Citations

Abstract Background: Treatment of aromatase refractory metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is difficult and challenging. Estrogen receptor (ER) resistance causes enhanced expression of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF).Several studies have shown that the ER interacts with the VEGF pathway and is an important mechanism of resistance. Therefore we embarked on a phase II study of fulvestrant, a complete ER suppressor and bevacizumab, a well studied VEGF monoclonal antibody in aromatase refractory MBC patients. Methods: A single stage phase II study with an interim analysis of fulvestrant and bevacizumab was conducted with these objectives: 6 month progression-free survival rate (PFS), tumor response, toxicity, and overall survival. Regimen: fulvestrant 250 mg day1 and 15 (cycle 1) then day 1 (cycle 2 and beyond) and bevacizumab 10mg/kg days 1 and 15 of each 4 weeks is a cycle. Results: At the time of interim analysis, 11/20 evaluable patients achieved 3-month progression-free survival status while remaining on treatment for at least 3 months, not meeting the protocol specified efficacy requirements and thus halting accrual. 36 patients were enrolled from September 2007-December 2008; 33 patients were evaluable. Number of prior metastatic chemotherapy regimens: 0 in 26 patients and 1 in 7 patients. 22 (67%) patients received prior hormonal therapy in the metastatic setting. 18 (55%) had measurable disease. A median of 6 cycles (range 1-19) were administered. 12/33 evaluable patients (95% CI:20-55%) achieved 6-month progression-free survival status while remaining on treatment for a least 6 months. Among 18 patients with measurable disease, 2 (11%) patients CI:1.4-35%) had a confirmed tumor reponse (both PR). Additionally, 2 patients had stable disease for greater than 6 months, for a clinical benefit rate of 22%. Median follow up was 8.5 months (range 1.7-17.5 months). Median progression-free survival was 6.2 months (95% CI:5.4-10.1 months). The 6 -month overall survival rate was 84.8% (95% CI 73.5-98%). The median dose level administered was 250 mg for fulvestrant and 10 mg/kg for bevacizumab for cycles 1-19. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) were hypertension 2 (6%), headache pain 2 (6%), and confusion 2 (6%). There was 1 grade 5 central nervous system hemorrhage. 13 (39%) patients experienced a grade 3 non-hematologic AE and 4 (12%) experience a grade 4+ non-hematologic AE. Conclusion: Fulvestrant/bevacizumab is safe and tolerable. Although this regimen did not meet its statistical endpoint, 22% of evaluable patients with aromatase refractory diesease achieved clinical benefit with minimal toxicity. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 4096.

Abstract Abstract #4020 Background: HER2 positive (HER2+) breast cancer accounts for 20% of all breast cancer and is an independent adverse prognostic factor. Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been shown to identify additional mammographically occult ipsilateral (I/L) and contralateral (C/L) disease, however indications for preoperative MRI in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer are not standardized. While invasive lobular cancer, younger patient age, and increased breast density have been suggested as routine indications, the role of preoperative MRI according to HER2 status has not been evaluated.
 Methods: All patients with invasive breast cancer who underwent preoperative MRI between January 2003 and December 2007 were reviewed. Retrospective chart review was performed to collect clinical, radiographic, and pathologic data. The incidence of additional I/L or C/L malignacy was calculated. Additionally, changes in surgical management because of MRI findings were recorded.
 Results: Of the 401 women with invasive breast cancer undergoing preoperative breast MRI, 51 (13%) had HER2+ tumors. The average age at the time of MRI was similar in both groups. HER2+ patients were more likely to have nodal disease, and tumors with higher rates of lymphovascular invasion or extensive intraductal components.
 
