or classified as Hispanic by surname only were excluded. Hispanics were grouped based on place of origin. Pearson chi-square tests were used to estimate differences in categorical data; predictors of palliative care referral/use were determined by logistic regression analysis. Results: 10,441 pts were included. The median age was 66 years. Regarding place of origin: 15.5% of pts were from Mexico, 8% from South/Central America, 7% from Cuba, 6% from Puerto Rico, 2.4% from the Dominican Republic and 57.6% were no-otherwise specified. When all Hispanic pts were included, 3.5% received surgery, 45% radiation and 52.9% chemotherapy. Overall, 2.2% of pts received a referral for palliative pain management +/- other palliative therapies. When divided by place of origin, Dominican pts had the highest percentage of pain management referrals at 5.5% (p&lt;0.01) followed by Puerto Rican patients (2.4%). On the other hand, only 1.3% of pts from South/Central America were referred to pain management. In multivariate analysis, Dominican Republic origin (OR: 3.30, 95%CI: 1.69-6.44, p&lt;0.01), bone metastasis (OR: 1.98, 95%CI: 1.17-3.3, p&lt;0.01) and a Charlson comorbidity index ≥2 (OR: 2.07, 95%CI: 1.11-3.85, p&lt;0.02) were significant predictors of receiving a pain management referral. We observed an increased number of pain management referrals over time with 1.4% of Hispanic patients getting a referral in 2004 vs. 2.9% in 2013 (p&lt;0.02). Conclusions: We observed that only a small percentage of Hispanic pts with metastatic NSCLC cancer are receiving referral for palliative care/pain management. Several cultural beliefs and barriers may play a role in these findings. Providers should offer early referrals to pain management/palliative care to all patients with metastatic NSCLC independent of their race or ethnicity. Citation Format: Narjust Duma, Urshila Durani, Julian Molina, Timothy J. Moynihan. Utilization of palliative therapies among Hispanics with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1641.