 When compared to HER2- patients, more HER2+ patients had additional ipsilateral MRI abnormalities. A second ipsilateral cancer was found in 31% of HER2+ patients compared to 25% of HER2- patients. When analyzed according to ER status, HER2+/ ER- patients were more likely to have an additional site of cancer compared to HER2+/ER+ patients (42% vs 23%). Conversely, among HER2- patients, rates of additional ipsilateral cancer were similar for HER2-/ER+ (26%) and HERr2-/ER- (23%) patients. Of the 216 patients (HER2+ and HER2-) with additional ipsilateral MRI findings (benign or malignant), 125/216 (58%) patients were deemed appropriate breast conservation (BCT) candidates after MRI. However, BCT was only chosen in 84/125 (67%) patients. Additional contralateral disease was documented in 8% of HER2+ versus 5% of HER2- patients.
 Conclusions: HER2 positivity remains and important prognostic factor for women with breast cancer. Indications for routine preoperative MRI are unclear. In patients with newly diagnosed Her2+ invasive breast cancer routine preoperative MRI may be valuable in the subset of patients who are also ER-. Further study is needed to determine the influence of MRI on patient decisions for surgical therapy. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 4020.

Abstract Long-term outcomes and hence the role of adjuvant therapy in patients with small (≤1 cm), node-negative breast cancer remain unclear. This study's objective was to evaluate whether human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)-2 status is an independent, poor prognostic marker in patients with these tumors and to identify a subgroup of patients with these small tumors who might benefit from adjuvant systemic therapy. All patients with a diagnosis of a node-negative breast tumor measuring ≤1 cm and available HER-2 test results between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2005, at the three Mayo Clinic sites were identified. Clinicopathologic data were compared in three groups: HER-2−, HER-2+, and triple-negative (TN) tumors. Of the 421 tumors identified, 364 (86.5%) were HER-2−, 28 (6.7%) were HER-2+, and 29 (6.9%) were TN. The median follow-up time was 1,015 days (range, 1–2,549 days). Groups were balanced in terms of patient age and tumor histology. Eleven patients with HER-2− tumors (3.0%), seven with HER-2+ tumors (25.0%), and eight with TN tumors (27.6%) received adjuvant chemotherapy. Follow-up data were available for 357, 28, and 28 patients in the three groups, respectively. Death rates in the three groups were 6.4% (23 of 357) (one recurrence-related death), 0% (0 of 28), and 7.1% (2 of 28) (one recurrence-related death), respectively. During follow-up, the tumor recurred in nine patients: four were HER-2− tumors (1.1%), two were HER-2+ tumors (7.1%), and three were TN tumors (10.7%). Patients with small, node-negative breast tumors have an excellent prognosis, but HER-2+ and TN tumors appear to have a higher recurrence rate, warranting consideration for broad use and optimization of systemic adjuvant treatments.

Abstract We assessed the cross-sectional relationship of age, menopausal years, body mass, previous estrogen use, and ethnic background to bone mineral status in a sample of 875 healthy postmenopausal women at the time they were recruited from the community to participate in a multicenter clinical trial. The women were 1-10 years postmenopause, 45-64 years of age, and had not received estrogen replacement therapy within 3 months of enrollment. Of the participants, 89% were white, 69% had a spontaneous menopause, and 53% had a history of previous estrogen replacement therapy. Bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine (L2-4) and proximal femur was measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Results were consistent with a significant negative linear regression of BMD on age or years from menopause. Body mass index (BMI) correlated significantly with BMD at all sites (L 2-4 r = 0.28; femoral neck r = 0.34, p < 0.0001). BMD adjusted for age and BMI were higher at both sites in women who had taken estrogen versus those who had not (L2-4 0.976 + 0.009 versus 0.932 + 0.01; femoral neck 0.740 + 0.006 versus 0.708 + 0.008, p < 0.05). Adjusted BMD also increased with duration of ERT. Parity was negatively associated with L2-4 BMD (p = 0.03) but did not correlate significantly with BMD at the femoral neck. Black women had the highest L2-4 BMD, and Hispanic women had the highest femoral neck BMD, even when results were adjusted for age and BMI. When data were corrected for differences in bone size, these interethnic differences were no longer significant. We conclude that increased body mass is positively correlated with BMD, and this may confer a degree of skeletal protection to heavier postmenopausal women. Exposure for 5 years to exogenous estrogen is associated with significantly increased age- and BMI-adjusted BMD.

Abstract Purpose: 17-Allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17-AAG) is a benzoquinone ansamycin antibiotic with antiproliferative activity in several mouse xenograft models, including prostate cancer models. A two-stage phase II study was conducted to assess the activity and toxicity profile of 17-AAG administered to patients with metastatic, hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Experimental Design: Patients with at least one prior systemic therapy and a rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) were eligible. Patients received 17-AAG at a dose of 300 mg/m2 i.v. weekly for 3 of 4 weeks. The primary objective was to assess the PSA response. Secondary objectives were to determine overall survival, to assess toxicity, and to measure interleukin-6, interleukin-8, and maspin levels and quality of life. Results: Fifteen eligible patients were enrolled. The median age was 68 years and the median PSA was 261 ng/mL. Patients received 17-AAG for a median number of two cycles. Severe adverse events included grade 3 fatigue (four patients), grade 3 lymphopenia (two patients), and grade 3 back pain (two patients). The median PSA progression-free survival was 1.8 months (95% confidence interval, 1.3-3.4 months). The 6-month overall survival was 71% (95% confidence interval, 52-100%). Conclusions: 17-AAG did not show any activity with regard to PSA response. Due to insufficient PSA response, enrollment was stopped at the end of first stage per study design. The most significant severe toxicity was grade 3 fatigue. Further evaluation of 17-AAG at a dose of 300 mg/m2 i.v. weekly as a single agent in patients with metastatic, hormone-refractory prostate cancer who received at least one prior systemic therapy is not warranted.

ABSTRACT Tefibazumab (Aurexis), a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to the surface-expressed adhesion protein clumping factor A, is under development as adjunctive therapy for serious Staphylococcus aureus infections. Sixty patients with documented S. aureus bacteremia (SAB) were randomized and received either tefibazumab at 20 mg/kg of body weight as a single infusion or a placebo in addition to an antibiotic(s). The primary objective of the study was determining safety and pharmacokinetics. An additional objective was to assess activity by a composite clinical end point (CCE). Baseline characteristics were evenly matched between groups. Seventy percent of infections were healthcare associated, and 57% had an SAB-related complication at baseline. There were no differences between the treatment groups in overall adverse clinical events or alterations in laboratory values. Two patients developed serious adverse events that were at least possibly related to tefibazumab; one hypersensitivity reaction was considered definitely related. The tefibazumab plasma half-life was 18 days. Mean plasma levels were <100 μg/ml by day 14. A CCE occurred in six patients (four placebo and two tefibazumab patients) and included five deaths (four placebo and one tefibazumab patient). Progression in the severity of sepsis occurred in four placebo and no tefibazumab patients. Tefibazumab was well tolerated, with a safety profile similar to those of other monoclonal antibodies. Additional trials are warranted to address the dosing range and efficacy of tefibazumab.

Purpose Results of a prospective randomized trial conducted by the Intergroupe Francais du Myélome (IFM 90) indicated that autologous hematopoietic cell–supported high-dose therapy (HDT) effected higher complete response rates and extended progression-free survial (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with standard-dose therapies (SDT) for patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Patients and Methods In 1993, three North American cooperative groups launched a prospective randomized trial (S9321) comparing HDT (melphalan [MEL] 140 mg/m 2 plus total-body irradiation 12 Gy) with SDT using the vincristine, carmustine, MEL, cyclophosphamide, and prednisone regimen. Responders on both arms (≥ 75%) were randomly assigned to interferon (IFN) or no maintenance treatment. Results With a median follow-up time of 76 months, no differences were observed in response rates between the two study arms (HDT, n = 261 patients; SDT, n = 255 patients). Similarly, PFS and OS durations did not differ between the HDT and SDT arms, with 7-year estimates of PFS of 17% and 16%, respectively, and OS of 37% and 42%, respectively. Of 242 patients achieving at least 75% tumor reduction, no difference was observed in PFS or OS among the 121 patients randomly assigned to IFN and the 121 patients randomly assigned to no maintenance therapy. Among 157 patients relapsing on SDT, 87 received a salvage autotransplantation; their median survival time of 30 months was only slightly better than the survival time of the remaining patients who were managed with further SDT (23 months; P = .13). Conclusion The HDT and SDT regimens used in S9321 yielded comparable response rates and PFS and OS durations. IFN maintenance therapy did not benefit patients who achieved ≥ 75% tumor reduction on either arm.